The Scandinavian nation has withdrawn their residence permits from 94 Syrian refugees after determining that Damascus and its surroundings are safe to return to. Denmark has in fact become the first European country to tell Syrian migrants they must return to their country of origin, stating it is now safe for them to do so.

Mattias Tesfaye, the Danish immigration minister, said last month that the country had been “open and honest from the start” with asylum seekers coming from Syria.

“We have made it clear to the Syrian refugees that their residence permit was temporary. It can be withdrawn if the protection is no longer needed,” he told the Daily Telegraph. “When conditions in the country of origin improve, a refugee must return home,” he explained.

Germany had previously declared that only refugees guilty of crimes could be deported to Syria. Denmark’s decision now means that 350 other Syrian residents in the country will possibly have their temporary protection permits revoked.

The ambition stated by the Danish Prime Minister, the Social Democrat Mette Frederiksen, is no asylum application lodged in Denmark, in maintaining the course of a very restrictive reception policy at a time when the country has received the lowest number of applications since 1998.

The small Nordic country of 5,8 million inhabitants makes no secret of its desire to discourage migrants from seeking refuge there. “We have to make sure that few people come to our country, otherwise our social cohesion cannot prevail,” said Frederiksen.

In 2017, then at the head of the Social Democrats, she presented a plan to send “non-Western” migrants back to African camps, sorting centers for migrants.

In September last year, Copenhagen appointed a migration ambassador to speed up the creation of one or more migrant camps outside the European Union as part of the new European asylum system, which it is advocating.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/03/03/denmarks-tells-syrians-to-return-home-to-their-safe-country/

Jeff Kwasi Klein, a member of the Green Party’s leadership in Berlin, called on his fellow Black citizens to create “robust communities” that would no longer have a need for the police. According to him, riots and looting are also legitimate tools to oppose racist institutions. However, in his subsequent interview with Die Welt, he tempered his statements.

Jeff Kwasi Klein, who holds the post of Diversity Officer in the Berlin Green Party, made the controversial speech at a demonstration against police violence in Berlin at the end of May last year. He addressed his audience as his “Black siblings.” This weekend, his speech began to circulate on social media again.

“We must organize. It is important that we do not rely on the state but focus on building robust community structures so that we no longer have to call the police when we need help,” Klein said in the speech.

“Because strong communities do not need the police, because the police are not here for us, they are responsible for the violence in our lives,” he proclaimed.

https://www.instagram.com/tv/CA290z3HkWl/?utm_source=ig_embed

After Die Welt now approached him, Klein distanced himself from his statement and tried to justify it.

“My speech was in response to the racist murder of George Floyd in the United States. The looting took place in the USA, but most of the protests were calm or started quiet and then got violently suppressed. Even if there is unrest, it does not make the whole protest against police violence illegitimate,” Klein now said.

He also rejected claims that he legitimizes violence. However, Black Lives Matter riots caused $1 billion to $2 billion in estimated property damage, and led to a number of murders of police officers and even fellow Black citizens such as retired police chief David Dorn.

The riots also saw Black protesters often violently beating White people. 

https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer/status/1266925493384736769

The beating of a White male also sparked a police manhunt for Black Lives Matter activist Marquis Loveafter footage of the attack went viral. 

https://twitter.com/FromKalen/status/1295236072272666626

Klein’s call or communities without police echoes movements to defund the police in the United States. Such attempts have mostly been seen as a failure, including the CHOP/CHAZ autonomous zone which temporarily succeeded in blockading police from an area of Seattle, which resulted in a rapid increase in crime and murders. 

The city of Minneapolis, at the forefront of the “defund the police” movement, has also quietly begun investing millions to hire police officers as crime rates surge.

“By robust communities, of course, I do not mean gangs, but building our own companies, Black businesses, social counseling centers, and associations. In cases of discrimination and violence by the police or the authorities, the Blacks could then visit a legal advice center for help instead of calling the police,” Klein said in what appeared to be an attempt to temper his previous words.

“Our anger will never cease to be heard. Even if it means breaking several things, such as their windows, their complacency, their ignorance, and their sense of security,” said Klein at the spring demonstration.

