Europe needs to change the definition of a ‘refugee’: opinion

The migration crisis in Europe stems from corruption and the radical policy of recognizing illegal migrants, criminals and supporters of Islamic terrorism as refugees.

This con has been simple enough. The corrupt media and politicians replaced the word “migrant” with “refugee”, an excellent form of slippery semantics that proved highly effective.

About a million of those migrants are illegals who paid thousands of euros to be smuggled into Europe. They are not fleeing war zones either. Many pass through Turkey and many other safe-haven countries on their journey to richer lands.

Once in Europe, most do not want to stop in Italy, Spain or any the poorer Central European countries. They want the benefits offered in Germany and Scandinavia, and that is because they are economic migrants, not so-called refugees.

About 90 percent of these migrants are Islamic men of fighting age who buy documents from 15-year-olds from EU clerks or corrupt criminal networks in their own country, which they then use to ask for asylum.

This and many other examples of corruption show that the current crisis cannot be solved in the manner Amnesty International is proposing.

First, it is necessary to create a new program to help real refugees, which which would focus on prepubescent children and their mothers. As long as there are women and children located in camps on European borders, help for men should be halted.

Fathers should be let in only if paternity tests confirm they are the parent. First, the mother and the children are permitted, while the man should remain at the border for test results.

Second, resources and logistics for helping refugees should be offered. Around a million illegals use support meant for real refugee women and children, yet politicians do nothing.

These fighting-age men should be deported and women with children should replace them. Then, Europe will show the world that it helps refugees, because today the image we have is of a Europe which only helps rich Islamists and rejects those who need aid the most.

Third, the definition of a “refugee” needs changing. Right now, opportunistic pro-migrant politicians and journalists use many definitions, usually what suits them best at the time.

Morality must be restored to these definitions and a “refugee” should differ from a “deserter”. These “deserters” constitute every man able to bear a weapon in a war zone. If a mother with children is fleeing a war, the husband should bring them to the border and then be turned back; maybe given a weapon to continue the fight.

The same goes for “asylum” pleas. If we are considering a male migrant from a country without war, we can only accept the citizens of countries with criminal regimes. If a state is friendly to Europe, then why should Europe fear sending him back?

When it comes to women, we should accept those persecuted for fighting for women’s rights.

European governments should unofficially support feminist networks working to change the attitude of many countries in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East and their oppressive policies towards women.

Often, these women are escaping real danger, so while Middle Eastern countries claim they are “searching” for the “runaway” mother who left her husband and took the children, in reality, Europe should be doing what it can to make sure these Islamists never find them.

rmx.news/article/commentary/europe-needs-a-new-migration-policy-and-fast-opinion

Coronavirus: Europe is the ‘new China’

The alarming fact about the high Coronavirus-linked mortality rate in Lombardy, is that it has killed more people in Italy than in China over the past week. Health officials are warning that limited resources to treat the severely ill could push the Italian death toll higher still.

Italian health authorities have confirmed that death toll has climbed 36 percent in one day, adding 168 deaths to bring the total to 631, while another 977 cases were confirmed, bringing Italy’s total confirmed cases to more than 10 000.

Italian government officials announced on Tuesday that payments on mortgages will be suspended across the country due to the health emergency, Italy’s deputy economy minister said.

Slovenia announced it would close its borders to Italy, joining Switzerland and Austria. Air France announced Tuesday evening that it would suspend all Italian flights between March 14 and April 3, becoming the latest airline to do so.

Denmark and Serbia joined in by cancelling all inbound flights from countries and regions hard-hit by the virus – including Italy.

In less than three weeks, Italy has gone from having just three cases to the biggest outbreak after China. And the data point to a troubling trend: Those infected in Italy appear more likely to die with the death rate in Lombardy at 8 percent.

CDC Director Robert Redfield told lawmakers in the US House of Representatives that “the US is beyond virus containment in some areas”. Also, Redfield warned that Europe was the “New China” in terms of the virus.

