Germany: The knife-wielding spree killer shouting Allahu Akbar was a Lebanese sex offender who had his sentence suspended
Reply
Worries about radical Islam among German citizens – A survey shows that the majority of respondents are dissatisfied with the established parties concerning this issue
Astounding 🐍 Tony Blair Statement 😳 Mind Your Own Business!!!
Germany: Two Arabic-speaking men beat and spit at a man and call him a Jew because he has a tattoo in Hebrew writing
His tattoo in Hebrew writing alone apparently made a man (40) the victim of Jew-haters.
Two young men addressed him as a Jew, spat at him and beat him on Wednesday in Brüggen in the Lower Rhine region, the police in Mönchengladbach reported on Friday. The alleged victim stated that he fought back and hit them back.
As a possible trigger for the attack, the 40-year-old said he had a tattoo on his arm in Hebrew writing.
Description of the attackers: 20-25 years old, 1.70-1.85m, slim, short black hair. They would have spoken Arabic. The State Security Service took over the investigation. Witnesses please call 02161-290.
WATCH: Orientals start a brutal mass brawl out of joy after the victory of a boxer of Turkish origin in Germany
When the fight in the ring is over, the fight in the stands begins. In Magdeburg, the heavyweight boxer Agit Kabayel is to give an interview after his victory. Meanwhile, the spectators start a mass brawl.
About 50 people went at each other with chairs and iron bars. In a video it is clearly visible how a spectator hits a steward with his fist towards his face. When he goes down, a second person comes and kicks the man.
The scenes are brutal. Kabayel tries to calm the people over the microphone. “Hey guys, hey,” he calls again and again. In vain. After about six minutes, the mob was expelled from the premises. One steward was injured. He suffered a laceration and had to be treated in hospital.
The whole thing was apparently triggered by an argument about a wheelchair user who wanted to cheer with Kabayel.It is still unclear how these incidents could have arisen because of this. “These people are ruining the joy of my victory,” said the boxer. For the SES boxing stable, the fight was the 150th anniversary, promoter Ulf Steinforth said in the newspaper “Bild”: “I have never experienced anything like this in 150 events and I had imagined something else for the anniversary. It’s just disappointing and I don’t want fans like that here either.”
The 28-year-old Kabayel had previously successfully defended his WBA Continental Championship title against the American Kevin Johnson. The fight in front of 1000 spectators, a model project of the boxing club, on the Seebühne in Magdeburg was broadcast live by MDR.
The station did not show the brawl. Instead, during the brawl, a TV picture was shown that only showed the ring. The boxer and boxing team officials could be seen, shocked, trying to intervene with the crowd.
In any case, the joy of a good fight and victory was abruptly over. Kabayel’s coach Sükrü Aksu was supposed to be interviewed during the commotion, but immediately broke off the conversation. “This sucks, doesn’t it?” he said to the MDR reporter before the camera went off.
Racism by Muslims against Black people in France – The media conceals the background of the perpetrators because they are not ethnic French people
France: A woman is attacked and sexually assaulted by Moroccan minors – Her two companions do not intervene
SHAME ⚽️ Taking To Knee Isn’t Political Says England 🏴 Dope Boss Southgate 🤬 Clueless!
France: Headmistress exposes Muslim anti-Semitism: She is suspended “for her own good”
The headmistress and elected councillor in Seine-et-Marne, Dorothée Moureaux (photo) , was suspended after a tweet in which she denounced Muslim anti-Semitism.
The case starts on February 16, 2019.
Dorothée Moureaux, 58, LR councillor in Moissy-Cramayel (Seine-et-Marne), primary school director in the same municipality, councillor of Greater Paris, reacts on her Twitter account to the anti-Semitic insults against Alain Finkielkraut on the Boulevard du Montparnasse, in Paris, on the sidelines of a demonstration by the yellow waistcoats:
“An outburst of hate against #Alain Finkielkraut. Shame on them. On 19.2. rally against #Antisemitism. It’s time to put #Muslims, who are the first to insult Jews, in their place.The extremes of right and left included”.
