Victoria L. was only 20 years old, she still had her whole life ahead of her. But then her body lies smashed among parked bicycles, tools and rubbish in the bicycle cellar. The autopsy report will say “massive violence to the head”. Sharif A., a 22-year-old, is a prime suspect. The Libyan is said to have been stalking the young woman in the past and to have been ordered by the police to stay away from the area where Victoria lives. The investigators found out that as early as June 2016, Sharif S. arrived in Hamburg under the name of Sharif A. (22) and was later relocated as a refugee to Plauen (Vogtlandkreis). Sharif A. has a permit to stay until April 6, 2021 and would then be forced to leave Germany.

https://politikstube.com/hamburg-libyer-soll-junge-frau-erschlagen-haben/

A drunk 19-year-old man was caught with a live hand grenade at Cologne Central Station. Officers of the Federal Police controlled the Bosnian on Saturday night and arrested him. Experts classified the condition of the grenade as “live”. The man, who initially could not identify himself and had a blood alcohol level of one per thousand at the time of the check, is said to have carried the weapon “ready to hand” in his backpack, the Federal Police announced.During interrogation, the man said that he had recently found the grenade on a meadow during a holiday in Bosnia and had taken it with him. According to reports, the investigators consider this statement to be credible, and the 19-year-old is now at large again. The police in Bielefeld searched the accused’s flat there, but did not find any other prohibited items.The grenade was confiscated and is now being thoroughly examined by the Federal Police’s defusing unit in Sankt Augustin. According to the police, the grenade is of Yugoslavian design and was used in the war there in the 1990s. The 19-year-old is now being prosecuted for violating the War Weapons Control Act.

https://www.ksta.de/koeln/koelner-hbf-19-jaehriger-mit-scharfer-handgranate-im-rucksack-festgenommen-37914958?cb=1610458521885

The Red Cross district association in Hagen, which is in charge together with the city and the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, has now dismissed this coordinator for its non-medical staff at the facility. According to the Red Cross, this measure became necessary because police and public prosecutor’s investigations were initiated against this person. This concerns a pending criminal charge for falsifying a licence to practise medicine.The decisions of the alleged psychiatrist and emergency physician regarding personnel have all been questioned again in the meantime and even investigated by the police.According to information from the editorial office, the same impostor had already attracted attention in 2015 when he worked for an aid organisation in a refugee tent city and appeared there as a qualified psychologist without the appropriate qualifications. It is not yet clear whether charges were brought at that time or whether they parted amicably. At least the man’s police clearance certificate does not contain a corresponding entry.

https://www.bild.de/bild-plus/regional/ruhrgebiet/ruhrgebiet-aktuell/ermittlungen-gegen-fake-arzt-impfzentrum-koordinator-ist-hochstapler-74837106.bild.html?fbclid=IwAR1OE9tHwbMSLkuwsuZWGL4NLafDVRJG_6mlRJGvSsWc6MhnJ2bi9g6yHKA /https://www.wp.de/staedte/hagen/gefeuert-falscher-arzt-organisiert-corona-impfzentrum-hagen-id231300472.html

The Internet portal of the state of Berlin, Berlin.de, links to a Muslim telephone counselling service whose supporting association is said to be close to the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. By Muslim standards, the Brotherhood demands nothing special: it merely wants to establish a state that is guided by the principles of Sharia law. This is what the Qur’an says, and anyone who takes the Qur’an seriously as the true message of Allah will hardly be able to strive for anything else.

The daily “Morgenpost” reports with reference to an enquiry by the Berlin Liberal Democratic Party (FDP) member of parliament Holger Krestel addressed to the responsible senate administration. According to the report, the responsible politicians and civil servants whitewash the situation: Since 1998, the editorial work of berlin.de has been outsourced to a BerlinOnline Stadtportal Ltd.KG. It is responsible for the content published on the portal in the name of the state of Berlin and is not directly bound by instructions from Berlin’s City Hall. So there’s nothing you can do about it…

