139 migrant minors arrive in Germany, but government refuses to provide their age and gender

Last week, 139 migrants from Greece arrived in Germany, but the Federal Ministry of the Interior refuses to release data about their ages, nationality and gender despite a press request for that information. 

The interior ministry did send press release with the title: “Another flight with sick children and unaccompanied minors from Greece landed in Hanover.” In addition to the 51 unaccompanied minors, there were 17 sick children and their core families. What is less clear is the age, gender and nationality of those 51 unaccompanied migrant minors.

With underage and unaccompanied asylum seekers costing around €5,000 per month just for accommodation and the German state planning to spend €64.5 billion on migrants over the next four years, some German taxpayers are curious about where their money is going, prompting the German news outlet Junge Freiheit to request the Federal Ministry of the Interior release gender, age, and nationality information. 

The short answer form the ministry stated that “for reasons of data protection law, we cannot provide any details about the people who arrived in Hanover today’.

The question of what migrants’ gender has been in the public interest since April at the latest. At that time, the federal government announced that it would be able to fly in seriously ill or unaccompanied immigrants under the age of 14, and they would be primarily girls. 

However, in the end, only four of the 47 migrants were girls. Even in Chancellor Angela Merkel’s CDU party felt some resentment over the issue.

Lower Saxony’s social secretary Heiger Scholz said that the group of minors housed by his state consists of two girls and nine boys from Afghanistan and Pakistan, according to the DPA news agency. Photos show that the proportion of girls was also very low overall.

“The first of a total of 150 migrants from Moria that Germany wants to take in have arrived at Hanover Airport, with 51 unaccompanied young refugees being distributed to several federal states,” wrote public broadcaster ZDF on Twitter.

A BBC report found that an astounding 84 percent of underage migrant minors in Sweden were actually adults, while other studies showed that 73 percent were actually adults in Belgium, and at least 40 percent were actually adults in Germany.

This month, a migrant from Pakistan who committed an Islamic terrorist attack targeting the Charlie Hebdo satirical magazine was discovered to have lied about his age in order to receive benefits from the French state, including protection from deportation. After his arrest, he confessed to being 25 instead of the 18 he first told authorities when he illegally entered France in 2018. 

There are also concerns in Germany that the country is not just accepting unaccompanied minors, such as those that were brought to Germany from Greece last week, but may also be on the hook to accept more migrants due to chain migration. The new EU Asylum and Migration Pact proposed by the European Commission refers to an expanded concept of family chain migration, just one of a number of controversial clauses of the new pact. Debates on the pact are expected to be difficult since several countries, such as Hungary, Poland, and Austria, have already announced they are unlikely to adopt it. 

If the pact is adopted, not only would parents and underage children be brought together in Germany, as has been the case before, but also those people who have an adult sibling in Germany. As the CDU migration expert Thorsten Frei recently warned, Germany would be particularly hit with more than 800,000 protected titles granted for new arrivals.

This number of migrants arriving in Germany is unlikely to decrease as Germany has already promised to take in several thousand migrants from the Greek refugee camps.

rmx.news/article/article/germany-accepts-139-migrant-minors-but-government-refuses-to-provide-their-age-and-gender

The Election in Black and White

America is heading towards the abyss – whatever the outcome of the coming election. If Trump wins, we have a fighting chance to save our democracy as we know it. If he loses, the racial totalitarians will be in power and our fight will be a rearguard action based on the hope that when the American people get a full dose of governance by the party of hate they will gather their forces to defeat them.

Michelle Obama – to pick one among a myriad of examples to hand – has declared the coming election to be an election about racism. According to Michelle, Trump and his supporters are racists, and their helpless victims are people of color like her. In this delusional vision – typical of the racial messages coming from every benighted American who considers themselves “progressive” – Trump supporters are white nationalists who oppress people of color. Thus, in a recent message, Michelle Obama has urged undecided voters to, “’Think about all those folks like me and my ancestors,’” and then vote Democrat, “like your life depended on it.” Like her arrogant supporters she thinks that a reflection on the state of benighted black people provides a self-evident reason to condemn the half of America who would vote Republican. The Democrat electoral cause is a crusade against a racist president and the white supremacists and racists, who support him and are determined to attack the most vulnerable citizens among us and make their lives hellish.

Okay, Michelle, since you asked for it, here’s what I think about folks like you. You are worth $100 million, a lot more than most of the people who inhabit this country. In short, you are incredibly privileged. I won’t insult you the way you insult white people by calling this black skin privilege, though many Republicans voted for your husband because they wanted a black American to be president even though he was a Democrat.

Not only are you privileged and rich, but despite your cavalier contempt for our country and its achievements – you are one of the most admired women in America, however implausible and tragic that may be. As for your ancestors, black Africans enslaved every one of the unfortunate men and women who were sold at slave auctions to Europeans and shipped to the New World. There, the English had indeed established a slave system. But in 1776, the creators of this great country founded the first nation in human history – black or white – dedicated to the proposition that all human beings – black as well as white – are created equal, and that they are endowed by their Creator with a right to liberty that no government can take away.

Immediately on the creation of their new nation, they began ending slavery first in what rapidly became the Free States of the North, then in the vast territory incorporated under the Northwest Ordinance in 1787. Seventy-six years later – not the 400 your devious and malicious friends reflexively attribute to “American slavery” – the Emancipation Proclamation sounded the death knell of a hateful system. The costs of this world-shaking effort were 350,000 mainly white Union lives, and that of the noblest president with which this country has been blessed.

