In the wake of the violent attack on a priest and his brother during Holy Mass in the Berlin church of St. Joseph, a security service is to be set up there starting next Sunday. This is reported by the “Catholic News Agency” (KNA) with reference to the press spokesman of the diocese of Berlin, Stefan Förner. This should make clear that the archdiocese takes the incident seriously, said Förner.According to Förner, a security concept for the church already exists – but no security service was present during the attack last Sunday. The brother of the clergyman who was knocked down by an unknown person during the sermon, Mr. Holger Doetsch, had previously called for a security service in the churches in an interview with the newspaper Tagespost. The priest in question is an employee of the Apostolic Nunciature.When asked about his condition, Doetsch replied to the Tagespost: “Not good, you take that seriously. It has become deeply engraved in my mind.I was remembering the incidents of Taizé and the attack on Brother Roger and the murder of the French priest Jacques Hamel. According to his perception, it was “a planned attack on the church. And this must have consequences”.

As KNA further reports, the concern of the archdiocese of Berlin is the health of the priest concerned, his brother and the altar girl standing directly next to him, as well as the attendant faithful.”The visible physical consequences are – thank God – not serious for the attacked men, the uncertainty on the other hand, which the aggressor caused, will remain”, so diocese speaker Förner.St. Joseph’s Church is currently used as a replacement for St. Hedwig’s Cathedral, which is currently under reconstruction. Clergymen of the Pope’s embassy and the military bishop’s office regularly celebrate services in the Berlin Cathedral.

https://www.die-tagespost.de/kirche-aktuell/aktuell/nach-angriff-ab-sonntag-sicherheitsdienst-in-berliner-kirche;art4874,211644

Yesterday, Wednesday evening, a train attendant of a regional express called the federal police. One passenger refused to leave the train. He also did not comply with the request of the police officers and had to be brought to the station under duress.

In Aachen, a 34-year-old man boarded the Regional Express 1 to Cologne. When a German Railroad company train attendant in Langerwehe noticed that he did not have a valid ticket, he asked him to leave the train. However, the passenger ignored the employee’s order. The federal police were then called, and they took him to Cologne Central Station. The Afghan only left the train under duress.He behaved extremely violently and unreasonably towards the emergency services. In the police station, the officers found a black “nunchaku” while searching his backpack. He also carried a hidden knife on his wrist. Both weapons were confiscated. Since he had no identity documents, he was arrested. The federal police initiated an investigation for illegal residence, violation of the weapons law and fare evasion. Further investigations will be conducted by the Cologne police.

presseportal.de/blaulicht/pm/70116/4696480

For a crime taken to court – and the prosecutor wearing a headscarf? Suspected criminals, whether atheist, Jew or Christian, must now prepare themselves for this in Berlin. What was previously considered impossible, because the state is obliged to neutrality, is to come true in Berlin.

Responsible for this: Senator of Justice Dirk Behrendt (Greens). He causes thereby an éclat in the Red-Red-Green coalition. Wednesday, early evening in the Legal Committee of the Chamber of Deputies, incredulous amazement from the Social Democrats and the Opposition: Behrendt commented on the latest decision of the Federal Labor Court in Erfurt on the Berlin Neutrality Law.

A Muslim woman was awarded 5,129 euros in compensation for discrimination because she was not hired into the teaching profession in the state of Berlin because of her headscarf.

The Erfurt judges criticized: If a prospective teacher is rejected because of a headscarf according to the Berlin law, it must be justified more clearly, why the headscarf disturbs the school peace – an individual case decision.Senator for Schools Sandra Scheeres does not rule out filing a constitutional complaint against the latest ruling of the Federal Labor Court. She said this during question time in the Berlin House of Representatives on Thursday. “It is important to me that we have a neutral situation in the Berlin schools so that no conflicts are carried into the schools. We must do everything possible to ensure that we have a peaceful environment for the students,” said Scheeres. As soon as the verdict is available in writing, the next steps will be considered.She was “not satisfied” with the verdict. It was about a ban on religious signs as a whole, not just the headscarf. Scheeres emphasized that this was important in order to maintain peace at school. “If there are conflicts with a teacher, this has an impact on the pedagogical work of the entire college. I receive daily letters from teachers and school administrators that we should stick to this line.

Justice senator Behrendt draws completely different conclusions in contrast to Scheeres – although the Federal judges did not explain the law itself explicitly for unconstitutional. And although the neutrality act continues to apply in the state of Berlin.

In the future, female legal trainees of Muslim faith will be allowed to read the bill of indictment in court wearing a headscarf. This was announced by Justice Senator Behrendt in the Legal Affairs Committee. The only restriction: In addition to the woman wearing the headscarf as prosecutor, the respective instructor is also to sit.And it must be clear to everyone in the courtroom: The prosecutor with head scarf is in training and is accompanied by a training public prosecutor, as Behrendt said. And in the same way also the representatives of Social Democrats (SPD) and Christian Democrats interpreted him.In the left-wing coalition, Behrendts decision is seen as arbitrary and as an affront. Social Democratic Party (SPD) legal expert Sven Kohlmeier told the Tagesspiegel newspaper: “Here we as a coalition must find a unified line. Dirk Behrendt’s going it alone is not good”.