The EU Parliament has announced that it would suspend business indefinitely as local lawmakers around the continent test positive for Covid-19.

UK Health Minister Nadine Dorries meanwhile declared on Tuesday that she has tested positive for Coronavirus. She is the first MP in the country to be diagnosed with COVID-19.

Sky News reported that six people have died in the UK so far and there are currently 382 official cases, up 54 from Monday.

Austria reported 70 new cases of the virus on Tuesday, bringing the national total to 182, with 43 cases in Vienna. In the Czech Republic, Prime Minister Andrej Babis, who had called on Italy to close its borders, said all schools and universities will be closed while gatherings of more than 100 people will be banned.

The Spanish parliament’s lower house suspended all activities on Tuesday after a lawmaker from the Vox Party MP Javier Ortega Smith, was diagnosed with the virus, Spanish daily El Pais reported, citing sources from with Vox.

freewestmedia.com/2020/03/11/coronavirus-europe-is-the-new-china/

Will Europeans choose nations states in the end?

German media practices an enormous amount of self-censorship and policing of content to ensure viewpoints that do not breach the established boundaries of political correctness are not widely propagated.

There are now some that see this model of political correctness, which has served as the foundation of democratic political culture in Germany, has been taken to far and backfired.

The result?  Mainstream parties in Germany are hemorrhaging support, resulting in a dissolution of what has served as Germany’s political system for decades.

In a sign that some journalists and papers are beginning to challenge this policing model, one of Germany’s major papers, Die Welt, published a long interview with Matteo Salvini, the former Italian deputy prime minister, who is often seen in the European Union and Germany as the personification of populist evil due to his views and policy on the migration crisis and the eurozone.

His dismissal from power in 2019, a result of a coalition party political game in Rome, was viewed with relief in Brussels.

Despite their success at removing Salvini from power, the current political atmosphere in Europe is rapidly shifting, especially since a second migration wave crashed on Greece and the threat of an epidemic hit Europe’s economies, leading many to reevaluate just how useful borders truly are.

That is why the more figures like Salvini are heard, the more Europeans may start to warm to his viewpoints. In the interview, Salvini presented his evaluation of the situation in Italy, praised Putin and Orbán, defended his migration policy, called for the protection of Italian borders, and pointed to the need to reform the eurozone in face of a looming recession.

The most interesting part of the interview came down to Salvini’s unambiguous message that current events will lead to Europe to return to the old formula of nation states for its basic political and economic structure.

The times of optimistic faith in the domination of international structures and the overarching role of European integration are now behind us.

Undoubtedly, what is happening in Europe today has uncovered tremendous layers of fear and instability which will weaken the faith in the durability or even purpose of centralized and globalist structures such as the EU.

Naturally, people searching for security will hide behind their traditional nation states, especially if those states can better provide it.

While hiding behind their closed borders, will they also come to the conclusion, that further European integration is useless to them? The answer to that will come in the near future.

rmx.news/article/commentary/will-europeans-choose-nations-states-in-the-end

Meet the victims of Hanau, Germany

This is Ferhat Unvar, one of Hanau’s victims.

In this picture he poses with the “Tauhid finger”, popular with radical Islamists, in addition to the Jihad flag of the Al-Qaeda terror network.

“A lovable guy from Hanau”.

Meanwhile it has been discovered that all the victims, including the gypsy Melanie Kirpacz from the infamous Kirpacz Gypsy clan, had extensive police records.

Four of them were making a living from drug dealing. All politicians made little innocents out of them at the funeral service in Hanau.

A funeral service was arranged in a way that Germany has never seen before.

For each victim family 30,000 € of emergency aid was given, and further financial means were promised.

All the stops were pulled out, from honorary citizenship to the golden medal of honour awarded by the city and monuments. (!!!)

What about German victims of Merkel’s illegal “guests” ???

In not one single case of the German victims who were murdered by Merkel’s invaders was there even a single condolence from a politician, not to mention the fact that financial means were given to the families of the victims!

