The ” German-speaking Muslim Community e.V.” published a video last Christmas Eve, which is still online on Youtube and is now increasingly causing a stir on the net in the run-up to Christmas. The message of the video, in which Abu Maher preaches: “Christmas is an insult to Allah!” (blasphemy).

The ” German-speaking Muslim Community” (DMG) is a registered association (e.V.), which defines itself as follows: “As a long-standing association in Braunschweig, we represent Islam according to the understanding of the first three generations after the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) and would like to teach Islam – based on the Qurân and Sunna (way of the Prophet) and its pure message – to our fellow human beings and society. It is close to our hearts to enable all those who are interested to get to know the values and norms that Islam imposes on human beings…

Under the headline “Important!” the association states: “As a Muslim community, we are part of the local society. We respect the law of the Federal Republic of Germany, but at the same time insist on our basic rights, such as freedom of religion and freedom of opinion, and would like to live and let live in peace and mutual tolerance like every citizen.”

Whether such a video contributes to peace and mutual tolerance, I seriously doubt…

“Whoever commits blasphemy has no right to live even for a moment”.
Meanwhile, I wouldn’t really rely on the Muslim community’s self-description. Because that could be life-threatening, as the following tweet shows:

Prediger in Braunschweig: “Weihnachten ist eine Beleidigung Allahs!”

Since mid-November, the government of Pedro Sánchez has been silently transferring hundreds of young illegal immigrants to bring some relief to the Canary Islands, which has witnessed a 900 percent increase in arrivals this year, which has seen arrivals increase to 21,452 arrivals between Jan. 1 to Dec. 15 this year compared to only 2,168 all of last year.

On No. 20, Spanish Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska was on an official visit to Morocco to discuss the issue of rising numbers of illegal crossings from Africa to the Spanish archipelago, many of whom depart from coasts controlled by Rabat in Morocco and Western Sahara. In spite of reception facilities being overcrowded in the Canary Islands, Grande-Marlaska insisted Spain would not transfer migrants to mainland Spain, as this would risk converting those islands in the Atlantic Ocean into a new entry point to mainland Europe.

According to the Spanish authorities, most illegal immigrants arriving on small boats to the Canary Islands do not qualify for asylum and should be deported back to their country of origin.

On the same day that Grande-Marlaska was holding discussions with his Moroccan counterpart, a plane transporting dozens of such migrants landed in Malaga. According to messages exchanged between top police officials on that day and shortly after, such a transfer of illegal immigrants from the Canary Islands was nothing exceptional. Since mid-November, there have been regular landings of groups of migrants, mostly young and healthy men, according to witnesses. Between Dec. 4 and Dec. 8 alone, as many as eight planes transporting some 500 illegal immigrants landed at the airports of Valencia and Alicante. Others have landed in cities such as Madrid and Granada as well.

Local authorities are usually kept unaware of the incoming flights of migrants. Furthermore, as confirmed by witnesses and images published on social media and by traditional media outlets, in many cases, no authorities were present to receive the migrants or even control whether they had been tested for Covid-19. All migrants were allowed to leave the airport by their own means, and their whereabouts remain unknown.

Asked about the flights, the Spanish interior minister first denied they were taking place and then stated they were regular commercial flights, explaining that the migrants had bought tickets on their own initiative. When they were given a temporary permit at the end of a 72-hour retention period from the time of their arrival at the Canary Islands, those illegal immigrants can go wherever they wish, government officials explained.

Only on Dec. 11 did the government of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez finally begin to acknowledge that it had been organizing some transfers, but just for the most vulnerable migrants. However, this version is refuted by the testimonies from police and airport officers, as well as flight crew members.

It appears that Sanchez’ far-left, pro-immigration government is taking up the same policies as the far-left, pro-immigration government of Alexis Tsipras in Greece in 2015, when that country made the immigration crisis far worse by organizing the systematic transfer of illegal immigrants from its islands to its mainland and then facilitating their travel farther north.

Sánchez has his own history of encouraging and facilitating illegal immigrants’ passage through Spain to France.

Migrants who have been transferred to mainland Spain are allowed to go freely wherever they want at a time when Spaniards are not permitted to travel between provinces and regions because of limitations linked to the pandemic. The Spanish government is thus trying to do away with a problem it contributed to with its pro-migrant policies from 2018, when Sánchez formed his first government. 