The counselling association itself denies any ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. According to the report, it wants to “quickly resolve the current problem and continue our successful cooperation with the Federal Foreign Office and the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development”. The association’s membership in “Aktion Deutschland hilft” under the patronage of former Federal President Horst Köhler and Foreign Minister Heiko Maas is suspended until further notice, because apparently not everyone quite believes the association’s attempt to resolve the problem.Since the Muslim Brotherhood is a Sunni religious community without formal membership, any evidence regarding the accusations is likely to be difficult.Those responsible will have a hard time finding a replacement. Hardly any Muslim organisation in Germany with a significant number of members is closer to democratic principles and the rule of law than the alleged Muslim Brothers, who do not want to be any such organisation.

pi-news.net/2021/01/internetportal-berlin-de-verlinkt-offenbar-die-muslimbrueder/

On Monday, Parler filed a lawsuit against Amazon, accusing the company of breaching its contract and violating a century-old antitrust law by promoting Twitter at its competitor’s expense. Amazon had removed Parler from its servers on Monday morning, claiming the conservative social media platform refused to remove posts advocating violence at the Capitol riots last Wednesday.

Due to Amazon’s removal, “Parler will be offline for a financially devastating period,” the lawsuit claims. It alleges that Amazon applied a double standard, breaking its contract with Parler over a small number of posts while preserving its ties with Twitter, where threats of violence reached into the thousands on Friday.

Amazon acted just as conservatives were flocking from Twitter to Parler, following Twitter’s ban of President Donald Trump’s accounts.

“Given the context of Parler’s looming threat to Twitter and the fact that the Twitter ban might not long muzzle the President if he switched to Parler, potentially bringing tens of millions of followers with him, AWS moved to shut down Parler,” the lawsuit alleges.

Oddly, Amazon leaked the story of Parler’s termination to BuzzFeed more than an hour before it bothered to inform Parler itself. BuzzFeed reported that AWS would remove Parler at 11:59 p.m. Pacific time Sunday night, in an article published at 6:07 p.m. Pacific on Saturday. Amazon did not email Parler about the termination until 7:19 p.m. Pacific, “meaning AWS leaked the letter to BuzzFeed before sending it to Parler.”

Parler’s contract with AWS stipulated that AWS must give notice 30 days before the termination of a contract.

AWS’s “death blow … could not come at a worse time for Parler—a time when the company is surging with the potential of even more explosive growth in the next few days.”

Due to Amazon’s removal, “Parler will be offline for a financially devastating period,” the lawsuit claims. It alleges that Amazon applied a double standard, breaking its contract with Parler over a small number of posts while preserving its ties with Twitter, where threats of violence reached into the thousands on Friday.

Amazon acted just as conservatives were flocking from Twitter to Parler, following Twitter’s ban of President Donald Trump’s accounts.

“Given the context of Parler’s looming threat to Twitter and the fact that the Twitter ban might not long muzzle the President if he switched to Parler, potentially bringing tens of millions of followers with him, AWS moved to shut down Parler,” the lawsuit alleges.

Oddly, Amazon leaked the story of Parler’s termination to BuzzFeed more than an hour before it bothered to inform Parler itself. BuzzFeed reported that AWS would remove Parler at 11:59 p.m. Pacific time Sunday night, in an article published at 6:07 p.m. Pacific on Saturday. Amazon did not email Parler about the termination until 7:19 p.m. Pacific, “meaning AWS leaked the letter to BuzzFeed before sending it to Parler.”

Parler’s contract with AWS stipulated that AWS must give notice 30 days before the termination of a contract.

AWS’s “death blow … could not come at a worse time for Parler—a time when the company is surging with the potential of even more explosive growth in the next few days.”

Due to Amazon’s removal, “Parler will be offline for a financially devastating period,” the lawsuit claims. It alleges that Amazon applied a double standard, breaking its contract with Parler over a small number of posts while preserving its ties with Twitter, where threats of violence reached into the thousands on Friday.

Amazon acted just as conservatives were flocking from Twitter to Parler, following Twitter’s ban of President Donald Trump’s accounts.

“Given the context of Parler’s looming threat to Twitter and the fact that the Twitter ban might not long muzzle the President if he switched to Parler, potentially bringing tens of millions of followers with him, AWS moved to shut down Parler,” the lawsuit alleges.