Sometimes individual murders were not even mentioned by the press and “swept under the carpet”.

Germany has finished !

Merkel’s globalist coalition opposes the majority of the German people, plans to take in 1,500 “unaccompanied minors”

Merkel’s globalist coalition has decided to take in 1,500 so-called “unaccompanied minors” and  “refugee children”, despite the vast majority of Germans opposing the plan.

Despite the people of Germany being overwhelmingly opposed to the plan, the German government still plans to move ahead with the plan and take in at least 1,500 “unaccompanied minors” and “refugee children”, regional daily newspaper Augsburger Allgemeine Zeitung reports.

According to the latest polls, only 39,3 percent favor the decision while 50,8 percent oppose it. When divided by party, the polls are even more striking,

Over 71 percent of Merkel’s CDU supporters are opposed to the idea. Over 75 percent of FDP voters oppose the idea while more than 95 percent of AfD supporters also disagree with the decision.

Only supporters of the Green Party, Left and Social Democrats view it favorably with over 68 percent, 56 percent, and 58 percent respectively.

Meanwhile, Berlin once more is talking about a European solution to take in migrants, following Erdogan’s offensive in Syria and his recent decision to open the Turkish border with the EU.

Pictures from the Greek border, however, paint a far different picture than that of peaceful refugees. Many violent attacks on the Greek border guards by aggressive, fighting-age migrants have been caught on film.

In the past, following the migrant crisis of 2015, so-called “underage refugees” often turned out to be military-aged men.

voiceofeurope.com/2020/03/merkels-globalist-coalition-opposes-the-majority-of-the-german-people-plans-to-take-in-1500-unaccompanied-minors/

Austria sends 2,500 soldiers to protect border, refuses to accept migrant minors

While Germany announced it will accept up to 1,500 children from refugee camps in Greece, neighboring Austria is opting for a much tougher approach to the threat of a new migration wave.

Not only is Austria not refusing to accept any migrants, but it’s also the first country in Central Europe to take such dramatic steps to fortify its border after deciding to send 2,500 soldiers to keep migrants out, according to info.cz

The new approach corresponds with statements of some Austrian politicians, which resemble war speeches. For example, at the end of the last week, Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz stated that he dreads a new migration wave, saying that he fears a “storm” or an attack on the border.

“Millions of people could embark on their journey to Europe if the Turkish-Greek border falls or if they get the impression that they will be able to pass,” said Kurz on Austrian state television ORF on Saturday.

To the Austrian chancellor, the current situation on the Turkish-Greek border is similar to the one from the beginning of the migration crisis in 2015, but with one difference.

“Today, the external border of Greece is protected,” Kurz said.

However, other Austrian politicians also appear to be in similar “fighting spirit”.

“We will not waver against migrants. We learned from the mistakes made in 2015,” said Klaudia Tanner (ÖVP), Austrian Minister of Defense at a press conference in Vienna on Sunday.

At the same time, she announced that the government is sending 2,500 soldiers as a preventive measure protect the Austrian border, which is three times the number guarding the border today.

Interior Minister Karl Nehammer (ÖVP) reiterated that, unlike Germany, Austria is not going to accept any child migrants from Greece, including those who may be ill or unaccompanied.

According to him, the whole leadership of the Austrian Christian Democrats (ÖVP) agreed on this. On the contrary, the government plans to help reinforce Greek border guards with additional Austrian units to protect Europe’s frontline.

“The exact tactics of the border guards must not be revealed. But we are in contact with the Greek authorities,” said Nehammer.

The Austrian interior minister is convinced that refusing to admit refugees, including children, and the fortification of borders do not contradict any human or Christian principles. Like some other Christian Democrats in the government, Nehammer argues that Austria was sufficiently involved in helping refugees in 2015, and now, others should get involved, including Muslim countries.

Five years ago, according to the interior minister, Austria received more migrants than the vast majority of other EU countries.

“We still have 30,000 unemployed asylum seekers to date,” Nehammer pointed out.

