The investigations of German authorities prove that the Islamic State has distributed its terror cells throughout Europe. The IS can move almost freely in the EU and is busy training for its planned attacks. The tranquil town of Osnabrück in Lower Saxony plays a key role in the holy war against the infidels.

The men stand smiling in their camouflage waistcoats in the forest. They pose for the camera with raised masks and dummy firearms. Always ready for battle. In one of the pictures, seized by state security staff from North Rhine-Westphalia, many of them show the emblem of the terrorist militia “Islamic State” (IS): the upstretched finger of Tauhid.

Jihad (holy war) is trained in the paintball game. “Sharia rules here” and “Allahu Akhbar” were shouted by the participants at the beginning of the training. In the chat, an organiser shouted that Muslims always had to train to ” kill the kuffar (infidels)”.

The fighting games were organised, among others, by former supporters of the Cologne-based Islamist association “Kalifatstaat”. This is proven by documents available to FOCUS Online.

The attack trainings were carried out from a secret prayer room in the Osnabrück district of Schinkel at the end of 2018/beginning of 2019. Primarily, sympathisers or descendants of the first generation of the Cologne-based Islamist association, which was banned 20 years ago, gathered there. According to the Federal Prosecutor’s Office, the paintball meetings served to prepare attacks or suicide bombings “in the context of their common ideological convictions”, in short also the “readiness for martyrdom”.

Local sympathisers of the Cologne Caliph Metin Kaplan, who was deported to his Turkish homeland 16 years ago as an enemy of the state, continue to fill many investigation files. For example, terror investigators secured recordings of meetings with the operators of the online platform “On behalf of Islam”, which is said to be close to the Kaplan association.

Above all, however, the investigators are concerned that the Osnabrück Kaplan militants are now increasingly supporting the IS. For example, the Lower Saxon cadre of extremists maintained close relations with a suspected Tajik IS terrorist group from North Rhine-Westphalia, which was detected by the Takim investigative commission. Together they practised house fighting at paintball meetings. The five members of the Takim cell will soon have to answer to the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court. The charges range from IS membership to failed murder attempts to plans to attack the US bases in Geilenkirchen and Spangdahlem.

The war training of the Takim brothers together with the advocates of the caliphate state prove how closely linked the violent Islamist network is in Western Europe. Several Muslim migrant communities from the former CIS states in the Caucasus and from the Balkans have formed highly effective groups in France, Belgium, Switzerland, Austria, Sweden and Germany in the name of IS. For years, the German counter-terrorism service has been warning that the IS, after its defeat in Syria and Iraq, is increasingly calling for jihad in Germany and its neighbouring states via social networks.

https://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/islamischer-staat-terror-netz-zieht-sich-ueber-ganz-europa-und-plant-anschlaege-sogar-aus-knast-heraus_id_13088959.html?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=facebook-focus-online-politik&fbc=facebook-focus-online-politik&ts=202103161823&cid=16032021&fbclid=IwAR3W7zzfJG9CbNbDLPa1rrEMz59uicBrJAfD33BRQ3MzjaDVsRBiAR1nQec

Before the verdict he cried and sobbed, afterwards the woman killer of Plattling smoked a cigarette with pleasure in front of the court.
Judge Georg Meiski sentenced him to life imprisonment for the knife murder of Tatjana S. (†20) in front of her eight-month-old daughter.
The Afghan refugee Shaeiq S. has every reason to be satisfied: Although he killed his partner with 18 stabs and the use of two knives in an agonising death on August 6, 2020, the Deggendorf Regional Court did not consider the murder to be cruel.

“The horror, the pain and the suffering are immense, the means of the rule of law are not,” said the judge. In plain language: The defendant, who has seven previous convictions, can be released after only 15 years in prison.
Tatjana’s parents were present in the courtroom when the judge described the background of the crime in front of the couple’s shared kebab restaurant.

