Karina Jehniche has the opinion that the judgement is “fatal”. The headmistress of the Christian Morgenstern Primary School in Spandau, an educational institution with a very high percentage of migrants, would not have “expected the Federal Labor Court to overturn the obligation of neutrality at Berlin schools. The judges have decided that teachers may now also teach wearing headscarves, as long as the peace at school is not disturbed.”I wouldn’t have expected that neutrality could be seen as discrimination,” says Karina Jehnichen. And she is not just talking as the head of her school when she describes the verdict as “fatal”, she is also deputy head of the Berlin School Management Interest Group (IGB). She therefore also speaks for around 300 senior educators.

For Karina Jehniche, it’s all about the headscarf symbol. For her, her problem with the judgment in her own school is most obvious: “We have students who come from crisis areas where Islam is the state religion and where there has been fighting against infidels. When such a child sees a woman wearing a headscarf, it can be impressed by it and the tolerance towards other religions decreases, said Jehniche. Especially for children a teacher is a great confidant. “We must work to ensure that all religions are tolerated. We are a multicultural society, which is precisely why a school must show neutrality”.

At the Morgenstern School “students from 49 nations are being taught”, says Karina Jehniche, “all world religions are represented here”. It is absolutely clear that one can expect “neutrality as an attitude” from a teacher. If one was allowed to wear a headscarf, other religions would now also have to become visible. But she does not want that.

In any case, she has already noticed that Muslim fathers are annoyed at meetings of parents’ representatives that the school principal is not dressed in an Islamic manner, that is, with a long skirt. Karina Jehniche has also experienced that Muslim students put pressure on female Muslim students to wear headscarves.Tilmann Kötterheinrich-Wedekind also regards the verdict as a problem, at least for his school. “We as a school have benefited greatly from the obligation of neutrality in the school peace agreement,” says the head of the Ernst Abbe Gymnasium in Neukölln, migration rate: 94 to 97 percent. “A teacher wearing a headscarf would be fatal here,” he says, “because tensions arise again and again in our school because of the mutual cultural understanding and when dealing with young girls. At the school, he says, there are many students from Turkish, Arab and Bosnian-Muslim families.

In other words, if you dress western as a Muslim girl, you will get problems when confronted by students. Many of his “very strictly conservative Muslim parents regarded a teacher with a headscarf as a positive role model,” says Kötterheinrich-Wedekind. Conversely, teachers dressed in western style are seen as a bad example.

Kötterheinrich-Wedekind has already had discussions and conflicts on the topics of prayer, sportswear or the question of how far religion is allowed to influence school. For him, these are all topics that do not belong in his school, which distracted from the actual task of the school.

In another school in the Berlin district of Neukölln, the principal is “appalled” by the verdict. The school, she says, “is also there to help students form their own opinions. Above all, it preaches tolerance towards all religions. But this is no longer clearly recognizable, she says, if someone no longer appears clearly neutral. “There are also messages of a non-verbal nature.

She also witnessed that Muslim students put pressure on Muslim schoolgirls to wear the headscarf. Teachers then intervened immediately and held discussions with the students and their parents. “But this is a very difficult and long-term process.”She is familiar with the case of a nine-year-old who told a Palestinian kindergarten teacher dressed in Western clothes: “I don’t take orders from you, you don’t wear a headscarf, you are not a real Muslim. In such a case, the peace at school was considerably disturbed. Since the boy’s parents had shown no understanding at all, the boy had to leave school. The school authorities had written in their reasoning: “Disturbance of the peace at school.

tagesspiegel.de/berlin/reaktionen-von-paedagogen-auf-kopftuch-urteil-wir-haben-schueler-aus-gegenden-in-denen-unglaeubige-bekaempft-werden/26138130.html

On a summer Sabbath day, Elie Rosen, President of the Jewish Community of Graz, spotted a suspicious man hanging around the synagogue. The synagogue had recently been vandalized and the man had a backpack full of rocks that he was about to start throwing at the synagogue.

After the synagogue had been vandalized a few days earlier, Rosen had warned that in the Austrian city, “we are dealing with a stronger left wing and anti-Israel antisemitism,”

Rosen’s concern was understandable since some of the graffiti smeared on the wall around the synagogue read, “Free Palestine” and “Our language and our country is Palestine”. A second attack by the same perpetrator on the Sabbath Eve had smashed the synagogue’s windows.