However, the Spanish policy of ferrying migrants to the European mainland is likely to serve as another powerful incentive for many Africans to embark on the dangerous route to the Canary Islands — if there is a chance they can get to Europe, they will risk their lives.

Just as the leftist government of Giuseppe Conte in Rome allowed a Tunisian terrorist to travel unchallenged through its territory and kill innocent people in the southern French city of Nice last November, Madrid appears to shirking its responsibility towards its fellow EU countries. At this time, it remains unclear how many Islamic radicals there are among the young men who are being transferred to mainland Europe.

So why is the European Commission not reacting? In March, EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Ylva Johansson asked Greece to revoke its decision not to accept any asylum request on its territory when it was trying to fend off a massive assault of illegal immigrants on its borders with Turkey. Now, she refuses to condemn the Spanish policy of transferring illegal immigrants to the continent and allowing them to go unchecked in the Schengen Area.

Instead, the European Commission is keeping its pressure on Hungary, with the European Court of Justice ruling this week that Hungary, not Spain, broke EU law by unlawfully detaining migrants in its transit zones. The European Commission had brought the case to the ECJ even after such transit zones for asylum applicants were deemed lawful by the European Court of Human Rights last year.

Should Budapest fail to control its part of the external Schengen border and act like Madrid, it would undoubtedly face fewer problems with Brussels.

https://rmx.news/article/article/spain-is-transferring-illegal-immigrants-from-the-canary-islands-to-mainland-europe

The Moroccan man (34 years old) who first strangled and then burned his son (3 years old) in May has been sentenced to life imprisonment by the Siegen Regional Court.

The presiding judge Elfriede Dreisbach said on Friday ( December 18th) that it was a case of treacherous murder. However, the court had not been able to establish a special degree of guilt. The motive remained unclear.The man had confessed to having strangled the child in his sleep in Lennestadt in the Sauerland region in May, placed him on a mattress and then set it on fire. The court emphasised that the father had thought the boy was already dead when he set fire to the mattress.

The 34-year-old, who lived separately from the boy’s mother, had also not planned the crime. His son was visiting him. He was already unable to answer the question about the reasons for his crime in an earlier trial. Investigators found a suicide note in his flat. In it, the man wrote that he wanted to die next to his son.

The prosecution assumed in the trial that the three-year-old had still been alive when the man set the mattress on fire.

The verdict is final. An appeal was renounced.

https://m.bild.de/regional/ruhrgebiet/ruhrgebiet-aktuell/sohn-3-gewuergt-und-verbrannt-vater-muss-lebenslang-in-den-knast-74526256,view=amp.bildMobile.html

To paraphrase a certain famous lefty, when genocidal eugenics comes to America, it’ll be wrapped in the flag of the civil rights movement.

It’s the end of 2020 and the critical race terror wave is just seeing how close it can get to making a compelling moral case for killing white people. There’s less and less ambiguity about it. From the beginning, Democrats and their lefty allies began arguing that the pandemic response had to be all about “equity”.

That obviously goes for the vaccine. Equity then becomes the new triage. And America’s leading experts start sounding like Nazis.

Marc Lipsitch, an infectious-disease epidemiologist at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, argued that teachers should not be included as essential workers, if a central goal of the committee is to reduce health inequities.

“Teachers have middle-class salaries, are very often white, and they have college degrees,” he said. “Of course they should be treated better, but they are not among the most mistreated of workers.”

If the central goal of vaccine distribution is reducing inequity, then some people just have to die because they’re that privileged.

Harald Schmidt, an expert in ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania, said that it is reasonable to put essential workers ahead of older adults, given their risks, and that they are disproportionately minorities.

“Older populations are whiter, ” Dr. Schmidt said. “Society is structured in a way that enables them to live longer. Instead of giving additional health benefits to those who already had more of them, we can start to level the playing field a bit.”

Level the playing field… by dying.

If there are any questions about how far the critical race theory lefties are from Nazi Germany, this helpfully answers that question. Remember when that “right-wing kook” Sarah Palin claimed that there would be death panels?

Harald  has a PhD, Health & Public Policy from Germany’s Universität Münster and an MA in Philosophy so he presumably must know this stuff. And by this stuff, I mean the ethics of deciding who lives or dies based on their race.

Two things. Briefly.

