“internAA” is a magazine by “staff members for staff members” of the German Foreign Office. Every month it has a different thematic focus. In the October 2020 issue, the theme was “Showing your colours”. Starting on page 7, there is a three-page text about the initiative “Diplomats of Colour”, written by its founder Tiaji Sio, a young female diplomat who, as a “black person”, is committed to fighting racism. Tiaji Sio is currently serving in Hanoi. Her text was illustrated by the German Foreign Office. On the bottom left of page 8, Foreign Minister Maas can be seen between the author and another DoC activist. And above the text is a photo of a road sign in Berlin that has been pasted over.Bernhard Weiss Street became George Floyd Street. The campaign was part of the worldwide protests against “white” state violence. The terms “police” and “white” were apparently enough to awaken in ignorant “anti-racists” the desire to erase the name of the militant Jewish democrat persecuted by the Nazis.Department 102 in the Foreign Office in Berlin adopts the picture without comment, thus showing all diplomatic representatives of Germany how the memory of a Jew persecuted under the Nazis is desecrated today in the name of anti-racism at Werderscher Markt (seat of the Foreign Minister, editor’s note).

Like many other German Jews, all the sons of the Weiß family served in the First World War. Bernhard was promoted from platoon leader of a medical company to first lieutenant to cavalry captain and earned the Iron Cross, 1st class. A breathtaking military career for a Jew in the imperial era. This was also noticed in Berlin. In the summer of 1918, the Prussian Minister of the Interior Bill Drews asked the Bavarians to release Weiß and appointed him deputy head of the criminal police in crisis-ridden Berlin. Weiß became head of the criminal investigation department as early as 1925 and police vice-president in 1927. This made him the highest-ranking Jew in the field of German law enforcement. He was a member of the German Democratic Party (DDP) and a tireless defender of the endangered democratic republic against right-wing and left-wing extremists. In doing so, he always stood faithful to his Jewish identity, while many other Jews had themselves baptised in order to be able to work their way up in the civil service.His unswerving loyalty to the democratically legitimised constitutional state brought Weiß into direct conflict with the leader of the emerging National Socialists in Berlin. For Joseph Goebbels, Weiß was the perfect object of hatred – a liberal Jew who, after a career in the army as a highly decorated front-line fighter, had also attained a position of civilian power. Goebbels’ inflammatory newspaper “Der Angriff” launched an unprecedented campaign to delegitimise the popular deputy police chief in Berlin. He portrayed Weiß as a big-nosed ape, donkey and snake and always referred to him as “Isidor” Weiß in order to hammer into his readers heads that as a Jew, Weiß had no rights in Germany.In 1932, after Papen’s “Prussian strike”, Weiß, like the entire government of Prussia, loses his office and is forced to resign in writing that he renounces any further activity in the civil service. Two months after Hitler’s seizure of power in 1933, Hermann Göhring puts a manhunt out for the Jew Weiß. A high bounty is placed on his head. Nazi henchmen storm his flat. Germany’s former most famous policeman has to go into hiding and flee. Together with Alfred Kerr, Kurt Tucholsky, Ernst Toller, Heinrich Mann and many others, Bernhard Weiß is on Hitler’s first expatriation list on 25 August 1933. Via Czechoslovakia he comes to London, where he sets up a small business. It was not until 1949 that Weiß visited his old homeland again. His most fervent wish in life, he says, is to return to Berlin. The Social Democratic mayor Ernst Reuter then offers him a position with an advisory function in the police service. But Weiß is already too ill to take up this post. On July 29, 1951, Dr. Bernhard Weiß, a Prussian Jew, died of cancer in a hospital in London. After his death, his widow Lotte returned to Berlin. Today, the courageous democrat is considered one of the founding fathers of modern German law enforcement.

https://juedischerundschau.de/article.2021-02.wie-das-auswaertige-amt-rassismus-mit-der-tilgung-der-erinnerung-an-ns-verfolgte-bekaempfen-will.html?fbclid=IwAR0AcK7pdj4TaVAxpWVz7-rKAugjAk9_SqsLVRdW1Vpl6bmgkBrczuDNvvs

The charge is murder with intent to cover up and cruelty! According to the prosecution, on July 7, 2020, Iraqi Husam A. (33) killed linguistics student Gabriel V. (†35) in his flat in the Neckarstadt district of Mannheim because the latter did not want to let the homeless man stay overnight (the tabloid BILD reported).

At the start of the trial before the Regional Court on Thursday, he blurted out this bizarre confession: “Scabies is to blame for my crime!His defence lawyer Steffen Kling then threw his hands in the air, was visibly annoyed, grabbed his client by the arm and said to the judge: “That’s enough! We’re not saying one more word.” His defence strategy is probably ruined…

Earlier, Husam A. had entered courtroom 5 with his head bowed and in handcuffs.

