A toxicology expert has estimated that in Germany alone there could be 8 0000 dead and 4 million other vaccination victims if a Corona vaccination became compulsory.

Professor Dr. Stefan Hockertz is an immunologist and toxicologist. In an interview with Radio München, he was critical of the mass vaccination scheme apparently planned by the German government and describes it as intentional bodily injury. Hockertz also pointed out, as have numerous other experts, that this mRNA corona vaccination was a genetic engineering intervention that alters the human genome.

The interview video with Professor Hockertz has now been deleted from YouTube, as have so many videos critical of vaccination. In the interview Hockertz talks about the concrete effects of a corona mass vaccination on the population in Germany – over 80 million people.

“Under no circumstances should these carrier systems pose a danger to people – I deliberately do not say ‘for the patient’, because it is not the patient, it is the healthy person who receives it – should not pose a danger to humans.

“We now know from our deliberations that a vaccine which has not been tested according to the rules of the discipline – state of the art, as we say – and which has therefore not been tested over a period of 5-8 years and, in particular, has been properly tested pre-clinically. We therefore must expect damage from the vaccination. We have to reckon with the fact that, if only because of the impurities – I don’t even want to talk about the extent to which DNA or RNA can cause cancer here. These are long-term effects. I would like to talk about the short-term effects. How, for example, these impurities can cause vaccination damage in about 5 percent of the population or in 5 percent of people who are vaccinated.

“And this is a figure that I did not make up, but it is a realistic estimate, which we know from statistical areas, of how often side effects can occur. Five percent now seems low and ‘vaccination damage’ means that there may be an overreaction of the immune system, the so-called cytokine storm, that there may be false reactions, cross-reactivities, whatever.

“But if we now bear in mind that 80 million vaccinations are to be carried out within a very short time. The Federal Ministry of the Interior, Mr Spahn, has ordered 80 million vaccine doses – a vaccine that has not yet been approved. And if we only have 5 [percent vaccine damage, then that makes – and I hope that the audience can count – 4 million people with vaccine damage. That’s 4 million times bodily harm. That is 4 million times knowing that a vaccine has not been properly tested after three months of deliberate bodily harm. That is a criminal offence.

“If we can now further assume and accept that, in the case of these vaccine damages, in the case of these 4 million people who have been deliberately injured, an extrapolation of 0,1 percent fatalities can be expected. Then we will have to reckon with the fact that the vaccine will be used to prevent the death of a person who has been injured intentionally. To force vaccinate 83 million people through the emergency laws – and that is what is being talked about – means that if only 0,1 percent of them die from this vaccination, and this is quite realistic, […] then we have 80 000 deaths.

“Eight thousand deaths is the extermination of a city like Constance, or Bamberg. And here I must say: If I do this in the knowledge that such a vaccine is badly tested, insufficiently approved and I accept to wipe out a small town like Constance or Bamberg, then there is not a single reason in this world for me to justify this.

“Certainly not a pandemic of national proportions proclaimed out of fear and panic, which we no longer have. If it comes to a head, we will have 600 or 800 infected people who are not even sick but are infected. And for that I’m prepared to accept the destruction of a city like Constance. I am very interested in the arguments of the BMI, the Robert Koch Institute and the Paul Ehrlich Institute.”

Vaccine salesman Bill Gates, according to his own statements in a television interview, reckoned with “only” 700 000 victims – with “side effects” – worldwide due to the Corona mass vaccination plan. According to Gates, the costs for compensation should be borne by the individual states – i.e. ultimately by the population itself – and not by the vaccine industry.

Dr. Stefan Hockertz was director and professor of the Institute for Experimental and Clinical Toxicology at the University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf from 2003 to the end of 2004. Before that, he was a member of the board of directors of the Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Environmental Medicine in Hamburg from 1995 to 2002. From 1986 to 2001 he was a researcher at the Fraunhofer Society in Hanover. Hockertz completed his first training as a biologist in 1985. He is also Dr. rer. nat. in biology at the University of Hanover, qualified as a professor in toxicology and pharmacology at the University of Hamburg, and professor for molecular immunotoxicology at the University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf.

https://freewestmedia.com/2020/12/26/forced-corona-vaccination-is-deliberate-bodily-harm/

If Christians celebrated Christmas under strict hygiene conditions, these events would still pose a danger that could force our government to tighten the lockdown a few days later because of exploding infection figures. As a precaution, North Rhine-Westphalia’s Prime Minister Laschet publicly declared that he would return his tickets for the Christmas mass. And the public broadcasters are increasing the “moral pressure” to cancel all Christmas services by posting more and more announcements on their platforms…

