This caused quite a stir: In November, only one day after the Vienna terror, underage asylum seekers simulated a brutal execution for a video in the Pottendorfer Castle Park (Lower Austria). However, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution and the Public Prosecutor’s Office in the Vienna district of Neustadt cannot see any terrorist background in it. In their opinion, it was only a ” deplorable prank”.

Of all people, the Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) mayor Thomas Sabbata-Valteiner witnessed the horrific scenes that briefly turned Pottendorf Castle Park into a scene of execution in November. For video recordings, four underage asylum seekers forced another on his knees, threatened him with “headshot” gestures and all that in the middle of the Pottendorf Castle Park. The head of the village immediately filed a complaint.

Now it turns out that the investigation has been completed. A terrorist background could definitely be ruled out, according to the public prosecutor’s office. Therefore, no criminal offence has been committed. For them, it was a ” deplorable prank”. The asylum seekers themselves are said to have explained to the director of their asylum centre that the incident was a way of living out their culture. In their culture, it is perfectly normal for execution videos to be filmed.

People are familiar with the scenes of Islamist execution videos. While their victims kneel on the ground, the Islamists pose in combat suits with weapons upright behind them. Then they shoot their victims in cold blood “for Allah”.

These are scenes from a real IS execution video:

Back in 2018, a staged IS execution video caused a stir. Back then, children in Libya reenacted an IS execution. The “victims” kneel on the ground, behind them a child poses with what appears to be a weapon.

For the public and for Russia Today, there was no question that it was a re-enacted IS execution video:

The Pottendorf execution video of the young asylum seekers definitely has nothing to do with terror, according to the Wiener Neustadt public prosecutor’s office. The Office for the Protection of the Constitution had not been able to establish a terrorist background.

For the public prosecutor’s office, this is a ” deplorable prank”:

For Freedom Party leader Norbert Hofer, on the other hand, the matter is quite clear. He explains: “Austria must not tolerate such a development. Today’s amateur actors are tomorrow’s dangerous people. If young people are so attached to their cultural achievements like executions, then they should be asked to return to their homeland. Such world views are not compatible with the culture of our homeland Austria.”

https://www.wochenblick.at/hinrichtungsvideo-fuer-staatsanwaltschaft-kein-terror-nur-ein-streich/

“Generation Identitaire is securing the border” to confront “the rise of the Islamist threat and the massive arrival of illegal migrants”, a press release published on Jan. 18 by the French Identitarian youth organization explained.

Last week, some 30 young Identitarian activists from Génération Identitaire launched a new “Defend Europe” mission at the Col du Portillon pass in the Pyrenees mountains, at the border with Spain. On Jan. 5, Prefect Étienne Guyot, who is the French government’s direct representative in the department of Haute-Garonne, announced that he had ordered the closure of the border at the Col du Portillon mountain pass because of the “terrorist threat which remains very high at national level” and of “sustained movements of migrants”.

On Jan. 18, French Identitarian activists embarked on an action with the goal to check whether the border had really been shut down at the mountain pass as Guyot claimed.

Generation Identitaire’s action in the Pyrenees was accompanied by three pick-up cars and manned with French activists only. It was very similar to the previous “Defend Europe” mission launched in April 2018 at the Col de l’Echelle pass in the Alps at the border between France and Italy, but the action was more low-key as they did not use a helicopter this time and were not joined by Identitarian activists from other European countries due to current health restrictions on international travel.

For that reason, their action did not unleash nearly as much anger in the media and among mainstream politicians as in April 2018, but there were still some decrying the action, including the Occitanie region’s socialist president, Carole Delga, and the Haute-Garonne department’s socialist president, Georges Méric. Méric demanded that the French prefect “decisively and immediately put an end to such an act of force as it is disgraceful and contrary to the values of the Republic”.

Reacting to those appeals from local political leaders, prefect Guyot informed that he was going to bring the case to court.

“We cannot be easily intimidated,” young Identitarian leader Thaïs d’Escufon told Remix News on the phone when asked this Monday if they fear a new judicial process. And she added that having won their appeal last Dec. 16 after two and a half years of proceedings for their 2018 action in the Alps, the risk of being prosecuted by the French state is now lower.

As a matter of fact, the young woman told Remix News that when activists from Génération Identitaire arrived at the border at the Col du Portillon pass on Jan. 18, there was not a single border control enforcement officer in sight in spite of the prefect’s order to shut down this part of the border with Spain and to ban all car and pedestrian traffic through the pass.