The wall that the Islamic attacker had vandalized was made out of bricks from the ruins of the original Graz synagogue that had been destroyed by the National Socialists. The synagogue, which had been rebuilt only two decades ago, serves Graz’s tiny surviving Jewish community.

Austrian Jews know better than to take such slogans lightly. One of the worst episodes of  antisemitic violence after the National Socialist period had been an assault by two PLO Islamic terrorists on a synagogue where a Bar Mitzvah was taking place. The terrorists had opened fire with machine guns and thrown hand grenades into the synagogue. A woman who had rolled on a hand grenade to protect the children died. A number of other congregants were wounded.

When Rosen asked the bearded man what he was doing, the vandal attacked him with a chair leg, and fled on a mountain bike. When the police caught him, he expressed no remorse.

The Syrian Muslim refugee justified his actions by citing his religion: Islam, and Islamic law.

The Syrian refugee had come to Austria in 2013 during the height of the so-called refugee crisis by traveling through Turkey. The Islamic tyranny which had once besieged the Gates of Vienna with an army has dispatched a different kind of army against Vienna. And that army, sent by Erdogan, has often been welcomed with open arms by European countries like Austria.

When the migrant who attacked the synagogue came to Austria, he was granted asylum.

His capture didn’t just solve the mystery of the attack on the synagogue, but also an attack on a church and a gay club.

There were a total of 7 attacks committed by this one single refugee.

This has become the new normal in Graz, an Austrian city the size of Pittsburgh, which has seen a surge in violence.

There had been an arson attempt at a church in July when a nameless perpetrator threw burning newspapers into the building after smashing a window with a rock.

Last year, an Iraqi migrant had started multiple fires in government buildings in Graz.

In 2015, a Muslim refugee had killed 3 people and injured 36 others when he ran his car into a crowd and then got out and began stabbing the survivors. The dead included a 7-year-old boy.

The mosques of Graz have been used to recruit ISIS terrorists. Some of the Islamic State’s killers died in its wars against its enemies, but others came back and are living in Graz.

After multiple police raids and arrests that involved as many as 800 officers, part of the network of ISIS and Al Qaeda recruiters was broken up, only to be reunited in prison.

A Muslim Brotherhood prison Imam from Graz who was brought in to help deradicalize some of the prisoners, instead plotted a jailbreak by the terrorists.The Brotherhood Imam had planned to have the terrorists pray in the yard as a distraction, and then attack the guards with shivs.

The arrested Syrian refugee adds to the growing Islamic population in Austria’s prisons.

Three years ago, it was estimated that a quarter of Austria’s prison population is Muslim. That’s a startling number in a country of almost 9 million with a Muslim population of around 700,000.

While Muslims make up less than 10% of Austria’s population, they’re filling up its prisons.

The situation is so bad that Austria’s top prison Imam wrote a book warning that the prison system was a breeding ground for terrorists and urged putting Islamists in solitary confinement.

One of those prisoners, an Albanian Muslim from Graz, has been accused of continuing to recruit for ISIS from prison using a smuggled smartphone and his Instagram account.

The terrorist, who is already serving a 9 year prison sentence for encouraging a 12-year-old boy to plant a nail bomb in a Christmas market in Germany, allegedly had links to Abu Tejma, the Islamist preacher in Vienna, whose large family had been living on welfare, while he drove a sports car and recruited some 160 Muslims,including teenage girls, to join ISIS,

“The blonde mouse, the Austrian, should be torn apart like a bag of crisps,” Tejma had bragged.

The Albanian Muslim from Graz had plotted his own attack on an American military base.

In prison, DERAD, a Confederation of European Probation project to deradicalize Jihadists, claimed that he was being successfully deradicalized, while he continued recruiting for ISIS.

All of this makes Austria in general and Graz in particular into ticking time bombs for terror.

A survey of Muslim refugees in Graz conducted by a professor of Islamic Religious Education at  the University of Vienna found that about half of them had strongly antisemitic views.

“It was noticeable that more than half had internalized antisemitism as part of their religiosity,” Professor Aslan observed.

He also noted that a number of Graz mosques were controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Austrian authorities are trying to belatedly withdraw their asylum to the Syrian refugee who attacked the Graz Synagogue.

Oskar Deutsch, the head of the Jewish community in Vienna, warned that, “Muslim anti-Semitism is a serious threat”. He also pointed out that the Jewish community spends three million euros a year on security for synagogues and schools.

