The City Councilor for Social Affairs in the Berlin district of Tempelhof-Schöneberg, Matthias Steuckardt (CDU), has accused migrants who live there in a homeless shelter of social fraud. He himself observed how residents drove up to the shelter in luxury cars.

“That annoys me because black sheep are exploiting our rule of law to the detriment of those who really need help,” he told local radio station Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg (RBB).

According to the broadcaster, there is a second accommodation in which similar reports have surfaced. “I have observed that new cars are constantly driving up, 7 Series BMW, 5 Series BMW, Porsche. The people come from Romania,” said one of them. The men who drove the luxury cars have keys to the homeless shelter. Other residents also observed “business activity, including drugs”.

The migrants with the expensive cars are only there in summer, a sort of “homeless tourism”. According to the RBB, there are photos that go back to 2017 and testify to this.

The broadcaster also spoke to an insider from the industry who knows the “system” well. In his opinion, these people are not needy. “Some pay the home up to 600 euros to be admitted and thus registered. With a registration, there are also social benefits, Hartz IV and child benefits,” he said.

The RBB reported that a Romanian with an expensive station wagon was spotted in front of the homeless shelter. He confirmed that he lived there. The caretaker testified that the owner of a BMW also lived in the home and that he “couldn’t understand that”.

Steuckardt complained that his office could do little about the apparent fraudulent exploitation of social benefits, as it could not, for example, investigate the assets of Romanian EU citizens.

Homeless people in Germany are housed according to the so-called General Security and Order Act (ASOG). The social welfare office is normally only active when “the life and limb of the homeless are at risk”.

freewestmedia.com/2020/09/15/berlin-city-council-accuses-migrants-of-social-fraud/

“Let black people go with our own land and reparations, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell.”

Thus spake convicted murderer Kori Muhammad, 42, at his June sentencing in Fresno, California. Muhammad drew a life sentence without possibility of parole for the 2017 murders of Carl Williams, Zackary Randalls, Mark Gassett and David Jackson, all targeted solely because they were white. The case passed with little attention from national media, despite relevance to ongoing racial violence.

Kori Muhammed was born Cory Allen Taylor and changed his name after converting to Islam as a teenager. In 1995, Muhammed participated in the Nation of Islam’s Million Man March in Washington. In his social media posts, Muhammad made references to “grafted white devils,” as the Nation of Islam explains, created 6,000 years ago by the mad scientist “Yacub.” According to police, Muhammed also supported a separate country for all “non-white” residents of the United States.

Muhammed believed he was part of an ongoing war between whites and blacks, and that a battle would soon take place. Derek Bavin, a classmate at Fresno City College, recalled that Muhammad would miss weeks of classes then accuse his instructors of being racist. He released hip-hop albums with repeated references to violence between blacks and whites.

Kori Ali Muhammad also boasts a long criminal history, with arrests for weapons, drugs, forgery and making terrorist threats. He was sentenced to seven years in 2008 and released early in 2016. In April of 2017, Muhammad felt “disrespected” by Carl Williams, 25, so Muhammad killed the man. When police sought him for the shooting, Muhammad planned to “kill as many white men” as he could before being caught. So on April 18, 2017, Muhammad drove through downtown Fresno targeting white victims.

When he walked up to a utility truck, Muhammad said in his confession, “I saw a Mexican driver and a white guy. I didn’t want to target the driver because he was Mexican, so I shot the white dude.” The “white dude” was Zachary Randalls, 34, whom Muhammad did not know and, as with all four victims, targeted solely because of his skin shade.

Muhammad encountered Mark James Gassett emerging from a Catholic Charities USA building and gunned him down with a .357 magnum revolver, shooting the victim again after he fell to the ground. Muhammad also encountered David Jackson, 58 emerging from Catholic Charities and shot him dead with the powerful revolver.  On arrest, Muhammad proclaimed “Allahu Akbar,” and when sworn in he raised his right fist.

“This is just a warning,” said Muhammad in an interview with the Fresno Bee. “If America does not treat black people right, it will be destroyed by God.” Muhammed showed no remorse for the killings and told reporters, “I say get over it. There will be no pity party.” Muhammad also discussed his mental illness and that would be an issue in the trial.

Based on examination by a physician, judge Jonathan Conklin found Kori Muhammed competent to stand trial. Prosecutor Brian Hutchins argued that Muhammad’s delusional views are part of his religious beliefs associated with the Nation of Islam. Muhammed’s attorneys withdrew his plea of not guilty by reason of insanity.

“You think COVID-19 is bad, wait till you see what’s coming next,” Muhammad said during the trial. On April 22, the Fresno jury found Kori Muhammad guilty of first degree murder in the death of Jackson, Gassett and Randalls, and second-degree murder in the death of Williams. The jury also found Muhammad guilty on four counts of attempted murder, discharging a gun into a home, and being a felon in possession of gun.

