In the early morning of Shrove Monday a 42-man, of Iraqi origin, is said to have killed his wife (30 years old) in Dortmund.

When his wife was discovered by the police in an apartment in downtown Dortmund, the officers soon assumed that she had been killed. The husband was arrested on the spot. Now terrifying further information about the suspected perpetrator’s past became known.

The autopsy of the woman’s body already revealed in February that the “30-year-old Iraqi woman died due to massive violence against her neck. At the scene of the crime, the husband, in response to a question from investigators, said his wife had tried to take his children away. Since then, however, the 42-year-old has remained silent on the case, reports the newspaper “WAZ”.

The couple had married in Iraq in 2011 and had given birth to four children there. In 2017 the family moved to Stolberg near Aachen. They lived in Germany with a temporary residence permit until the end.The 42-year-old had already become violent towards his wife in the past. She and her children first fled to a women’s shelter. They then moved into the apartment on the street Viktoriastraße in Dortmund. According to “WAZ”, the 30-year-old voluntarily hosted her husband again only a few weeks before the crime.

In the meantime, it has become known that the Iraqi has apparently already committed another murder. The mother of four was his second wife. He is said to have killed his first wife in the Netherlands. There he was even in prison before he married the second wife.

Since his arrest, the man is now in custody. He is represented by a lawyer. There is no date set for the trial yet.

derwesten.de/staedte/dortmund/dortmund-mann-toetet-ehefrau-30-jetzt-kommt-auch-noch-das-raus-id229264258.html?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=share&fbclid=IwA

The domestic intelligence agency for the city-state of Hamburg in Germany announced on Friday that there are 50 Hezbollah members in Hamburg and roughly 30 Hezbollah-affiliated associations spread across Germany, JPostreported.

The number of Hezbollah members increased from 30 in Hamburg in 2018 to 50 in 2019 said the new 313-page intelligence report that covers a wide range of threats to Hamburg’s democracy and constitutional system.

The intelligence officials said that “the reason for the clear increase [of Hezbollah operatives] in comparison to last year is the intensive intelligence of the domestic intelligence service, especially in the internet.”

The report noted that “in Hamburg there are roughly 50 Hezbollah supporters who consort… at the Islamic Center Hamburg as well at the Imam Ali Mosque.”

Both the Islamic Center and the Imam Ali Mosque are owned by Iran’s regime and serve as the long arm of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran Ali Khamenei.

The Hezbollah supporters participate in religious services on Friday and other religious events at the Islamic Center Hamburg and the Imam Ali Mosque, according to the Hamburg report.

The German Interior Ministry last month issued a federal order outlawing Hezbollah in Germany, and also took enforcement measures under the provisions of the order.

The order prohibits any contact with members of the organization and does not differentiate between its various arms – military, political or social. According to the order, any use of the organization’s symbols and the organization’s assets in Germany, if any, would be banned.

Israel’s Kan 11 News later reported that Germany received intelligence informationfrom Israel that helped formulate the declaration that Hezbollah will be outlawed.

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah condemned Germany’s ban on his group, calling the German decision a “political decision that reflects Germany’s submission to America’s will and to pleasing Israel.”

In 2013, the European Union blacklisted Hezbollah’s “military wing” as a terrorist organization, while failing to blacklist the group’s political arm.

In March of 2019, the British government designated Hezbollah as a terrorist organization. Earlier this year, Britain’s finance ministry added the entire Hezbollah organization to its list of terrorist groups subject to asset freezing.

There are an estimated 1,050 Hezbollah members in Germany, according to German intelligence. The Hezbollah operatives raise funds, recruit new members, promote the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions campaign against Israel, and spread jihadi ideology.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/281413

President of Minneapolis Police Officers Federation Bob Kroll says that people should remember George Floyd’s “violent criminal history”, including a home invasion that involved pointing a gun at a woman which resulted in five-year prison sentence. Kroll called protests over Floyd’s death the work of a terrorist movement.