Antisemitic incidents in Austria doubled in the last five years, and while many of the perpetrators have National Socialist motives, the Jewish community’s report noted that, “Muslim anti-Semitism is conspicuous when it comes to incidents with a high threat potential.”

The Austrian government has announced that it’s dispatching uniformed and undercover police officers to protect the country’s handful of Jewish synagogues. But the antisemitic violence is part of a larger trend of Islamist attacks against both churches and synagogues. And against the symbols of non-Islamic values and political life.

The Syrian refugee believed his religion gave him the right to attack anything un-Islamic.

Susanne Raab, the Minister of Culture and Integration, urged a campaign to stop the overlap of “political Islam” and antisemitism. But that overlap is innate to Islam.

“The act shows that you have to take Muslim anti-Semitism seriously,” Oskar Deutsch, the head of the Jewish community in Vienna, warned.

But truly taking it seriously would mean hitting the brakes on Islamic migration into Austria.

The attack on the Graz Synagogue is grimly symbolic. The synagogue had been destroyed in the year of the Anschluss by the country’s new National Socialist masters. It is ominously fitting for the country’s new invading theocratic Herrenvolk to once again target the synagogue.

A new Islamic fascism is rising in Austria. When the National Socialists marched into Austria, they were often met with cheering crowds of supporters. The cheering crowds who met the migrants marching into Austria are allowing a dark history to repeat itself one more time.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/08/rising-islamic-terrorist-threat-austria-strikes-daniel-greenfield/

By Thomas Lifson

A pro-Trump demonstrator was murdered last night in Portland, as a BLM crowd cheered the news. While we will know a lot more after an official investigation, preliminary video evidence seems to indicate that the member of a group called Patriot Prayer was deliberately murdered, perhaps even hunted down. Listen for yourself to the words shouted just before shots are heard:

More video, from a different angle here, with possibly the same words semi-audible:

Listen to the BLM speaker and crowd celebrate the news:

The left wing propaganda media naturally are obfuscating the crime. The New York Times headlines, “Deadly Shooting in Portland After Pro-Trump Ralliers Clash With Protesters, faintly implying that responsibility lies with the pro-Trump crowd who are the subject of the verb “clash.”

Below the headline, it took the Times 150 words of passive voice prose that failed to differentiate aggressor from victim before admitting that the deceased could have been a Trump supporter.  

A caravan of supporters of President Trump drove through downtown Portland, which has seen nightly protests against police violence and racial injustice. One person was shot and killed in the conflicts that erupted.

A man was shot and killed Saturday as a large group of supporters of President Trump traveled in a caravan through downtown Portland, Ore., which has seen nightly protests for three consecutive months.

The pro-Trump rally drew hundreds of trucks full of supporters into the city. At times, Trump supporters and counterprotesters clashed on the streets, with people shooting paintball guns from the beds of pickup trucks and protesters throwing objects back at them.

A video that purports to be of the shooting, taken from the far side of the street, showed a small group of people in the road outside what appears to be a parking garage. Gunfire erupts, and a man collapses in the street.

Finally, when identifying the victim, the Times takes care to make sure readers know that his group was “far-right” and had been clashing with protestors in the past:

The man who was shot and killed was wearing a hat with the insignia of Patriot Prayer, a far-right group based in Portland that has clashed with protesters in the past.

It reminds me of comments about a rape victim having worn a short skirt.

Faiz Siddiqui of the Washington Post went even farther in blaming the victim: pro-Trump supporters “precipitated the violence” by getting out of vehicles surrounded by BLM protesters

That a murder has finally taken place is no surprise, nor, I fear, will it be unique for long. Left wingers like BLM and Antifa have been escalating their level of violence against Trump supporters. The Washington Free Beacon has compiled a list of 7 examples of violence and intimidation this week, including the failed effort to trap and seal Seattle police officers in a precinct station and burn it. But there are others they missed, including the mob surrounding Sen. Rand Paul and his wife Kelley following the president’s acceptance speech at the White House and the harassment of other guests by members of a mob that was staying at an expensive DC hotel, and this flag burning next to sleeping children that could easily have resulted in a tragic fatal fire.

 David Paulin asks:

Wouldn’t this be justification for Trump to send in the military under the Insurrection Act?  Previous presidents sent in troops when black Americans were being attacked and harassed, and when local Democrat officials refused to do anything about it. How is this different?

