A dispute has flared up in France over the funding of a project for a mosque in Alsace. The Minister of the Interior, Gerald Darmanin, made accusations against the Strasbourg Municipality on Tuesday night and complained about the funding for the construction of a mosque by the Islamic association Milli Görüs.

The city hall is funding a mosque represented by an association that defends political Islam, Darmanin said on Twitter. According to the AFP news agency, the city council had previously approved a building subsidy of over 2.5 million euros for a mosque run by Milli Görüs.

At the heart of the dispute is the so-called Charter of the Principles of Islam in France. This charter opposes the political instrumentalisation of Islam and emphasises the compatibility of the religion with French principles, such as the separation of church and state. Darmanin criticised Milli Görüs for not signing the document. As AFP reported, the mayor of Strasbourg, Jeanne Barseghian, suggested making the signing of the charter a condition for the money to actually flow. Before this happens, another vote is pending, she said.

Following attacks in the previous year, President Emmanuel Macron called on all Muslim associations to commit to the Republic in the fight against Islamism. The umbrella organisation Conseil francais du culte musulman (CFCM) then issued a new basic charter. Some statements in the charter, however, “offend the honour of Muslims” and have “an accusatory and exclusionary tone”, according to a statement by some associations at the time, which did not want to sign the charter.

The charter stipulates, among other things, equal rights for men and women and the “compatibility” of Islam with the values of the French Republic. At the same time, the association rejects the “instrumentalisation of Islam for political goals”.

https://religion.orf.at/stories/3205512/

The Danish government has announced a package of new proposals aimed at fighting “religious and cultural parallel societies” in Denmark. A cornerstone of the plan includes capping the percentage of “non-Western” immigrants and their descendants dwelling in any given residential neighborhood. The aim is to preserve social cohesion in the country by encouraging integration and discouraging ethnic and social self-segregation.

The announcement comes just days after Denmark approved a new law banning the foreign funding of mosques in the country. The government has also recently declared its intention significantly to limit the number of people seeking asylum in Denmark.

Denmark, which already has some of the most restrictive immigration policies in Europe, is now at the vanguard of European efforts to preserve local traditions and values in the face of mass migration, runaway multiculturalism and the encroachment of political Islam.

The new proposals, announced by Interior and Housing Minister Kaare Dybvad Bek on March 17, are contained in a 15-page report, “Mixed Residential Areas: The Next Step in the Fight Against Parallel Societies.”

A main element of the plan calls for relocating residents of non-Western origin to ensure that, within the next ten years, they do not comprise more than 30% of the total population of any neighborhood or housing area in Denmark.

The plan also calls for phasing out the term “ghetto areas,” which has been criticized as being derogatory, and replacing it with the more politically correct “prevention areas” (forebyggelsesområder) and “transformation areas” (omdannelsesområder).

The term “ghetto,” which refers to areas with high concentrations of immigrants, unemployment and crime, first came into official use in Denmark in 2010 with the release of a government report, “Reinserting Ghettos into Society: A Showdown with Parallel Societies in Denmark.”

A “ghetto area” currently refers to a residential area with at least 1,000 inhabitants, where the proportion of non-Western immigrants and their descendants is higher than 50%, and where at least two of the following four criteria are met:

• The proportion of residents aged 18-64 who are not in work or in education exceeds 40%.
• The proportion of residents who have been convicted of violating the Penal Code, the Firearms Act or the Narcotic Drugs Act is at least three times the national average.
• The proportion of residents aged 30-59 who have only a primary school education exceeds 60% of all residents in the same age group.
• The average gross income for taxpayers aged 15-64 in the area (excluding education seekers) is less than 55% of the average gross income for all residents in the area.

In 2018, the Danish Parliament, with support from all of the country’s main political parties, adopted the “parallel society package” (Parallelsamfundspakken), also known as the “ghetto plan” (Ghettoplan). The 22-point plan states that there will be no “ghetto areas” in Denmark by 2030. Details are included in a government report, “One Denmark Without Parallel Societies.”

At the time, the government, explained the need for a comprehensive strategy to combat parallel societies:

“The government wants a cohesive Denmark. A Denmark that is based on democratic values ​​such as freedom and the rule of law, equality and freedom. Tolerance and equality. A Denmark where everyone participates actively. Over the past 40 years, Denmark’s ethnic composition has changed markedly.