The Col du Portillon is a regular route used by illegal immigrants traveling from Spain further north into Europe, and with the Spanish government actively transferring migrants from the Canary Islands and setting them free on the mainland, there have been increased numbers of such migrants illegally crossing the border in the Pyrenees lately.

As Thaïs told Remix News, gendarmerie forces showed up only to observe what Identitarian activists were up to, but they had to take a few migrants into custody when the young civilian French citizens notified them of their whereabouts. She could not say, however, whether those illegal immigrants were later expelled back to Spain or released by French authorities and allowed to move about freely.

Génération Identitaire had nonetheless announced that their intention was not to catch migrants at the border themselves, which they are not allowed to do under French law, but to contact police and gendarmerie forces “to allow them to intercept and expel illegal immigrants”. In theory, this is what any citizen is supposed to do when confronted with a situation where someone is breaking the law, as migrants do when illegally crossing the border. That is why Generation Identitaire’s indiciates that that its latest “Defend Europe” mission, which ended last Wednesday, was success, as the team of activists says it lays bare the fact that the prefect’s order to control the border with Spain to stop potential terrorists and other illegal immigrants was only a public relations ploy by the French government and was still not in force on the field almost two weeks later.

In France, prefects are the government’s direct representatives in departments and as such they are responsible for executing the government’s orders. But instead of trying to control illegal immigration as it said it would finally start doing after the terrorist attack by a Muslim boat migrant freshly arrived from Tunisia through Italy last October, the French government has been looking for ways to criminalize the entire Génération Identitaire movement.

During a press conference held on Jan. 26, Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin announced that he had asked his ministry “to gather all elements which would allow the interior minister to propose the dissolution of Génération Identitaire”, explaining he had been “particularly outraged” by Génération Identitaire’s action in the Pyrenees and by the way young Identitarian activists “undermine the Republic”.

The fact that the activists’ most recent action helped reveal a government that was not delivering on its promises of border security, there are worries that these attempts to silence the Génération Identitaire organization represent a threat to rule and law and repression of political groups critical of the government. 

French Identitarians’ new ‘Defend Europe’ mission sparks government anger after revealing total lack of border security with Spain

The bus on route 71 had almost reached its destination when the attack began. According to witnesses, on July 6, 2020, the attacker stabbed a woman several times with a kitchen knife shortly before reaching Obergünzburg in the Ostallgäu district until he was overpowered by the bus driver. The victim died, several pupils witnessed the crime. Since Tuesday, the victim’s husband has had to answer for the murder of the 27-year-old woman before the Kempten Regional Court. If convicted, he faces life imprisonment. The accused remained silent at the start of the trial. The prosecution accuses him of having planned the crime and of having carried it out insidiously – out of revenge for a supposed humiliation (Ref.: 210 Js 12078/20).

According to the report, the 38-year-old Afghan had previously physically abused his wife and children. In November 2019, he had, among other things, thrown a dish at his daughter’s head after she had, in his view, arrived home too late. When his wife intervened, he had hit her several times – and had already threatened the daughter that he would stab her mother.

When the wife and their children lived separately from the accused and ordered a ban on contact for her husband, he had developed a ” big grudge”, according to the prosecution. He was angry that he could no longer fulfil the role of head of the family. The man feared that he would lose reputation in the Afghan community in Obergünzburg.

These accusations were substantiated by a girlfriend of the victim. She testified in court that the accused had often been jealous of his wife and had “suspected” her of talking to other men. In addition, he had repeatedly abused and threatened her. Among other things, he had told their children that he would “make mincemeat” of her.

As a result, the woman was often afraid, the witness said. She had therefore taken a longer way to the bus to wait at a bus stop where there were more people around. The two women had recognised the accused during the bus ride to Obergünzburg on their way back from the German language class in Kempten, but the attack itself had still surprised her.

According to the prosecution, this was exactly why the accused planned an attack in public: he had assumed that the woman would feel safe on the bus. Several passengers testified in court that the attack came from behind and without warning. “She had no chance,” said a student who had witnessed the attack.

According to several passengers, the attack was only stopped when the bus driver intervened. The 31-year-old overpowered the attacker and threw him out of the bus, he said. His victim, however, was no longer responsive at the time.

