Muslim exorcists kill 22-year-old Berlin woman – allowed to walk out of court as a free man

In Berlin, an Islamic scholar, a hodja and three other Muslims are on trial. They are said to have given salt water to a young woman until she died after an ordeal lasting several days. Background: The 22-year-old woman did not bear children to her husband for four years. The hodja concluded that she was possessed by the devil. And the devil was to be cast out with the “salt water cure”. This was reported in the “Bild” newspaper.

The hearing of evidence brought to light some macabre facts:

The husband, the parents of the young woman and the hodja guarded the 22-year-old alternately. Initially she drank the salt water, which damages the organs and the brain, herself. When she was no longer physically able to do so, the four defendants assisted her. The Hodja read verses from the Koran.

Every cinema-goer who has seen “Mutiny on the Bounty”, for example, knows that people die if they drink too much salt water. Moreover, the body resists its absorption. It takes a considerable amount of ignorance and criminal energy to torture a person for days and kill them by pouring salt water into the body. Anyone who assumes that a “salt water cure” is harmless and can cast out the devil is obviously not really mentally in the 21st century.The Berlin judiciary, however, grants the defendants a cultural privilege: All four are at large. Imagine the outcry in politics and the mass media if this were to be the treatment of German defendants suspected of having caused the death of a human being in a cruel way!

pi-news.net/2020/11/muslimische-teufelsaustreiber-toeten-22-jaehrige/

Prepping for the Riots

Just like during the worst of the Black Lives Matter riots, the plywood is going up over store windows in cities across America.

Well, certain cities. 

You’ll find the plywood being stacked in New York, Los Angeles, and Philly. In the bluest of blue areas. Despite all the harping on “right-wing violence”, there’s little question whom storekeepers are worried about. Yes some Boogaloo Bois, occupying the intersection between militant anti-government politics, the alt-right, apocalyptic cults, internet culture, and Black Lives Matter may have some minimal impact. And in a few places, Proud Boys may end up sparring with Antifa. But that’s not why all that plywood is going up.

And everyone knows it.

The Weimar America stuff is, at least for now, sideshow theater meant for Twitter and more obscure platforms. The fringe won’t feed large scale riots. Only the Democrat base that showed up en masse for the riots wrecking entire cities is capable of doing that kind of damage with the media acting as the cheering section for the rioters.

Everyone knows it, but few outside conservative circles dare say it.

Store owners, many of them Democrats, in New York, Los Angeles, Philly, and big blue cities, aren’t worried about mass riots by Trump supporters. They are worried that the anti-Trump Democrats (calling them Biden supporters would be misleading) will be so violently furious if Trump wins or doesn’t immediately lose that they will smash and grab. And they know that if these people win, the violence will continue. The plywood is also a vote. It may not be cast directly in an election, but it is a form of electioneering that makes the issue in the election abundantly clear.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2020/11/prepping-riots-daniel-greenfield/

This is also Chancellor Merkel’s responsibility: please resign from office, Mrs Merkel !

Austria: Unconfirmed reports that the Islamic State claims responsibility for synagogue attack

BREAKING: UPDATE – Attacker is said to have blown himself up with a belt of explosives – Terror attack on synagogue in Vienna – Shooting in the open street – Allegedly many deaths

Update: Meanwhile, the attacker is said to have blown himself up with a belt of explosives, reports Krone.at. However, several other perpetrators are said to be on the run. The police are asking the population to avoid the area on a large scale. There are already first reports that several people died and many were injured in the attack.

Terror attack in Vienna: The internal security of the Israeli religious community in Austria instructs all Jewish citizens not to leave their flats or houses.

Stopping mass immigration requires action instead of words, French author Laurent Obertone says

France needs action, not words, to stop mass immigration, famed French author and journalist Laurent Obertone said in an interview with Hungarian conservative daily Magyar Hírlap. In the same interview, he also warned that Central and Eastern European countries opposed to mass immigration must not give in to pressure on the issue.

“Unfortunately, we’ve been living with dystopia for years,” Obertone said. “On the one hand we have the good intentions of our leader [Emmanuel Macron] and the media, and on the other hand, the reality: terrorist attacks, increasing crime, unprecedented insecurity, and a lack of any sense of actual security.”