“In 1980, we were 5.1 million people in Denmark. Today we are close to 5.8 million. The growth of the population comes from outside. Both immigrants and descendants of immigrants. The majority of the new Danes have a non-Western background.

“In 1980, there were about 50,000 people with non-Western backgrounds in Denmark. Today there are almost half a million. This corresponds to an increase from approximately one percent of the population to approximately 8.5 percent….

“What has gone wrong? At least three things.

“First, the individual immigrant has the responsibility to learn Danish, to get a job and become part of the local community and to be integrated into his new homeland. Far too few have seized the opportunities that Denmark offers, despite the fact that Denmark is a society with security, freedom, free education and good job opportunities.

“Second, as a society, for too many years we have not made the necessary demands of newcomers. We have had far too low expectations for the refugees and immigrants who came to Denmark. We have not made sufficiently tangible demands on jobs and self-sufficiency. Therefore, too many immigrants have ended up in prolonged inactivity.

“Third, for decades too many refugees and family-reunified people have not been integrated into Danish society. They have been allowed to clump together in ghetto areas without contact with the surrounding community, even after many years in Denmark, because we have not made clear demands on them to become part of the Danish community….

“It’s about to be the last call. In parts of Western Europe, massive challenges have arisen with ghettos and very ingrained parallel societies. Denmark is not there yet. And that is why we must make a massive effort now, so that we can stop the development before the problems become impossible to solve.

“There is only one way. The ghettos must be completely eradicated. Parallel societies must be broken down. And we must make sure that new ones do not arise. Once and for all, the very big task of integration must be tackled whenever immigrants and their descendants have not embraced Danish values ​​and isolate themselves in parallel societies.”

The 2018 agreement stipulates that if a residential area ends up on the so-called ghetto list, local councils must choose between four measures: 1) demolish public housing; 2) build new housing for private rental; 3) convert public housing to elderly or youth housing; or 4) sell public housing to private buyers or investors for private rental.

The plan seeks to reduce the share of public housing to no more than 40% in the most vulnerable areas by 2030. The overall goal is to transform the ghetto areas into normal residential areas.

Interior and Housing Minister Kaare Dybvad Bek says that the plan is working. The number of residential areas on the government’s most recent “ghetto list,” published in December 2020, has declined by half in three years, from 29 in 2018 to 15 in 2020. The number of “hardened ghettos,” which refers to any area that has been included on the ghetto list for four years in a row, has declined from 15 in 2018 to 13 in 2020.

Bek attributed the decline mainly to more people finding employment or pursuing an education:

“It is fantastically positive that it is progressing in so many areas, and we are already seeing the effect of the parallel society package. There is a historically large decrease in the number of vulnerable areas on all lists, especially because far more residents have come to find work or pursue education.

“The large drop in the number of vulnerable areas is especially a pat on the back to the housing organizations and municipalities that in recent years have worked hard to ensure mixed housing areas, so that all children have the same opportunities, no matter where they grow up.”

Bek’s newly named “prevention areas” are to be designated on the basis of the same criteria as the existing “ghetto areas,” but with lower limits. A “prevention area” refers to a residential area with at least 1,000 inhabitants, where the proportion of non-Western immigrants and their descendants is higher than 30%, and where at least two of the following four criteria are met:

• The proportion of residents aged 18-64 who are not in work or in education exceeds 30%.
• The proportion of residents who have been convicted of violating the Penal Code, the Firearms Act or the Narcotic Drugs Act is at least two times the national average.
• The proportion of residents aged 30-59 who have only a primary school education exceeds 60% of all residents in the same age group.
• The average gross income for taxpayers aged 15-64 in the area (excluding education seekers) is less than 65% of the average gross income for all residents in the area.

A total of 58 residential areas in Denmark will be categorized as “prevention areas” in the government’s new proposal, which will affect approximately 100,000 people of non-Western origin. Bek explained:

“For far too many years, we have closed our eyes to the development that was underway, and only acted when the integration problems became too great. Now we want to make sure that we do not once again stick our heads in the sand while new parallel societies emerge. We will do this by preventing more vulnerable housing areas and by creating more mixed housing areas throughout Denmark.

“Today, municipalities and housing organizations do not always intervene in time if large public housing areas enter into a negative spiral. Therefore, we will now provide access to most of the tools that apply to vulnerable residential areas. For us, it is about helping the residents and creating equal opportunities for all children, regardless of where they grow up in Denmark.

