Germany: African asylum seeker riots and injures police officers and insults them as racists – Finally he is allowed to leave the police station as a free man

The night before last, a police control in Bielefeld turned into a dangerous commotion. A police patrol had spotted a group of six people at Kesselbrink in front of a kiosk.

The Kesselbrink is known as a meeting place for the Bielefeld drug scene. Because the people were very loud and had scattered large amounts of garbage, the police officers wanted to check the personal details and asked the group to identify themselves.A 23-year-old asylum seeker from Burkina-Faso immediately reacted violently, insulted the officials and accused them of racist motives. After the man refused, an officer grabbed him by the arm for the purpose of a search. Thereupon, the 23-year-old began to resist violently and tried to beat and kick the police officers. During the scuffle, the rioter was brought to the ground and held. The others came threateningly towards the officers and shouted at them.The police officers called for assistance and used irritant gas against the growing group of people who were gathering and “approached the scene roaring loudly” (police report). As people came towards the officers armed with chairs, one of them drew his firearm.This calmed the crowd, which however continued to throw glass bottles at the officers. This also continued when a total of 15 patrol cars arrived to support their colleagues. Again, irritant gas had to be used against several people, as they ran resolutely and aggressively towards police officers.Finally, after one and a half hours, the crowd dissolved. The asylum seeker was taken to the police station to establish his personal details. Afterwards he was allowed to leave, at some point a procedure for resistance against him will be initiated. Two policemen were injured by bottle throws in the face and the arms.

nrwjetzt.de/nach-randale-in-bielefeld-asylbewerber-23-gibt-personalien-an-und-geht-nach-hause/

Austria: Gang war between Afghans and Chechens

Yesterday, Sunday, there was a violent clash between a group of Afghans and Chechens in the 21st district of Vienna. According to oe24 information, the authorities were called to the Prager Street around 8:18 pm because the two parties were clashing near a gas station. According to eyewitness reports, between 15 and 20 people allegedly beat each other. When the emergency forces arrived, some of the people involved fled by car.Four Afghans were still on the spot and, according to the police, showed clear signs of injury, suggesting that they had been involved in a previous beating. One of the injured is said to have suffered a deep cut on his fingers, probably caused by a knife. The group of men still on the scene was charged with brawling. According to the persons involved, they had been harassed and persecuted by the Chechen group some time before.It is suspected that the dispute could have been a possible rivalry between the two groups. The brawl is said to have been preceded by insults and provocations from both sides.An immediately initiated manhunt against the Chechens who had fled in a car failed for the time being. However, the Vienna State Police Department was confident that the suspects would be tracked down, as the incident was recorded by surveillance cameras at the nearby gas station.

oe24.at/oesterreich/chronik/wien/Bandenkrieg-in-Wien-eskalierte-Pruegelei-zwischen-Afghanen-Tschetschenen/432825760?fbclid=IwAR0WdYI5zFl7mEAn0vMNSSe3yJt0ubF5sqx4rUHoQexmwyd1FCQQKpS0ALg

Austria: Syrian recorded how he tortured a dog and posted it on the social networks

A video on Instagram exposed a 24-year-old Syrian from Linz as an animal abuser.

Several people had reported on Friday to the Lenaupark Police Department that the video showed a man who had tied the front legs of a dog and several sheep together and then beaten the animals. The Syrian could be investigated, the public prosecutor’s office in Linz ordered a house search. Here, the police found a spiked collar next to the dog, a Staffordshire Terrier. The dog was taken to the animal shelter in Linz. A laptop and a mobile phone were also seized. With this, they hope to find out where the sheep were tortured and whether the Linz resident has any other videos of animal cruelty.

krone.at/2168038?fbclid=IwAR2KlQ9YcrpEAygnlUGhMDGkZF3OzK6MpI3KqyIhGskKCVccXRixkpLqsHs

Sweden overtakes China in Covid-19 deaths but BLM riots in Gothenburg

China’s official death toll for Covid-19 currently stands at 4 634 for the entire country. Sweden is at 4 656 fatalities.

Critics say that comparing numbers may not be accurate, but the fact is that China has about 1,4 billion people, 140 times more than Sweden.

Even if some misreporting is taken into account, it is difficult to explain a 140 times higher mortality rate per capita.

The death rate is bound to spike too, after violent Black Lives Matter protests in Gothenburg and Stockholm, with mobs attacking the police, pelting them with stones and looting.

Despite the current restrictions on gatherings of more than of 50 people, some 3 000 protesters took to the streets in Gothenburg.