In 2013, the dishwasher had come to Germany from Afghanistan, impregnated a 19-year-old in 2014 and then repeatedly established liaisons with underage girls.
“Tatjana was only 15 when she fell in love with the 20-year-old accused in 2015,” the judge said. Her family accepted him, her father even paid 10 000 euros for the snack van. For Shaeiq, she dressed modestly, withdrew from other boyfriends, converted to Islam and eventually even married him according to Muslim rites. “Initially, Tatjana probably perceived this extensive claim to control as a sign of special love,” Judge Meiski said.

But under the influence of alcohol and drugs, Shaeiq S. increasingly became delusional and jealous, doubting the paternity of his daughter, who was born in 2019, and even insinuating that Tatjana was having an affair with her father. “Allah will punish you,” he threatened her. “There must be blood first,” he told a friend before the crime.
In the summer of 2020, she moved out of the flat, wanted to separate. She went to the snack bar for a final discussion at around 8 pm on the day of the crime. Judge Meiski: “He pulled her into the car, tapped her on the chest with a knife and asked if she had cheated on him. Because she was tired of the eternal pointless questions, she said: Yes, and with several. He now had the answer he had long been waiting for and stabbed her.

Afterwards, he pulled the daughter out of the car and sat down with her in front of the kebab stall. “Even in this situation he still denied Tatjana the right to live and shouted to helpers: Let her die, the bitch, she has betrayed me.”
It was not alcohol that had murdered the young woman: “It was you,” Judge Meiski told the accused. “Adam could no longer dictate anything to Eve, thus she destroyed paradise and was no longer worth anything in his eyes.”

https://archive.is/5RaG7#selection-1397.0-1410.0

A 15-year-old German teenager who was helping two young migrant men integrate, which included providing them with German lessons, was raped by the two Syrian men.

Over four years after the event, the district court of Uelzen found Mohamad T. (24) and Schadi A. (24) guilty of the crime.

Annika R., who changed her name and is now 19 years old, faced her rapists in court, according to German newspaper Bild.

In the summer of 2016, Anika, who is the daughter of a refugee worker, visited the Syrians’ accommodation in the Lüchow-Dannenberg district. First they drank tea in a room together when suddenly the two men became aggressive. According to the indictment, Mohamad T. suddenly held the girl’s arms while her accomplice stripped her and raped her.

After the rape, the duo threatened her, telling her: “If you say anything, we’ll kill your entire family.”

She waited a year to break her silence about the sexual assault, and only did so when one of the perpetrators was about to move into her house. 

The judge gave the two men a reduced sentence, pointing to the young age of the migrants at the time of the rape. Schadi A. received a verdict of two years probationary juvenile sentence while his accomplice received an 18-month probationary sentence, plus a €500 fine for both of them. Both men denied the rape occurred. 

The victim’s lawyer, Björn Nordmann, said “It is important for my client that the court believed her. The past four years have been difficult for her.”

The two men’s defense lawyers appealed the verdict, claiming it was not harsh enough. 

It is unclear why the two men, who would have been over 18 at the time of the attack, received reduced juvenile sentences.

German court gives probation to two Syrian migrants who raped 15-year-old girl who gave them German lessons

A French teacher says he was threatened with a beheading by a student and then suspended by the headmaster for defending beheaded teacher Samuel Paty. Paty was beheaded because a 13-year-old girl had lied about his course on free speech to her Muslim father.

Le Parisien reported that the Muslim teenager had lied because she did not want her father to find out that she had been suspended for skipping classes. She claimed instead that her history and geography teacher Samuel Paty, had suspended her from classes after she had a disagreement with him over caricatures of the prophet.

Another French teacher was threatened with a beheading and then suspended by his superiors after twenty-nine years of service, for having defended Samuel Paty.

On Saturday October 17, 2020, the day after Samuel Paty’s assassination, the teacher noticed the students’ indifference to what had happened the day before. For most, the assassination of this teacher based on the lies of a teenager, was just an “event” and they treated it like a banal news item.