“What is not being told is the violent criminal history of George Floyd. The media will not air this,” Kroll wrote in a letter addressed to his members that was published on Twitter on Monday.

George Floyd was sentenced to five years in prison in 2009 for an assault and robbery committed two years earlier. He was convicted after pleading guilty to entering a woman’s home and jabbing a gun in her stomach while searching for money and drugs, according to court documents.

According to the court report, the victim said the largest member of the group, who she identified as Floyd, “forced his way inside the residence, placed a pistol against the complainant’s abdomen, and forced her into the living room area of the residence.”

“This large suspect then proceeded to search the residence while another armed suspect guarded the complainant, who was struck in the head and sides by this second armed suspect with his pistol while she screamed for help.”

Floyd, who was accompanied by five other men, never found any money or drugs, but took jewelry and the victim’s cell phone. A neighbor who observed the robbery occur wrote down the license plate number of the perpetrators.

Even before that, he had been convicted of a range of charges from armed robbery to drug possession, the Daily Mail reported.

“This terrorist movement that is currently occurring was a long time build up which dates back years,” Kroll said in his letter.

According to him, some of the city’s issues exist because Minneapolis leaders “have been minimizing the size of our police force and diverting funds to community activists with an anti-police agenda.”

“Our chief requested 400 more officers and was flatly denied. This is what led to this record-breaking riot,” he added.

“I’ve worked with the four defense attorneys that are representing each of our four terminated individuals under criminal investigation, in addition with our labor attorneys to fight for their jobs. They were terminated without due process,” Kroll wrote.

In his letter, he also explained why the police department was not more vocal in the press. According to him, it would have a negative impact on the work and safety of police officers.

“I’ve been a visible target from the groups conducting this riot, politicians on the left allowing it and encouraging it, and liberal media. My visibility during this time would only increase your danger. I’ve received countless death threats throughout this.“

“We see the heroic work being done. We acknowledge it and commend you for it,” he said, telling his co-workers to stay safe.

Many have pointed to the massive loss in black lives directly due to riots and looting and have asked why David Dorn, the elderly black man and retired St. Louis police captain who was shot and killed on videowhile protecting his friend’s pawn shop during the riots, has not received nearly the same media attention and support from the Black Lives Matter movement.

Other black males, such as 53-year-old Federal Protective Services officer Dave Patrick Underwood, a federal law enforcement officer who shot and killed while on duty during riots last Friday in Oakland, have also received little attention in comparison to Floyd.

Floyd’s death last week sparked widespread violent protests across the United States, from New York City to Los Angeles. He died of asphyxiation after a policeman kneeled on him for nearly nine minutes, which was caught on video.

rmx.news/article/article/minneapolis-police-union-chief-george-floyd-had-a-criminal-history

The prefecture of Paris is worried about two new rallies planned this weekend in front of the Embassy of the United States and on the Champ de Mars. The organisers of the tribute to US race riot symbol George Floyd, are seeking to unite several ultra-left organisations, anti-white movements and anti-police collectives.

During the demonstration on June 2, banned by the Paris police headquarters, organised by Assa Traore, the sister of Adama Traoré who died after a police check, the police services had anticipated the arrival of 7 000 up to 10 000 people, in the high range. In reality, 23 000 to 25 000 people showed up in front of the Paris court, the Tribunal de Grande Instance, blocking the ring road, burning trash bins and attacking the police. At the end of this demonstration, the municipal police station of Clichy was set on fire.

According to several sources in the intelligence services, between 10 000 and 20 000 people are expected this Saturday, June 6 in Paris. And “several tens of thousands” will gather for another event, according to these sources, on Sunday at the initiative of SOS Racisme in particular, with a possible concert.

Since the death of the Malian Adama Traoré, public debate has been intoxicated by the extremist version put forward by the Traoré family, who despite the expert reports has repeatedly accused the police of killing their brother. His sister had called for an illegal march to coincide with US race protests this week.