Obertone said that a few days before teacher Samuel Paty was beheaded in an Islamic terrorist attack, French leaders were still debating whether the use of the word “ensauvagement” (turning wild), often used to describe migrant crime, was too rude and racist, while in his books Obertone says he was pointing out that exactly the phenomenon that the country’s leaders refused to accept reality even though 250 people have been killed in Islamic terrorist attacks since 2015.

“It is time for our leaders to come down from their parallel world and deal with the facts. Instead of communication and the distribution of public funds, concrete steps must be taken against the mass immigration that our country has suffered for decades and is opposed to by much of society,” Obertone said.

Obertone is the author of the best-selling book “Guerilla” which describes a dystopia in the near future involving a civil war in France. The book delves deeply into current divisions that already exist, including between France’s left-wing groups, its migrant population, and French nationalists. The book, also popular in Hungary and Germany, has not yet been translated to English.

In his 2013 book “La France Orange Mécanique” (Clockwork orange France), the author uses media reports and crime statistics to report on the worsening of violence and crime in French society in the years between 2000 and 2010, which he points out is greatly tied to rapid growth in France’s foreign population. The author argues that the French state, compared to the 1950s and 1960s, no longer fulfills its duty to provide security to its citizens.

Asked about his country’s immigration and integration policy, Obertone said that both have failed. Obertone’s criticisms come at a time when critics of France’s immigration policies have even claimed that France is actively participating in population replacement that will result in ethnic French people becoming a minority in their country.

“We always see that the public is becoming increasingly impatient on these issues, so our leaders cannot proceed as if everything is fine with the migration system. But they fall into their own trap, as they prefer to comply with the media and Brussels, taking only symbolic steps,” Obertone said.

“These policies are mostly just words. We are talking about ‘restraint’, ‘regulation’, ‘assimilation’, but all these words have lost their meaning. We cannot assimilate the millions of people who come from a culture completely different from ours. What’s more, community redeployment typically results in locals being assimilated to immigrants in districts where they are already in the majority.”

Obertone’s comments appear to refer to ethnic French becoming the minority in certain neighborhoods, which has resulted in deep cultural changes, such as women being afraid to wear certain clothing out of fear, a phenomenon that has even ended in violence against women in many cases who disregard the norms in Middle Eastern cultures.

Asked what advice he would give to Central European countries opposed to mass immigration, he said they should stay the course no matter what.

“Consistently stick to the path they take, whatever it takes. Don’t give in to the blackmail of global progressivism, even as the pressure grows day by day. People are the soul of the nation. They must refrain from the insane ideologies that see them as enemies and bring nothing but chaos and division,” Obertone told Magyar Hírlap.

rmx.news/article/article/stopping-mass-immigration-requires-actions-instead-of-words-french-author-says

October Surprise: This Race Is Over

By Jerry Cave and Bill Thomas

We now know — thanks to October — who will win on November 3. The reason we know is found in early voting data.

October voting is no longer the exclusive domain of the Democratic Party. Both parties vote early and in ever-increasing numbers. Which makes the October vote an early “action report” on the election outcome that’s more reality based than the polls or the mainstream media.

Who you vote for is a secret. When, where, and how many voters cast their ballots is not. It’s data. In this case, data in its most meaningful form: the number of early votes by registered Democrats and the number of early votes by registered Republicans. 

Convincing the other party’s voters to vote for your candidate is a long shot.Getting your voters to turn out for your candidate is how elections are won. It’s called GOTV, for Get Out The Vote.

GOTV plus voter enthusiasm invariably equals winning results at the polls.

In the final weeks of the campaign, enthusiasm for Donald Trump, demonstrated at multiple daily rallies, has been far beyond what it was four years ago. Will enthusiasm help produce another winning voter turnout for Trump?

Spoiler alert: Data generated by early voting says “yes.”

To understand why history will likely repeat itself, it’s important to look at voter turnout in party strongholds, districts where support is expected to be high. The highest Democratic voting percentages are often in districts with large majorities of African-American voters. The black vote is a key component in the strategy of every Democratic election campaign, especially Joe Biden’s. Accordingly, black turnout provides the best way to measure enthusiasm for the Democratic Party’s candidate and ultimately to project a winner.

