“Many of those who emigrated to Europe were terrorists. They want to destroy: not only Syria, but also Europe.” This is what Gregory III, Catholic Patriarch of the Syrian Greek Melkite Church, declared before the end of the war in Syria.

He knew what it was about because his cousin was hanged by the so-called “moderate rebels”; these rebels were financed by the USA and the EU at the reign of Obama.

When the patriarch spoke about Syria and Assad, he made no bones about it:

“We are not a democracy, but neither are we the worst of tyrannies. But apart from Israel and Lebanon, Syria is the only Arab regime that respects religious freedom.”

About the people who are called “refugees” in the West, the Patriarch explained:

“Because of the war. in which the rebels of the ‘Islamic State’ appeared in our country, many people left the country. But among those who emigrated to Europe were many terrorists. They want to destroy: not only Syria, but also Europe.”

Gregory III hopes that Christians in the Middle East are not destined to disappear or be locked up in a ghetto: “Our churches are so full they are bursting. It is a miracle. I’m proud of the Church of Syria, unlike what happened in Iraq, where many priests fled, while here all the clergy remained.”

Curious. ‘Fled the war’ is therefore more likely to be about Islamists and not Christians?

So the Catholic bishop said that the Syrian “refugees” did not flee the war at all, but set off for Europe with the intention of bringing the war to us! And now that the war in Syria is over, we are picking up more “refugees” in Lebanon instead of sending them home to Syria….

Syrischer Patriarch: „Islamistische ‚Flüchtlinge‘ kommen, um euch zu vernichten“

The University of Winchester in the UK has treated itself to a life-size bronze statue of climate protection activist Greta Thunberg . “As the University for Sustainability and Social Justice, we are proud to honour this inspiring woman in this way. We hope that your statue will help to inspire our community and to remind us that we can change the world for the better, no matter what life throws at us,” Vice Chancellor Joy Carter proudly announced at the unveiling. But her students were not happy.

The position and timing of the statue, emphasized the professor, are both perfect. “The statue is a symbol of our commitment to the fight against the climatic and ecological emergency in the run-up to the United Nations climate change conference, which will take place in Great Britain later this year.” Earlier, the English university had set itself the goal of being climate neutral by 2025. A “climate emergency” was therefore declared in 2019.

One would imagine that this outpouring of admiration would elicit at least exuberant gratitude. But student representatives did not welcome the bronze figure. They described the statue as a “vanity project”. The President of the Winchester Student Union, Megan Ball, criticized the move to the BBC: “We are in a Covid year, many students did not really have access to campus, many are trying to study online and urgently need support. Instead of spending almost £24 000 (around 28 000 euros) on the statue, the money should better be made available for student support services across the campus.”

The university administration denied that funds for student support or staff had been used, but it did not seem to convince the disgruntled students. The whole debacle however shows where the priorities of the students lie in Winchester.

The statue is the first life-sized depiction of the 18-year-old Swedish girl, who gained international attention in 2018 with the help of a widespread PR campaign.

With the statue, the University of Winchester joined the series of remarkable events that have recently been unfolding at Anglo-Saxon educational institutions. The University of Oxford recently announced, also because of pressure from Black Lives Matter, that it would question “white supremacy” in the curriculum and reform the orientation of the courses. Incidentally, the first victims of these measures were the composers Beethoven and Mozart, as their music reinforces “colonialist patterns”.

And another first from the ivory towers of academia: Columbia University in New York is offering special Apartheid graduation ceremonies for students of a certain racial origin so that every ethnically defined group can celebrate their degrees in a “more intimate setting” in the future. In addition, people with low incomes or members of the gay and transsexual community can also wish to have their own celebration.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/04/02/winchester-university-students-criticise-greta-thunberg-statue/

Four Muslim migrants from North Africa gang-raped a 36-year-old woman on the Spanish island of Gran Canaria, after she stopped to ask how she could help them.  According to the March 3 report,

The alleged victim is believed to have lived on the Canary Islands, whereas the suspects are thought to have arrived only recently on a boat….  [T]hey were given initially government-provided accommodations managed by the Red Cross but later kicked out for breaking the rules.  They are then thought to have set up camp in the park [pictured above] where the woman was allegedly attacked after enquiring about their situation.  The woman had asked if she could help them with anything, but within ‘a matter of seconds’ this had led to her being assaulted…

This woman, who was described “as either an Irish expat or coming from a Nordic country,” joins countless other European women—especially those “from a Nordic country”—to be raped by Muslim migrants.

Why is this ongoing phenomenon not being checked?  One of the reasons revolves around the specter of “racism.”  The “woke” establishment tends to see European women accusing Muslim men of raping them through a skeptical light.

For example, in Sweden—the rape capital of Europe—studies continue to reveal that migrants, mostly from North Africa, the Middle East, and Muslim sub-Sahara, account for the overwhelming majority of rapes, as captured by the following headline: “Report: 9 in 10 Gang Rapists In Sweden Have Foreign Origins.”