“The ‘ghetto’ term is misleading. I do not use it myself, and I think it overshadows the important work that needs to be done in the residential areas. This whole effort is about fighting parallel societies and creating a positive development in the residential areas, so that they are made attractive to a broad section of the population.”

Denmark’s governing center-left Social Democratic Party has pursued strong anti-immigration policies, partly in an effort to blunt the appeal of populist parties on the right.

Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, who has been in office since June 2019, recently announced that her government intends significantly to limit the number of people seeking asylum in Denmark. The aim, she said, is to preserve “social cohesion” in the country.

Denmark, which has a population of 5.8 million, received approximately 40,000 asylum applications during the past five years, according to data compiled by Statista. Most of the applications received by Denmark, a predominately Christian country, were from migrants from Muslim countries in Africa, Asia and the Middle East.

In recent years, Denmark has also permitted significant non-asylum immigration, especially from non-Western countries. Denmark is now home to sizeable immigrant communities from Syria (35,536); Turkey (33,111); Iraq (21,840); Iran (17,195); Pakistan (14,471); Afghanistan (13,864); Lebanon (12,990) and Somalia (11,282), according to Statista.

Muslims currently comprise approximately 5.5% of the Danish population, according to the Pew Research Center, which forecasts that this figure will double or possibly triple by 2050, depending on the migration scenario.

On January 22, during a parliamentary hearing on Danish immigration policy, Frederiksen said that she was determined to reduce the number of asylum approvals:

“Our goal is zero asylum seekers. We cannot promise zero asylum seekers, but we can establish the vision for a new asylum system, and then do what we can to implement it. We must be careful that not too many people come to our country, otherwise our social cohesion cannot exist. It is already being challenged.”

In her 2021 New Year’s address, Frederiksen said that in the year ahead, her government would continue to insist that immigrants integrate into Danish society:

“As a society, we must step more into character and stick to our Danish values. We must not accept that democracy is replaced with hatred in parallel societies. Radicalization must not be protected. It must be revealed.

“The government will rethink its integration efforts so that it is based to a greater extent on clear requirements and clear expectations with a focus on law and duty.

“Basically, it must be the case that once you have been granted residence in Denmark, you must of course support yourself. If this is not possible for a period of time, the government will propose that you — in return for your social welfare benefit — be obliged to contribute the equivalent of a normal working week of 37 hours. These are some of the tasks ahead of us in the new year.”

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/17197/denmark-parallel-societies

The list of countries stopping AstraZeneca’s vaccine continues to increase after the vaccine was linked to serious side effects and a number of deaths. A Norwegian expert group consisting of doctors who examined three affected healthcare workers, one of whom died after taking the vaccine, has now been able to determine the cause that could cause the vaccine to be fatal.

According to Norwegian tabloid Verdens Gang (VG), a Norwegian expert group of doctors has been able to determine the cause behind the reported alarming side effects that led to a number of people becoming seriously ill, and which explains the increasing number of deaths that are directly linked to AstraZeneca’s vaccine.

The link could be established after three healthcare workers who took the vaccine, all under the age of 50 and without belonging to risk groups, became seriously ill shortly after the vaccination. One of the patients died just a few days later. An expert group at Rikshospitalet has investigated why the three healthcare employees had severe blood clots after being vaccinated.

“The cause of our patients’ condition has now been found,” said the chief physician and professor Pål Andre Holme to VG. The patients came to the hospital with acute pain and had blood clots in unusual places such as the stomach and brain. They also had bleeding and a low platelet count. The woman who died was under the age of 50 and like the others who fell ill, she had no reason to develop the sudden severe symptoms. The only common factor was that they had been vaccinated with AstraZeneca’s vaccine shortly before. The woman who died had received her vaccination earlier last week, was admitted to a local hospital on Thursday and was transferred to Rikshospitalet later.

The leading hypothesis of the leading experts was that the vaccine triggered a strong and unexpected immune reaction in the individuals, and after extensive testing, the Norwegian experts were able to establish that this was indeed the case.

“We had a theory that this is a strong immune reaction that most likely came after the vaccine and we have now come to the conclusion that it is so,” said the chief physician. The problem behind the strong immune response is specific antibodies. There is no other explanation behind the immune reaction, according to Holme.

