My post on the infiltration of the political parties in Germany by Turkish right-wing radicals and Islamists allegedly violates community standards. With this, Facebook is clearly taking sides with Islamists.

The following is the wording of the post in question:

German government reports influence of Turkish right-wing extremists and Islamists on political parties – activities mainly in local politics

According to the federal government, Turkish right-wing extremists are trying to influence public and political opinion in Germany.

This is stated in the response to a parliamentary question of the Free Democratic Party (FDP), quoted by the newspaper “Die Welt”. Particularly in local politics, parts of the Turkish right-wing extremist scene are trying to occupy established intercultural dialogue formats, it says. According to the report, the federal government has knowledge about the candidacy of such persons in local and integration council elections.In November, the Bundestag had called for a ban on ” Grey Wolves” to be considered. However, according to media reports, experts currently consider the legal hurdles to be too high.Furthermore, according to the newspaper “Die Welt”, the German government classifies the Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research ( SETA ) as part of the Turkish ruling party AKP. SETA has run an agency in Berlin since 2017. The Milli Görüs movement also tries to function as a contact for politics and society. Via the “Islamrat für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland” (Islam Council for the Federal Republic of Germany), which it dominates, it is indirectly represented in the German Islam Conference.

ttps://www.deutschlandfunk.de/medienbericht-bundesregierung-weist-auf-einflussnahme.1939.de.html?drn%3Anews_id=1213889&fbclid=IwAR1OmGefa03QPvIDtkBtJtLBPHsYt33iuFsPdew2-vpwBkn9sX83Hms-9dA

Several mainstream German politicians have sharply criticized the Federal Government’s integration commission and its recently presented final report. “The expert commission not only deliberately ignored its task, but instead took a relatively one-sided position on general integration-political issues without being asked to do so,” a CDU politician Christoph de Vries told a German daily.

The task of the commission was to “show how much immigration Germany can sustain under which framework conditions with a view to integration”, explained the member of the Bundestag to daily Die Welt. The starting point for this was the Federal Government’s definition of a “target corridor” of up to 220 000 immigrants per year.

The expert commission for integration includes 25 members under the leadership of the integration officer Annette Widmann-Mauz (CDU). It presented its final report recently in which the main recommendation was to stop using the term “migration background”. Instead, the panel wants everyone to speak of “immigrants and their (direct) descendants” in future.

“Verbal acrobatics about migration terms instead of a substantial discussion of integration deficits helps neither the migrants nor the majority society”, complained de Vries. Furthermore, the commission described integration as “a task of the state and society at large” and “not as a responsibility of migrants”.

Integration deficits are “largely ignored and integration ability is rejected as a category, although there are scientifically recognized indicators such as labour force participation, educational qualifications or delinquency” to measure the success of integration the CDU member complained.

Another member of Angela Merkel’s CDU, Christoph Bernstiel also accused the commission of having “completely missed” its actual goal. The paper reads “in many places like minutes from an academic debating club” that “focuses on denouncing terms”. The question “whether the term migration background is discriminatory” is of secondary importance. His party colleague Marian Wendt made a similar statement: “Instead of pointing out problems and suggested solutions, the report of the expert committee prefers to deal with terminology”.

The criticism of integration researcher Ruud Koopmans also goes in the same direction: “Unfortunately, the integration commission follows the academic fashion of discussing terminology rather than the underlying phenomena,” he told Die Welt. “The belief that new words can create a new reality is predominant. Any new term for a migration background would be perceived as stigmatizing again after five years.”

This kind of appalling arrogance – this time from a Left politician – has also struck ordinary voters. While many citizens are fighting for their livelihoods because of the harsh Corona measures, Thuringia’s Prime Minister Bodo Ramelow played games on his cell phone during a Corona online conference in which the lockdown extension was debated, which has caused fierce criticism nationwide. The pandemic has quite literally been a matter of life and death, in which the livelihoods of millions and perhaps the future of an entire generation of students are at stake.

The state politician openly boasted on social media that he was “up to level ten” of Candy Crush during the Corona summit of state leaders and the Chancellor. Candy Crush is a puzzle game that is played on smartphones.

Meanwhile, the number of left-wing extremist acts of violence has risen sharply in the past year. The authorities registered 1 359 corresponding violent crimes, as reported by Welt am Sonntag, citing a response from the federal government to a request from FDP member of the Bundestag, Linda Teuteberg. This corresponds to an increase of 29 percent compared to 2019. At that time, 1 052 acts of violence were recorded. According to the Federal Ministry of the Interior, a total of 9 973 left-wing extremist crimes were identified in 2020. The number is thus roughly on a par with the previous year.

Teuteberg told the newspaper that “the tendency in left-wing extremism to increasingly violent acts is also worrying – there is no ethical superiority of any variant of violent extremism and any trivialization of criminal activity as activism should be forbidden”.

Last year, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution observed a radicalization of the left-wing extremist scene and warned against the “emergence of terrorist structures in left-wing extremism”. “Serious physical injuries to the victims up to possible death are accepted approvingly,” it said in an internal analysis.

The Office for the Protection of the Constitution in Saxony came to the same conclusion: In Leipzig in particular, “the violence-oriented left-wing extremist scene is reaching a new level of escalation through the criminal and violent acts it has committed”.

Lower Saxony’s police chief Axel Brockmann warned of a qualitative and quantitative increase in left-wing extremist violence .