To neutralize these findings, on March 9, 2021, the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (“Brå”) said that “Immigrants’ sharp over-representation in rape statistics may be due to the fact that Swedish women are more likely to report immigrants for rape than they are to report Swedish men.”  Stina Holmberg, a research councilor at Brå, elaborated:

It may be that you are more inclined to report something you [a Swedish women] have been exposed to, if the crime was committed by someone you feel more alien to, and who has low social status.

Skepticism for rape reports against non-white males turns to open hostility whenever this issue is forthrightly discussed, as Sarah Champion, a Labor politician and MP for Rotherham (the epicenter of sex grooming), learned last summer, when she was accused of “fanning the flames of racial hatred” and “acting like a neo-fascist murderer.” Her crime? She had dared to assert that “Britain has a problem with British Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls.”  (The same elements that accused Champion of being a “murderer” also, and rather unsurprisingly, characterize the UK’s anti-extremism program, Prevent, as being “built upon a foundation of Islamophobia and racism.”)

Perhaps most telling is an April 220 article, titled, “I was raped by Rotherham grooming gang—now I still face racist abuse online.”  In it, a British woman (alias, “Ella”) revealed that her Muslim rapists called her “a white c*nt, a white whore, a white b***h,” during the more than 100 times the Pakistani grooming gang raped her in her youth.

“We need to understand racially and religiously aggravated crime if we are going to prevent it and protect people from it and if we are going to prosecute correctly for it,” Ella said in a recent interview:

Prevention, protection and prosecution—all of them are being hindered because we are neglecting to properly address the religious and racist aspects of grooming gang crimes…. It’s telling them that it’s OK to hate white people.

That there are “racial” and “religious” aspects to the epidemic of Muslims raping European women is an understatement.  According to Dr. Taj Hargey, a British imam, Muslim men are taught that women are “second-class citizens, little more than chattels or possessions over whom they have absolute authority.” The imams, moreover, preach a doctrine “that denigrates all women, but treats whites with particular contempt.” Consider a few earlier examples:

• Another British woman was trafficked to Morocco where she was prostituted and repeatedly raped by dozens of Muslim men.  They “made me believe I was nothing more than a slut, a white whore,” she recollected. “They treated me like a leper, apart from when they wanted sex.  I was less than human to them, I was rubbish.”
• Another British girl was “passed around like a piece of meat” among Muslim men who abused and raped her between the ages of 12 and 14.  Speaking now as an adult, a court heard how she “was raped on a dirty mattress above a takeaway and forced to perform [oral] sex acts in a churchyard,” and how one of her abusers “urinated on her in an act of humiliation” afterwards.
• A Muslim man explained to another British woman why he was raping her: “you white women are good at it.”
• A Muslim man called a 13-year-old virgin “a little white slag”—British slang for “loose, promiscuous woman”—before raping her.
• In Germany, a group of Muslim migrants stalked a 25-year-old woman, hurled “filthy” insults at and taunted her for sex.  They too explained their logic—“German girls are just there for sex”—before reaching into her blouse and groping her. 
• Another Muslim man who almost killed his 25-year-old German victim while raping her—and shouting “Allah!”—afterwards inquired if she liked it.
• In Australia, a Muslim cabbie groped and insulted his female passengers, including by saying “All Australian women are sluts and deserve to be raped.”
• In Austria, an “Arabic-looking man” approached a 27-year-old woman at a bus stop, pulled down his pants, and “all he could say was sex, sex, sex,” prompting the woman to scream and flee.

In short, there certainly is a “racist” aspect to the rape of European women by migrants—though in reverse: non-white Muslim men tend to see white women as nymphomaniacs that are “hot” for being degraded and abused—a stereotype that, incidentally, stretches back to the very beginnings of Islamic history.

Even so, Ella’s attempts to highlight these “religious and racist aspects” that fueled the abuse she and other European girls and women experienced—that is, her attempt to connect the dots in an effort to help eliminate this phenomenon—led only to “a lot of abuse from far-left extremists, and radical feminist academics,” she said. Such groups “go online and they try to resist anyone they consider to be a Nazi, racist, fascist or white supremacist.”

They don’t care about anti-white racism, because they appear to believe that it doesn’t exist. They have tried to floor me and criticise me continually and this has been going on for a couple of months. They tried to shut me down, shut me up … I’ve never experienced such hate online in my life. They accuse me of ‘advocating for white paedophiles’ and being a ‘sinister demonic entity.’