I won’t deal with the specifics of your paranoid view that only black people experience the frustrations of modern life, and only because they are black. But I will dredge up this unpleasant fact: Ninety-percent of interracial crimes in the United States – more than half a million in all – are committed by blacks against whites. Yet, this has not led to a wave of anti-black racism on the part of whites. On the contrary, there has never been a time when white Americans have more generously and openly and virtually unanimously embraced the idea that black lives matter, and proceeded to do what they could to help that minority of the black community that has fallen behind. Indeed, the president you slander as racist has done more for black people in his four years in office than your husband did in eight. It is time for a little humility Michelle and color-blindness, and for putting way the racist rhetoric you are hoping your party will use to get back in power. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/10/election-black-and-white-david-horowitz/

German Olympics president Thomas Bach refuses to include Navid’s case on IOC agenda for Wednesday meeting

Left-wing Berlin wants to ban words such as ‘foreigner’ and ‘asylum seeker

Officials in Berlin’s left-wing government have a new handbook which states that they can no longer label people as “foreigners” or “asylum seekers”, with both of them allegedly discriminatory. 

Words such as foreigners (Ausländer), black passengers (Schwarzfahrer) and asylum seekers (Asylbewerber) should no longer exist in Berlin.

The term “Schwarzfahren” means to “ride black” and refers to riding a train without a paid ticket. In English, it would be the equivalent of disallowing the term “black market”. There is no evidence that the German term “Schwarzfahren” was ever meant to refer to Black people in any manner or intended to be used for any derogatory purpose.

The new handbook rules for officials came from the local senate, which is the executive body of Berlin. With the new guidelines, an official should replace the word “foreigner” with the new term “person with an international past”. The term “black traveler” is also to be changed, with the manual offering the option of “passengers without a valid ticket”.

The handbook is extremely detailed, has 44 pages, and is part of a new diversity program. It suggests a large number of new terms for commonly used words in Germany, according to Czech news portal Novinky.cz. 

Recently, Remix News reported on a battle for a popular product called gypsy sauce, which is also said to be discriminatory. The new name is “Hungarian-Style paprika“ sauce.

“Since the term ‘Gypsy sauce’ can be interpreted negatively, we decided to give our Knorr Sauce a new name. In a few weeks you will find this on the shelf as ‘Hungarian Style Paprika Sauce’,” the Knorr company said in a statement.

The war over words and what they mean in culture has accelerated in recent years, with left-wing governments taking what were once commonly used phrases and expressions, and making them illegal. For example, New York City’s government banned the word “illegal immigrant” and “alien” from all government documents. The government also voted to make it illegal for any citizen in New York to use the terms in a manner that is meant to demean or discriminate against someone, with fines for using the terms reaching as high as $250,000. 

The UK’s National Cyber Security Center has also banned the terms of “whitelist” and “blacklist”, alleging they are racially insensitive, a stance that Google engineers also embrace. 

rmx.news/article/article/left-wing-berlin-wants-to-ban-words-such-as-foreigner-or-asylum-seeker

Germany: Parents are afraid to let their children walk alone across the city of Suhl because of the violence committed by asylum seekers

The Lord Mayor of Suhl, André Knapp ( Christian Democratic Union, CDU), has spoken out against the reception of further refugees in the Thuringian city and warned against overburdening the residents.
“From the lessons learned in recent weeks, I do not see that the facility in Suhl should and can permanently accept even more asylum seekers,” explained Knapp in response to a request from the magazine FOCUS Online. Suhl is home to the initial reception facility for asylum seekers in Thuringia. Around 600 people are currently housed there.The left-wing state government had recently announced its intention to take in 500 more refugees and reiterated its plans after the major fire in the Greek refugee camp Moria. Thuringian CDU politicians reject this – among other things with reference to the conflict-laden atmosphere in the initial reception facility in Suhl.

In asylum accommodation, the crime rate has risen sharply in recent months. From January 2020 to mid May 2020 alone, the Suhl police recorded more than 200 crimes in which the suspects were residents of the shelter. In the city of 35,000 inhabitants, there are repeated clashes and the atmosphere is tense. Recently, bus drivers expressed their fear of continuing the route to the home because they were afraid of assaults and feared for the safety of the passengers.

“I can see that many people are reacting very negatively to the recurring and in some cases increasing number of crimes in the inner city,” explained Knapp to FOCUS Online, “I am getting calls from parents who are worried about letting their children walk through the inner city alone following the latest incident, a stabbing in broad daylight. The 47-year-old local politician, himself a father of three children: “Here, the rule of law must exhaust all available means to ensure law and order and security.In an interview with FOCUS Online, the CDU politician sharply criticized the left-wing state government for its handling of the asylum accommodation that opened in 2014. “In 2015 there were serious riots between the residents of the facility for the first time,” said the Lord Mayor.Thereupon, the local political leaders of the city of Suhl “repeatedly” addressed the Free State of Thuringia as operator of the asylum center and “reported organizational deficiencies”. Knapp: “However, the actual willingness of the Free State of Thuringia to create the necessary organizational and personnel conditions for the safe and secure handling of the facility was extremely deplorable.

https://archive.md/evqA7#selection-2563.0-2563.437