“Until then, I had not been fully aware of the new reality, namely the tolerance of the new generations to barbarism,” the teacher admitted.

“However, in homage to Samuel Paty, and for educational purposes, I then planned a selection, my choice, among the less raw caricatures of Muhammad. To my knowledge, there were no Muslims in my class. A student asked me if I was not afraid. And when I told him no, he said: ‘My father is going to behead you!’”.

For this student from an immigrant background, the assassination of Paty was understandable and excusable.

On Monday, November 2, 2020, upon returning from the All Saints holidays, the teacher was summoned to the principal’s office before the start of classes. He awaited the teacher there with an inspector and a report from the pupil in his charge who had threatened him with a beheading.

According to the indictment, the teacher had advocated “the closure of Islamic mosques”, also a lie. But the principal clearly chose to believe the student. “I was then asked to apologize to the class the next day, Tuesday November 3. The following Friday, I had to report this meeting to the principal. An incident on that day would give him the pretext he needed to get rid of me.” It was a fight between students in class which broke out in the morning because of Covid.

“I had to leave the establishment within a quarter of an hour. Forced out! As one colleague remarked, I must go and have my head beheaded elsewhere.”

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/03/17/my-father-will-behead-you/

Shortly before today’s press conference of the Islamic lobby association “Inssan e.V.” to present the current figures of “Islam and Muslim hostility in Germany”, the head of the ” Research Group on Worldviews in Germany” (fowid) Carsten Frerk has published an extensive analysis. Frerk warns against uncritically accepting the data of Inssan or CLAIM, as they are ideologically distorted and do not stand up to scientific scrutiny.

If one believes the data from Inssan (Arabic: “human being”) and CLAIM (“Alliance against Islam and Muslimophobia”), the degree of discrimination suffered by Muslims in Germany increases from year to year. But is this statement really in line with empirical findings? Social scientist Carsten Frerk, head of the “Research Group Worldviews in Germany” (fowid), has taken a closer look: “I don’t doubt at all that there is Muslim hostility in our society,” he says, “but with the methods that Inssan or Claim use, this unfortunate phenomenon cannot be reflected in an adequate manner.”

In his study “Muslimfeindlichkeit und Empirie” (Muslim hostility and empiricism), published today on the fowid website, Frerk shows the improper approach of Inssan/CLAIM on the basis of several different issues. This concerns, among other things, the dubious use of figures (for example, percentages are often used instead of absolute figures, which looks more dramatic but says little empirically), the distorted data collection (mosque visitors are overrepresented in the data, although they only represent a minority of Muslims) and the undifferentiated presentation of the incidents (a “mosque attack” can be a thoughtless graffiti or a criminally relevant, anti-Muslim attack).Frerk also criticises the underlying conceptual categories. For example, he shows that “Muslimophobia” is a real phenomenon that can be studied scientifically, while “Islamophobia” and “anti-Muslim racism” are contradictory artificial terms that cannot be used to adequately describe social reality.

These scientific deficits can probably be explained not least by the ideological interests of Inssan e.V. and CLAIM: “In the course of this analysis,” Frerk writes in his study, “the impression became increasingly stronger that Inssan/CLAIM are not concerned with a correct representation of social conditions, but with strengthening the structures of Islamic lobbyism or legalistic Islamism, which plays the ‘discrimination card’ in order to gain advantages over other social groups. It fits in with this that both organisations are considered to be part of the network of the Muslim Brotherhood in Germany.”

This also explains why in recent years there has been “an increasing shift from necessary anti-discrimination work to Islam(ist)ism propaganda”. “The data presented by Inssan and CLAIM on hostility towards Muslims in Germany are extremely questionable for this reason!” says Frerk. He therefore also classifies the decision of German government to promote CLAIM as a “federal central institution” as “extremely questionable”:

“I think that organisations that have such a strong interest in a certain, ideologically distorted perspective on society as Inssan/CLAIM are not suited to collect empirical data, which is urgently needed to reduce real discrimination. We need serious social science research in this area, not state funding of legalistic, political Islam! The federal government should, in my opinion, urgently reconsider its funding practice.”

https://www.giordano-bruno-stiftung.de/meldung/muslimfeindlichkeit-inssan-analyse

Sylvana Simons, once with the Islamist Denk party, is a black anti-racism activist calling for the “decolonisation” of education and the Dutch language. She is one of the hopeful candidates in the country’s general election.