A total of four autopsy reports have been issued for Traoré. Despite claims to the contrary, a French legal report in 2020 showed that Traoré was high on drugs and that there was tetrahydrocannabinol in his blood. The official medical report listed heart failure as cause of death. A report commissioned independently of law enforcement, however claimed asphyxiation as the cause of death.

Race activists argue that his death was the direct result of excessive use of force by the police and this has sparked major protests in Paris, Lyon, and Toulouse under the slogan Justice pour Adama.

These protests have styled themselves after the American Black Lives Matter movement, and are focused on the alleged disproportionate rates of police violence inflicted on blacks and Arabs. But in the US – with 325 million inhabitants – only 10 unarmed black people died at the hands of law enforcement last year.

This prompted Fox host Tucker Carlson to expose the media lies about race violence directed at black people.

Maghreb singer Camélia Jordana, after accusing the police of racist violence, incited crowds to take up arms at the illegal Traoré protest.

On Tuesday, June 2, the singer was seen leading the illegal demonstration demanding “justice” for Adama Traoré. She called for armed revolt.

With her fist raised in a Black Power salute, Jordana, in the middle of a crowd of more than 20 000 people, sang: “Revolution has come! Time to pick up the gun!”

Jordana was also involved in a drug control altercation on the banks of the Seine on Sunday, May 31.

After declaring that black and Arab youths in the suburbs “are massacred for no reason other than their skin colour” by the police, Jordana got involved in a police control for the use of narcotic drugs, attacking the officers who had stopped a suspect involved in multiple assaults and haranguing passers-by.

These demonstrations, held in the midst of a health crisis in France, should be prosecuted and condemned for deliberately endangering the lives of others and involuntary killings, Nicolas Dupont-Aignan, president of Debout la France and Member of Parliament for Essonne, told Valeurs Actuelles.

“The demonstrations that pretend to the death of Adama Traoré in July 2016 are sadly ironic: many people demand an investigation and harsh penalties for recklessness or clumsiness which led to the death of this person… while committing a serious and repeated offense.”

He pointed out that “judicial expert reports in the presence of all the parties concluded that the police were innocent”. But the family now denies the probative value of these analyzes by producing “non-adversarial expertise” – that is to say an expertise carried out by a person paid only by the civil party and without the knowledge of the respondents.

According to Dupont-Aignan, this not a credible argument. “For good measure, family members added a complaint for failure to assist a person in danger. However, this qualification is erased before manslaughter because the same facts can only give rise to a single criminal conviction, generally the most serious offense.”

He said the protesters have probably heard of the Covid-19 pandemic and they know that by coming together they promote the of spread of the Coronavirus and that part of the infected risks death. “At least one person is likely to die as a result of such a gathering.”

Article 1 of Decree No. 2020-548 of May 11, 2020 also prohibits meetings of more than ten people and requires staying at least one meter from the others on public roads.

“By meeting, these demonstrators therefore commit the crime of manslaughter by recklessness and even by manifestly deliberate violation of a particular obligation of prudence or safety imposed by law or regulation,” he said.

If these demonstrators are not arrested, it would would mean a double standard applies to French citizens based on race.

freewestmedia.com/2020/06/06/race-protesters-in-paris-called-to-take-up-the-gun/

The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) recently published its sixth monitoring report on Switzerland.

ECRI is the human rights monitoring body of the Council of Europe — not to be confused with the European Union. The Council of Europe calls itself the “continent’s leading human rights organization.”

ECRI was founded in 1994 by the heads of state of the Council of Europe with the mandate, among other things, to “review member States’ legislation, policies and other measures to combat racism, xenophobia, antisemitism and intolerance, and their effectiveness”.

The organization is composed of “members designated by their governments… on the basis of their in-depth knowledge in the field of combating intolerance”. They should have … expertise in dealing with racism… and intolerance. ECRI’s members are nominated in their personal capacity and act as independent members”.