According to the autopsy report, the woman died very quickly as a result of several of the eleven stab wounds. Among other things, one of the knife wounds severed the right ventricle, and the lungs, liver and diaphragm were also hit.

The resuscitation initiated at the scene of the crime was “hopeless”, said a forensic doctor. The woman’s heart had probably already stopped beating while the attacker was still stabbing her. However, no injuries caused by the woman’s defence had been found.The woman’s husband was arrested by the police after a short escape and has been in custody since July 2020. According to the Kempten Regional Court, a verdict in the murder trial against him is expected in mid-February.

https://www.fnp.de/welt/prozess-in-kemptentoedliche-messerattacke-in-linienbus-zr-90180576.html?fbclid=IwAR0hc5CjSShFPuSLJeQR7sNUxj4YothsvUEuMp7mcrwLKpSuVk5yEyus85U

Joe Biden removed the bust of Winston Churchill from the Oval Office. Predictable, as was the fact that he would put Latin leader Cesar Chavez, Martin Luther King Jr., Robert F. Kennedy, Rosa Parks and Eleanor Roosevelt in his place. Upon his arrival in the White House, Barack Obama was the first to remove Churchill’s bust, but Donald Trump had replaced it.

“The Oval Office is the President’s private office and it is up to him to decorate it as he wishes,” a spokesman for Downing Street said with Englsh forebearance. Quite right. But something about his choices, not just his aesthetic ones, tells us about him.

In 2016, then London Mayor Boris Johnson said of Obama: “Some said it was a symbol of the part-Kenyan president’s ancestral dislikeof the British empire – of which Churchill had been such a fervent defender”. Obama replied that there are “so many tables where you can put busts, otherwise it starts looking a little cluttered”. Not exactly a certificate of esteem for Churchill.

Jeremy Corbyn’s number two and shadow chancellor John McDonnell also called Churchill a “villain”. Last summer, in the wake of riots by Black Lives Matter, the movement that the Democrats and Kamala Harris have supported, Churchill’s monument in London was vandalized and the British authorities were forced to cover it from public view.

Why do they hate Churchill so much?

Let us go back to the period before and during WWII: The sickly Neville Chamberlain had lost the confidence of the English people. His appeasement of Hitler and the first nine months of the war were dooming Britain and all of Europe to defeat. Churchill was asked to become prime minister the day Hitler conquered France, Belgium and Holland, which collapsed within weeks. But today Churchill is attacked as a “symbol of colonialism”.

It is not just a bust. Multiculturalism, with its profound vocation for surrender and moral relativism, has transformed Western culture, of which Churchill was one of the greatest expressions in a moment of crisis, into something to be ashamed of.

A few hours after removing Churchill’s bust, the White House’s contact form added a drop-down menu with pronoun options, including “she/her,” “he/him,” and “they/them”. Users can also select “other,” and write in their own selections or indicate they “prefer not to share” their pronouns. It is Biden’s final surrender to a toxic and ridicolous gender dictatorship.

“There are so many tables where you can put busts, otherwise it starts looking a little cluttered”. This is how the West looks with the Democrats in charge. As Churchill said, it is our “darkest hour”.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/295563

Geert Wilders called on Prime Minister Mark Rutte to send in the army after riot police faced immigrant violence rocking the Netherlands for a third night following the introduction of a curfew to try to stop the spread of Coronavirus.

“The scum – often immigrant – is destroying our country. They have nothing to do with the Netherlands. They do not share our values. Stop this and act Prime Minister Rutte before this violence becomes half a civil war. Stop it now. Deploy our army. Now,” Wilders tweeted after shocking images of Moroccans attacking a police vehicle surfaced on social media.

Wilders also retweeted a comment noting the almost exclusive presence of Moroccans in the rioting, as FWM reported, the first news source to do so.

“The vast majority were of immigrant descent,” shop owner Robert van Ewijk told Dutch daily De Telegraaf. He saw how molotov cocktails and pig carcasses were thrown through broken store windows.

Riot police were called out across the Netherlands as rioting continued for third night following the introduction of a curfew to try to stop the spread of Coronavirus. Some 151 people were arrested, police said. Police chief Willem Woelders told current affairs programme Nieuwsuur: “Things were relatively quiet until 7:30pm, but then all hell broke loose.”

In Haarlem and Rotterdam extra riot police were drafted in, Woelders said. In Amersfoort, fireworks were thrown at police and there were also problems in Den Bosch, where a group of up to 150 Moroccans had gathered in defiance of the 9pm curfew, and a Jumbo supermarket was looted.