“You complain about the riots and the looting, but you do not understand that this is organized resistance against a racist system that only listens when it feels physically or financially threatened,” noted the Green Party politician.

Klein’s words echo BLM activists in the US, which have included violent threats and other racially charged remarks.

‘Let’s build robust communities so we don’t need the police,’ urges Black Green Party politician in Berlin

In the trial of a murder by torture in a refugee home in Lohmar (Rhein-Sieg district), the Bonn Regional Court sentenced one defendant to life imprisonment. An accomplice was sentenced to eleven years imprisonment – due to his massive drug and alcohol consumption, he was considered to be of diminished capacity at the time of the crime. Both defendants were convicted of murder by cruel means of murder on Monday.

The two 28 and 29-year-old men from Morocco had tied up and maltreated a 45-year-old man in his room in the municipal accommodation in Lohmar for several hours in July 2020. Among other things, they hit the victim’s skull more than 20 times with a table leg. His face was completely disfigured afterwards. The autopsy revealed 200 skin injuries all over the body.

Even for the experience of a jury court, this was a particularly horrific case, it was said at the beginning of the judgement. One police officer had described his first impression at the crime scene with the words: “That was torture. Everything was covered in blood. During the trial, the defendants had largely claimed memory lapses.

The court could only guess about the reasons why the man had been so horribly beaten up. Even if the defendants had been attacked with a knife – as one of the two had explained – one could not speak of self-defence in this “orgy of violence”. “The two people sitting here,” the judgement said, “had enjoyed killing.”

The presiding judge also said that frustration could not be ruled out. The accused had previously learned that their asylum applications had been rejected. Afterwards, they had met the later victim and had been drinking and taking drugs for two days until “something went terribly wrong”.

After the verdict, both defence lawyers declared that they would appeal.

https://www.rnd.de/panorama/sie-hatten-spass-am-toten-lebenslange-haft-fur-foltermord-ZZCJXLS6DNDZTMI4X6ORJICKXU.html

Rape is apparently not as bad as it seemed since 2015? At least that is what the sentences against ” refugees” show, most which are not particularly severe. Now another case that once again sparks doubts over the rule of law: In the summer of 2016, the 15-year-old daughter of a refugee aid worker was raped by two young Syrians; four years later, the two “refugees” have now just been given suspended sentences, as if they had stolen a piece of chewing gum in the supermarket.

The suspended sentences will certainly impress the ” persons seeking protection” and will certainly be a lesson, at the latest after the verdict they will know that “protection and security” also applies in court. Will two young Germans who would rape an underage Syrian girl also be so lucky in court?

Perhaps the judge wisely thought that although the prisons are full enough, there must still be room in the jail to lock up the real criminals, such as the people who refuse to pay the licence fee for the public broadcaster (GEZ)?

Bild.de reports:

The two Syrians arrived in Germany in 2015 and lived in a shelter in Lüchow-Dannenberg. In summer 2016, the daughter of a refugee aid worker visited the Syrians’ accommodation in the Lüchow-Dannenberg district. At first they drank tea in the room, then the mood turned. According to the indictment, Mohamad T. suddenly held the girl’s arms while his accomplice undressed and raped her After the sex assault, the duo threatened her: “If you tell anyone anything, we’ll kill your whole family.”

https://politikstube.com/sind-halt-keine-gez-verweigerer-15-jaehrige-vergewaltigt-bewaehrungsstrafe-fuer-zwei-syrische-fluechtlinge/

Yesterday, four migrants were handcuffed in Puerto Rico, a town in the municipality of Mogán, Gran Canaria. The men of Maghreb origin are accused of raping a 36-year-old woman in a local park on Friday.

As reported by the newspaper La Provincia, the victim is an Irish national who has lived in the community with her family for years. After the incident, the woman first went to a health centre and filed a complaint on Sunday with the doctor’s report.