Friday prayers, on the other hand, seem to be harmless even on Christmas days. Ute Teichert – chairperson of the Federal Association of Physicians in the Public Health Service – also considers Christmas services dangerous, but does not say anything about visiting a mosque. “This year, attendance services should be banned nationwide”. Because we know how easily the virus can be transmitted, especially during church services, we must not take any additional risk at Christmas in view of the high infection figures”.None at all! But that doesn’t matter at all. After all, the gastronomy sector is being completely wiped out throughout Germany, even though there has never been any evidence that the superspreaders moved through their hometowns starting from there. Now the lockdown light didn’t work (which is also proof that the gastronomy sector is only minimally involved in the spread. Quickly the next culprit had to be found. Now we have the retail sector. But not all retail, of course, as evidenced by hundreds of exemptions in the various states in addition to grocery shops. Schools, day-care centres, universities, overcrowded suburban trains in big cities… No problem!Now the places of worship of the Christian churches are coming into focus. Knowing that this would hardly be legally enforceable and would not stand up before the Federal Constitutional Court, they are calling for a total ban on church services. In fact, however, the demanding protagonists hope that celebrations will take place in as many small congregations as possible.Because then a perfectly suitable culprit as a victim has been quickly found, in case a new infection should make it necessary to extend the lockdown until Ultimo. The Christians, and above all the Catholics hated by the majority of the federal government, absolutely had to imagine “O Du fröhliche” in church. They are not allowed to sing it anyway, because in churches, apart from the ban on holy water and the requirement to refrain from receiving communion, there is, as is well known, a ban on singing.Nobody knows exactly how many mosques there are in Germany. Nobody knows exactly how many mosques there are in Germany. The last estimates were between 2,750 and 3,500, but it is not important that the state knows how many mosques there are in Germany. As is well known, Islam allegedly poses no danger whatsoever. And that’s why Corona gives a wide berth to all those who kneel on prayer mats Friday after Friday and let the imam explain to them for an hour in his sermon that the Basic Law is more important than the Koran.[sarcasm off]

This is probably the reason why not a single politician in the coalition of the mainstream parties or the chairman of any institution close to the government thought it necessary to say phrases like: “In the next few weeks, there must be no presence services and no presence Friday prayers”. This has nothing to do with knowing that Muslims would not comply anyway or would perform their prayers on the street in front of the mosque. Presumably, the (again estimated) 5.8 to 8.3 million Muslims in Germany are immune to the virus through the blessing of Allah. Not worldwide, but: the pure and healthy diverse German air makes them resistant.Everything just sucks!

https://philosophia-perennis.com/2020/12/23/keine-christmette-freitagsgebet/

The results of the Romanian legislative elections have upset the political scene in this central and eastern European country. A new “far-right” populist party which was launched on December 1, 2019 has made a huge breakthrough in the midst of a health and social crisis.

With the legislative elections of December 6, 2020, the new party “Alliance for the Union of Romanians” [Alianța pentru Unirea Românilor] with the acronym AUR has stirred up the Romanian political scene.

It is not its fairly classic conservative policy positions that worry the mainstream, but its very rapid rise in a very short time. In fact, during the municipal elections of September 27, 2020, the party managed to obtain only 0,77 percent of the total votes cast, while in the legislative elections of December 6, 2020 they received 8,7 percent of the votes.

According to AUR, the family should be “traditional”. Thus, during their campaign they ardently defended a bill prohibiting the teaching of gender identity theory. Nevertheless, the Romanian Constitutional Court stopped this law, ruling on its unconstitutionality on December 16 with the mainstream denouncing the party as “homophobic”.

With the surprising score of 9 percent, the AUR party received a lot of media coverage and was able to reach other members of the electorate that had not heard of them before. According to what the party published in a December 8 statement, 15 000 new members joined the AUR party within 24 hours of the vote count.

Former Romanian President Trăian Băsescu had speculated on the possibility of interference by “Russian trolls from Saint Petersburg” in the new party’s election campaign. However, AUR leader George Simion said the campaign was carried out using smart targeting and the Nation Builder software – also used by Donald Trump and Emmanuel Macron – for a budget of 100 000 euros.

https://freewestmedia.com/2020/12/26/romania-meteoric-rise-of-a-new-far-right-party/