1. Those privileged seniors are already dying at a high rate, in no small part because of government policies that forced nursing homes to accept infected patients, resulting in about a third of the deaths in the pandemic. 

2. A whole lot of the fatalities among older seniors are actually minorities. But, notably, lefties will argue that older minorities are more conservative and it’s best to prioritize the younger unionized minority essential workers over their grandparents.

Life and death are ultimately about the electoral priorities of the Democrats.

A 35-year-old woman died this morning after a knife attack in her matrimonial home in the Hassels district of Düsseldorf. Her husband was arrested a short time later as part of the manhunt.

Witnesses reported to the Düsseldorf police during the night that a woman had been stabbed to death in a flat on Potsdamer Street. According to the information available so far, the suspected husband stabbed his 35-year-old wife with a knife. She died of her injuries at the scene of the crime. The suspected perpetrator, a 35-year-old Iraqi citizen, fled the scene of the crime. The man was arrested by police at the Düsseldorf-Garath suburban railway station during a search of the area. Witnesses and family members were cared for by emergency counsellors at the scene. The public prosecutor’s office and a homicide squad of the Düsseldorf police have taken up the investigation.

presseportal.de/blaulicht/pm/13248/4793886

The Court of Justice of the European Union, the EU’s top court, has ruled that Hungary violated EU law when it prevented illegal immigrants from seeking asylum. The ruling paves the way for the European Commission, the EU’s powerful administrative arm, to impose financial penalties over Hungary’s restrictive immigration policies. The Hungarian government has vowed that it will not bow to pressure to jump aboard the EU’s multicultural bandwagon.

In its December 17 ruling, the court, informally known as European Court of Justice (ECJ) accused the Hungarian government of corralling migrants into so-called transit zones and of limiting their ability to apply for asylum. The court also found that Hungary did not allow asylum seekers to leave detention while their cases were being considered and offered no special protection to children and the vulnerable.

The case stems from a lawsuit filed by the European Commission over a 2015 decision by Hungary to establish two transit zones on its southern border with Serbia to stop a mass influx of migrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East. The action prevented migrants from entering Hungary or transiting the country to reach other parts of the EU.

In May 2020, the ECJ ruled that the transit zones were illegal under EU law. In order to comply with the ruling, Hungary has since closed the transit zones. Asylum seekers wanting to enter Hungary now have to apply for asylum at Hungarian embassies or consulates in neighboring non-EU countries. “External border protection is an issue that Hungary cannot, does not want to, and will not concede,” said Gergely Gulyás, from the Prime Minister’s Office.

The ECJ, in its latest ruling, acknowledged that Hungary had closed the transit zones but that it was still guilty of breaking EU law. The ruling states:

• “In the first place, the Court holds that Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligation to ensure effective access to the procedure for granting international protection, in so far as third-country nationals wishing to access, from the Serbian-Hungarian border, that procedure were in practice confronted with the virtual impossibility of making their application.”
• “The Court recalls that the making of an application for international protection, prior to its registration, lodging and examination, is an essential step in the procedure for granting that protection and that Member States cannot delay it unjustifiably. On the contrary, Member States must ensure that the persons concerned are able to make an application, including at the borders, as soon as they declare their wish of doing so.”
• “The Court confirms…that the obligation on applicants for international protection to remain in one of the transit zones for the duration of the procedure for examination of their application constitutes detention.”
• “The Court emphasizes that the Procedures and Reception Directives require, inter alia, that detention be ordered in writing with reasons, that the specific needs of applicants identified as vulnerable and in need of special procedural guarantees be taken into account, in order that they receive ‘adequate support’, and that minors be placed in detention only as a last resort. Owing, in particular, to its systematic and automatic nature, however, the detention regime provided for under the Hungarian legislation in the transit zones, which concerns all applicants other than unaccompanied minors under 14 years of age, does not allow applicants to enjoy those guarantees.”
• “Moreover, the Court rejects Hungary’s argument that the migration crisis justified derogating from certain rules in the Procedures and Reception Directives, with a view to maintaining public order and preserving internal security.”
• “The Court holds that Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Return Directive, in so far as the Hungarian legislation allows for the removal of third-country nationals who are staying illegally in the territory without prior compliance with the procedures and safeguards provided for in that directive.”
• “The Court recalls that an illegally staying third-country national falling within the scope of the Return Directive must be the subject of a return procedure, in compliance with the substantive and procedural safeguards established by that directive, before his or her removal, where appropriate, is carried out, it being understood that forced removal is to take place only as a last resort.”
• “The Court considers that Hungary has not respected the right, conferred, in principle, by the Procedures Directive on any applicant for international protection, to remain in the territory of the Member State concerned after the rejection of his or her application, until the time limit within which to bring an appeal against that rejection or, if an appeal has been brought, until a decision has been taken on it.”
• “The Court notes that, when a ‘crisis situation caused by mass immigration’ has been declared, the Hungarian legislation makes the exercise of that right subject to detailed rules not in conformity with EU law, in particular the obligation to remain in the transit zones, which resembles detention contrary to the Procedures and Reception Directives. On the other hand, when such a situation has not been declared, the exercise of that right is made subject to conditions which, while not necessarily contrary to EU law, are not defined in a sufficiently clear and precise manner to enable the persons concerned to ascertain the exact extent of their right.”