Thanks to the good personal description, all four men, who had recently come to Gran Canaria illegally on a boat, could be arrested during the course of yesterday (Monday). They had previously lived in tourist establishments in the municipalities of San Bartolomé de Tirajana and Mogán, but had been expelled from there. One of them was known to the police. He had already been convicted several times.

https://politikstube.com/gran-canaria-gruppenvergewaltigung-einer-36-jaehrigen-vier-nordafrikaner-verhaftet/

European leaders are considering a proposal to introduce a common EU-wide Coronavirus vaccination passport. The so-called Covid passports would permit those who have been vaccinated to travel freely within the European Union without the need for quarantining and testing.

The leaders of several European countries heavily dependent on tourism are pushing for Covid passports to be implemented with immediate effect. Others say that it is far too early to consider such a move, especially because the EU’s Coronavirus vaccine rollout has been dogged by delays and questions about the efficacy of certain vaccines, particularly in light of the virus’s new mutant strains.

The idea of Covid passports has also sparked a heated debate over government overreach and the constitutionality and ethics of vaccine-related discrimination. At the same time, some EU member countries have threatened to act unilaterally and issue their own Covid passports if the EU fails to produce bloc-wide certification.

In short, the Covid pandemic continues to expose fault lines within 27-member EU, which remains more divided than ever.

European leaders held a two-day virtual summit on February 25-26 to discuss ways to solve problems with the Coronavirus vaccine rollout in the European Union. The vaccine launch has been plagued by bureaucratic sclerosis, poorly-negotiated contracts, penny-pinching and blame-shifting — resulting in needless shortages of vaccines.

The European Commission initially recommended that at least 70% of adults in the EU be vaccinated by the beginning of summer. So far, however, the EU’s inoculation rate is still below 10% and the original goal will not be met until after the end of summer at the earliest.

At the current vaccination rate, the EU will not reach the 70% threshold — needed to reduce the spread of the virus, relieve pressure on health care systems, and allow restrictions on businesses society to be lifted — until March 2024, accordingto independent calculations.

If the present rates of inoculation do not improve, Germany will not reach the 70% threshold until May 2024; Belgium until September 2024; Denmark until August 2025; the Netherlands until September 2025; and Italy until December 2027, according to independent calculations. The delays will have a devastating impact on the tourism industry.

Tourism-dependent countries, including Austria, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Portugal and Spain, are urging other EU states to adopt Covid passports, which would be modeled on the “green passport” system implemented by Israel.

Israelis who have been fully vaccinated are given a Green Pass — a digital certificate — which is valid for six months and will allow them access to gyms, hotels, cinemas, plays, concerts, swimming pools and indoor restaurant dining.

Unresolved Questions

On March 1, the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, tweeted that “this month” she would present a legislative proposal for a “Digital Green Pass.” The certificate would provide proof that a person has been vaccinated against Covid-19. The aim is to “gradually enable” Europeans to “move safely in the European Union or abroad — for work or tourism.”

In fact, the 27 EU member states are nowhere close to reaching an agreement on common rules for a mutual recognition of vaccine certificates. Also unresolved are a host of constitutional, ethical, legal and scientific questions. The introduction of Covid passports also risks creating a market for forged documents.

The Royal Society, the United Kingdom’s national academy of sciences, recently issued a 22-page report — “Twelve Criteria for the Development and Use of Covid-19 Vaccine Passports —which may serve as a roadmap for countries both inside and outside the European Union.

The report concludes that although an internationally standardized Covid-19 vaccine passport system is feasible, much more time is needed to meet the basic technical and scientific prerequisites for such certificates to become reality. The report urges political leaders to exercise caution and consider the longer-term implications, especially regarding questions of government surveillance and constitutional rights to privacy.

According to the report, a vaccine passport must fulfill at least twelve requirements: 1) meet benchmarks for Covid-19 immunity; 2) accommodate differences between vaccines in their efficacy, as well as changes in vaccine efficacy against emerging variants; 3) be internationally standardized; 4) have verifiable credentials; 5) have defined uses; 6) be based on a platform of interoperable technologies; 7) be secure for personal data; 8) be portable; 9) be affordable to individuals and governments; 10) meet legal standards; 11) meet ethical standards; and 12) have conditions of use that are understood and accepted by the passport holders.