The election program of her party BIJ1 is even more leftist on socio-economic issues than the Socialist Party, and more progressive than D66 on issues such as equality and inclusion.

The municipalities of Amsterdam and Rotterdam have recently had their own role in the slavery past investigated, and are now considering apologizing to the descendants of the enslaved. But the majority of Dutch voters do not think these apologies are necessary. Simons is a passionate supporter of reparations and sees it as proof of the necessity of the BLM movement in the Netherlands.

Other parties are still “insufficiently” aware of how deeply systemic racism is present in the Netherlands, she believes. She wants to tackle discrimination directly in education, in the labour market as well as the housing market. And she believes it is in everyone’s interest that the system of unequal treatment is tackled by the government as soon as possible, “because you yourself could also be the victim next time”.

According to Simons, BIJ1 has received thousands of hateful private messages, comments, emails, posts and tweets. The party has selected 52 messages for her “Black Manifesto”. The far-left Hotline for Discrimination in the Amsterdam Region helped the party to make a selection.

BIJ1 refers to online hatred and threats as part of a larger social problem, in which open racism and sexism go unpunished. According to the party, people are getting away with breaking the law on a large scale because the authorities now do not want or cannot deal with it properly. The legal possibilities and powers to prosecute people for online hatred are too currently limited. The party has called for mass censorship.

That is a political choice, according to BIJ1, who advocated more legislation to stop online hatred. “Anyone who speaks out in our country can expect extra hatred,” said Simons. “But enough is enough. This should stop now. I will continue to fight until the legal system works well for every woman of colour and for everyone else.” Simons was mocked by Geert Wilders in 2016 when she requested full-time security because of “hatred”. The round-the-clock isolation of Geert Wilders due to Islamist threats has lasted almost two decades already.

She told Culturu.com that she expected to receive a lot of resistance in the parliamentary Tweede Kamer specially from the the right-wing. “I know that the knives are already being sharpened in The Hague.”

Simons said she made the choice as a result of some divine intervention: “I experienced my vision as a divine experience […] I had no control over when or how the next intervention was going to come. It was not me. Something happened.”

Simons is a former television presenter, responsible for polarising national discourse on Zwarte Piet, racial profiling and the legacy of slavery dating back to the Dutch colonial era. The Black Lives Matter movement unsurprisingly provided fresh fodder for the racial activist.

“It was good to see that so many people said ‘enough is enough’ and they came out and spoke out,” Simons said of the 2020 BLM rallies in the Netherlands. “And I do also hope that they will use that same voice when we have our general elections,” she said.

“If your reality is that of a young Black person in this country, what you’ll find is that from the moment you enter school, you enter the system. There is bias and prejudice. People have lower expectations of you. People judge you differently,” Simons said.

When tax officials obtained dual nationality data to identify child benefit fraudsters last year, black activists cried “inequality”. As a result, Prime Minister Mark Rutte resigned in January after the country’s Data Protection Authority announced that the tax office’s use of dual nationality data was “unlawful and discriminatory”. Thousands of Moroccan, Turkish and Surinamese families were plunged into debt as a result of the probe. Simons clearly hopes to gain from this fact.

Simons has also complained about a quarter of the population being listed by the national statistics office as having a “migration background”. Polls currently suggest that her crusade against “systemic racism” will fall short of the threshold to enter into parliament despite a huge anti-racism demonstration on Museumplein in the middle of the lockdown last year showing that the anti-racism theme is also alive in the Netherlands.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/03/16/systemic-racism-becomes-a-theme-in-dutch-election/