​According to the Swedish daily Aftonbladet, the rioters attacked a reporter. The police said many of the rioters were of immigrant descent.

“It is young people from the suburbs who take this opportunity and riot”, police spokesman Christer Fuxborg told the newspaper. “In our opinion, these are individuals who are here to destroy”, Fuxborg added. “Right now I don’t feel so proud to be a resident of Gothenburg”, he added.

“The only purpose, what I understand, is that they want to confront the authorities and deal out damage”, Fredrik Dahlgren of the Gothenburg Police said.

Sweden’s national broadcaster incredulously blurred the faces of rioters to protect their identity.

[Tweet translated: Do the police in other countries also back down for the mob in entire platoons, or is it part of the unique, Swedish model?]

[Tweet translated: Welcome to the multicultural Aftonbladet. This is what “racists” warned you about for decades. ¯ \ _ (ツ) _ / ¯]

freewestmedia.com/2020/06/08/sweden-overtakes-china-in-covid-19-deaths-but-blm-riots-in-gothenburg/

France: Post-Pandemic Disaster?

The coronavirus pandemic in the northern hemisphere seems starting to subside — perhaps just temporarily.

Many journalists wonder if Italy, one of the eight countries most affected in Western Europe, will leave the EU. Another country of concern is France — not in great shape.

Although France spends a significant amount on its healthcare (8.6% of France’s GDP), the pandemic there has been frighteningly mismanaged. There was a tragic shortage of intensive-care beds: 5,000 for the whole country, compared to Germany’s 28,000. There was also, until the end of April, a near-total lack of masks and protective equipment for hospital doctors and caregivers. Further, there was the great lack of an ability to test for the coronavirus. The situation led the government to decide on one of the strictest general lockdowns in Europe. For eight weeks, the French economy, like others, effectively stopped. The results were devastating.

France, before the pandemic, was already in an alarming economic state. For several years, the country’s economic growth rate had been barely above zero; the country’s central bank had lowered its growth forecast for 2020 to 1.1%. France’s unemployment rate was high (8.1%); it had not fallen below 8% for two decades. France was, in addition, paralyzed from any kind of growth by a proliferation of regulations and an omnipresent bureaucracy. The Index of Economic Freedom, published each year by the Heritage Foundation, ranks France number 64 , behind the United Kingdom (7), the Netherlands (14), Germany (27), and far behind formerly communist countries such as Poland (46), Romania (42), Bulgaria (37) or the Czech Republic (23).

France has now entered a deep recession. Economists anticipate that growth at the end of 2020 will be minus 8%. By comparison, the figure given for Germany is minus 6.3%. Many economists seem unsure if, in 2021, growth in France will resume at all. They say the country’s rigidities are such that for the country fully to recover, it could take a decade. Although the French government has not published any recent statistics on unemployment, commentators say that one out of two persons working in the private sector is now unemployed. Worse, as a large number of small and medium businesses have gone bankrupt during the pandemic, there is virtually no hope of seeing millions of jobs quickly recreated. Although the French government also has not published any recent statistics on poverty, an increase in unemployment is bound to go hand-in-hand with an increase in poverty.

Before the pandemic, taxes and public spending, the highest in the developed world, also further paralyzed France’s economy. The overall tax burden equaled 48.4% of the country’s GDP; government spending amounted to 56.5% of the country’s GDP. The country’s budget deficit was at least 3% a year. To cover its spending, the government, had to borrow; so the country’s debt continued to rise. In 2019, it reached 100% of GDP.

During the pandemic, like the governments of other European countries affected, the French government injected tens of billions of euros into the economy, but could rely only partly on the European Central Bank: it remains bound by drastic rules that limit its ability for quantitative easing. France consequently went further into debt; its obligations now are even greater. Financiers estimate that its debt, which has increased by at least 15%, will reach 130% in 2021. The French government cannot increase taxes unless it intends to go from recession to depression, and is unlikely to lower public spending during a time of increased poverty and extremely high unemployment.

France’s situation is all the more untenable in that for decades it has been a country of high immigration. France has accepted hundreds of thousands of newcomers — on average, 400,000 migrants annually. Most have no marketable skills and rely on welfare indefinitely. Among people living on social benefits, the proportion of first-generation immigrants is more than 20% — double the rest of the population. Even if the French government decided to put an abrupt end to immigration, the weight of unskilled immigrants already present in the country would not disappear.