Judge Conklin delayed the sentencing so the murder victims’ families would have a chance to make statements in court. Harold Wagner, stepfather of Mark Gassett, said Muhammad was an “evil coward,” and others lamented the loss of their loved ones. In his own statement, Muhammad proclaimed, “Let black people go with our own land and reparations,” and mocked the victims’ relatives by blowing kisses.

The case drew no official statement from California Gov. Gavin Newsom or attorney General Xavier Becerra, not even as an example of “gun violence.” Like Micah Johnson, who gunned down five police officers in Dallas in 2016, Kori Muhammad targeted victims because of their race, yet media did not describe the quadruple murderer as the racist perpetrator of a hate crime.

Kori Muhammad was held on $2.6 million bail, but if cash bail had been eliminated, as Democrats seek, he would have been free to continue his killing spree. Had Muhammad drawn a death sentence it would never be carried out. In 2019, Gov. Gavin Newsom, reprieved 737 convicted murderers on California’s death row, including serial killers and cop killers.

In California, murderers lives matter more than those of their victims. Californians can expect more racist violence from those whose delusional beliefs are associated with the Nation of Islam.

“People don’t appreciate the black man,” Kori Muhammed told the Fresno Bee. “We built pyramids and trade routes and made great nations. We are the first to walk the Earth and we will be the last to walk it.”

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/09/life-sentence-kori-muhammad-death-sentences-his-lloyd-billingsley/

Some of the films that in recent years have won the Oscar for best film, in 2024 might yet be called upon to return the coveted statuette:

“Spotlight”, “The king’s speech”, “It is not a country for old men”, “The Gladiator”, “A beautiful mind”, “American Beauty”, “Titanic”, “Braveheart”, “The English Patient”, “The Silence of the Lambs”, “Schindler’s List” …

This is to go back only as far as the Nineties.

Certainly “Ben Hur”, “The Hunter”, “The Godfather” will not be saved … Perhaps they will be called upon to return the Oscar,not because they no longer deserve it, but because in those films there are no black protagonists, often not even in secondary roles. Nor are there any quotas reserved for the LGBT community.

None of this will happen, even though 2024 is the year that the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, which awards the Oscars, has chosen to enforce new rules for nominating for best film. Directors and producers have time to adapt. An ideological canon to be followed in order to be able to be among the chosen ones for the title of best film.

The film will therefore have to meet two of the four new standards set, said the Academy, which is running for cover after the controversies of the #OscarsSoWhite and Black Lives Matter campaign.

The film that wants to be nominated for Best Picture must have at least one main character or one significant secondary character belonging to an underrepresented racial or ethnic group; at least 30 percent of secondary roles must go to two “underrepresented groups”; and the main plot or narrative must be focused on an under-represented group.

Under-represented groups are women, people of color, LGBT or people with disabilities. Productions must also fill in “standard inclusion forms”.

Basically, “diversity” means “no white males” (Oscar nominee Charlotte Rampling said so). Even worse if they are heterosexuals.

The Los Angeles Times notes that some recent Best Picture nominees with almost exclusively white and male actors – including the World War I film “1917” and the gangster epic “The Irishman”- may have a hard time satisfying the new standard and staying real. Not to mention “Joker”. And what about “Dunkirk”, “Darkest Hour” and “Hurt Locker”, great war films that would not pass the exam imposed by the Academy that wants to become a sort of cinematic Eurovision.

And what about “Cleopatra”, the 1963 film guilty of cultural appropriation starring white Liz Taylor as the Egyptian queen?

And “Rocky”, this symbol of the much-abused “white heterosexual masculinity”?

And “My Africa”, with all those colonial fantasies?

And would the new rules mean that the first foreign film to win the statuette, “Parasite”, would be banned because Koreans are not a minority in South Korea?

For the same reasons, Hollywood awards prizes only to Israeli movies which present the Jewish state in a bad light, as the “oppressor” and the “occupier.” Never mind that over 50% of Israeli Jews are Sephardi in origin, 20% are Arabs with full rights, and that Israel is home to about 150,000 Ethiopian Jewish immigrants.

With these new rules, the Academy marks the return to the spirit of the Soviet Agitprop, the “socialist realism” of Moscow films, all educational and didactic, in which Kolkozians and young workers sang and danced with the always tanned Communist positive hero, always happy, always muscular, always loyal to the Party’s diktats.

When asked for an opinion, the Soviet writer Ilya Ehrenburg replied: “Socialist realism? Nobody knows what it is. Maybe that’s what the clique that defends its place likes and still dominates.”

Even in Hollywood, perhaps, they are afraid of being overwhelmed by “social justice” and are submitting voluntarily..