In a “note” at the end of the ruling, the ECJ revealed the apparent purpose of its ruling against Hungary:

• “An action for failure to fulfil obligations directed against a Member State which has failed to comply with its obligations under European Union law may be brought by the Commission or by another Member State. If the Court of Justice finds that there has been a failure to fulfil obligations, the Member State concerned must comply with the Court’s judgment without delay.”
• “Where the Commission considers that the Member State has not complied with the judgment, it may bring a further action seeking financial penalties. However, if measures transposing a directive have not been notified to the Commission, the Court of Justice can, on a proposal from the Commission, impose penalties at the stage of the initial judgment.”

Hungarian Justice Minister Judit Varga vowed to continue to protect Hungarian sovereignty. In a December 17 Facebook post, she wrote:

“Today’s decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union has become devoid of purpose, as the circumstances at issue in the present proceedings no longer exist. Transit zones have been closed but strict border control is maintained.

“We will continue to protect the borders of Hungary and Europe and will do everything we can to prevent the formation of international migrant corridors.

“Hungary will only be a Hungarian country as long as its borders remain intact. Therefore, not only our thousand-year-old statehood but also the future of our children obliges us to protect our borders.”

The ECJ’s ruling comes less than a month after the European Commission unveiled a controversial “Action Plan on Integration and Inclusion” which aims to streamline the migration and asylum process with faster screening and to have EU member states contribute their “fair share” based on their GDP and population.

The EU’s bid to reform its migration policy has been met with mixed reactions from a number of EU countries. Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic have been vocal in their opposition to it.

Zoltán Kovács, the spokesman for Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, wroteon Twitter that Hungary’s stance on migration remains unchanged:

“1/5 Since 2015, the stance of the HU Gov’t on migration has been clear and unchanged. We have presented this stance and our proposals on several occasions. We believe that the EU and its member states must cooperate in keeping the looming migration pressure outside our borders.

“2/5 To this end, we should form alliances with countries of origin, so that they are able to provide proper living standards and ensure that their people do not have to leave their homelands. Instead of importing the trouble to Europe, we must bring help to where it is needed.

“3/5 We believe that Europe’s borders must be protected: External hotspots will have to be established to process asylum claims; we must ensure that the external borders of the EU and the Schengen Area remain perfectly sealed along all sections.

“4/5 Our goal is to see EU member states support each other in achieving the tasks above. While HU does not support obligatory distribution, it does defend joint borders, and we expect to receive the same amount of support as other Schengen states protecting those external borders.

“5/5 We would like to remind everyone that since the 2015 migration crisis, the Hungarian Government has spent more than 1 billion euros on protecting the borders of Hungary and the European Union, without a single cent of contribution from Brussels.”

After the ECJ delivered its ruling, Kovács repeated Hungary’s opposition to the EU’s migration action plan. In a December 17 statement posted to Orbán’s official blog, he wrote:

“On November 24, 2020, the European Commission presented its migration Action Plan on the social integration and inclusion of migrants. The Commission believes that barriers to the participation and inclusion of immigrants in European societies need to be removed. At the press conference presenting the document, it was clear from the words of the EU Commissioners responsible that the Commission would continue to encourage the reception of migrants, as they believe that this will be necessary in the future for economic reasons.

“While the Action Plan would give immigrants more rights and entitlements, it does not seem to take into consideration the security risks associated with mass migration.