Surprisingly, representatives of the coalition partner of Christian Democrats in the Austrian government, the Green Party, did not comment on the migration issue. Many political scientists have expected that Austria’s approach to refugees might be the greatest “stumbling block” in the cooperation of these political parties. Yet, the Greens have offer practically no criticism of Kurz’s Christian Democrats over their migration stance.

Meanwhile, in Germany, Green Party politicians have not only called for the country to open its borders to migrants, but many within the party have said Germany should send ferries to Africa and the Middle East to transport migrants directly to Europe.

“If the #EU wants to remain committed to the European idea, then #solidarity is needed. Refugees on the Greek islands have to be evacuated. Germany should go ahead and also accept refugees from the European external borders. #Lesbos #Greece,” said leading Green Party member Michael Kellner on Twitter.

Green Party youth leader Tom Dzienus wrote, “I can’t say it enough, but especially now: Ferries instead of #Frontex! #Greece.”

rmx.news/article/article/austria-sends-2-500-soldiers-to-protect-border-against-migrants-will-refuse-child-migrants

Historical St. Pankratius Church vandalized in Gütersloh, Germany

Last Sunday afternoon, at about 03.30 pm, there was damage to property inside the church of St. Pankratius Church (photo above) on the street Unter den Ulmen in Gütersloh.

A witness heard loud noises coming from the church and thereupon noticed that already in the main entrance some property was devastated. Further inside, corner glazing was destroyed and an altar cloth and tablecloth were burned.

The witness also identified a 62-year-old woman who might possibly be connected to the crime. Investigations have been initiated and are ongoing.

presseportal.de/blaulicht/pm/23127/4542751

Europe Under Siege – Barbarians are storming the gates, but Europeans still won’t pull in the welcome mat

In 1683 a massive army of the Ottoman Empire laid siege to the Christian city of Vienna. After two months, an allied force that consisted of men from all over the Holy Roman Empire and from other central European states, including Hungary, and that was led by John III Sobieski, the King of Poland and Lithuania, turned the Ottoman soldiers back, preventing the potential Islamization of the continent.

In recent days, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, president of the Ottoman Empire’s successor state, Turkey, has unleashed thousands of Muslims, mostly young males of military age, upon the European Union, today’s not-so-holy but increasingly imperial reincarnation of the Holy Roman Empire. More specifically, Erdogan, in violation of an agreement with the EU that netted him billions, has allowed – and encouraged – these people, who have been routinely described in the Western media as “refugees” and “migrants,” to storm the border separating his country from the EU’s southeasternmost satrapy, Greece. Indeed, he’s lent them active support, providing many of them with free transport to the border, which they’ve attacked with rocks, “makeshift battering rams,” and tear-gas canisters (supplied by Ergodan) while setting fires and shouting “Allahu akbar!” Photos taken at the border underscore just how perverse it is to call these thugs “refugees” or “migrants.”  

Seems like old times. What’s different this time around is that whereas seventeenth-century Europeans understood that they were confronting, in the Islamic invaders of their day, an existential threat to their way of life, many of their descendants don’t seem to have a clue about what they’re dealing with. On Tuesday of last week, and again on Saturday, thousands of Germans, rallying in Berlin and other cities, demanded that the “migrants” on the Greek borders be allowed to pour into the continent and to find their way to Germany, if they wish, so that they can help form “a solidarity society” in which there will be “no more suffering.”

The youth division (CUF) of the Swedish Center Party sent out a similar message, calling on Europeans to “Open your hearts – and your borders” and let the hustling hordes “come here and become part of our society.” In the Swedish cities of Gothenburg (last Wednesday) and Stockholm (Friday), crowds gathered in support of open borders; the latter demo was organized by the group Feminist Initiative, which, in a show of goodwill, has apparently decided to overlook the tendency of Muslim male arrivals to treat their own wives like chattel and treat Swedish women like sex dolls.