Entertainment is a new cultural dictatorship.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/287211

Stolberg’s knife attack is apparently not only “connected” with the local elections in North Rhine-Westphalia, as the WDR (West German Broadcasting) reported in an initial report, but also appears to be an Islamist act of revenge, and a case of clan liability.The victim, a 23-year-old man, is the son of a man who is “optically of Turkish origin” (according to the spokesman for the Düsseldorf Attorney General’s Office in an interview with the magazine TE) and was seen with four other people in a photo that the AfD published on Facebook on the occasion of the local elections in NRW. One of the four is the spokesperson of the AfD city association of Stolberg, as the spokesperson of the North-Rhine Westphalian AfD says.The Attorney General’s Office describes the crime in the same way at the request of TE: When the later victim drove his car slowly through a traffic-calmed zone at a pond in Stolberg in the night from Sunday, a 21-year-old man holding a German and Iraqi passport apparently identified him. “In anger over the photo”, which he apparently considered, as the press spokesman put it, to be “treason”, the German-Iraqi man struck the car of the later victim.He stopped, opened the door. Then the German-Iraqi stabbed him twice with a knife and then fled. Witnesses have heard him shouting “Allahu Akbar” during the violence. The victim is hospitalized after an emergency surgery, seriously injured.The fugitive was arrested by the police on Sunday evening and is now in police custody. “The wanted man could be arrested in Stolberg in a vehicle as a passenger by a mobile task force”, the Cologne police twittered on Sunday evening. He apparently also attacked the police officers: “During the attack, the driver, passenger and a police officer were injured and receive medical treatment,” the police said.

The next, jihadist attack: On the night of Sunday a man severely injured a 23-year-old with a knife (see tweet above). The father of the victim had been seen on an AfD advertising motif. The attacker is said to have shouted “Allahu akbar”.

It is possible that the crime in Stolberg, North Rhine-Westphalia, is connected to the local elections. The father of the 23-year-old victim could be seen on an advertising motif – i.e. an election poster of the AfD, according to a spokesperson of the Düsseldorf Attorney General’s Office, which took over the proceedings on Monday. The suspected perpetrator had shouted “Allahu akbar” before or during the crime.

According to information from the tabloid “Bild”, the attack is said to have taken place around 0.40 a.m. in the city of Stolberg. According to previous findings, the suspect, a 21-year-old man, had opened the driver’s door of the slow-moving car from the outside and suddenly stabbed the driver with a knife. The victim is said to have been seriously injured and saved by emergency surgery. He is currently still in hospital.

The background and the identity of the perpetrator are still unclear. The attacker is said to have connections to the Islamist community. Police spokesmen in Cologne and Aachen neither wanted to confirm nor deny this. Due to the possible background of the attack, the Cologne police initially took over the investigation, reports the magazine Focus.

As the saying goes: If words are followed by deeds. Isn’t it, Mr. Stegner, Mr. Böhmermann and what the left-wing agitators are all known as. More and more citizens seem to realize this – at least that is the impression given by the comments on the Facebook site of public broadcaster WDR:

journalistenwatch.com/2020/09/14/linke-hetzt-dschihadistischer/

Last Friday morning, the ex-boyfriend of the beautiful office clerk Bianca G. (27 years old) sentenced her to death – and killed her with a knife. Her crime: to separate from her hot-blooded, Turkish-born husband.Disgusting: Her new boyfriend watched the crime inactively.After the bloody deed, Cenk D. (29 years old) had a calm conversation with the new friend of the woman whom he had just murdered with numerous stab wounds. The man of Turkish origin had moved out of the shared apartment in Lübeck three weeks ago.Then there were loud arguments again and again, the police had to come to mediate several times during the night. Of course there were no legal consequences. Unfortunately, in these cases, “something” always has to happen before the constitutional state acts – quite different from all the new laws that are directed against unwanted expression of opinion.

On the morning of the crime, Cenk is said to have hidden in the basement for a long time. A witness reports that he already had a knife with him. Why the witness did not call the police is not known. Maybe because he had already resigned and nothing would have happened anyway. Around 8 am, the murderer asked his ex-girlfriend who the new man at her side was. When she answered that this was her new boyfriend, Cenk D. executed her with a knife in a bloodlust. The new friend, Tim M. (33 years old), watched. Then he called the police, before he calmly talked to the murderer, according to the neighbors.This was also shown by photos (see FB-Post above). The investigating judge issued an arrest warrant on the strong suspicion of manslaughter. That a suspicion of murder could be present based on the circumstances and past incidents is probably quite unthinkable in the Germany of 2020 – perhaps it would be racist.

Scathing remark:

The independent public prosecutor’s offices and courts must now be allowed to work, they will certainly pass an appropriate sentence in the name of the people.

wochenblick.at/tuerkischstaemmiger-ex-freund-richtet-27-jaehrige-mit-messer-hin/