Professor Melinda Mills, Director of the Leverhulme Center for Demographic Science at the University of Oxford and lead author of the report, said:

“Understanding what a vaccine passport could be used for is a fundamental question — is it literally a passport to allow international travel or could it be used domestically to allow holders greater freedoms? The intended use will have significant implications across a wide range of legal and ethical issues that need to be fully explored and could inadvertently discriminate or exacerbate existing inequalities.

“International standardization is one of the criteria we believe essential, but we have already seen some countries introducing vaccine certificates related to travel or linked to quarantine or attending events. We need a broader discussion about multiple aspects of a vaccine passport, from the science of immunity through to data privacy, technical challenges and the ethics and legality of how it might be used.”

Professor Christopher Dye, Professor of Epidemiology in the Department of Zoology at the University of Oxford and co-author of the Royal Society report, added:

“An effective vaccine passport system that would allow the return to pre-Covid-19 activities, including travel, without compromising personal or public health, must meet a set of demanding criteria — but it is feasible. First there is the science of immunity, then the challenges of something working across the world that is durable, reliable and secure. There are the legal and ethical issues and if you can crack all that, you have to have the trust of the people.

“Huge progress has been made in many of these areas, but we are not there yet. At the most basic level, we are still gathering data on exactly how effective each vaccine is in preventing infection and transmission and on how long the immunity will last.”

The Reuters News Agency reported that there are still many unanswered questions about immunity to Covid-19:

“EU officials also point out there is no guidance yet from the WHO and EU agencies whether people who have received two shots of the Covid-19 vaccine can still carry the coronavirus and infect others, even if no longer vulnerable themselves.

“It was also not clear if people could be infectious having already fought off the coronavirus themselves, for how long they remained immune and if they too should get certificates.”

Professor Carsten Maple, a cyber security expert at the Alan Turing Institute, the UK’s national institute for data science, warned that criminals could exploit the demand from prospective travelers for vaccine passports:

“This really gives that kind of incentive. You’ll get people who’ve got these rights, especially if it’s mandatory. Other people will be excluded. People, where it is mandatory and really offers a significant difference, will be incentivized to create a market of forged documents.

“We know that in Israel they’ve made statements about anybody who tries to forge will face criminal proceedings and possibly be imprisoned. So, they really think that this is a risk that could happen.”

Maple also raised concerns over how a vaccine passport, once issued, could be revoked if medical evidence indicated that immunity was short-lived:

“What we need to do in dynamic environments is to consider: how can we revoke that certificate effectively? That’s a real challenge we see in security of systems very often. I think it’s very pertinent in this case.”

European Disunion

Portugal’s Prime Minister Antonio Costa, whose country currently heads the EU’s six-month rotating presidency, said that he wanted Covid passports to be in place by this summer:

“It is a document that, obviously, will greatly facilitate freedom of movement, will greatly help the functioning of the internal market and will, of course, help tourism to gradually recover….

“The ideal is that this green certificate is not a national certificate, but a certificate common to the whole European Union and that it is subject to mutual recognition.

“We are defenders of a European-wide measure and it is with this objective that…this document will exist by this summer….

“It is above all essential that the European Commission can have consolidated scientific information on the degree of immunization ensured by vaccines and also by the immunity granted through contraction of the virus.”

Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz tweeted:

“In consultation with other EU member states, we are in favor of a digital green passport, similar to the one in #Israel. This should offer the possibility to prove on the mobile phone that one has been tested, vaccinated or recovered. Our goal: to avoid a permanent lockdown & finally to enable freedom to travel within the EU as well as to visit events or restaurants.”

On March 2, Reuters reported that Austria and Denmark, chafing at the slow rollout of Covid-19 vaccines within the European Union, have joined forces with Israel to produce second-generation vaccines against mutations of the Coronavirus. The move will be seen by many as a geopolitical humiliation for the European Union, which is trailing far behind Israel’s “world-beating” vaccination campaign.

Adding insult to injury, Czechia, Hungary and Slovakia have broken ranks with the European Union and have ordered vaccines produced by China and Russia, even though the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has yet to rule on whether they are both safe and effective.