After the journalist’s call, Dorothée Moureaux deleted her tweet. It is hard to say what her fate would have been had she not done so, but there is no doubt that legally she was not forced by anything to distance herself. The four lines lacked nuance, as so many tweets do, but criticism of Islam is not forbidden.
In this regard, Dorothée Moureaux drew attention to an obvious fact quantified by the Foundation for Political Innovation in a survey published in November 2014: “Muslims are two to three times more likely than the average French person to share prejudices against Jews.”
And even if Dorothée Moureaux had made a truly polemical statement, she would have had the right to do so. The courts have long been of the opinion that the freedom of expression of elected officials is fundamental, even if it means going too far. In a ruling of September 7, 2017, the European Court of Human Rights overturned the defamation conviction of a local councillor who had accused the mayor and first deputy mayor of Le Broc (Alpes-Maritimes) of fraud without evidence!
Unfortunately, support for Dorothée Moureaux will be scarce.
The head of the LR list for the local elections in Moissy, Christian Duez, immediately distanced himself from his candidate in Le Parisien: “I don’t agree with this speech at all (…) she sometimes writes faster than she thinks. Dorothée Moureaux is removed from the LR list. She is flooded with mails containing insults and threats.
Her Twitter profile mentioned her position as head teacher, but she did not mention it in the tweet that drew attention. However, on February 20, Dorothée Moureaux was summoned to the Directorate of National Education Services of the Seine-et-Marne department, where the academic director, an inspector, the secretary general and the director of the rectorate were awaiting her. The accused argued that she had spoken in her capacity as an elected official, but that was that.
The sanction fell the same day: a four-month suspension that would turn into a creeping dismissal in the form of job withdrawal. Dorothée Moureaux will never find a permanent job as director.
She became a substitute teacher, certain that she would remain so until retirement, with a considerable loss of income. In the end, my colleagues and parents were the ones who showed me the most solidarity,” she says. I was never reprimanded, I think I was appreciated …” Mails that Causeur has consulted attest to this.
On April 16, 2019, she got a warning from the Public Prosecutor’s Office stating that her tweet fell under the criminal law.
The judges say that Dorothée Moureaux posted a message that “stigmatises Muslims”.
About Jews, they strangely refer to “members of another religious community”. Hypocritically, they then point out that Ms Moureaux was “threatened herself”.
Finally, she was reprimanded by the rectorate for her own personal safety. She was dismissed.
Apparently assuming that a suspended Samuel Paty would still be alive, the national education and judicial authorities recommend retirement, so to speak. Doesn’t the real racism lie in this idea of Muslims as a bloc of intolerance, unable to accept the slightest criticism?
Dorothée Moureaux admits that she no longer has the funds to appeal this decision, which has serious consequences for her and is a concern for freedom of expression, especially in the educational community. What a mess,” she sighs. ‘To think that the Creteil Academy is desperate for head teachers and headmasters! “
Maybe one day we should ask why.
Majority of French want foreigners convicted in France imprisoned in their own countries
According to a survey by the Institute for CSA Studies for CNEWS, a majority of French people believe that foreign criminals should serve prison sentences in their own countries if found guilty in France.
By studying the detailed results a little more closely, it is notable that the share of men and women is rather equivalent on the side of the “yes” (respectively 65 percent of men and 68 percent of women) as on the side of “no” (35 percent against 32 percent).
The “yes” wins in all age groups, but it is strongest among 35-49 year olds, who answered in the affirmative at the rate of 70 percent. Among 18-24 year olds the question was more debated, with 56 percent of “yes” against 44 percent of “no”. Moreover, the majority of the youngest (59 percent) opted for a qualified answer: 24 percent of “yes, rather” and 35 percent of “no, rather not”.
On the conservative side of the political spectrum there was hardly any debate, with only 17 percent of those who said “no”. Among the sympathizers of the National Rally, the most important share of affirmative answers were observed, at 90 percent, of which 80 percent of those questioned were “completely” convinced.