“We have no other history in these patients that can cause such a strong immune response. I am absolutely certain that it is these antibodies that are the cause, and see no other reason than that it is the vaccine that triggers it.”

The Norwegian expert group was able to show that it was specific antibodies not all antibodies. “We take vaccines to get an immune response to what we are to be protected against. Then you develop, among other things, antibodies. Some antibodies can then react to activate the platelets, as in these cases, and cause blood clots,” Holme told VG.

The Norwegian woman is not the only one whose death could have been linked directly to AstraZeneca’s vaccine. Last week it also emerged that a 60-year-old woman died of a blood clot and suffered from very serious symptoms, according to Danish outlet DR. An Italian man, music teacher Sandro Tognatti, 57, also died the day after taking the vaccine, prompting Italy to stop the vaccine immediately.

At least seven people have suffered blood clots in the brain in Germany and three of them have died after taking the vaccine. It is part of the ongoing investigation that led Germany to stop AstraZeneca’s vaccine. However, the German Minister of Health Jens Spahn also says that the halt is a “pure precaution”. In Bulgaria, a death has also been reported which has also led to a suspension of the continued mass vaccination plan with the AstraZeneca vaccine. Countries outside Europe have also begun stopping vaccination with AstraZeneca’s vaccine, including Indonesia, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Venezuela.

Last week Sweden, Latvia, Italy, France, Spain and the Netherlands halted the rollout. The World Health Organization (WHO) nevertheless continues to recommend vaccination with AstraZeneca. European Commissioner Hans Kluge says that the benefits of the vaccine outweigh all possible risks and that it should continue to be used.

The European Medicines Agency has however decided to resume vaccination with AstraZeneca’s vaccine, despite the fact that Norwegian doctors stand by their conclusion that a connection between the blood clots and the vaccine cannot be ruled out.

The EU announced on March 18 that the vaccine was “safe” and that vaccination will therefore be resumed. The EU does not deny the Norwegian doctors’ conclusions, but believes that the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risks, Swedish news outlet SVT reported.

The Danish Medicines Agency has meanwhile sent out a letter to all Danes who have received the vaccine in the last 14 days stating which symptoms the vaccinated should be aware of and which could indicate that there is a risk of blood clots:

Severe headache.
Severe abdominal pain
A leg feels cold.
Suddenly and unexpected pain in some part of the body.
Hard to breathe.
Paralysis in one side of the body.

They have now also come out with an extended list of other symptoms to keep track of:

Multiple and newly acquired major bruises and / or multiple punctate hemorrhages in skin / mucous membranes (e.g. in the mouth)
nosebleeds that are difficult to stop
Swelling, redness or pronounced tenderness in the leg or arm (not locally around the injection site)
Sudden shortness of breath and / or chest pain.
Symptoms such as pain in the arm where you have received the jab, fever and fatigue are common and something you should expect after a vaccination.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/03/23/more-deaths-are-linked-to-astrazenecas-vaccine-the-cause-found-according-to-norwegian-experts/

The moment when revolutions are won or lost is when the enforcement branch of whatever government decides not to go along with orders against the public. It certainly appears that this moment took place in a few Italian cities this past weekend. This is from Torino. The police removed gloves and helmets in a show of solidarity with a peaceful crowd that was against the lockdown measures being foisted upon pretty much the whole Western world apart from some US states and parts of Eastern Europe that know communism when they see it.

Someone says ” come on guys…let’s go for it” and the chorus : bravi…bravi

The capital of Germany, ruled by a coalition of the Social Democratic Party of Germany, The Left [Die Linke], and The Greens, is embroiled in a new mega construction scandal. This latest scandal comes in the wake of two senior lawmakers from German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservative alliance resigning after accusations that they had profited from the Coronavirus pandemic through kickbacks for state purchases of face masks.

In Berlin, almost 50 “modular accommodation units for refugees” (MUF) have swallowed up a total of more than a billion euros in construction and other costs. According to the Senate, the production costs an incredible €1 600 to €2 600 per square meter — far too expensive and dubious for simple prefabricated buildings. It should be lower than the average cost, which is around €1 400.

Thus, with the monthly salary of a German taxpayer, one square meter of living space is created for people who for the most part are not even allowed to be the country.

But the project is also legally questionable, according to the AfD magazine Kompakt: “We have never experienced such a brazen abuse of special building rights as in Berlin in all of Germany,” said a lawyer. Meanwhile, there is even speculation about demolitions being carried out, because the migrant accommodation is only allowed to be inhabited by asylum seekers and Berlin wants to transfer them to the regular housing market.