Meanwhile, Greek Tourism Minister Haris Theoharis said that Greece had reached a unilateral agreement with the United Kingdom, and that all Britons, whether they have had a coronavirus vaccine or not, will be allowed into Greece this summer. He explained that Britons who have received the Covid vaccine will no longer be required to self-isolate upon arrival, and those who have not been vaccinated will require a negative Covid-19 test before travelling to Greece.

Greece has already signed an agreement to admit Israeli tourists this summer who can prove their vaccination status with the Israeli digital certificate.

Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo argued that now is not the time to discuss a Covid passport. “It’s really not a good idea to start granting such privileges in this situation,” he said. “Certainly not because the active population, the people who travel, are barely vaccinated.”

Belgian Foreign Affairs Minister Sophie Wilmès warned that vaccine passports could “lead to discrimination between European citizens if there is no universal access to vaccines.”

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, in a February 25 interview with Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, said that Covid passports would be premature because data on the efficacy of vaccines is incomplete:

“First of all, it really has to be clearly established that people who have been vaccinated are no longer contagious. As long as the number of people vaccinated is so much smaller than the number waiting to be vaccinated, the state should not treat the two groups differently.

“When it comes to private contractual relationships, the state has little room to interfere. Overall, however, I am convinced that something like this must be widely discussed, certainly also in Parliament. If we have made a vaccination offer to enough people and some of them do not want to be vaccinated at all, one will have to consider whether there should be openings and accesses in certain areas only for vaccinated people. But we’re not there yet.”

The German Ethics Council (Deutsche Ethikrat), in guidance issued on February 4, advised against treating people who have already been vaccinated differently from those who have not. This applies to both rights and obligations, meaning, for instance, that mask requirements and social distancing rules should continue to apply to everyone.

The Council also recommended that government-mandated restrictions should be lifted for everyone at the same time — but not until it is proved that the vaccination program is successful.

Other European governments have taken a wide range of different positions on Covid passports:

• Britain is reviewing the potential to use vaccine passports as a means to reopen the economy. Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the review, to be delivered before June 21, will explore the “moral, philosophical and ethical viewpoints” on vaccine passports. He added that the UK “cannot be discriminatory” against people who are unable to be vaccinated.
• Bulgaria, where tourism comprises 12% of gross domestic product, is backing the idea of digital Covid-19 vaccine passports.
• Denmark is developing digital certificates that prove people have been vaccinated against Covid-19.
• Estonia is testing so-called digital immunity passports that collect vaccination data and enable people to share their immunity status with a third party, such as an employer.
• Finland is planning to introduce a coronavirus vaccine certificate. The certificate system would require a government decree, which is currently being drafted by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
• France says that it is too early talk of a Covid passport. Secretary of State for Tourism Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne said: “The idea of ​​restricting the movement of people to only those who are vaccinated is a debate that seems premature to us. You have 4% to 5% of the European population vaccinated, the most vulnerable and not those who spontaneously can travel. The fact of conditioning travel to the fact of being vaccinated is an ethical and not a small issue.”
• Iceland now provides Covid-19 digital vaccination certificates to citizens who have received two doses of the vaccine. Iceland, which is not a member of the EU but is part of the Schengen Area, will recognize vaccination certificates that are issued from any EU or Schengen country.
• Italy, where tourism accounts for 13% of gross domestic product, has officially been reticent about Covid passports. In a Facebook post, however, Italian Tourism Minister Massimo Garavaglia wrote that in principle he agrees: “The adoption of new European digital tools that document the state of health of travelers…will be crucial for the recovery of the travel industry. We must work together with our European colleagues in this direction. Vaccine strategy will play a key role.”
• Poland plans to provide vaccine passports to people who are fully vaccinated against Covid-19.
• Romania is opposed to an EU-wide Covid-19 passport for travel. Romanian President Klaus Iohannis said: “To use these certificates to divide the population of Europe in two does not seem like a good thing to me.”
• Spain, where tourism accounts for nearly 12% of gross domestic product, said that it would not take unilateral measures on Covid passports and would wait for European Union to set common rules.
• Sweden plans to launch a digital coronavirus “vaccine passport” by summer, assuming there is an international standard in place for the document by then.