A crucial factor for the country’s future, largely overlooked since the pandemic, is that most of the immigration in France since the 1960s has come from the Muslim world: France is now the European country with the largest number of Muslims in its population. Some estimates were that they consisted of around or 6 million people: 8.8% of the population of roughly 67 million. Other estimates spoke of 10% of the total population, or 6.7 million people. In addition, available data show that the birthrate in Muslim families is higher than in non-Muslim families, further adding to the social and economic impact of the mass-migration. Demographers project that by 2050, the Muslim population in France will double, or possibly increase even more.

Before the pandemic, integrating Muslims into the general population did not seem to be working particularly well. In a survey conducted for the Institute Montaigne in 2016, 29% of French Muslims questioned said that, “Islamic law (sharia) is more important than the law of the Republic”; 65% said that women should wear an Islamic veil and that women who do not wear one are “immodest”, and 24% said that modest women should wear the niqab, a veil that also covers the face. The figures for responders under the age of 25 were even higher.

No one is imagining that integration will suddenly work better, and the lack of it has visible effects. Muslim populations are increasingly living apart from the rest of the population. In Muslim neighborhoods, for instance, the lockdown was not respected at all. When journalists asked Muslims why they did not pay attention to the pandemic, they replied that Allah was protecting them and that the sickness only affected infidels.

In the 1980s, districts now officially regarded as “sensitive areas” (zones urbaines sensibles, or “no-go zones”) barely existed. Twenty years later, they have become areas where French laws rarely apply. In 2002, the author Georges Bensoussan, defined these areas in his book as The Lost Territories of the Republic. Three years later, the “lost territories” rose up in protest for three weeks and France seemed on the brink of a civil war. Calm returned only thanks to imams to whom the government ceded power. The government told them that the police would no longer intervene where Muslim populations live. In 2017, when Bensoussan published A Submitted France, he said that now the entire country was affected.

There are presently 751 sensitive zones in France. There, gangs reign and the law that is enforced is the law of Islam, sharia. Most of the non-Muslim residents have gone. Doctors enter these areas only under escort. During the last decade, several perpetrators of the jihadist attacks that struck France — and left 263 dead and many more wounded — came from these districts. More than 150 mosques there are run by radical imams who incite hatred without the slightest murmur.

Some recent books show that perhaps an exhilarating feeling of supremacy combined with a desire for widespread submission to Islam might be at work. Bernard Rougier, a professor at the University of Paris who recently published a book, The Territories Conquered by Islamism, notes that “Islamist ideologues are doing in France what they did in the Maghreb 30 years ago”. Many infiltrate political parties, various associations and sports clubs; make demands and intimidate; gain influence and are finally given their way. The lost territories of the republic, he says, are now “territories ruled by the Islamists”.

François Pupponi, the former socialist mayor of Sarcelles, in the northern suburbs of Paris, in his book, The Emirates of the Republic, speaks of a “process of colonization” — the creeping takeover of entire cities all over the country.

The police, during the pandemic, have been ordered to avoid going into the no-go zones. The government might have feared that if an incident occurred, riots could break out. On April 19, a young man riding a motorcycle at high speed hit the door of a police car near a sensitive zone in a suburb of Paris and was injured: for days, throughout the country, buildings and cars were burned.

The ubiquitous police checks during the pandemic seemingly forced many of the gangs to suspend their activities. The impoverishment of the country resulting from the lockdown will make drug trafficking less profitable. Police therefore expect in the months to come that the gangs might be more violent.

Social conflicts in France, always present, have become even more frequent since the beginning of the presidency of Emmanuel Macron. For years, almost all public gatherings have ended in riots, car burnings and store lootings. They are not a help.

The country’s longest strike in four decades ended the day the lockdown was enacted. For more than six weeks, the movement of people and goods was effectively impossible or extremely slowed. The uprising of the “yellow vests”, which began on November 17, 2018, before the long strike, lasted fifty weeks. Macron chose to ignore the claims of the strikers, and instead decided to crush the yellow vests movement by using police violence. Polls in January indicate that he has become the most hated president since the founding of the Fifth Republic in 1958.

When the general lockdown was officially supposed to end on May 11, the French intelligence services told Macron and the government that they feared a large uprising might begin going hand-in-hand with an explosion in gang violence.

Macron apparently then decided to keep the population under tight control. The French were not allowed to travel more than 60 miles from home (the restriction was lifted on June 2). They cannot leave the country without government authorization. Public gatherings of more than ten people are prohibited. Public parks, coffee shops and restaurants are still generally closed. In every city, the police are everywhere and visible. The country seems to be in a state of siege that cannot last indefinitely.

