Author Archives: medforth
Germany: Afghan stamps mother of five to death
He kicked her so brutally that the woman died of her head injuries!During an argument, a 38-year-old man is said to have kicked his wife in the face, so that she died a short time later of a craniocerebral trauma.The 38-year-old man has been on trial in Oldenburg since Friday for the killing of his wife. The charge is manslaughter.
The Afghan is accused of having kicked the 33-year-old violently in the face while arguing in July. The woman died a few days later in hospital.
The couple from Afghanistan, who have five children, lived separated. On the evening of the crime, an argument in the woman’s flat had escalated. The children were also present in the flat. They were taken into care by the Youth Welfare Office.
The Oldenburg Regional Court has scheduled several trial days until January for the trial.
bild.de/regional/bremen/bremen-aktuell/prozessauftakt-mann-soll-mutter-seiner-fuenf-kinder-getoetet-haben-74167140.bild.html?wtmc=fb.shr&fbclid=IwAR1GiK7RBdQmV79xu0PUKgL2u50jkBIIwhnipO5i-1pNNHJy-riqWybeLQ8
“Death to Christians” threats frighten residents of a tenement building in Vienna days after the deadly Islamist terrorist attack
A few days ago, tenants of a Viennese apartment building in the district of Leopoldstadt noticed threats in their stairwell. They are calling for murder (“Death to Christians”) containing spelling mistakes and glorifying the terrorist attack on the Schwedenplatz square. It is written: “The house will soon belong to us and then the whole world”. The indigestible sentence is also reminiscent of Nazi diction. Supplemented with: “Allah” may the 20-year-old assassin, who murdered four people on November the 2nd, be “merciful”. Concerned neighbours thereupon alerted the Vienna police and filed a complaint. So far it is still unclear who is responsible for the disturbing graffiti. The LVT ( State Office for the Protection of the Constitution and Counter-Terrorism) has already started investigations in this regard.
These are also intended to clarify whether the slogans originate from IS sympathizers or whether Muslims are being deliberately denigrated in the building in Leopoldstadt. “The attack of November the 2nd was a dramatic act of terrorism in Austria and never before seen in its dimension”, said Interior Minister Karl Nehammer at a press conference on Thursday. On that occasion he also shared the latest findings on the terror investigations: It could not be excluded that the perpetrator deliberately wanted to search for victims in churches in order to execute them. Therefore, he said, there would immediately be increased protection for churches.
“We are in a delicate phase”, said the Minister of the Interior and warned of possible copycat offenders, which is why there will be an increased presence of security forces at churches and other places of religious worship from now on, announced the Director General for Public Security, Franz Ruf. In addition, it would be ensured that the facilities would be guarded in a plain and uniformed, visible and concealed manner. In addition, there are new Cobra rapid reaction forces, which ” will locate possible perpetrators within the shortest possible time, lock them up and finally end the situation of amok or terror”, Brigadier Hannes Gulnbrein continued.
Did President Trump Spring a Trap on Treasonous Democrats on Election Night?
By Paul Dowling
“I, DONALD J. TRUMP . . ., find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections . . . constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. … I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.”
—President Trump, in his executive order of September 12, 2018, giving the pretext for the blocking of property and money transfers, without prior notification, belonging to persons who have dealt in foreign interference during the 2020 presidential election
Trump Knew All Along the Democrats Would Cheat
When President Trump became president in 2017, he knew that the Democrats were hell-bent on removing him from office. The Democrats tried endlessly to find skeletons in Trump’s closet, as part of a Soviet-style harassment campaign, wherein a person, rather than a crime, is investigated. Stalinist Lavrenty Beriawould have been proud; it was Beria who said, “Show me the man, and I’ll find you the crime.” The fact that Trump has survived so much character assassination and political scrutiny only goes to show how scrupulously honest Trump has been in his business and other dealings throughout his life.