Select Commentary

In an essay for the Financial Times, Melinda Mills, lead author of the Royal Society report on Covid passports,” wrote:

“Vaccine passports are essentially certificates that link proof of vaccination to the identity of the holder, a potential silver bullet to return to our pre-Covid-19 lives. Before the pandemic, the EU was working on plans for cross-border electronic certificates to replace the paper booklets that many travelers carry. At this week’s EU summit some leaders pressed for further steps towards coronavirus passports.

“But would these certificates only be required for international travel or could they be needed for getting a job, attending a football match, or buying some milk? …

“There is also the question of mission creep. Recall the UK’s early digital contact tracing app, which raised concerns about privacy, government surveillance and private sector data sharing….

“Credit cards and social media data hold a wealth of behavioral and location data, that companies regularly mine. With vaccine passports, it will come down to trust in government and that can only be won through transparency. There is a risk that the government expends time and money to create a passport system only to have the public recoil in horror.

“We also shouldn’t forget we are globally interconnected. When travel resumes, visitors and workers will cross borders and need global standards such the WHO’s Smart Vaccination Certificate. This could be a legal minefield of issues. Human rights and data protection need to be weighed against a duty of care and commercial freedom to act. Governments may make vaccine passports mandatory on economic grounds or to protect public health. Or they may decide to dodge that bullet but allow businesses to require them instead.”

In an essay titled, “No Jab, No Job,” Guardian columnist Gaby Hinsliff added:

“For weeks, ministers have been downplaying the idea of vaccine passports, which could be used to deny people who are unjabbed access to pubs, clubs, sporting or musical events, and potentially some workplaces. But this week brought a sudden volte-face. Now Michael Gove is to lead a review into whether they might be feasible, once all adults have been offered a dose.

“Presumably, it hasn’t escaped ministers that promising twentysomethings a summer of Reading festival and football matches and clubbing, but only if they take the vaccine, could powerfully incentivize the age group most likely not to bother. Although officially the cabinet remains open-minded, the education secretary, Gavin Williamson, admitted that he would ‘probably do pretty much sort of anything’ to go to the cinema or theatre again.

“The pressure group Liberty warns that vaccine passports could create a ‘two-tier society,’ where unvaccinated people overlap too closely for comfort with those who are already marginalised and discriminated against. Vaccine uptake is lower in BAME [Black, Asian and minority ethnic] communities, targeted by disinformation campaigns and often with good historical reasons to distrust authority figures, but also in poor white communities….

“Yet making freedom conditional on facing the needle takes us perilously close to the concept of compulsory vaccination, forcing anxious people to accept something they don’t trust or else go underground… hardly likely to reassure anyone whose fear of the vaccine is bound up with a fear of an authoritarian state.”

In an interview with Computer Weekly, cyber security expert Tim Mackey warnedthat technology is far from fool-proof, and that serious security reviews are necessary:

“Returning to a world where international travel and even air travel is once again commonplace is something we all want, but it requires far more than an app to be solved. Significant coordination between international entities is required to ensure that the data recorded by the app is correct and complete.

“Once in the app, the data needs to be verifiably secure and stored in a tamper evident form that itself can’t be modified. Building confidence around this process requires some of the transparency seen within open source software development, where skilled practitioners are able to review the implementation and configuration of the proposed solution.

“Mis-steps along this path could easily tarnish the reputation of digital health passports and form a setback to the return to a pre-Covid-19 travel experience.”

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/17131/europe-covid-passports

It is mainly migrants who are in the intensive care units in Germany as a result of the Corona crisis.

German daily Bild reported that the head of the Robert Koch Institute, Professor Lothar Wieler, recently had a conversation with a group of chief physicians. The subject of the discussion with doctor Thomas Voshaar, chief physician at the lung clinic at the Bethanien Hospital in Moers.

The doctor had compiled an internal evaluation of the months of November and December 2020 and the beginning of January 2021. This showed that over 90 percent of the intubated, seriously ill Corona patients in the intensive care units had a migration background. Internally, it was agreed to call these sick people “patients with a communication barrier”.

