Unstealing an Election

Committing virtually any kind of fraud requires less resources than catching it. 

Fraud is caught as often as it is largely because federal and state government have more resources to dedicate to the project than the average fraudster has. (That’s true of most crime. When the criminals have more resources than law enforcement, you end up with Chicago, Detroit, or any other crime-ridden hellhole.)

That’s what makes organized crime dangerous. It ties together a large group, some of whose members are experienced pros with expendables who get resources and training.

What happens when the organization committing the fraud controls the political infrastructure of entire cities, including those parts of it meant to police them?

That’s called corruption. Combine organized crime and corruption, and you have, well, the urban Democrat political machine in places like Philly.

The upshot is that it’s a lot easier to steal something than to unsteal it. And just because the theft is caught, doesn’t mean you’re getting what he stole back.

Republicans and conservatives are fighting on the ground to unsteal the election. This will be the largest such effort in American history. But tat doesn’t mean that it will succeed. Stealing an election is a lot easier than unstealing it.

At this point it’s a numbers game. The numbers game is a familiar one in election. Democrats are pretty good at playing it in their own political machines despite the media’s sudden outburst of righteous rage at the very idea (gasp) of challenging ballots and the validity of an election. They might want to remember that Obama was a lot better at knocking out his opponents without having to actually run against them, including invalidating the signatures of one of his mentors. That gave him his first real leg up.

While the numbers game, the race to catch invalid and illegal ballots, and even more overt instances of fraud, continues, conservatives are bravely rallying to stop the steal (the hashtag that will get you quickly suppressed on social media) to push the GOP to keep up the fight and to show support for an honest election.

Will this unsteal the election?

There are no certainties in life. And one of the bigger problems in the conservative movement in the last few years has been the rise of the “trust the plan” grifters who get social media followers by promising that a week from now everyone involved will be in Gitmo.

It’s a fight. Fights don’t have certain outcomes. And this fight isn’t just about now. 

You can’t have real elections if there’s massive fraud. 

Conservatives often ask about New York, Baltimore, or any deep blue city, why the people there don’t just vote their way out of the problem. Now they’re getting a front row seat to the answer. 

You don’t vote your way out of a corrupt rigged system. Cities run by Democrat political machines have meaningless elections in which the winners are picked early on by the network, to be occasionally challenged by lefties in primaries, and then rubber stamped in meaningless elections in which Democrat electioneering material is often illegally there at the polls.

No one wants Philly or New York City to become America. That would be the end of a free nation. And it’s why it’s important to unsteal elections, but even more important to keep them from being stolen.

The two big questions hanging over our heads going forward, even beyond what’s happening now, is how to deal with widespread Big Tech censorship and voter fraud.

Right now conservatives are chasing after the thief. What should also be done to keep elections from being stolen?

https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2020/11/unstealing-election-daniel-greenfield/

Georgia Goes to a Recount

Whatever happens next, Georgia is going to be at the political epicenter over the next few months. The battle for control of the Senate comes down to Georgia. 

Georgia’s presidential race, not the Senate races, is headed to a recount. It’s got a very slim margin due to the usual urban Democrat political machine voter fraud shenanigans. 

Don’t assume however that a recount is going to fix things. As I wrote earlier, stealing an election is a lot easier than unstealing it. Much like committing a crime requires fewer resources than bringing the criminal to justice.

There were two separate problems, one legal and one illegal, in Georgia, as in many other states.

1. Voter fraud in urban areas

2. Defections in suburban areas

Republicans, as I also wrote earlier, have to beat the voter fraud margin because voter fraud can be hard to prove and then hard to do anything about.

Take the Veritas whistleblower video. Even if the USPS investigation results in any kind of action, that won’t affect the ballots. Individual state and federal employees who were caught, even on video, committing ballot fraud might be charged, but tracking down the ballots they tampered with and invalidating them is a much taller order.

This is why Republicans have to win by high enough margins to beat the voter fraud margin.

Conservatives are up against a fundamentally corrupt system. And the system isn’t going to police itself. In a two-party system where one party cheats aggressively, but controls a sizable chunk of the government, reform is very difficult and requires a long term strategy.

Republicans hadn’t had one and still don’t. That’s the basic reality. 

A strategy means a realistic plan that can close loopholes, deal with fraud, and that can get passed or implemented without any wishful thinking. The Democrats have a plan to steal elections. Republicans don’t have a plan for stopping them.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2020/11/georgia-goes-recount-daniel-greenfield/

Germany: 83 out of 100 rioters are migrants

According to the Ministry of the Interior, 83 of 100 suspects of the Stuttgart riot night have a ” proven migration background”. “Of these, 49 have German and 34 have foreign citizenship,” according to a recently published response by the ministry to an application by the AfD party in the Baden-Württemberg state parliament. In the police statistics, persons who have both German and another nationality would be registered as Germans. According to the information provided, this applies to 20 suspects.As a ministry spokesman said in Stuttgart on Thursday, the definition of migration background is the same as that of the Federal Statistical Office. According to this definition, a person has a migration background “if he or she or at least one parent does not possess German citizenship by birth”.

During the riots in June, dozens of mainly young men had clashed with the police in the city centre. Several officers were injured and shop windows were destroyed.

Afterwards there was a controversial debate because, according to the Stuttgart police, they had asked some suspects about the nationality of their parents through the registry office after information about their origin had been denied during questioning. While critics asked what role an immigrant background played in the evaluation of the crimes, the police justified the action at that time, among other things, with the seriousness of the crimes and information for prevention concepts. Different concepts were needed for migrants from socially deprived areas than for Germans from more prosperous areas, for example.According to the ministry, the group of people in the night of the crime was of unequal origin: “The range of suspects ranges from 13-year-old Syrian refugees to 29-year-old Germans with education. The Ministry explained that it was only decided on a case-by-case basis whether and to what extent investigations into personal circumstances were necessary. Contacts abroad could, for example, play a role in assessing the risk of flight.In its parliamentary question, the AfD again criticised the fact that the migration background is not recorded in the crime statistics, but at the same time it is used for the statement that “foreigners are no more criminal than Germans”.The first trial concerning the night of the riot is scheduled for Tuesday. An 18-year-old has to answer to the Stuttgart local court for a particularly serious case of breach of the peace. Among other things, he is said to have smashed the rear window of a police car.

https://www.stuttgarter-zeitung.de/inhalt.randale-in-stuttgart-83-verdaechtige-der-krawallnacht-haben-migrationshintergrund.83ddf3c3-cf9f-43a2-97a5-2a102409bc0a.html