ECRI’s monitoring of Switzerland, since its first report about the country was published in 1998, is an illustrative example of the organization’s persistent efforts — and considerable success — over the past two decades in limiting free speech in Europe.

Already in its first report, in 1998, ECRI, despite admitting that “a decrease in manifestations of racism and intolerance has been noted over the last 2-3 years” and that “overt manifestations of [racial prejudice and xenophobia] are rather rare,” told the Swiss media to promote specific narratives:

“It would seem necessary to make the mass media in Switzerland aware of their responsibilities concerning the problems of racism and intolerance …initiatives for combating racism and intolerance by the mass media (eg by presenting some positive cases of a fruitful co-existence between different groups)… are to be encouraged….Codes of conduct in the various media professions, whereby the media practices self-regulation, would seem most desirable”.

Two years later, in its second report on the country, the organization still conceded that, “open manifestations of racism are quite rare in Switzerland.” Nevertheless, ECRI was “concerned that a climate of intolerance or xenophobia towards non-citizens and those who are different from the native Swiss population appears to persist”. No substantial documentation was offered as basis for the allegation — ECRI even criticized in the same report that “little information is systematically collected in Switzerland regarding the extent of racism and discrimination” — but none seemed to be needed, as ECRI’s motivation appeared to be political:

“There still seems to lack [sic] an acceptance of Switzerland as a truly multi-cultural society whose members may feel a sense of Swiss identity alongside another cultural or ethnic identity”.

Throughout the years, ECRI has stressed the media’s central role in promoting specific, politicized agendas. In 2009, in its fourth report, the organization called for the introduction of what is by now a prevalent European practice, especially in Sweden, of not mentioning the ethnic origins of criminals:

“A widespread and recurring problem in the Swiss media is the practice of mentioning the origin of a person suspected or convicted of a criminal offence even when this information is irrelevant. With a concern for transparency, the police admittedly give the media ‘objective’ information on suspects, including their age and nationality, which the media pass on without always questioning its relevance. In some cases, however, this approach seems much harder to justify…”

By 2014, the concept of “hate speech” had found its way into ECRI’s fifth country report on Switzerland:

“Muslims, Black people, the Yenish and the Roma perceive a considerable deterioration of their situation and of the political climate. Refugees, cross-border workers and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) persons are also the targets of hate speech. In particular, the Democratic Union of the Centre (UDC) party, which remains the largest at federal level (scoring 26.6% of the vote in 2011), has continued to use extremely intolerant images and language…”

In the same report, the organization also addressed what it saw as insufficient judicial crackdowns on hate speech:

“ECRI considers that the authorities, in particular the prosecution services, should adopt a zero tolerance attitude in respect of all racist statements by politicians… The more freedom politicians are given to make racist statements with impunity, the fewer scruples members of the general public will have about making racist comments…”

Once again, ECRI focused on the media:

“ECRI recommends that the Swiss authorities develop an action plan in close cooperation with media representatives…to tackle the established routines … that can lead media coverage… to have a stigmatising effect on vulnerable groups, in particular Roma and people of colour…”

The organization, however, noted with satisfaction that its earlier recommendations had been followed:

“ECRI is pleased to note that a number of online newspapers have adopted self-regulatory measures, such as more systematic moderation of comments, abolition of anonymity for posters and the automatic closure of the accounts of persons who resort to racist discourse”.