Wieler had already been aware of this problem. He responded: “I heard that too. But it’s a taboo. I tried to reach out to certain people. We must address this religious group through imams. The whole thing has huge implications for Berlin. That’s a real problem.”

Evidently, it is mainly Muslims who cannot be reached due to the “communication barrier” and the RKI boss has spilled the beans on this taboo subject.

In addition, Wieler spoke of parallel societies in Germany, with four million people who cannot be reached. The RKI boss literally stated: “And that’s crap”. Although this group makes up only 4,8 percent of the population in the country, it makes up 50 percent of the patients in the intensive care units.

Dr Thomas Voshaar has informed German Federal Health Minister Jens Spahn about this matter. “Everyone I spoke to, including Mr. Spahn, said: ‘OGottoGottoGott’ [Oh my God, oh my God, oh my God].”

As Bild learned from a government spokesman, Spahn did not find it necessary to pass this information on to the Chancellery. As a result, these patients were never an issue at the Chancellor’s Corona summits with the country’s health and political leaders. “OGottoGottoGott”, appears to have been the only political answer to this pressing problem.

This begs the question of lockdowns being exclusively designed because of the “patients with a communication barrier”?

One must bear in mind that the compulsory Corona measures are ostensibly imposed to avoid overloading the intensive care units. And now we are learning by the way that it is predominantly migrants who are admitted because of the pandemic, because the state is not in a position to make it clear to them how to behave. Instead they call it a “communication barrier” euphemistically. The better expression would be: “A resounding failed integration policy”.

Meanwhile Germans are locked up, businesses go bankrupt and senior citizens die of loneliness in old people’s homes.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/03/03/covid-taboo-90-percent-of-ventilated-patients-in-germany-have-migration-background/

The former chief of Swedish Security Service (Säpo), Malena Rembe, demands Sweden should “take home all IS Swedes”, in a controversial push to bring back terrorists and those tied to the IS group back into Sweden.

These include not only women and children but also men who fought for the terrorist organization, the Samnytt news outlet reported. Rembe is concerned about the safety of IS members because she believes they live in dangerous areas of the Middle East.

In her Sunday interview with Sydsvenskan, Rembe, who previously worked as counter-terrorism chief analyst, expressed her concern about the current situation in the Kurdish prison camp al-Hol in northern Syria.

According to Rembe, who herself has visited the prison camp and had conversations with IS women, it is an “extremely dangerous place” to stay. She, therefore, is appealing to the government of Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Löfven not only to arrange a return journey for children who have Swedish citizenship but also the remaining men and women.

“Al-Hol is an extremely dangerous place. There are plenty of firearms and knives. People get drowned. People get suffocated with plastic bags,” said Rembe.

Her proposal is in the same spirit as the scathing letter of the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin, to the government. According to the UN, Sweden violates human rights by not assisting Swedish citizens with leaving the concentration camp and returning to Sweden.

However, it may prove a tall order for Swedes, who overwhelmingly reject more immigration into their country. Even the pro-migrant Löfven has signaled that Sweden cannot take in asylum seekers at the same levels as the past due to integration problems and spiraling crime.

The former Säpo chief claims that the only way to stop the spiral of violence of Islamist terrorism is to take care of the people in an orderly manner.

Furthermore, she is concerned that the rule of law is not of sufficient quality, and there is a risk that suspected IS terrorists will get killed. Therefore, she wants the government to forget political prestige, stop worrying about losing voters, and instead “bring home all Swedes.”

“As long as they are in prison camps with other IS supporters, it can be life-threatening to distance themselves from IS. You can get murdered,” said Malena Rembe.

As a solution to the risk that IS terrorists will continue to pose a terrorist threat in Sweden, Rembe believes that they would have to be radicalized in the first place. Rembe has no suggestions on how to proceed in concrete terms but believes that the task is not impossible and that resources are required.

“It will stand out to people that you invest so much in these individuals. But then we have to think: If we do not do that, they can pose a much greater threat,” added Rembe.

Sweden should take in IS terrorists, says former chief of Sweden’s security service