The refugee was aided by the victim’s family after his getaway. The African stabbed the then 11-year-old boy, the son of his refugee aide, with a bread knife and almost killed him. The tabloid Bild reports that the trial for attempted murder began on Wednesday at the Passau Regional Court (Bavaria).The incident occurred on 25th of July 2018.  
Abdulrahman M from Eritrea is an asylum seeker and lives with other refugees in an apartment building in Vilshofen. Tina K (34 years old) lives with her husband and two sons in the same house and cares for the refugees. According to the prosecution, M. ambushed Paul, then eleven years old, at his parents’ apartment while his mother was shopping with the other refugees. He asked the boy about his mother, then forced him into the living room. “There he pushed him to the floor and stabbed him with the knife hidden in his pants,” said the prosecutor. M. (26 y/o) is said to have yelled “Die, die”. Among other injuries, the boy suffered a 15-centimeter-long laceration over his larynx. The boy reacts to the knife attack fearlessly and defends himself against it. The family dog, a terrier hybrid, saves his life – he bites the attacker – Paul can free himself and runs out of the house. M. pursues him, only flees when the blood-stained boy manages to stop a car. M. did not comment on the crime during the trial, instead talks about a nude video he recorded himself and which Paul’s mother saw. “It is not allowed for a woman to see a Muslim naked, that has to be punished with death.” 

unsertirol24.com

Fotos: Polizeipräsidium Südosthessen

After the homicide last Thursday, May 9, 2019, in the downtown area of Offenbach, investigators are now asking the population for help. The wanted person is the 42-year-old Mohammed Soultana, who currently has no permanent residence in Germany. A 44-year-old woman from Frankfurt had been shot in her car at about 7 p.m. on the evening of the crime in Luisen street. The victim had waited there by the side of the road in her car. The suspect comes from the immediate surroundings of the woman who wanted to pick up her son from sports class. As far as the investigators from the public prosecutor’s office and the criminal investigation department know, there was a violent dispute between the suspect and the 44-year-old before the crime. The exact background is still being determined. It is to be assumed, however, that the suspect suspected where he would meet his victim on Thursday evening and drove specifically to Luisen street.After the crime, the 42-year-old fled directly to Belgium, where his trace was lost. Since then he has been searched for. Mohammed Soultana is strikingly tall at 1.98 metres, has a sporty, muscular figure, dark curly, short hair and green eyes. It cannot be ruled out that he still carries the murder weapon with him. Therefore, witnesses should not approach him, but immediately inform the police about the emergency number 110. The Darmstadt public prosecutor’s office, Offenbach branch, has offered 3,000 euros for pertinent information.

https://www.presseportal.de/blaulicht/pm/43561/4271572

Two previously unknown perpetrators sexually harassed a 19-year-old woman on Landhaus street in Stuttgart yesterday evening.The woman was on her way home around 9.20 p.m. when the unknowns suddenly grabbed her and dragged her into the forecourt of a residential building. One man held the woman there, while the other unzipped his trousers and exposed his penis. A woman passing by, a hitherto unknown witness, grasped the incident and shouted at the men, who then let go of the young woman and fled. Later, the woman went to the police. The men can be described as follows: The one suspect was about the beginning to mid-20 years old, about 185 centimeters tall and beardless of oriental appearance. He was completely dressed in black. The other suspect was about 20 years old, about 180 centimeters tall with dark hair and a three-day beard and also of oriental appearance. He was dressed in a black baseball cap, dark bomber jacket, red T-shirt and red shoes. Witnesses, especially the intervening passer-by, are asked to report to the criminal investigation department by calling +4971189905778. 

https://searchlight-germany.blogspot.com/2019/05/germany-two-orientals-attack-woman-and.html

On Tuesday, between 5 p.m. and 5.15 p.m., a sexual harassment took place in Matterstock street in Würzburg. The 17-year-old victim was sitting on the stairs to St. Joseph’s Church when she was approached by the later suspect. He verbally harassed the young woman and tried to persuade her to engage in sexual activities. The victim was able to defend herself successfully, and the man probably also left for Scharold street due to passers-by present. 

The suspect is described as male, 180 cm tall and of slender stature darker skin type, dark longer hair with Rasta plaits striking was a recognizable tooth gap in the area of the incisors the suspect spoke broken German as well as fragmentary English. During the crime he carried a shopping bag with the inscription “NORMA” with him.

In this context, police investigators are looking for witnesses who can provide relevant information on the incident or the identity of the suspect. Witnesses please call the police station Würzburg-Stadt by calling 0931/457-2230. 

https://searchlight-germany.blogspot.com/2019/05/germany-dark-skinned-man-molests-17.html