Senior Public Prosecutor Dr. Jeanette Zipperer on the night student Gabriel V. died: “The accused grabbed an unopened champagne bottle, hit the victim’s head several times, then waited without any emotion and hit the injured party again to prolong his suffering and agony.”According to Dr. Zipperer: “After the victim was lying on the ground with his skull open, the accused pulled down his shorts in order to direct suspicion towards homosexual men. It didn’t help: a shoe print at the scene of the crime lead to A.’s conviction shortly afterwards.Actually, the Iraqi (single) did not want to comment on the crime in court. But when questioned about his biography, this faux pas happened: Husam A. ( who has been in Germany since 2016) told about his heavy alcohol and drug consumption, that he had lost all his friends because of it and that he was still suffering from an infectious skin disease.

In this context, the fatal sentence was also uttered: “Scabies is to blame for what I did!”

The trial continues.

https://m.bild.de/regional/frankfurt/frankfurt-aktuell/mannheim-mordprozess-student-mit-sektflasche-wegen-kraetze-erschlagen-75206310,view=amp.bildMobile.html

France’s President Emmanuel Macron is currently fighting a battle against radical Islam, but it could well be lost if he does not take action soon. The President is still trying to master the situation on two fronts. However, this two-pronged attack could be the very trap into which the Islamists are trying to lure the French leader.

At the National Assembly, French Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin is manning one front line. He has introduced a law there to “strengthen the principles of the Republic”, a de facto a reorganization of the famous law on religious worship of 1905. The relationship between the state and religions has been redefined in 70 articles, albeit without explicitly mentioning Islamism.

When French teacher Samuel Paty was beheaded, the headline of a New York Times report was “French Police Shoot and Kill Man After a Fatal Knife Attack on the Street.” Thus Macron will have to face heavy criticism from the mainstream US media, something he has been trying to avoid at all costs. French daily Le Monde has denounced the “disconcerting American blindness when it comes to jihadism in France” but this blindness will no doubt prevail with Joe Biden being elected as US president.

In France, the population which adheres to Islam has expanded in recent years. The rise of Islam can be seen in recent figures: Young Islamists, some of whom were born or socialized in France, refer to the Quran in their acts of violence, and 57 percent of young Muslims in France now prioritize Sharia law over the laws and principles of the republic.

A number of books, including scientific studies, about the “conquered territories of Islam in France” or about the infiltration of radical Muslims in administration, sports and cultural associations, as well as ghetto formation with quasi-assumption of sovereign rights and of course uncontrolled immigration have intensified this unease and has led to a shift in consciousness that has been putting pressure on politics.

According to an IFOP poll, 89 percent of French voters considered the terrorist threat to be “high,” 87 percent thought that “secularism was in danger,” and 79 percent that “Islamism has declared war on the nation and the Republic.” These respondents are clearly not all “far-right” National Rally voters.

Macron is going to have to deal with the issue if he wants to be re-elected, and it will not be Americans voters keeping him in the Elysees for another term. With the law, the state is supposed to regain control, in a certain sense, sovereignty over life in France.

The law, however, makes no distinction between mosque, church and synagogue. The churches, on the other hand, have revolted and have rejected control of the prefect, i.e. the state, in self-administration including bookkeeping. The chairman of the Episcopal Conference, the Archbishop of Reims, Eric de Moulins Beaufort, makes it clear: “The law of 1905 is a law of freedom. But with the new law it threatens to turn into a control, police and repression law.”

The Protestants are also alarmed and are standing up against the law. The chairman of the Union of Protestants of France, Francois Clavairoly, told the Senate: “Freedom of religion itself has been attacked. I would never have believed that I would ever have to defend freedom of worship in France.” The Grand Rabbi Chaim Korsia also warned of the collateral damage caused by the law: “Religions that behave in an exemplary manner must not suffer from stricter controls.”

Protestants, Catholics and Jews fall under the law of 1905. But more than ninety percent of all mosque associations fall under the much more liberal law of 1901 and hardly need to fear the tightening of controls. It is to be expected that the law will be greatly changed, with more than 2 500 amendments already on the table of the President of Parliament. The first vote should take place in mid-February. Then it goes to the Senate, which is dominated by conservatives, where further changes are to be expected.

The second front line being drawn in the battle, is the state versus the Conseil Français du Culte Musulman – CFCM, or French Council of Muslim Cults. Its eight members are supposed to sign a Charter for Islam in France. The Charter provides, among other things, that Muslims recognize freedom of conscience (including converts and ex-Muslims), the equality of all people, including men and women, and furthermore condemn anti-Semitism and reject all forms of violence. That goes against the essence of Islam. Nevertheless, five of the eight associations have signed. Three have refused, however.