Also in connection with alleged Corona fraud, the state security and public prosecutor in Berlin are investigating around 60 Islamist groups with more than a hundred individuals, associations and mosque associations involved in criminal dealings. In several cases there is even “the suspicion of direct terrorist financing”, reported German daily Die Welt, citing “circles of Berlin’s law enforcement authorities”. It is yet another example of how ordinary self-employed Germans and employees have to suffer their corrupt elites.

The unprecedented failure of the Federal Economics Minister Peter Altmaier (CDU), who has himself been drowning in scandals, does not end there. Only a few days ago it was reported that Altmaier had to put the Corona aid on hold because an IT botch in his home enabled systematic abuse of the funding. Altmaier’s reputation has suffered from his unconditional courting of Angela Merkel and the metamorphosis of the CDU to a left-wing party, AfD insiders say.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/03/22/unbelievable-asylum-accommodation-in-berlin-costs-over-e1-600-per-square-metre/

Jennifer W., accused of being an IS terrorist, described her former husband as violent before the Munich Higher Regional Court (OLG) on Monday. He had beaten the Yazidi woman and the girl who had lived in their house in Iraq – for reasons that were getting more and more null and void.

The Federal Prosecutor’s Office accuses the young woman from Lohne (Vechta district) in Lower Saxony of becoming a member of the terrorist organisation Islamic State (IS) in Iraq and keeping a mother and her daughter in her house as slaves.

The 29-year-old had also recently testified about her allegedly violent husband before the Frankfurt Higher Regional Court, where the Iraqi is charged with the same crime as she is: A little Yazidi girl allegedly died in the courtyard of their house in Fallujah (Iraq) in 2015 – tied up in the burning heat. The man allegedly tied her up and Jennifer W. stood impassively by.

She did not dare to untie the child, the accused said. About the day the child is said to have died, she had already said in Frankfurt that she had not dared to intervene. “I then thought about what I was going to do, but didn’t dare.” Then she had looked after the child again. “I saw that she was getting weaker.”

In Munich, Jennifer W. has so far only made a written statement, which her lawyer read out in court. She announced, however, that she would answer the court’s questions herself – but not those of the Federal Prosecution or the plaintiffs. It is possible that this will be continued on the next day of the trial on Friday.

https://www.sueddeutsche.de/bayern/prozesse-muenchen-is-rueckkehrerin-beschreibt-ehemann-als-gewalttaetig-dpa.urn-newsml-dpa-com-20090101-210322-99-921760

By Fay Voshell

The current dispute among members of the British Royal Family goes far beyond private family matters concerning Queen Elizabeth II, Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, and the Cambridges.  It is about more than personality differences, hurt feelings, and tears about flower girl dresses.

The current battle royale is a symbolic and real struggle between opposite worldviews.  On the one side is the constitutional monarchy of Britain, headed by Queen Elizabeth II and all that the monarchy and the commonwealth stand for: lineage, history, tradition, and nation.  On the other side are arrayed converts to “woke” ideology who are committed to modernism embracing radical change, egalitarianism, and supranational global interests.

Tellingly, among the allies supporting the Sussexes’ rebellion against the queen, the prince of Wales and the Cambridges are progressives who also have considered the Trump presidency and his supporters illegitimate: Oprah Winfrey; Hillary Clinton; Michelle Obama; and Joe Biden, who called Meghan Markle’s charges against the Royal Family an act of “courage.” 

It seems the attempt is being made by Meghan and Harry to portray the royal leaders of the commonwealth as irretrievably racist.  The Sussexes’ insinuative comment about someone in the Royal Family pejoratively mentioning son Archie’s skin color — if indeed such a comment was made at all — became a means for a general condemnation of British royalty.  The “firm,” as Markle called the Royal Family, has been judged as systemically racist.

The alliances so carefully held together by Elizabeth II are seen as infected by systemic racism that needs to be cleansed by the infusion of fresh blood, by those who will eradicate the remnants of racist colonial oppression by completing the decolonization of the British commonwealth. 

The Sussexes’ accusations of racism among the Royal Family, if they succeed in being taken seriously, would effectively delegitimize the British monarchy and the commonwealth.