It is time to call to account Nancy Pelosi and other Dems for egging on extremists, not just failing to condemn them, which is bad enough.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/08/portland_blm_crowd_cheers_news_of_murder_of_patriot_prayer_counterdemonstrator_im_not_sad_that_a_fking_fascist_died_tonight.html

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has boasted that she would repeat her actions in 2015 which opened the gates to Europe and led to the migrant crisis.

Chancellor Merkel made her statements at an annual summer press conference in Berlin on Friday, saying she would “make essentially the same decisions” after she was asked if she had any sort of regret for opening Germany’s borders in the summer of 2015.Merkel argued that asylum seekers stuck at the frontiers of Germany or Austria “have to be treated like human beings,” France24 reports.

According to the broadcaster, Merkel has seen a surge in support domestically following the coronavirus outbreak and the German federal government’s handling of it.

But while Merkel may have favourable polling numbers over her handling of the coronavirus, the mass migration of hundreds of thousands of migrants since 2015 has not been a popular policy in Germany among large sections of the German public.

The opposition to Merkel’s migrant policy has been reflected in the rapid growth of the anti-mass migration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which went from having no seats in the German parliament in the 2013 federal election to becoming the official opposition following 2017’s national election.

Merkel’s decision was also followed by the Berlin terror attack in December of 2016 that saw bogus asylum seeker Anis Amri kill a dozen people and injure over 50 others when he hijacked a truck and drove it through a crowded Christmas market.

Murders of young women and girls by migrant men has also been a major issue in Germany since 2015, with high profile killings of young women like Maria Ladenburgerand Jewish teen Susanna Feldmann making headlines internationally.

Germany’s mass migration policies have also impacted the country’s demographics, with a report from earlier this year suggested that as many as a quarter of all German residentsnow come from migrant backgrounds.

Germany’s Federal Statistical Office stated in July that at least 26 per cent of German residents had one or more parents born outside Germany, with Turkish-background residents being the largest minority at 13 per cent of the overall population.

Merkel’s open-door policy has also been blamed for the rise in antisemitism across Germany by Hungarian foreign secretary Péter Szijjártó.

Earlier this week, Szijjártó slammed German insinuations that antisemitism was “rampant ” in Hungary, saying: “Our Jewish compatriots have no reason to be afraid.”

“Their cultural festivals don’t require the presence of soldiers armed to the teeth, their synagogues and cemeteries were rebuilt with state funding, and we were the proud hosts of the European Maccabi Games last year,” he added, suggesting German politicians should “take a look around [their] own backyard.”

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/08/30/five-years-after-2015-migrant-crisis-merkel-tells-press-i-would-do-it-again/

Because he allegedly stabbed two men at Riebeckplatz and in a streetcar at Rennbahnkreuz in Halle (Saale), the trial against a 20-year-old man from Syria began last Friday at the regional court. He is accused of grievous bodily harm as well as attempted manslaughter in unity of crime with grievous bodily harm.

The first crime took place on November 8 of last year. In a supermarket on Riebeckplatz, he is accused of having stabbed a fellow countryman several times with a jackknife. The victim allegedly stole money from him.

The second crime took place on March 6. Here he is said to have provoked an argument in a streetcar at Rennbahnkreuz and then stabbed a 32-year-old man nine times in the back with a knife from behind. The German suffered life-threatening injuries.

According to the court, the defendant partially admitted to the crimes. Because the accused was an adolescent at the time of the crime, the use of juvenile criminal law comes into consideration. Here sanctions up to a youth penalty of 10 years are intended.Initially, 9 trial days are planned. 27 witnesses have been summoned by the criminal court.

dubisthalle.de/maenner-niedergestochen-prozess-gegen-20-jaehrigen-beginnt1

German extremism expert Christian Jung has published a new book on Antifa, a result of years of meticulous research. The author shows how far the left-wing extremist scene and its activists are networked with mainstream parties, authorities and the media in Germany.

After Jung’s bestseller Der Links-Staat, which he co-authored with Torsten Groß in 2016,  the new study reveals how the rot has set in, without the general public noticing this development.

The election victory of red-green in the federal election in 1998 heralded a turning point for Germany, according to Jung. Because in the new cabinet of Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, politicians were represented for the first time who came from the 1968 movement – including those who had been active in terrorist groups.