Trump has known for a long while that, to finish his part in restoring America’s free republic, he would have to deal with tremendous election fraud in his bid for re-election. In 2016, Trump enjoyed the element of surprise in that his overwhelming popularity was great enough to overcome the systemic fraud set in place to rig the election for Hillary Clinton. So certain were the complicit media of a win for Clinton that they predicted a 95% probability of her winning. But the same blunder — born of Democrat arrogance and overconfidence from years of triumphant cheating — would not occur a second time in 2020. The media would, during Trump’s first term as president, embark on creating the illusion that the most popular president since Ronald Reagan was actually reviled. ThisBig Lie would be endlessly repeated, in hopes of making enough people believe a loss to Biden was in the cards for Trump.
Learning How the Sausage Is Made
In 2018, there was serious election fraud in Florida and in Arizona. Trump’s team observed the cheating and learned from it in preparation for the 2020 presidential election cycle. Prior to the 2018 election, on September 12, Trump issued an “Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.” The importance of this Executive Order largely escaped notice during the 2018 election cycle, but it would loom ever larger as the 2020 election approached.
The fact that no major arrests seem to have been made, concerning the election fraud of 2018, indicates that many of the fraudsters may have received plea bargains in exchange for making the next round of electoral crimes so highly visible that the irregularities could not be missed. If arrests had been made back in 2018, the Democrats would simply have brought in new operatives to do their criminal bidding in 2020, which, in the long run, would not have helped President Trump. While this line of reasoning is speculative, to be sure, the actual election fraud perpetrated in 2020 against the president is unmistakable.
Does Trump Possess Proof of Widespread Cheating in the 2020 Election?
After the November 3 presidential election of 2020, a news story broke reporting the seizure of important computer servers in Frankfurt, Germany. Though the event is disputed, what occurred, according to the Gateway Pundit, was this: “[a] unit under the command of USEUCOM (i.e., United States European Command) did in fact conduct an operation to take control of computer servers. But these servers belong to the CIA. … Such an operation would have been carried out with US law enforcement present to take custody of the evidence.” The presence of federal agents of the court would guarantee a chain of legal custody for the servers that would render their data admissible before a judge.
Gina Haspel and Christopher Wray were supposedly not informed of the raid in advance, leaving the CIA and FBI heads necessarily blind to this action and, therefore, unable to interfere. This means that the CIA was certainly the target and that a law enforcement agency unrelated to the FBI, such as the U.S. Marshalls or the Secret Service, was likely used to take control of the evidence. The timely firing of Mark Esper prior to the raid would mean that theoppositional defense secretary was cut off from foreknowledge of the raid and, therefore, would have been unable to disrupt what was going to transpire.
Biden’s Voter Fraud Was Predictable
As Bill and Ted may have characterized Biden’s unrealistic vote totals on election night, “strange things are afoot at the Circle K.” But these are strange thingsBiden himself brought up while speaking to former Obama staffers on Pod Save America on October 24, 2020, saying, “[W]e’re in a situation where we have put together — and you guys did it for our…president Obama’s…administration, before this — we have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.” Perhaps it would have been wise for the former vice president to have remained mum and in his basement that day, especially in light of his follow-up comment, while speakingto Michigan voters on November 1, 2020: “I don’t need you to get me elected; I need you once I’m elected.” Taken together, Biden’s comments paint the picture of a candidate with no need of voters to get elected, instead relying on election fraud to win — the same plan, it would seem, that worked for Barack Obama.
Did Trump Set a Trap for Election Thieves?
The Millennium Report of November 6, 2020, opens, “Just as the Democrats had 4 years to come up with a plan to steal POTUS 2020, so did Team Trump to foil that convoluted scheme. … Where to set the biggest traps was as easy as pie — Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia.” This idea that Trump set up the Democrats with his executive order and sprang a trap on them on Election Night is definitely within the realm of possibility, given what is known about thiscreative president.
It is likely that Trump has known about Dominion Voting Systems for some time but has chosen not to interfere with enemies who were in the process of setting themselves up for their own destruction. Little did the Democrats suspect that their villainous strength — the ability to win elections by cheating — was about to become an eminently indictable weakness. Psalms 141:10 reads, “Let the wicked fall into their own nets, while I pass by in safety.” It would appear likely that this is precisely what President Trump’s motto has been during the presidential election of 2020.