Above all, there are two postulates: No interference from abroad and rejection of a political Islam. This is indirectly directed against Turkey and the Muslim Brotherhood, who dominate these three unruly associations. But these “non-negotiable” (Macron) principles of an Islam in France must be submitted by all associations and imams. The key point: These principles are controllable, all other concessions (equality of men and women, freedom of conscience, rejection of violence, etc.) are proclamatory only and a matter of personal conviction.

The three unruly Muslim associations, which represent around 15 percent of the seven million Muslims in France, want to negotiate. They do not accept the primacy of republican laws over the Quran and they say so openly.

The Turkish influence on around 270 mosques – a good tenth of all mosques in France – must be stopped. It is radical Islamic, nationalist and fundamentalist in character. The General Secretary of the Turkish association Milli Görüs, who incidentally is also active in Germany and has been observed by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution for several years, linked the Charter with the law before parliament.

He protested against the fact that everyday practices such as wearing the headscarf, which is mentioned in the law but not in the Charter, are viewed as political activities. And of course he cited the fear that Muslims could come under general suspicion, described by the catchphrase “Islamophobia”.

Macron initially wanted to continue negotiations. And that could be the trap. Because if the law is weakened on its way through Parliament and the Senate and entire passages – for example about education at home (home-schooling, which is allowed in France) or about wearing religious clothing and scout uniforms – are omitted, the Islamic associations will insist on equal treatment and shout “discrimination” if not. Then the Charter can no longer be adhered to in its current form.

That is why the maneuvre of the three Islamic associations is clear: They are playing for time. If Macron cannot induce or force them to give in before the law is passed, or even allow a lex Islam, he will be a loser, barely a year before the presidential elections.

The Charter may solve one problem, but the even bigger problem has not yet been addressed: French Islam also feeds on uncontrolled immigration. Therefore, the mainstream parties (The Republicans) and the National Rally (RN, formerly National Front) are calling for a constitutional amendment to accompany the Law on the Principles of the Republic, in which the principle is enshrined, according to the Republicans, that “no person or group can refer to his or her origin or religion in order not to have to observe general rules and laws”.

The chairwoman of the RN, Marine Le Pen, wants to rule out the wearing of a Muslim headscarf in public spaces and also ban ideologies that contradict the rules of the Republic. That corresponds to a lex Islam that would surely find favour with the population. The RN also wants to make it more difficult for foreigners to obtain citizenship and to introduce stricter laws against illegal immigration. Such plans also meet with approval from the population.

Macron has gone further with the Charter and the law than any government before him. But it’s not enough. The problem of Islamism is a question of identity. Or as Eric Zemmour – currently the best-known publicist in France – puts it: “France must decide whether it wants to remain France or whether it wants to become a constitutional state among many.”

Macron wants to force religious radicals into the Republican circle. To do this, he has to make hard decisions and make them as soon as possible. It’s obvious that any Muslim association that does not sign the Charter must be banned. But will Macron have the guts to do so?

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/02/06/time-running-out-for-president-macron-to-stop-radical-islam/

And here is the wording of my post:

Criminal Arab clan bigwig receives 27th permit to stay in Germany

A prominent member of the notorious Miri clan can probably stay in Germany for the time being. Ahmad A., who has been convicted many times, received at the end of last year a renewed permit to remain in Germany, which is now his 27th. According to confidential documents of the Berlin Foreigners’ Registration Office, the certificate of suspended deportation is valid for one and a half years.The alleged 39-year-old man arrived in the country from Lebanon with his parents in 1989. His asylum application was rejected in 1992. Due to the lack of passports, the family could not be deported. Already as a youth, A. was known to the police for robbery, extortion, theft and bodily harm. In the meantime, 22 criminal records have been added to the Federal Central Register. A. is said to have close contacts to the Berlin gangsta rap scene. Only in September did a judgement against A. become final. The local court in Berlin sentenced him to two years and three months in prison for dangerous bodily harm and violation of the weapons law.The offender, who calls himself Ahmad “Patron” Miri in public, has claimed to be from Syria for several years. A second asylum application was rejected. The ban on deportations to Syria, which had been in place since 2012, expired at the end of December. However, transfers to the country are still hardly possible. Ahmad A.’s lawyer did not answer a request by the weekly SPIEGEL about his client’s asylum status.

https://www.spiegel.de/panorama/berlin-ahmad-der-patron-miri-kriminelle-clangroesse-erhaelt-27-duldung-a-9755b228-0e1e-47a3-a06e-2cb30d4de899-amp

https://medforth.biz/criminal-arab-clan-bigwig-receives-27th-permit-to-stay-in-germany/