The “influence of the Communards, Maoists and communist cadre organisations reached the top of the state,” Jung points out. Together with his Foreign Minister and Vice Chancellor Joseph [Joschka] Fischer, once a street fighter and activist in the left-wing extremist organisation Revolutionärer Kampf[Revolutionary Struggle], Schröder proclaimed these individuals to be “decent” in 2001.

Since then, millions and millions of taxpayers’ money have flowed into the “fight against the right,” which, contrary to political assurances, actually benefit left-wing extremist and often violence-oriented groups, Jung argues.

Before the fall of the Wall, the GDR leadership had been the most important financier of left-wing extremism in Germany. Today, it is the German taxpayer who has to support the enemies of the state. Antifa, a beneficiary of public funding, even expanded significantly under the leadership of “bourgeois” Angela Merkel.

The group has experienced an unprecedented boom in the last 20 years and is increasingly aggressive both against the rule of law and its representatives as well as against political dissenters.

But state support is not limited only to financial support for the left-wing extremist scene. With their one-sided information policy, authorities for the protection of the constitution and criminal investigation offices of both the federal government and the federal states play down the danger that radical leftists in Germany pose.

Based on a critical analysis of the official data, Jung shows that not only the left-wing extremist potential, but also left-wing criminal and violent acts are systematically reduced or covered up by those responsible. At the same time, the criminality of the far right is being exaggerated. Even the extent of left-wing violence against police officers, who are exposed to increasingly brutal attacks by Antifa and anarchists in everyday life, is glossed over with the help of fake data, according to Jung.

Opinion journalists in the editorial offices of the mainstream media like to pick up on the falsified official statistics and, with their manipulative reporting, help to deceive the public about the real extent of the threat that left-wing extremism poses to the free and democratic basic order in Germany.

In a historical retrospective, the author shows how not only many of the former 1968 activists, but also sympathizers of the terrorist organisation, the Red Army Fraction (RAF), who emerged from the left student protest, are currently generously showered with taxpayers’ money, also in the asylum industry.

Jung reveals how they view their task primarily as preventing criminal foreigners from being deported from Germany, aided by a law on foreigners, which, under the influence of left-wing politics, has been increasingly eroded to favor of illegal migrants.

One of Jung’s particular merits is to expose the numerous cross-connections between the left parties represented in the Bundestag and the left-wing extremist scene.

Die Linke, the SPD and the Greens, have joined forces in various alliances with left-wing extremist groups and often make joint statements. Above all, Green Youth and Young Socialists make no secret of their sympathy for the left wing. Jung provides numerous well-researched examples of this in his book.

Jung also examines the case of the Alternative for Germany (AfD), to which completely different standards are applied when it comes to classifying the party as a “suspected case” of anti-constitutionalism. He explains in detail in his book how the obvious double standard is further evidence that the domestic spy service is not an independent authority, as the law requires.

After reading the fact-rich book, it should be clear to every reader that Germany has been drifting further and further to the left under Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU), and is heading towards an alliance with the left-wing extremist Greens in the federal government.

In the former East Germany, leftists are brought into the highest state offices with CDU aid. One example is the case of Barbara Borchardt, a founding member of the Antikapitalistischen Linken [the anti-capitalist left] who was elected constitutional judge in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania thanks to the support of the CDU parliamentary group.

In Thuringia, similarly, the CDU made the re-election of the radical left Prime Minister Bodo Ramelow possible. In fact, today the Christian Democrats have become the de facto drivers of the “anti-fascist united front”.

freewestmedia.com/2020/08/30/the-secret-seizure-of-power-by-left-wing-extremists-in-germany/

By Monica Showalter

Following the conclusion of the Republican National Convention, the far left’s “fiery but peaceful” protestors had a pretty disgusting plan: Instead of just yelling at the top of their lungs from the outside, or attempting to disrupt the convention from the inside, or burning and looting nearby shops to give the whole thing a bad public relations odor, they decided to physically attack Republicans as they exited the convention. That was the plan.

They certainly attacked random nobodys exiting the front, but when Sen. Rand Paul attempted to get to his hotel two blocks away on foot after waiting 45 minutes at the wrong hotel, the mobs recognized him and got really excited, first swarming him and his wife in a group of 30, and then swelling to 60, and then to a 120-sized turba mob. They made lunging attacks at the senator and his luckily-spotted police escort who were trying to protect Paul and his wife and deflect the “protestors.” 