Take North Carolina. In 2012, black voter turnout for Barack Obama was understandably high. Black voters made up 27 percent of North Carolina’s total number of voters that year. In 2016, Hillary Clinton’s turnout among blacks in the Tar Heel state dropped to 22 percent. This year, with Biden running, North Carolina’s black turnout for early voting is 19.5 percent. 

Then there’s this: the black vote that is coming out is not all coming out for the Democrat. 

poll by the University of New Orleans of likely Louisiana voters reported that 28 percent of blacks preferred Donald Trump. That’s driven largely by black men, among whom Trump’s 43 percent edges Biden’s 42 percent.

Rasmussen national survey, reflecting the same trend, shows Trump’s approval among likely black voters at 46 percent. Approval does not translate directly into votes, but there is too much action — in the form of early turnout — behind that number to dismiss it.

In 2016, Trump asked African-Americans what they had to lose by backing him instead of his Hillary Clinton. Apparently, now they know. Under Trump, blacks saw record employment, the creation of economic opportunity zones, increased funding for black colleges, and the lowest incarceration rate for blacks since 1995.

If the most reliable Democratic voting bloc loses its enthusiasm for Biden, his chances in the South and elsewhere disappear.

Florida shows how that looks. Sunshine State Republicans outperformed expectations in early voting. Democrats are ahead in mail-in ballots, but not by the numbers needed to beat the GOP on Election Day when Republicans traditionally come out to vote in droves. 

Rasmussen’s Daily tracking poll found that by the end of October over 31 percent of black Florida voters said they would vote for Trump.

Trump broke through the Democrat’s Blue Wall defense in 2016, and now he looks like a serious threat to their Black Wall in 2020. Trump is still going to lose the black vote. He’s just going to lose it by less.

The question, again, is how many early-voting Democrats actually voted Democratic. Trump won with backing from Democrats in 2016. Why would they abandon him now?

Donald Trump has “overwhelming support among Republicans,” says Pew Reports. Biden’s support from fellow Democrats stems largely from their dislike of Trump more than an affinity for Joe. And Biden can’t attract a crowd much larger than his Secret Service detail. That’s certainly not true of Trump.  

In fact, there’s no better source of actionable data than a Trump rally, because everyone who wants to attend has to provide contact information to get a free ticket. The campaign then uses this data to turn every event into a force-multiplier. First, each rally reaches millions of voters live at the venue, on cable TV, and on YouTube. Then millions more engage on Facebook and Twitter.

After the rally, a campaign team targets those who attended with digital ads that recipients can retarget to their contacts as look-alike campaigns on social media.

The party also mines the same data for useful insights and information it can convert into turnout. Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDanielnoted that 45 percent of the attendees at an October New Hampshire rally werenot registered Republicans and 20 percent did not vote in 2016.   

Who would wait in line for hours to see a Trump rally in October and then notvote for Trump in November? It’s easy to predict there will be many new Trump voters this year in more states than just New Hampshire. 

In modern times very few vice-presidents or serial losers in primaries succeed in winning the White House. Joe Biden has both of those things going against him. And that’s before factoring in China/Burismagate allegations directed at him and his family, Barack Obama’s low-impact performance on the campaign trail and the anti-police riots in Philadelphia, all of which will help Trump.

Finally, there’s the matter of polling. Most polls are commissioned by media organizations that are openly hostile to Trump. Why should anyone believe them now making basically the same anti-Trump predictions that were completely wrong in 2016? 

One polling company, though, stands out. The Trafalgar Group accurately predicted Trump would win Michigan and Pennsylvania in 2016. Now Trafalgar forecasts Trump will take FloridaMichigan, and Arizona.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer could be more disappointed than Joe Biden on election night. Trafalgar has African-American GOP Senate candidate John James slightly ahead in Michigan. Trump may drag Sen. Martha McSally over the finish line in Arizona, and Alabama will return its Senate seat to the GOP. 

It’s also hard to see how a cresting wave of Trump enthusiasm won’t create a GOTV result that keeps Colorado Republican Sen. Cory Gardner in his job.

The bottom line is simple math. When you add the electoral votes from reliably red states to any breach in the Blue Wall, Trump wins again, possibly even bigger than he did last time.

That may not be the October surprise you expected, but then that’s why they call it… a surprise.  

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/11/october_surprise_this_race_is_over_.html