Christian Democratic legal expert Sven Rissmann accuses the Senator of Justice of “wanting to create facts”. A headscarf for civil servants, especially in the core area of state power in the judiciary and police, is politically and socially unwanted.

In the Social Democratic Party (SPD) the fear of the consequences of the Behrendt-decision is spreading: Can a public prosecutor be banned from wearing a headscarf in the future if she was already allowed to wear a headscarf during her preparatory service as a prosecutor and as a civil servant on probation?Also the opposition factions of Free Democratic Party (FDP) and AfD say: Behrendt tears down legal and institutional firewalls on his own. In the currently heated debate between the Left and Right, the decision could lead to additional radicalization.The Red, Red and Green government coalition is divided anyway after the decision of the Federal Labor Court. The Social Democratic Party (SPD) insists on the state’s obligation of neutrality – especially in court or with the police. The Social Democrats fear that the political floodgates could open.The Greens, on the other hand, see teachers wearing headscarves as a sign for the future in multicultural Berlin – so that children learn to “deal with diversity and difference”. This includes a “diverse faculty” in the schools. The realities at the schools are intended to create acceptance “in society as a whole”.For the Greens and the Left, the previous neutrality act goes against the grain. After the Erfurt ruling, they are demanding an amendment – because of the goal of anti-discrimination. Also senator of justice Behrendt had criticized the law repeatedly. “In the multi-religious society it must be about what someone has in his head and not on his head,” he twittered.Curiously, while parts of the left and the Greens are celebrating the verdict of the federal labor judges, other parts of the two parties are complaining about the return of religion in the state. Especially since Christianity is losing influence in Berlin. Not even a quarter of the citizens of Berlin belong to one of the two Christian churches. In contrast, Islam is gaining influence.Civil servants in the civil service are required to uphold neutrality in their job – politically and ideologically-religiously. Therefore Behrendts initiative also deals with the question: Should civil servants be allowed to openly display their faith to citizens? Or rather, to put it more bluntly: Is it still possible to place a judge with a headscarf in the courtroom despite the obligation of neutrality? Or a policewoman with a headscarf in employment? So far, this is not allowed.

tagesspiegel.de/berlin/eklat-bei-rot-rot-gruen-in-berlin-justizsenator-erlaubt-angehenden-staatsanwaeltinnen-kopftuch-im-gerichtssaal/26153338.html

by Giulio Meotti

“The Khmer Rouge had studied at the Sorbonne, they were not uneducated savages,” said “Douch”, the just deceased Pol Pot’s torturer in chief. He was serving a life term. Kaing Guek Eav, known as “Comrade Duch”, was the chief of the notorious Tuol Sleng prison where thousands of people were tortured and murdered in the late 1970s by the Communist regime that controlled Cambodia from 1975 to 1979. It is thought that 15,000 men, women and children passed through the gates of the former school-turned-prison.

Under Pol Pot’s regime, 1.7 million died, a fifth of the Cambodian population. In Rithy Panh’s book, “The Elimination,” the author asks himself: “I want to understand how educated people, intellectuals, have done this”.

Here is the list of the leading cadres of the Khmer Rouge: “Hou Youn: PhD in Economics from Paris,” “Leng Sary: university studies in Paris,” “Leng Thirith: studies in Paris,” “Khieu Ponnary: university studies in Paris,” “Khieu Samphan: PhD in Economics from Paris,” “Sakun: university studies in Parism” “Pol Pot: University Studies in Paris,” “Son Sen: university studies in Paris,” “Suong Sikoeun: university studies in Paris..

One of the main perpetrators of the horrors of the Khmer Rouge, Khieu Samphan, holds a doctorate from the Sorbonne. In his thesis, Samphan argued that the work done by non-farmers was unproductive: bankers, bureaucrats and businessmen had nothing to add to society. They suck like “parasites.”

“The distinction made by the Scottish economist Adam Smith between productive and unproductive labor deserves careful consideration here”, wrote Samphan in his ideological manifesto. In the name of these ideas, the Khmer hunted for those who did not have calluses on their hands. Meanwhile, Samphan’s ideas were considered favorably by the French intellectuals who awarded him his doctorate.

The Khmer Rouge evacuated the cities, pushed the inhabitants into the countryside, closed the banks, banned the use of currency and destroyed the markets.

“Year Zero begins. The past no longer exists.” Books were burned, schools abolished, cars, medical equipment and household appliances destroyed. Eyeglasses were also banned. Everyone was dressed in dismal black pajamas.