It was a travesty. Paul described it very well here.

Some excerpts: “We cannot go outside now, it’s too dangerous.”

“The United States is going to become Portland.”

“We’ll eff you up.”

“This is happening in all our cities, thank God for the police.”

“I want to live the life of a normal person, where I go to the grocery store and buy groceries, or stop at the Minute-Mart.”

Paul’s most important statement came here:

“This also is not normal. There’s something is going on here. This is like, the FBI needs to be involved.”

 And more specifically as the Fox News reporter probed:

“My feeling is there is interstate criminal traffic being paid for across state lines, but you won’t know it unless you arrest them. Otherwise you just think oh these are just some normal hoodlums from a big city. I promise you that at least some of these members and people who attacked us were not from D.C. They flew here on a plane, they’ve all got fresh new clothes, and they were paid to be here. It is a crime to do that and it needs to be traced. The FBI needs to investigate. But the only way you can do it is you have to arrest people. And usually we say ‘oh, well, you didn’t get hurt, so we’re not going to arrest them.’ They were inciting a riot, and they would have killed us had the police not been there. They all need to be arrested, and I’m not saying forever, but they need to be arrested, questioned, they need to say where you’re staying, and the bills need to be subpoenaed by a judge, to say ‘who paid for your bill, how did you get here on a plane and staying in a fancy hotel, and yet you’re acting like a criminal.’ Something’s going on here and it’s much bigger than people think. But the bottom line is, we can’t let the United States become Portland and that’s what my fear is…

Which is pretty much the most important question that can be asked of any of this lunacy engulfing the country.

Two things stand out.

One, dangerously intransparent foundations, such as the Tides Foundation which takes cash in big amounts from anonymous donors, and has been known to contribute to terroristic organizations such as Earth First! and the “Ruckus Society” have stepped up their donations to “social justice” and “criminal justice” and “racial justice” organizations. George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, while less intransparent, given that its money comes from Soros’s vast fortune as a currency speculator, is in this category too. Here is what the New York Post, via the Center for Consumer Freedom noted:

The New York Post reports today that the secretive Tides Foundation began organizing attacks on President Bush after receiving millions of dollars from foundations controlled by presidential candidate John Kerry’s wife. Tides’ role in this “charitable money-laundering” operation is hardly surprising. After all, for over two decades it has been a major financial clearinghouse for radical activist groups. Many major philanthropies like the Ford Foundation and Pew Charitable Trusts fund projects through Tides to disguise themselves as the funding source.

Anti-consumer beneficiaries of Tides’ “anonymous” funds include Greenpeace, the
Ruckus Society, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and Earth First!. Earth First! spun-off the FBI-certified “terrorist” Earth Liberation Front in 1992. Tides was instrumental in NRDC’s now-infamous (and unfounded) health scare about Alar on apples. NRDC paid the PR firm that was promoting the scare through the Tides Foundation.

Second, the Democrats, who also take money from the donors to these foundations that may be behind these riots, have been curiously silent in their failure to condemn the violence, even on people they know and work with from the Senate building. Joe Biden made a general condemnation of violence after poll numbers showed that rioter violence was not playing well with the American voters, but he hasn’t said a thing about the attack on Sen. Rand Paul. His running mate, Kamala Harris, is even worse, witchily cackling that the violence will never stop, as noted in this well-written blog item today by Bill Dunne here.

Paul noted the irony of his own role in attempting to get justice for Breonna Taylor, who was killed in a no-knock raid on apparently the wrong apartment, writing a bill to ban no-knock raids. But he came off as a little naive there — these mobs aren’t interested in reform. They want to tear the whole edifice down and some huge billionaires are behind them. More than tanks in the streets, there needs to be an investigation into who’s funding these mobs, and arrests of the foundation executives and moneybag billionaires found to be involved. We still don’t know precisely which ones are doing this, but it’s critical that we find out, because as Harris says, the attacks won’t stop (and we need to know how Harris would know this, too). Some big swoopdowns need to happen, and one hopes the Trump administration is willing to take on the task, or is already on it. Paul would be wise to initiate some Senate investigation too, because someone’s getting away with this and the attacks are growing more brazen, targeting not just shopkeepers but now police and elected officials.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/08/somethings_going_on_here_and_its_much_bigger_than_people_think.html