On the other hand, ECRI was unhappy that “the follow-up given by the authorities to complaints concerning racist comments on the Internet was still inadequate”. It recommended that “the Swiss authorities give one or more police units… responsibility for actively combating hate speech on the Internet…”

ECRI’s curious battle to limit free speech, especially that of the media, continues. In its sixth and most recent country report on Switzerland, ECRI berated the media for focusing too much on news items such as the construction of minarets or radicalization, deeming it “intolerant discourse against Muslims”:

“ECRI… notes a sharp rise in intolerant discourse against Muslims particularly in the media. This is believed to be linked to legislation or legislative proposals that affect Muslims in particular… a study which was carried out by the University of Zurich from 2014-2017 on the quality of media coverage of Swiss Muslims in 18 print media outlets… noted that 25% of articles concerned religious symbols in the public space (such as the construction of minarets or wearing the headscarf or Burqa) and 21% concerned radicalisation, while only 2% reported on the daily life of Muslims and 2% covered successful integration… The reporting predominantly condemned a lack of will to integrate and a tendency to radicalisation among Muslims and called for more controls and sanctions. Another study …showed that 85% of Muslim respondents experienced the representation of Islam in the media as rather or very negative. Further, 88% were particularly clear on the responsibility of the media for the deteriorated attitude of non-Muslims towards Muslims”.

The organization said that:

“… states should raise awareness of the dangers posed by hate speech… by combating misinformation, negative stereotyping and stigmatisation; developing educational programmes for children and youth, public officials and the general public; supporting NGOs and equality bodies working to combat hate speech; and encouraging speedy reactions by public figures to hate speech”.

The organization emphasized self-regulation as the “appropriate” approach to “tackling hate speech” especially through the application of “codes of conduct”, and even regulation in some cases, which they believe should apply to both politicians and the media:

“ECRI considers that the use of self-regulation can be an appropriate and effective approach to tackling hate speech…. parliaments, political parties, business organisations, cultural and sport associations… should make it clear that the use of hate speech…is unacceptable and take action to prevent and sanction such use. ECRI specifically stresses the importance of codes of conduct in self-regulatory schemes…political leaders and members of parliament should… adopt relevant codes of conduct. Regarding the media and Internet, where the vast majority of hate speech is generated… ECRI recommends both regulation and self-regulation…”

ECRI noted that Swiss journalists already have a code in place that states that they “must avoid any allusion by text, image or sound to a person’s ethnic or national origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation as well as to any illness or physical or mental handicap that could be discriminatory in character.”

As for the Internet, ECRI noted that Swiss authorities had informed the organization that they were “seeking cooperation with relevant Internet service providers to improve the identification of authors of hate speech and to have such content removed as quickly as possible…”

ECRI has done a good job helping Europeans kill free speech.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15859/switzerland-free-speech

The District Court in Litoměřice in the north of Czechia sentenced Libyan immigrant Abdallah Ibrahim Diallo to two years in prison for raping a 15-year-old girl and stealing her mobile phone in 2019.

However, according to experts, Diallo is mentally ill, so the court has decided that he should enter treatment in a psychiatric hospital before serving any prison time. It is unclear how long he will be placed in a psychiatric facility or at what point he will be released to a prison.

While the Libyan did not confess to the crime, there was irrefutable evidence that he was responsible for the rape.

“It is proven that the crime, as described in the indictment, actually happened. The incriminating evidence consists of a detailed statement of the victim, the DNA of the accused man found on her body and clothes, and the fact that he had her phone in his possession,” said the chairwoman of the court, Alexandra Šetková.

The Libyan man originally arrived in the Czech Republic by train from Germany where he unsuccessfully applied for asylum. On June 18, 2019, he raped the then 15-year-old girl near the village of Lukavec in the north of the Czech Republic.

Initially, no psychiatric report was requested but doubts about the defendant’s mental state arose due to his strange behavior in custody. Experts then confirmed that the man suffered from schizophrenia, but stated that his control and cognitive abilities at the time of the crime were not non-existent but only in a reduced state.

“He had at least the basic awareness that raping is illegal,” the judge said.

Although Diallo originally faced up to ten years in prison, given his mental illness, the public prosecutor proposed a sentence of around three years. The final sentence the judge gave amonted to two years.

The court then recommended treatment in a psychiatric hospital as the defendant could be dangerous to himself and the people around him if he was placed in prison right away.