No weapon against the Royal Family could have been more successfully forged or so cleverly and manipulatively employed.  That is because racism is seen by progressives as ubiquitous as original sin and therefore as infecting every act and word of the royal family, no matter how seemingly charitable.  Since racism is systemic, it does not require proof.  It just is there and is removed only by the newly “woke,” who see it clearly and who, as the true heirs to the throne, will eradicate it.  It may only be exterminated by a replacement of the entire order.

The battle is essentially a religious and political fight, as fights for the throne have almost always been.  The contest is just as significant as the centuries’ long fights among Protestant and Catholic monarchs, one of which was the struggle between Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots.

The irony is that Meghan Markle and her husband Prince Harry, while clinging tightly to royal titles and privileges, apparently are true believers in the current egalitarian democratic movement that is anti-monarchical and anti-hierarchical in general.  Progressivism reflects the influence of the anti-monarchy radicals of the French Revolution.  Liberté, égalité, fraternité demanded freedom from all hierarchical restraints, monarchical and religious.

The difference is that the Sussexes give every indication of wishing to retaining the power and wealth of the monarchy but imitate Evita Perón or Imelda Marcos.  Retain the designer wardrobe, the 3,000 pairs of shoes and the popular influence, but ditch traditions and protocol. In short, embrace the “woke” idea of equality: access to all the privilege and wealth without retaining the history of the nation, the monarchy, or the church.

Their rebellion also may be seen as an attempt to take advantage of the global reach of the commonwealth and to put its remaining influence under the banner of globalist progressivism.  The “woke” routinely seek to eliminate present day “rulers,” and to elevate themselves by means of an omnipotent media and partisan mobs that seek to overshadow what crowns still survive.  They ignore the words of B.G. Niebuhr, who wrote, “Our hereditary dynasties are our good fortune, which we will realize once we have lost them.”

Ironically, some royals like Prince Charles already have some rather progressive but apparently insufficiently radical beliefs, and are considered unqualified by the Sussexes to lead the nation and commonwealth in a more radical direction.  The goal may be not to totally destroy the institution, but to retain the riches and privileges while changing the ideological direction and employing the structure of the monarchy and the commonwealth as an instrument of globalism.

No one should be surprised about the current battles royal.  The same battles are being fought in every Western institution, including academia, the media, and the churches. 

It is noteworthy that the University of Leicester has announced that it may stop teaching Geoffrey Chaucer’s work and other medieval literature in favor of courses on race and sexuality.  As the Daily Mail has reported, England’s foundational texts like The Canterbury Tales and the Anglo-Saxon epic Beowulfwould no longer be taught under proposals to scrap medieval literature altogether as a part of decolonization.  Scholars who have spent a lifetime on research and teaching would be replaced.  The halls of the University of Leicester would not be torn down, but they will, if the plan is implemented, be occupied by new order courtiers who will utilize academia to promote “woke” ideology.  

Last and not so incidentally, the Sussexes have mounted an attack on the Church of England.  Queen Elizabeth is the head of the church, which for good or ill has been allied with royal authority since the time of Henry VIII.  Markle dissociated herself from the wedding ceremony of the Church of England, which numbers some 85 million members around the globe, by insisting she and Harry were married privately and that the lavish ceremony was just a public spectacle.

One can scarcely avoid the conclusion that the archbishop of Canterbury was seen as a bit player to be moved onto a backyard stage set.  But it appears Welby is unwilling to be moved about like a Hollywood extra, entering stage left to perform sacred rituals on command.  While he has demurred from accusing the duo of falsehoods, officials of the church have made it known  no such wedding took place and that the archbishop believes that the established protocol and liturgy surrounding marriage was properly observed. 

The Church of England deals with the gospel of wokeness with varying degrees of success and failure on an almost daily basis.  However, it appears unwilling to subject itself to leveling pretenders who are ignorant of the church’s history, talking of it with arrogance, and superficiality in order to subject it to lower ends.

There is an answer to the problems the “woke” Sussexes present to the throne of England and the commonwealth. 

The anti-hierarchical ideology they promote while seeking to retain royal privilege and wealth should be utterly repudiated by the British monarchy.  They also should be given the freedom they continually have asked for: release from any royal title or role and freedom to be merely private citizens.

Otherwise, the English crown will remain uneasy as it is continually beset by rebels against it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/03/meghan_and_harry_rebel_against_the_crown.html