“According to the main points of the action plan, Brussels would provide migrants housing and give them a greater say in public affairs at all levels of government. With this, more migrants and EU citizens with a migrant background would be involved in consultations and decision-making processes at the local, regional, national and European level.

“The Union, according to the plan, would give more support to immigrants than to its own citizens by supporting businesses established and run by the former. Moreover, the plan, by supporting the employment of migrants, would put unemployed EU citizens in an even more difficult position.

“As if this is not enough, Brussels would also force us to adopt the mindset of the eurocrats on the issue, clearly setting forth in the Action Plan that it seeks to change the way Europeans think about migration and migrants: ‘Inclusion is also about addressing unconscious bias and achieving a change in mentality and the way people perceive one another and approach the unknown.’ Good to know.

“If you are thinking that all of this sounds familiar, you’re not alone. The Action Plan looks similar to George Soros’ plan to have Europe admit ‘at least a million asylum-seekers annually for the foreseeable future.’ The financial speculator has been for years promoting his ideas of an ‘open society’ to change Europe and European society. Those migrants that Europe should be admitting, according to the Soros plan, their distribution should be permanent and mandatory. He also made it clear that his plan aims to protect immigrants and that national borders are an obstacle to this.

“But the Commission’s Action Plan goes even further, seeking to bring in some 34 million migrants to become EU citizens (nearly 8 percent of the current EU population). That is, 34 million migrants would be granted citizenship and the right to vote.

“Who says this is what Europe wants or needs? When have the citizens of Europe voted for this? As Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said in Parliament earlier this week, Hungary will oppose this plan with all its might and will not compromise.”

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16868/hungary-europe-borders

A little girl was lured into a flat by a 21-year-old man last Wednesday and raped there. The Ansbach Criminal Investigation Department is now appealing to the public and is looking for further alleged victims.

On December 15, 2020, a girl on her way home from school in Ansbach was lured into a flat by a 21-year-old Syrian national under a pretext and severely sexually assaulted there. The suspect was arrested on the same day and has since been remanded in custody.

Initial criminal investigations by the criminal police in Ansbach revealed concrete evidence of at least one further case of serious sexual abuse of a female child. According to initial interrogations, this assault occurred in July 2020, also in Ansbach.

The criminal investigation department in Ansbach is currently conducting numerous interrogations and examining further traces and clues. Based on the current results of the investigation, it cannot be ruled out that other children or adolescents, both boys and girls, have become victims of the alleged suspect.

https://www.polizeiticker.ch/artikel/update-zur-schwerer-sexueller-missbrauch-eines-madchen-in-ansbach-weitere-opfer-gesucht-174947?fbclid=IwAR2MznM4hRnAuYw15gbBTVl1H4_CL8OuxdJ768gT1-V1Zf83MGvYAJiyV2A

Cataleya awoke with a knife to her neck. Her father Q. A. wanted to kill the then 17-year-old because of her homosexuality. She barely survived.

“He screamed, ‘You’re gay?, you’re gay?’ and slashed the knife through my neck.” Those were the words Cataleya used to describe how her father tried to kill her in October 2019. Cataleya was still a man at the time and just 17 years old. Because of the severe injuries, Cataleya, who called herself Seran at the time, had to be placed in an induced coma. With a lot of will to live and luck, she survived her father’s knife attack – large scars bear witness to the attack.The father, who is of Iraqi origin, must now stand trial in Switzerland. The charges are attempted murder, attempted intentional homicide or grievous bodily harm.According to the indictment of the public prosecutor’s office of the Canton of Bern, the attack occurred on May 29, 2019, in Emmental. Q. A. woke his daughter, who was still a man at the time, with a knife held to her neck. The knife was 27 centimetres long, according to the documents. With it, he inflicted injuries on the victim’s neck, face and chest, according to the investigation. Among others, several deep cut wounds on the neck were detected by the experts. The trachea was also cut and the thyroid gland was severed, according to the report.”The victim suffered life threatening injuries, lost about 1 to 1.5 litres of blood and had to be intubated in hospital,” the indictment says. There is also talk of permanent disfigurement due to the scars, which are still clearly visible.

https://www.heute.at/s/du-bist-schwul-mann-sticht-tochter-messer-in-hals-100118323?fbclid=IwAR06dOj9x5c7yW-146ab_pSl3BknD8XPxGO6sAHACYBq1zpuH_XShUkrbZc