However, the mild verdict infuriated many people, including members of the Freedom and Direct Democracy (SPD) party.

“Mental disorders have become hugely popular when trying to excuse the crimes of illegal migrants. How many times have we heard from Western Europe that foreigners committing the most heinous crimes suffer from a mental illness?! Unfortunately, we are now witnessing the same scenario in our country as well,” the party wrote on Facebook.

rmx.news/article/article/libyan-immigrant-sentenced-to-two-years-in-prison-for-raping-a-15-year-old-czech-girl

By Andrea Widburg

Project Veritas ought to be called Project Fortitudo so as to recognize the mind-boggling bravery of an undercover operative who infiltrated the Rose City Antifa organization in Portland, Oregon, one of the oldest active Antifa groups in America.  The anarcho-leftist Antifa specializes in violent street fighting, putting at extreme risk anyone who goes into the group with a hidden camera.

That’s the risk a Project Veritas investigator took, beginning sometime in the past, but at least eleven months ago.  (To protect the investigator’s identity, the year in which he began his undercover operation is bleeped out.)

Although Antifa has leapt to prominence in the past few days, as it’s joined forces with Black Lives Matter to wreak havoc in American cities, conservatives have been aware of it for some time.  For most of us, Antifa became a concern beginning with the Berkeley rioting when the Berkeley Republicans invited conservative speakers, such as Milo Yiannopoulos and Ben Shapiro, to the U.C. campus.  Even the Washington Post noticed that Antifa had a problem.

Antifa members showed up and engaged in extreme violence, including setting fire to the campus.  As a hint that Antifa is the paramilitary arm of the Berkeley Democrat party, the mayor told the police to stand down as Antifa and other leftist organizations beat conservatives with poles, pepper spray, and fists.  Rose City Antifa gets the same sweet treatment from Portland’s mayor.

No wonder, then, that some of the most extreme Antifa violence in America has taken place in Portland.  Andy Ngo, who has taken it upon himself to document what Antifa is doing, was so badly assaulted at a Portland riot that he suffered a brain bleed, something that can lead to death or permanent mental disability:

During the current riots, this is what Antifa is doing in Portland (warning: graphic):

You’ll want to keep the above image in mind as you watch the Project Veritas video, which opens with images of Antifa violence, not just in America, but around the world.  (It even includes a quick shot of the above video.)  The video describes how people are processed and trained to become full-fledged Antifa members.  Joining requires identity-verification interviews and training.

What’s shocking about the video is how the people doing the training are focused on violence, societal disruption, and hating Trump.  Lecturers tell trainees that the “whole goal of this, right, is to get out there and do dangerous things as safely as possible,” obviously meaning that Antifa members should bring the danger to others without harming themselves.

To give a sense of the violence inherent in Antifa, Project Veritas shows the moment that Nicholas Cifuni, in the “Recon and Tactics” class, tells his trainees to “practice things like an eye gouge.  It takes very little pressure to injure someone’s eyes.”  Cifuni also reminds his trainees that their job isn’t just to land a picture-perfect kickboxing blow.  Their job is “destroying the enemy.”

Something that’s just as jarring, although less interest-grabbing than obscenities and eye-gouging, is the investigator’s sense that Antifa is well funded and has an international organization:

They were getting this tradecraft from someone else, someone with much more experience, someone who did this for a living. Caroline, which [sic] is the founder of RCA, moved to Sweden with her husband, who is a dual citizen. So, there is a back and forth with a European connection. …

With RCA, it seems much more structured. Almost like a company or like a business. So, I feel like there is some type of outside funding, influence, or resources being used.

As is the case with all Project Veritas investigations, more videos will follow.  The more Americans who see them the better, because it will help them understand who is taking over their cities and why President Trump was right to label Antifa a domestic terrorist organization.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/06/project_veritas_begins_its_antifa_expose_.html