It was only five years ago that German chancellor Angela Merkel made the fateful decision to allow into her country tens of thousands of Muslims who were said to be Syrian refugees. Then as now, the Western world’s mainstream media distributed images of suffering women and children (not a few of which were staged). Ultimately, it turned out that the overwhelming majority of the “migrants” were not Syrian families fleeing war but, yes, young males of military age from all over the Muslim world. Nonetheless Merkel’s action was applauded by many of her country’s citizens, who, desperate as ever to prove that they aren’t Nazis, gathered at railroad stations to welcome these aspiring malefactors and welfare recipients with hugs and kisses.

One consequence of Merkel’s irresponsible move was that upwards of a thousand German women were sexually assaulted by their colorful and exotic new countrymen while celebrating New Year’s Eve 2015-16 in the central squares of Cologne and several other major cities. That was a particularly tough night, but hardly a brand-new phenomenon in a continent where the last few decades of Muslim immigration have led to an ever-rising incidence of violent crimes and to drastic funding cuts in everything from education to health care in order to feed, clothe, and house the restive, and not especially appreciative, denizens of ever-expanding sharia enclaves.

A few of the would-be conquerors who are charging the Greek border are indeed Syrians. But most, as an article in the British Metro acknowledged last Friday, are from “other Middle Eastern states and Afghanistan.” (Plus Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc.) Have Europeans forgotten the lessons of the 2015 debacle? Well, some of them obviously never learned them in the first place: the CUF’s chairperson, Ida Alterå, who is all of 22 years old, has reportedly expressed the view “that the main problem of the 2015 migrant crisis was that Europe did not let enough migrants in.”

Stephen Erlanger of the New York Times, who is presumably somewhat older than Ms. Alterå, had an equally fatuous take on what he called “the mismanaged chaos of the 2015 influx of migrants and refugees.” While stating that that inundation “produced horrible pictures of dead children, masses of unregistered people wandering the roads, political divisions and a significant boost to far-right populism across the Continent,” Erlanger avoided mentioning that the tide of immigrants also led to countless rapes and other weighty challenges to European freedom and security.

Some European leaders have taken these challenges seriously by acting to protect their nations, but here’s how Erlanger characterized their moves: “populists from Viktor Orban in Hungary to Matteo Salvini in Italy and the Alternative for Germany party have profited from the chaos of 2015 and the influx of more than a million people, mostly Muslim. The populists have vowed loudly to defend European and national borders, and identity.” So it is that responsible attempts by leaders to protect their own citizens are reduced to cynical, self-serving, and probably racist political moves.

As for the Greek government, it’s doing its best to push back the barbarians at its gates. It has no choice. Greece is an economic basket case and has already been overrun with more Muslims than it can ever hope to handle. As Patrick Strickland admitted last week in a long report on the border crisis for the New York Review of Books (NYRB), Greece – which at first reacted with hospitality to the arrival of Muslim masses on its shores – has long since become a “refugee warehouse” in which the residents of some islands are outnumbered by the needy and raucous newcomers.

Nonetheless, all the usual suspects are savaging Greece for trying to save itself. Amnesty International has accused Greece of violating EU and international law by putting an emergency one-month hold on accepting new asylum applications. The UN High Commissioner on Refugees adds that Greece is in breach of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Human Rights Watch (HRW), maintaining that there’s “no legal basis or justification” for Greece’s stance, has called on the EU to “respond with compassion to the arrival of people fleeing conflict and persecution by putting their dignity and humanity at the center of its response.” And Edouard Rodier of the Norwegian Refugee Council has urgedEuropean countries to take in the Muslims: “Europe needs to take responsibility for what is happening now at its external borders. It cannot suspend people’s right to seek asylum.”