CLAIM: Dominion Exec Bragged That He Made Sure ‘Trump Is Not Gonna Win’ on Conference Call
Joe Oltmann, the founder of FEC (Faith Education Commerce) United, spoke to OAN about how he participated in a September 27 conference with members of antifa, and allegedly made a bombshell discovery about a key member of the leadership of Dominion Voting Systems.
Oltmann said he learned that “Eric from Dominion,” whom he later identified as Dominion employee Eric Coomer, would be on the call.
According to Oltmanna, someone on the call asked, “What are we gonna do if f***ing Trump wins?”
Oltmann paraphrased Coomer’s alleged response: “Don’t worry about the election, Trump’s not gonna win. I made f***ing sure of that!”
Snopes currently rates these allegations as “unproven,” explaining that they “don’t know whether Oltmann’s allegations against Coomer are accurate or not.” Evidence presented by Oltmann so far, such as social media posts allegedly belonging to Coomer, do not prove or disprove the key allegation made by Oltmann—that Coomer bragged about rigging the election. Snopes concedes that despite this, it “doesn’t necessarily mean Oltmann’s claim is false, it just means it is so far not supported by any publicly available evidence beyond his verbal account.” However, Snopes does add yet another caveat: “It’s also not clear whether Coomer’s alleged remarks if they did take place, were made in earnest, and therefore whether they should be interpreted as proof of election meddling … even if Coomer made the comment in earnest, he might have been lying, either to impress others on the call, to exaggerate his power and influence, or for some other reason.”
As of right now, there is no proof that the person on the call was Eric Coomer of Dominion, or that he made the statement. Conference calls involving a large number of participants may have recordings, but so far, no recording has surfaced, and Oltmann’s claims are, at this point, hearsay, especially without other witnesses who participated on the call verifying the statements.
Oltmann was apparently banned from Twitter soon after he first went public with his allegations. But without a recording of the conference call verifying that the comments were even said, and verifying who said them, there isn’t much to go on here. If Oltmann recorded the call, he needs to release the audio. Without audio to prove the foundation of his claim, these allegations will go nowhere.
Know Your Ally: Britain
Farage Victory Over Illegal Immigration
VP of Dominion Voting Fraud Inc. is missing
BREXIT VICTORY: EU Defeated On Fisheries
Austrian government steps up protection of churches after Vienna attack in run-up to Christmas
Austria has begun tightening security at its churches and other sites of religious worship, fearing copycat attacks after an Islamist gunman killed four people in a rampage earlier this month in the capital Vienna.
The attacker may have also intended to target houses of worship, Interior Minister Karl Nehammer said on Thursday.
“It cannot be ruled out that the perpetrator also wanted to deliberately seek out victims in churches,” Nehammer told reporters, citing the investigation’s findings. “There will therefore be a reinforced protection of church facilities as of today.”
Currently, there is no concrete threat against places of worship, but the minister explained that security is being tightened against possible copycat attacks in the “sensitive phase” of the run-up to Christmas.
Nehammer said that more police will be present in front of churches, synagogues and other religious institutions. He also stressed the need for “social solidarity” to “fight terrorism together.”
According to the minister, the “rapid reaction” officers and mobile patrols of the Cobra taskforce with armored vehicles and heavy equipment will be used in case of terrorist threats, or events in which attacks cannot be ruled out.
The 60-member group examining the November 2 attack is investigating 21 people, and 10 suspects are remanded in custody over alleged links to the Vienna attack. The perpetrator, a 20-year-old man who was born and raised in Vienna, was shot dead by police after firing at passersby on the street and in bars.
Authorities in Austria have admitted “intolerable mistakes” were made in the handling of intelligence on the attacker. Police had been aware of a “persistent and increased risk” of Islamist terrorist attacks, according to a report published by the Interior Ministry in 2019. It warned of the “increased danger of Islamist-motivated attacks” in Europe by radicalized individual perpetrators or autonomously acting small groups.
https://www.rt.com/news/507914-austria-protection-churches-vienna/