Such is the price for speaking unpopular truths—especially those that directly challenge the official narrative.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/04/white-victims-muslim-rapists-raymond-ibrahim/

Germans are significantly more often victims of crimes with foreign suspects than vice versa. In 2019, the police solved around 70,000 cases in which at least one German suspect was involved and at least one foreigner was a victim. On the other hand, there were about 130,000 crimes in which at least one non-German committed a crime against a German, according to a parliamentary question by AfD MP Stephan Brandner to the federal government, which is published in the newspaper JUNGE FREIHEIT.The proportion of foreigners had been about 12.5 per cent in 2019.

The AfD politician also wanted to know the proportion of immigrants among the suspects in cases where Germans were victims. This group is defined in the police crime statistics (PKS) as persons with the residence status of asylum seeker, person entitled to protection and asylum, contingent refugee, tolerated person or who are in Germany without permission. The police registered around 35,500 cases in this regard in 2019. The most frequent suspects were from Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq.

In the case of homicides, there were 248 cases in the year with a German as the suspect and a foreigner as the victim. In the case of rape, sexual assault or offences against sexual self-determination, the police registered significantly more foreigners who committed offences against Germans (1,791) than the other way round (458). The same was true for assaults.

Brandner told the newspaper JUNGE FREIHEIT: “An efficient fight against crime requires that statistics be taken seriously and not glossed over, as the federal government always does. The AfD politician also criticised that German victims of crime against foreigners were not in the focus of public attention sufficiently. However, he said, it was “the duty of a state to protect its population from avoidable violent crime”. Criminal asylum seekers must therefore be deported promptly. “They have lost their right to protection.

https://jungefreiheit.de/politik/deutschland/2021/deutsche-opfer-von-auslaendern/

On Tuesday, a two-week-long debate began in the French Senate regarding the law promoted by French President Emmanuel Macron to fight radical Islam, and according to right-wing lawmakers, Macron’s plan is insufficient.

Some call the legislation Macron’s stepping stone to the next presidential election. The French president came up with his proposal shortly after the brutal beheading murder of high school teacher Samuel Patty by a Chechen-born youth, with Macron claiming that similar acts committed by radical Islamists should not happen under the new law.

“The murder encouraged the law, but, otherwise, it is a project that was prepared for a long time as part of Macron’s presidential reforms,” says Zdeněk Müller, an Arabist living in France.

However, the opposition disagrees with the president’s plans. In the National Assembly, most Republicans rejected the bill, considering it too soft.

The law on separatism is extensive. It consists of a total of 55 articles and covers various areas of life. It gives the state more control over mosques, but also religious organizations, and strives for greater transparency of churches and their funding.

The state primarily wants to gain control over the money that comes from abroad, but the issue is also public money, which, according to a 1901 law, can support various civic associations.

“Muslim communities sometimes confused this and pretended to be civic associations, but in reality, they served religion. It was pointed out that the money then went to religious and not to civic activities,” explains the Arabist.

The law is also an instrument for combating polygamy, forced marriages and prohibits the use of so-called virginity certificates. However, it also deals with punishing the spread of hatred on the Internet. Macron claims that it will strengthen the principles of secularism in public life.

A heated debate on the law has already been taking place in the National Assembly, which adopted it on Feb. 16. The controversial law, which had its loud opponents on the left and right, caused a stir even because of its name. While in October, Macron spoke of separatism, the National Assembly passed a law on “respect for the principles of the republic.” In one of many amendments, a group of right-wing and centrist senators advocates restoring the word separatism in the title of the bill. For them, using this term is meant to express a certain tendency of some, especially Muslim communities, to exclude themselves from civil society and create their own parallel world.

In the end, more than600 amendments were submitted. One of the most discussed parts of the law is Article 21 on home education. The law stipulates that French children between the ages of 3 and 16 are required to physically attend educational establishments. Exceptions will be available to children with an individual plan for health reasons or sports or artistic training. This point of the law is aimed in particular at fundamentalist families who educate their children, especially girls, outside French schools.

In the Senate, however, Article 21 did not pass as the right, which has a majority in the upper house, removed it from the law.

“Of course, religious radicals can also use home education, but we must not punish people for whom it is one of the alternatives to education,” Republican Jacqueline Eustache-Brini, one of the lawmakers, explained.

François Patriat, president of the La République En Marche! (LREM) party’s group in the Senate, admitted that this point would be difficult to find an agreement with the right-wing opposition. However, lawmakers of the Macron’s movement believe that the National Assembly will return the deleted article to the law and reverse the senators’ decision.

An issue likely to reappear in the Senate, that has not been discussed in the National Assembly, is the ban on wearing Muslim headscarves. Patriat rejects the debate because the law does not address this issue. But part of the right is calling for a ban on children wearing religious symbols in public. If approved, children could not wear a cross on their necks or a kippah on their heads.

Of course, various Muslim associations are also working to influence the final form of the law. But as Müller points out, they are often not united. Although they profess the same religion, they often differ in opinions based on their roots in North Africa or Turkey.

https://rmx.news/article/article/france-s-right-wing-considers-macron-s-law-against-islamic-separatism-too-weak