The number of anti-Semitic incidents in Germany has increased at a alarming rate. Federal Interior Minister Horst Seehofer ( Christian Social Union ) and head of the Federal Criminal Police Office Holger Münch have just presented the statistics on politically motivated crime. According to the statistics, there were 1,799 anti-Semitic crimes last year – an increase of almost 20 percent over the previous year (1,504), including anti-Semitic graffiti or damage, threats against Jews, and violent assaults. Anti-Semitism is shameful for the whole country. In the statistics, 90 percent of the crimes are politically attributed to “right-wing” or right-wing extremist perpetrators. Seehofer called this “an important statement” on Tuesday.But here he fishes in the murky waters. Most of the perpetrators are anonymous and never caught. How do you know whether a swastika smearing or an insult against Jews comes from right-wing German perpetrators? The police simply “suspect” this. Seehofer stuttered at the press conference that one could not simply blame the majority of the crimes on ” unknowns “:Otherwise there would be the accusation that one “would not do anything against those of right-wing opinion”.A recent parliamentary inquiry by the Free Democratic Party (FDP) in Berlin revealed that a large proportion of the anti-Semitic crimes committed there – 120 out of 253 cases – were classified as “right-wing” in the statistics, even though the perpetrators’ motives are not known. Already two years ago, the Independent Expert Circle on Anti-Semitism complained that there might be “a distorted statistic to the Right” that did not correspond to the truth.A broad survey among Jews, recently published by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency, probably comes closer to reality. When asked about the perpetrators in Germany, 41 per cent of those affected by an anti-Semitic incident said that in their view the perpetrators were extremist Muslims, 20 per cent saw right-wing extremists as perpetrators and 16 per cent saw left-wing extremists as perpetrators. According to the estimates of those affected, the majority of perpetrators were Muslims. According to a study conducted by Dr. Julia Bernstein on behalf of the Independent Expert Group on Anti-Semitism, as many as 80 percent of those who were physically attacked stated that the perpetrators had a suspected Muslim background.

tichyseinblick.de

The riots during the rescue of a woman’s body in a so-called “refugee reception centre” near Regensburg have exactly the opposite effect that some normal-thinking people might have hoped for. Instead of calling the rioters to account or immediately deporting them to their predominantly Muslim homelands, more and more voices are blaming even the police and the refugee reception centre per se for the unprovoked escalation of violence against the police and rescue forces.”It is still unclear whether the residents of the refugee shelter will be punished for their attacks on the police officers,” writes the weekly Focus, and reveals obvious sympathy for the aggressor in the headline “Large-scale police deployment: after riots in asylum shelters, criticism of refugee reception centre is growing”.According to police spokeswoman Sandra Mallmann, the police had recorded the police operation and now evaluated the pictures together with the public prosecutor’s office. “According to the police, the incident in the refugee center is not a deliberate escalation. Rather, after the death of the woman, a group dynamic among the angry residents had developed.” reports the weekly Focus further.Then the “refugee centers” become condemned. “Again and again there are conflicts between residents and police forces in the politically controversial accommodations”. This is followed by the realisation that in those centres refugees are accommodated for longer periods of time who, in the opinion of the authorities, have little chance of asylum. A way to abolish the  centres would therefore be a consistent deportation. Even more secure borders. But the article wants to go further.Dennis Forster from the board of directors of “Campus Asyl” in Regensburg now has his say. He believes that this “type of accommodation in large, often barrack-like homes” is the reason for aggression among the residents. “Whatever happened there and how it may have come about: Part of the explanation for me is also the high level of frustration and the potential for conflict that the concept of an refugee centre entails,” he told the newspaper Mittelbayerische Zeitung, adding: “Because deportations can occur here at any time, the residents are exposed to great psychological stress. In plain language: The deporting policemen are to blame.  As expected, the mayor of Regensburg, Gertrud Maltz-Schwarzfischer ( Social Democrats ), also expresses herself similarly.A shy objection comes from the Christian Social Union (CSU). In a statement, Bavarian Interior Minister Joachim Herrmann condemned the attacks on the police officers: “It is understandable to a certain extent that a sudden death in the facility can stir up the mood among the residents. However, it is absolutely unacceptable for residents to use violence against the emergency services. It was therefore important for the police to quickly get a grip on the situation with strong forces.”

journalistenwatch.com

È la proposta che il Viminale ha studiato in accordo con la Farnesina per “dare incentivi ai Paesi che si dimostrano particolarmente collaborativi nel settore del rimpatrio dei clandestini”. La decisione è arrivata, fanno sapere “dopo le aperture del premier, Giuseppe Conte, e del ministro degli Esteri, Enzo Moavero Milanesi”, a cui Salvini si era rivolto nei giorni scorsi per chiedere di fare di più sul piano degli accordi bilaterali con i Paesi d’origine dei migranti.

Un tavolo tecnico tra gli esperti dei due dicasteri, quindi, potrebbe riunirsi già il 23 maggio, qualche giorno prima dell’appuntamento elettorale europeo. L’auspicio del governo, però, fanno sapere dal ministero dell’Interno, è che dopo il 26 possa essere “finalmente l’Unione europea a farsi carico di questo tipo di interventi”.

Nei giorni scorsi Di Maio aveva punzecchiato l’alleato leghista proprio sul tema dei rimpatri, lamentando l’assenza di misure in questo senso all’interno del testo del nuovo decreto voluto da Salvini. “Un conto è bloccare i porti – aveva detto – altro rimandare a casa migliaia di persone”. Il ministro dell’Interno si era smarcato replicando che “I rimpatri sono accordi internazionali”, e rientrano quindi nella sfera di competenza del ministro Moavero. Ora sul tema sarà anche il Viminale a collaborare con la Farnesina.

http://www.ilgiornale.it/news/politica/migranti-nel-decreto-sicurezza-fondo-ad-hoc-i-rimpatri-1693940.html