Before killing the victims with a blow to the back of the head, the Khmer Rouge repeated a ritual phrase: “Finally, you will make yourself useful for the revolution. No longer as a man, but as a fertilizer. ” It was in Paris, at the Sorbonne, that Samphan had discovered not only Marx, but also Rousseau’s “good savage” and Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s “Humanism and Terror.”

A Le Monde correspondent in Cambodia in 1998 met Semphan in the jungle: “Pol Pot and I have been deeply influenced by French thinking,” he told the reporter. “In particular from the Enlightenment and from Rousseau.”

And in Europe, the intelligentsia applauded the new experiment implemented by the father of Parisian communism. But the “révolution de la forèt,” while it could be sung with naive impunity on the Rive Gauche became a slaughterhouse in Cambodia where it was implemented, a veritable Dante’s hell.

It is Europe’s heart of darkness. The same dark evil that happened in the Holocaust. The country of Goethe, Schiller, Bach, Schumann and Beethoven created gas chambers which killed 20.000 Jews per day.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/286490

By Andrea Widburg

On Tuesday, Nancy Pelosi was outed as the Marie Antoinette of the Democrat party when a hair salon released footage showing Nancy flouting the very lockdown rules she insists others follow. On Wednesday, Pelosi made the whole situation worse when she “took responsibility” by claiming that she naively allowed the hair salon to inveigle her into “a setup.”

The last time a Democrat politician so blatantly tried to blame someone else for a moral failing was back in 1990, when Marion Barry, after he was caught smoking crack cocaine, said of his former girlfriend, “Bitch set me up . . . I shouldn’t have come up here . . . goddamn bitch.” For Nancy Pelosi, being the third most powerful person in America means never having to say you’re sorry.

As the election nears, I keep coming back to the same line of thinking: Malignant narcissism means denying responsibility for anything negative you’ve done. The Democrat party and its members have internalized narcissism to the point at which nothing bad that they do is ever their fault.

For Democrats, as for all malignant narcissists, they can always throw the first punch with impunity; it’s only the counterpunch that is a mortal sin. In their own minds, they are always the victims of setups or of people evil or naive enough to respond to Democrat insults, defamation, violence, or chicanery.

If you want to understand the dynamics of Nancy Pelosi’s defamatory non-apology, a little back history is in order. First, Pelosi is fabulously wealthy, with Pelosi and her husband having a combined net worth estimated, at minimum, to be around $97 million. She lives in a home with a $24,000 refrigerator that holds $14 pints of ice cream. Second, Pelosi is 80 years old, which means she is in the high-risk category for the Wuhan virus.

The above facts mean that Nancy Pelosi could easily have paid someone to her home for the blow-out that Pelosi needs because she’s special – but that you, the ordinary person trapped in your home, may not have. These facts also mean that Nancy Pelosi, who’s insisted that everyone should wear a mask, should be super-paranoid about having anyone come near her.

But Pelosi didn’t want to turn her home into a hair salon and she seemingly isn’t that worried about coming into contact with people who might have the virus to which she’s so vulnerable. That’s why, on Monday, Pelosi went to a San Francisco salon to have her hair professionally washed and dried. Again, she needs to look nice; you don’t:

What Pelosi hadn’t counted on was the fact that the salon’s manager might resent seeing Pelosi using her salon. After all, Pelosi has aggressively been advocating (and California Democrats have even more aggressively been enforcing) such stringent Wuhan virus rules that the salon owner cannot conduct business at her salon. She’s going broke, but Pelosi gets to look pretty (well, pretty for Pelosi).

When Pelosi was first confronted with her hypocrisy, she had a flunky give a statement:

“The Speaker always wears a mask and complies with local COVID requirements. This business offered for the Speaker to come in on Monday and told her they were allowed by the city to have one customer at a time in the business. The Speaker complied with the rules as presented to her by this establishment,” he said.

That Pelosi “always wears a mask” was obviously a lie, because the infamous video showed her maskless. Moreover, it strains credulity to believe that, seven months into the lockdown, Pelosi and her staff were that naïve about the rules.

An apology was in order. But people like Pelosi don’t apologize. The best that narcissists can do is issue “non-apology apologies,” things such as “I’m sorry you’re mad at me,” or “I’m sorry that you were foolish enough to think I was telling the truth.”

Pelosi, though, couldn’t even choke that out. Instead, she chose the Marion Barry strategy and went on the attack, defaming either the hairstylist or the salon owner for setting her up.

You will not be surprised to learn that Erica Kious was not amused by Pelosi’s lies. Ms. Kious also believes that, between the lockdowns and her new notoriety, she can no longer work in San Francisco:

The Wuhan virus has proven to be a clarifying experience in American politics. Trump started the process of stripping the hypocritical façade from the Democrats, showing them to be red of tooth and claw. The virus has finished the process.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/09/pelosis_malignantly_narcissistic_response_to_being_caught_at_the_salon.html