And while leftists debate terminology and play games during debates, politicians of the AfD are targeted by violent left-wing extremists. The latest victim is Marie-Thérèse Kaiser from the AfD Rotenburg. Suspected left-wing extremist perpetrators vandalized the house in which she lives and a car parked in front of it.

A suspected attack on the car of a Saxon AfD politician is currently being investatigated by the State Criminal Police Office (LKA) Saxony. The reason for this are several missing and loosened wheel nuts on the car of the AfD district chairman of North Saxony and Bundestag candidate, René Bochmann, the AfD announced last week. According to the Saxon AfD, Bochmann noticed while driving that the steering wheel was moving uncontrollably. He was only barely able to prevent a collision with an older passerby.

According to the AfD, the perpetrators are from the left-wing extremist spectrum. Jörg Urban, the AfD state chairman in Saxony, reacted in horror: “This cowardly attack leaves me speechless. Here the death of a politician and other bystanders was accepted approvingly! Apparently some opponents of the AfD have long since abandoned a democratic basic order.”

The attack continues a long series of crimes against members and supporters of the AfD. People are regularly assaulted and sometimes seriously injured. Election posters for the AfD are always the target of widespread vandalism and AfD information stands have been destroyed and party’s electoral activists have been beaten and kicked.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/01/31/playing-games-german-integration-commission-and-left-politician-excel-at-mediocrity/

Once again, “Facebook” is in court because it deletes posts rigidly. FB user Tobias Huch (39) is fighting back against this and took “Facebook Ireland Limited” to the regional court on Thursday.

Huch is a renowned human rights activist, journalist and book author. He informs people about the dangers of IS and volunteers in humanitarian aid for Kurdish refugees.But this human rights activist, of all people, accuses Facebook of supporting IS on its Instagram service: They deleted four posts with photos showing, among others, armed men. Huch was publishing his work as a war correspondent, and Facebook threatened to block his Instagram account! Reason: “Your post violated our community standards.”Huch: “Unbelievable that they claim I would support the IS.” The judge: “The photos are at least ambiguous. Political insiders know what you want to show. Others see in the footage only a terrorist organisation. Armed men cheering. At first glance you don’t see what is meant.”Facebook’s censorship is unacceptable to lawyer Joachim Steinhöfel (58), who represents Huch in court and is paid by the donor-financed fund “Freedom of Expression on the Net”: “It’s terrible what that would mean for freedom of expression and freedom of the press if the deletion were to be upheld!”

He wants to enforce stricter rules for Facebook and applied for an injunction. His demand in it: The photos should be shown again and deleting them again should be prohibited.

The court decided to adjourn and announce its decision on February the 18th.

https://www.bild.de/regional/bremen/bremen-aktuell/huch-klagt-gegen-social-riesen-facebook-will-menschenrechtler-loeschen-75114380.bild.html?fbclid=IwAR3cihbvKUy6ZM21HnWD624zoLzG4_G69x884KZ-gFPAGaHeHndOVbvK3_k

It was supposed to be a long-planned arrest, but the police operation ended in disaster!

Since Friday, January the 29th, Mahmut H. has been on trial before the Hamburg Regional Court. The 29-year-old German, who according to the public prosecutor’s office was wanted on three arrest warrants, is alleged to have injured a police officer (57) so severely during his arrest in February 2020 that he died a few days later in hospital. The charge is bodily harm causing death.Police investigators from Itzehoe had wanted to arrest Mahmut H. in the Hamburg district of Lurup on February the 25th 2020: The wanted man had shortly before advertised a vehicle on Ebay classified ads, arranged to meet the police investigators, who pretended to be interested buyers, at a bus stop on Lurup Hauptstraße.

Then police started to arrest him: One of the officers jumped into Mahmut H.’s car through the open passenger door, and a scuffle started.

Meanwhile, the 29-year-old accelerated, turned his VW luxury limousine Phaeton across the four-lane street Lurup Hauptstraße and collided head-on with the BMW of a Hamburg special investigator from State Criminal Police Office 23, pushing the vehicle twelve metres across the road.

The 57-year-old police chief inspector of the State Criminal Police Office, Klaus-Ulrich H., who was sitting in the BMW, was so seriously injured that he died eight days later in hospital. His colleague suffered minor injuries.

Mahmut H. had already committed his first offence at the age of 14. In 2017, he was sentenced to nine months in prison for assault, forgery and driving without a licence. Today he has a total of 14 previous convictions.

According to the police, he was uninjured in the crash.

According to a court spokesperson, it will have to be clarified in the course of the trial exactly how the collision occurred.

In court, the accused affirms: “I thought it was a robbery. The prospective buyers came closer, suddenly a man jumped frantically into the car. He attacked me in a jump without saying anything. I thought I was in a bad film. I don’t know why I took the turn.”

When asked by the judge if the police officers had not identified themselves, the accused only said: “No, not that I know of.”

After the incident, the Hamburg police reported that Mahmut H. had continued to accelerate after the collision and had pushed the civilian police car even further in front of him.

The death of the officer had caused great consternation among the Hamburg police.

The trial will continue.

https://m.bild.de/regional/hamburg/hamburg-aktuell/prozess-auftakt-in-hamburg-intensivtater-fahrt-zivilfahnder-tot-75118850,view=amp.bildMobile.html