From time to time, the presiding judge had the impression that he witnessed in a ” story time”, so vague seemed the testimony of a witness, who was “probably not an innocent man himself”, as the judge put it. Especially the last of the six charges, the main offence, clearly showed the seriousness of the problem for which a 20-year-old and a 19-year-old were brought before the Böblingen district court.The court considered it proven that the crimes committed by the refugees had taken place according to the indictment: It was about several jointly committed assaults, including serious offences, insults and threats. For this, the main offender was sentenced to one year of juvenile detention, the probation of which will be decided in six months, until then he will remain at large. The 20-year-old, who came to Germany from Iran as an unaccompanied refugee at the age of 16, is not allowed by law to drink alcohol during this time, he has to go to addiction counselling, complete a social training course and do 100 hours of social work.The second defendant was sentenced to a fine of 900 euros.The main crime took place last summer on the Böblingen airfield. The 20-year-old and his 19-year-old buddy had arranged to meet an acquaintance on the airfield to “sort something out”. What exactly it was about remained unclear in court, but hints suggested that it was about insulting the ex-girlfriend of the main defendant.According to unanimous testimonies, the get-together quickly became noisy and subsequently violent. Who hit and kicked whom, when and where, or put him in a headlock, is part of the story time which the presiding judge thought he witnessed.However, he was sure that the decisive witness had wanted to flee,” said the judge, which the two defendants tried to prevent three times. Among other things, an empty vodka bottle is said to have only just missed the witness, and a larger pebble had also been thrown. Since this crime, the 20-year-old has been imprisoned.The two defendants were already known to the police and had been convicted: There was a brawl in Stuttgart and further attacks in Böblingen; a total of five offences within four months, and always or often under the influence of alcohol.Nevertheless, the 20-year-old should be given a fair chance, the judge said, justifying the sentence under juvenile criminal law, which is possible for exactly twelve more days – adult criminal law applies irrevocably from the 21st birthday on. The statement of the employee of the juvenile court welfare service was a factor in this.At the age of twelve, the accused had been witness to the killing of his uncle, who was to be recruited by the Taliban. The parents sent the boy and his brother to Iran, where they made a living with odd jobs. In 2016, they came to Germany, also with the burden of sending money to the family. This task had been too much and had been a cause for the 20-year-old’s considerable alcohol consumption. However, he had already attended meetings at the addiction counselling centre while in custody. Thus, the presiding judge concluded the hearing with the words “we’ll try it” and released the 20-year-old.

https://www.stuttgarter-nachrichten.de/inhalt.vor-dem-boeblinger-amtsgericht-junge-fluechtlinge-bekommen-jugendstrafe.db8d3634-2f85-46cc-9ed6-ebf2a300f51d.html

A turnaround in the case of the body found in Kaiserslautern. According to a spokesperson of the Western Palatinate police headquarters, a 31-year-old suspect was arrested in his flat in Kaiserslautern on Wednesday. The man was brought before an investigating judge. He denies having committed the crime. At the request of the public prosecutor’s office, the court ordered pre-trial detention because of the risk of absconding. The man was taken to a prison.Meanwhile, the investigation is ongoing. The identity of the woman killed in the city centre nine days ago is still unknown. So far, the police have been given 140 clues about the crime by the public. It is unclear when further results of the investigation will be published.For the time being, the investigators are not telling how they got on to the suspect’s trail. However, they are hoping for further clues – especially the identity of the victim. In which surroundings a potential witness might have actually witnessed something important can possibly be deduced from the additional information that a police spokesperson has given on the person of the arrested man: He is a 31-year-old asylum seeker from Syria. The investigators cannot completely rule out the possibility that the victim is also an immigrant, but it seems rather unlikely.The police are still asking for information that can help to establish the identity of the woman who was killed. She is said to be 35 to 50 years old and had a flower tattoo on her lower right leg.

https://www.rheinpfalz.de/lokal/kaiserslautern_artikel,-nach-leichenfund-polizei-nimmt-tatverd%C3%A4chtigen-fest-_arid,5149593.html

If you thought public schools were now, wait until they go full critical race theory.

Here’s a preview of “anti-racist grading”. What’s anti-racist grading? The math on that simple. Anything you attach “anti-racist” is nullified. Thus “anti-racist policing” means no policing. Anti-racist carpet cleaners make your carpets dirty instead.

And anti-racist teaching? Since none of you are the products of anti-racist education, I’m sure you can already figure that equation out. But here’s the work shown.

One thing we understand from Universal Design for Learning is that there are multiple ways a kid can express their knowing. And so if you know 2+2=4, one way you can express your knowing is by writing it. Another way you can express your knowing is by discussing it. A third way is by creating a model that shows it. A fourth way is by illustrating it and a fifth way is by performing a play. But in too many schools, only one way is considered legitimate. So if you write it, you get an A and that’s it. There might be 100 kids in the school who know 2+2=4, but if only two of those kids can write it, then only two of those kids will receive As. That is profoundly discriminatory.

Awesome. No wait, profoundly awesome. In an anti-racist way.

Kids will no longer need to learn that 2 + 2 = 4 because it’s assumed that they already know it. And they can express that knowingness by performing a play whose theme is that capitalism is evil because it insists that 2 + 2 = 4.

The main beneficiaries of this anti-racist education will be minority students who will be left even more unprepared for the real world, and even more dependent on the subsidies and privileges of the anti-racist system and its anti-racist non-plantation that is totally a plantation. 

Who knew how true Animal Farm would really be.

Two bad. Four also bad. All numbers are bad. Only anti-racist numbers are good. And there’s only one anti-racist number. Zero. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2020/12/anti-racist-grading-means-not-expecting-kids-know-daniel-greenfield/