Oddly, Amazon leaked the story of Parler’s termination to BuzzFeed more than an hour before it bothered to inform Parler itself. BuzzFeed reported that AWS would remove Parler at 11:59 p.m. Pacific time Sunday night, in an article published at 6:07 p.m. Pacific on Saturday. Amazon did not email Parler about the termination until 7:19 p.m. Pacific, “meaning AWS leaked the letter to BuzzFeed before sending it to Parler.”

Parler’s contract with AWS stipulated that AWS must give notice 30 days before the termination of a contract.

AWS’s “death blow … could not come at a worse time for Parler—a time when the company is surging with the potential of even more explosive growth in the next few days.”

Yet “worse than the timing is the result—Parler has tried to find alternative companies to host it and they have fallen through. It has no other options. Without AWS, Parler is finished as it has no way to get online,” the lawsuit notes.

A delay of “even one day” in the court granting a restraining order and forcing Amazon to resurrect Parler’s account “could also sound Parler’s death knell as President Trump and others move on to other platforms. It is no wonder, then, that competitor Twitter’s CEO has heartily endorsed efforts to remove Parler from the public sphere.”

The lawsuit argued that AWS engaged in a clear double standard by attacking Parler. “By pulling the plug on Parler but leaving Twitter alone despite identical conduct by users on both sites, AWS reveals that its expressed reasons for suspending Parler’s account are but pretext,” it claims.

The lawsuit notes that Amazon claimed to find 98 examples of posts that clearly encourage and incite violence on Parler. “However, the day before, on Friday, one of the top trends on Twitter was ‘Hang Mike Pence,’ with over 14,000 tweets. … And earlier last week, a Los Angeles Times columnist observed that Twitter and other social media platforms are partly culpable for the Capital [sic] Hill riot, by allowing rioters to communicate and rile each other up.”

“Yet these equivalent, if not greater, violations of AWS’s terms of service by Twitter have apparently been ignored by AWS,” the lawsuit notes, bitterly.

Parler brings three claims against Amazon. It accuses AWS of violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act by “contracting or conspiring to restrain trade or commerce.” It accuses AWS of breach of contract “by not providing thirty days’ notice before terminating its account.” Finally, it accuses Amazon of “tortious interference with a contract or business expectancy.” By terminating Parler’s contract, “AWS will intentionally interfere with the contracts Parler has with millions of its present users, as well as with the users it is projected to gain this week.”

Parler has over 12 million users under contract, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit asks the Washington State district court to issue a temporary restraining order and an order forcing AWS to maintain Parler’s account until further notice from the court. It also seeks treble damages for the egregious attack on Parler’s ability to do business.

The lawsuit appears to be on firm footing, and it seeks an order as soon as possible. Stay tuned for more news on this.

Amazon also faces at least one lawsuit for excluding conservative and Christian nonprofits from its charity program, Amazon Smile, relying on the scandal-plagued far-left smear factory the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). The SPLC has long pressured Big Tech companies to blacklist conservative organizations that the SPLC falsely smears as “hate groups” and lists along with the Ku Klux Klan. A similar bias may be at work in this situation.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2021/01/11/breaking-parler-sues-amazon-asks-court-to-reverse-illegal-death-blow-n1331525

In the municipality of San Bartolomé de Tirajana on Gran Canaria, it is probably only a matter of time before things escalate in terms of migration. The residents of El Salobre and Lomo de Los Azules are fed up. They have increasingly to protect their property and are being left in the lurch by the authorities. The situation is getting worse and worse.

Since the underage ” refugees” moved into the camp created there a few weeks ago for 160 people, the residents have not been able to rest. Again and again, the migrants climb over the fences of their properties and show no respect even to elderly people.All the cries for help from the residents have so far gone unheeded. The situation is becoming increasingly worrying. Mayor Conchi Narváez ( Socialist Party of Spain) is finally asked to take up the matter and provide more protective measures. The streetlights should not be switched off at night and the police should be more present at all times of the day.Meanwhile, another migrant boat reached the beach of Amadores on Gran Canaria yesterday at around 09:40 am. The persons on board were 15 people from countries south of the Sahara. If this boat already made it to the beach during the day – unnoticed by radar – it is unclear how many boats reach the islands after dark.

https://www.kanarenmarkt.de/164465/migranten-krise-gran-canaria-bis-es-eskaliert.html/amp