A few questions. If the governments of Europe are obliged “to take responsibility for” foreigners – most of whom, frankly, are healthy-looking young males  – what responsibility do those governments have to their own citizens – among them the elderly, the infirm, the women who are already scared to walk the streets at night, and the girls who are the same age as Britain’s grooming-gang victims? If the Muslims at the Greek border have a “right to seek asylum,” exactly what rights do the taxpayers of Europe have? Do they deserve the “compassion” to which HRW refers? Why should the “dignity and humanity” of Muslims from other continents trump the “dignity and humanity” of native Europeans? At what point in this decades-long Islamic tsunami will it be acceptable for the people of Europe to say “enough” without being called bigots?  

Strickland, in his NYRB piece, introduced us to two men, “twenty-five-year-old Omar al-Daloo and thirty-year-old Saber al-Kolak,” whom he met at a Greek migrant camp. Both were from the Gaza strip; both had left home with the goal of reaching “Germany or somewhere else in Western Europe”; and both “have wives and children at home, and hope that obtaining asylum will afford them family reunification.”

Strickland was plainly out to gin up reader sympathy for these gents and their kinfolk. But they’re not refugees. They have absolutely no right of asylum in Europe. They’re economic migrants, plain and simple, who seek to exploit the present situation in order to relocate their broods to welfare states that already are diverting too much taxpayer money to pay for the upkeep of alien freeloaders. The irony here is that the countries Omar and Saber are eager to fleece have already poured untold sums into their native Gaza, money that was intended to relieve poverty and that has instead been used for a range of other purposes, all of them nefarious.

“With everyone living on top of one another” at the Greek refugee camp, reported Strickland, “fights over food and water distribution and spots in the morning queue to see the doctor” have become “a daily reality.” Note to Strickland: people live “on top of one another” in a great many cities around the world without constantly resorting to violence. A day before Strickland’s visit to the camp, “some Palestinians and Somalis had clashed after a minor disagreement, over exactly what no one could recall. There were threats, stones thrown, knives pulled out, and several men ended up being carted off to the hospital.” Yes, by all means let’s throw open the gates of Europe for these delightful folks.

In a report published last Thursday, Marie Jégo outdid Strickland in the sob-sister department, waxing poetic about the “haggard eyes” and “drawn features” of the people she encountered at a migrant camp in northwestern Turkey. “Distraught, demoralized, they no longer know where to go….Their most ardent dream, to live a dignified and peaceful life under the European sky, was shattered.” Jégo’s piece appeared in Le Monde, the most prominent newspaper in France, where millions of Frenchmen can no longer lead “a dignified and peaceful life” because their rulers, without ever consulting them, have set their country on the path to becoming an Islamic dystopia.

On the same day that Jégo’s article appeared, a writer for the Swedish daily Aftonbladet also engaged in a bit of hand-wringing: “Who will take responsibility for these people’s lives and freedoms?” Let’s turn that question around: why is the welfare of everybody from everywhere on the planet the responsibility of Europeans? The Aftonbladet writer called it “absurd” to suggest that “Sweden has no more room” for migrants – this in a nation that’s on the brink of social and economic collapse because of the huge number of Muslim immigrants it’s taken in.

Not to be outdone, Turkey’s deputy foreign minister, Yavuz Selim Kiran, sent out a tweet on Saturday in which he compared Greece’s treatment of “innocent migrants crossing the border” to the incineration of Jews at Auschwitz. Yesterday, Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis was scheduled to meet Angela Merkel in Berlin. Meanwhile Erdogan was headed for Brussels to butt heads with officials of the EU, which disclosed yesterday that it might take in 1,000 to 1,500 children currently living in Greek migrant camps.

Is there any good news here? Just this: while Western European politicians, activists, and commentators keep virtue signaling, the leaders of the Visegrad countries – Czechia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia – have affirmed their readiness to help Greece guard its borders. On Sunday, Cyprus announced it would pitch in as well. At least one weekend report indicatedthat the EU, too, is prepared to take action on behalf of Greece; if true, this might mark a turning point. In any event, how appropriate is it people from pretty much the same places whose inhabitants defended Vienna in 1683 are standing with Greece in the year 2020? Somewhere up there, one likes to imagine, John III Sobieski is smiling.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/03/europe-under-siege-bruce-bawer-0/