In Rotterdam, mayor Achmed Aboutaleb had to evoke his emergency powers to call in riot police with water cannons after trouble broke out in the south of the city. There were some 60 arrests. RTV Oost reported that mobs were running through the centre of Zwolle and there were renewed clashes with police in the north of Helmond. In Amsterdam, there were at least nine arrests after riots erupted in the east of the city and in Gouda, the mayor also had to evoke his emergency powers after several cars were set on fire.

There were several arrests in Geelen, in Limburg, including minors, police said.

Prime minister Mark Rutte said 99 percent of people were complying with the stricter new rules, including the 9pm curfew that came into force on Saturday. He singled out the vandalism in Amsterdam and Eindhoven, as well as Enschede where a hospital building came under attack, for special condemnation. “Any normal person will look at this with disgust and ask themselves what possessed these people. This has nothing to do with protesting: it is criminal violence and that is how we will treat it.”

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/01/26/wilders-calls-on-government-to-send-in-the-army-to-quell-immigrant-unrest/

The riot at the Capitol Building was less than three weeks ago, but it’s never too soon to start assigning blame. A bunch of those cuck RINO traitors want to blame Trump just because he held a rally to complain that the election was being stolen from him and then, purely by coincidence, it turned into a deadly riot. (We still don’t know who murdered Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick by smashing him in the head with a fire extinguisher. Probably an Antifa infiltrator, right?) And the media and their fellow Democrats want to blame the same people they always blame whenever something goes wrong: anybody who disagrees with them about anything, ever.

Social media has given millions of Americans a chance to make their voices heard, but those voices often annoy Jake Tapper and Brian Stelter. So, what’s to be done? In the case of the purportedly right-wing social media service Parler, our moral, ethical, and intellectual betters all agree that we’re all better off without it. They say it’s good that Parler has been shut down in the wake of the Capitol riot, because the wrong sorts of people were gathering there. Undesirables. Deplorables. Nobodies, or at least nobody who would ever even want a job at CNN or the New York Times.

But is it really fair to lay all the blame on Parler?

Brooke Singman, Fox News:

Republicans on the House Oversight Committee said any potential FBI investigation into the “role” Parler played in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot “should include” Facebook and Twitter, calling the recent request for an FBI probe from committee Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney “evidence” of the “growing alliance between Big Tech and Democrats.”

Committee Ranking Member James Comer, R-Ky., and GOP Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., penned a letter to Maloney, D-N.Y., on Monday after she requested that the FBI investigate Parler’s “role” as a “potential facilitator” of planning or inciting the violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6.

“Like you, we were disturbed and angered by the riot and we believe those responsible should be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law,” they wrote. “But casting blame on a single social media company known for its conservative username while simply ignoring other social media companies known for sympathizing with liberal causes is blatantly and overtly partisan…”

“A cursory search of other social media platforms yields identical, disturbing posts, from across the political spectrum, advocating for a wide swathe of positions, demonizing an equally diverse group of people,” they wrote, pointing to posts found on Facebook and Twitter.

Of course, accusing the Democrats of being blatantly and overtly partisan is like complaining that a creature that has fins and breathes water is blatantly and overtly piscatory. It’s just part of the package.

If you’ve ever spent more than five minutes on any social media platform ever created, you’ve probably seen something you didn’t like. I sure have! That’s why social media created functions like “muting” and “blocking” and “scrolling past stuff that makes you angry.” If you see something that offends you, then you can take some personal responsibility and do something about it. If you see something that you know is false, you can tell the truth about it. Which is almost always futile, but you have that option. You can control your online experience. You don’t need somebody else to do it for you.

Did people use Parler to communicate with each other during the Capitol riot? Probably. It’s tough to tell now, because the whole thing has been taken down. Did people use Twitter and Facebook and other social media platforms to do the same thing, on January 6 and many times before? Definitely. Hell, people have been livestreaming themselves committing violent crimes for years now. Is that Facebook’s fault?

Taking down an entire platform just because some people misused it… where does that end?

The same way it always ends, of course. The wealthy and powerful get away with it, and the rest of us don’t. Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey will be just fine. The guys who run Parler? Not so much.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/jim-treacher/2021/01/25/house-gop-if-the-fbi-is-investigating-parler-for-the-capitol-riot-lets-include-facebook-and-twitter-n1409462