During the lockdown, a law was passed to fine heavily (250,000 euros, $275,000) any social network that published what a judge might consider “hateful.” People are also being asked to report to the justice department any suspicious statement they read or hear about. Since schools and high schools have reopened, teachers were invited by the government to listen to the conversations of their students and immediately to report any comment criticizing the government.

There seems no political solution to the situation. Macron, elected in May 2017 when the main French political parties had collapsed, used a fear of “fascism” to defeat Marine Le Pen, president of the rightist National Front party. Macron is unpopular and widely rejected by the French population. His approval rating, which never exceeded 31%, fell to 23%. None of the decisions he made ever stopped the country’s decline. The mismanagement of the pandemic in the country was appalling. Yet, he evidently still seems to think that by the next election, in the spring of 2022, he can defeat Marine Le Pen a second time — she will probably be his main opponent once again — and glide to an easy victory.

Recent polls, however, suggest that this strategy might not be so easy: it seems Marine Le Pen has been gaining ground.

The present situation, the columnist Ivan Rioufol in Le Figaro suggests, is the result of the “cowardice” of all of the leaders who have ruled the country for decades:

“At the source of French misfortune, there are French traitors who bear French first names. They have been abusing the voters’ trust for more than 40 years. They lied about the real state of society and ransacked the country”.

“A gunpowder smell spreads over the country,” wrote the essayist, Maxime Tandonnet. “Never since the Liberation, even in the worst times, has a team in power been hated so much. The vast majority of the people reject it to a point that is difficult to express. “

He added that he hopes “one or more heroes will emerge from the apocalypse”. At the moment, regrettably, no hero is in sight.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15720/france-post-pandemic-disaster

Former President Bush, Senator Romney, and Colin Powell Won’t Support Trump Re-Election

This is not your grandmas Republican Party, or your grandpas, or your second cousin twice removed’s GOP.

To say that the party has evolved under Donald Trump is stating the obvious. Those who have followed Trump have had no problems adapting to the new reality.

But for many old-line, “rock-ribbed Republicans,” Donald Trump has proven to be a bridge too far.

But that doesn’t mean Biden will automatically get their votes. There will be many who will stay home rather than vote to give AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren the reins of power.

It is said that former President Bush will not support Trump for re-election. The story, appearing in the New York Times, quotes sources close to the former president saying that he won’t support Trump in November and that his brother Jeb isn’t sure. The Bush camp is denying the story with a spokesman for the former president saying he “would steer clear of speaking publicly on his presidential vote and called The New York Times assertion false.”

Former chairman of the Joint Chiefs and Secretary of State Colin Powell showed no such reticence on CNN, saying “I cannot in any way support President Trump this year.” Powell did not vote for the Republican president in 2016.

And whither the other old GOP hand, Mitt Romney?

Fox News:

The New York Times, citing “people familiar with their thinking”, reported that Bush won’t support Trump’s reelection, and former Trump 2016 rival Jeb Bush isn’t sure how he will vote. Meanwhile, Romney will not vote for Trump, and is considering once again writing in his wife, Ann, or casting another ballot, the Times reported.

There is no love lost between the president and Mitt Romney.

Meanwhile, Romney was the only Republican senator who voted to impeach Trump on one of the two articles of impeachment — abuse of power. Romney has criticized Trump on a number of occasions in recent years.

A sign of how low the relations between Trump and Romney are came earlier this year when Trump was informed that Romney was in self-isolation because of possible exposure to the coronavirus.

“Gee, that’s too bad, Trump said, although he denied moments later he was being sarcastic.

As for Powell, when informed of Powell’s decision to back Biden, Trump called him “a real stiff.”

New York Post:

“Colin Powell, a real stiff who was very responsible for getting us into the disastrous Middle East Wars, just announced he will be voting for another stiff, Sleepy Joe Biden. Didn’t Powell say that Iraq had ‘weapons of mass destruction?’ They didn’t, but off we went to WAR!,” Trump wrote on Twitter shortly after Powell appeared on CNN.

Powell, who is the first African-American to serve as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and secretary of state, joined with other former military leaders who criticized the president’s comments about using US troops to stop unrest following the death of George Floyd.

If the presidential contest became a battle of who was the better name-caller, Trump would win in a landslide.

The effect of these defections — if you want to refer to them like that since they weren’t ever “supporters” anyway — will be cumulative. Trump doesn’t need these people to get re-elected, or govern for that matter. But if presidential politics is 75 percent perception and 25 percent substance, the perception of the president bleeding support over a period of time will be unavoidable.

https://pjmedia.com/election/rick-moran/2020/06/07/former-president-bush-senator-romney-and-colin-powell-wont-support-trump-re-election-n504338