Democratic Party politicians recently claimed that they would want to replace terms such as “mother”, “father”, “son”, and “daughter” with more “gender-neutral” words such as “parent” and “child”.

The director of the Ordo Iuris Institute Center for International Law Karolina Pawłowska commented on this development, while also referring to what Joe Biden’s victory meant for Western society.

“We can unfortunately see that along with president Donald Trump’s loss in America, rapid and negative changes concerning the functioning of the political theater will take place. They are aiming to undermine basic social institutions to the whims of radical activists,” she said in the interview for portal Dorzeczy.pl.

Pawłowska believes that these actions are meant to conduct deep social engineering in the US whose main goal is to make humans completely powerless against public institutions by stripping humanity of its basic structures. She warned that this phenomenon was dangerous and due to Biden’s victory, the situation may take a turn for the worse and the changes will be introduced much more rapidly.

The lawyer emphasized that Biden bends under the pressure from radical demands concerning the protection of human life and family. This will impact not only in the US, but will also lead to a change in policy by the US on the international arena.

Pawłowska explained that in that last few years, protection of life, family and fundamental rights was one of the key areas of US foreign policy which was expressed in its actions in the United Nations. She reminded that the US, along with Brazil, Poland and Hungary initiated a coalition in the UN called the “Partnership for Families”. Its crowning achievements was passing the so-called Geneva Consensus on Octt. 22, 2020, which entailed that abortion can never be considered a human right, that every life should be protected, and that family is the fundamental social cell that society rests on.

“Given the current situation, it is almost certain that the US will leave this alliance and go over to the other side. The change of president in the US will probably strongly influence the UN where radical concepts are often the topic of deliberations and resolutions,” Pawłowska said.

“Amen” and “Awomen”

The lawyer also spoke in context of a Democrat representative ending a prayer inaugurating the US Sessions of Congress with the words “amen” and “awoman”. Amen does not even refer to males, but is Latin for “so be it”.

She emphasized that the goal of such a narrative is to create the perception that we live in a world founded by male oppression and domination, which is to be shown even in words which we use on an everyday basis. “In the case of the word “amen” it is a total abuse, as it has not association with men or men and means “so be it”,” she said, adding that a feeling of systematic discrimination is meant to be created in a religious context and installed into the nation’s social consciousness, 

Pawłowska stressed that neo-Marxist theories are using the different issues in functioning of certain social groups to explain the need to conduct social engineering. This is the same rhetoric used by Marxists who claimed that abolishing private property would help create a perfect world. 

“We know very well that is not what happened,” she added.

An estimated 100 million people were killed under communist rule across the world during the 20th century. 

https://rmx.news/article/article/bidens-election-means-acceleration-of-the-neo-marxist-revolution-says-polish-ordo-iuris-lawyer

An unarmed pro-Trump protester was shot dead by Capitol police on Wednesday. On the eve of the election of the US President in Congress on January 6, Washington DC saw a mega-demonstration by Trump supporters.

Violent BLM riots had raged unhindered in Washington for weeks in the summer of 2020, but the left-wing mayor Muriel Bowser called in the National Guard against Trump supporters and “white supremacists” after protesters massed at the Capitol building on Wednesday during the Save America Rally.

The crowd entered the Capitol Rotunda after police stood down. All legislators were moved to the basement as they tried to lock down the area. The police later used tear gas and stun grenades against the protesters. Pictures show how heavily armed police officers in full standby gear and with gas masks make their way through the building. The pro-Trump rally drew an estimated half a million people to Washington, DC.

The pro-Trump protester killed has been identified as 35-year-old Ashli Elizabeth Babbitt, a 14-year veteran who served four tours with the US Air Force and had worked as a high level security official. The New York Post reported that law enforcement sources told them Babbitt “was apparently shot by Capitol Police”.

Babbit was a strong supporter of President Trump, but a graphic video of her death showed no evidence of her posing any sort of threat. She was shot in the neck. Notably, Facebook has not taken down the thousands of nasty comments on Ashli Babbitt’s personal page celebrating her death.

A video posted by National File, clarified the unwarranted and random nature of the shooting.

In addition to the death of Babbitt, who was shot by the police inside the Capitol, the police confirmed that three other people had died in “medical emergencies” during the protest. It seems strange that there are no facts being communicated as to the circumstances of their deaths.

Some 52 people were arrested during the protest action, while most of them, 47, were arrested for violating the 6pm curfew.

A dozen Republican senators and around 50 Republican MPs had announced their intention to contest the election results for Joe Biden on massive fraud charges. One poll revealed that the majority of all Americans (56-34) believed that “enough fraud took place at the presidential election to change the outcome”.

Earlier, the conservative anti-antifa Proud Boys leader, Enrique Tarrio, was arrested at the airport in Washington for burning a flag of the neo-Marxist Black Lives Matter movement, in an attempt to suppress Wednesday’s peaceful “Stop The Steal” protest. Tarrio was reportedly arrested at gunpoint by DC police.

At a hearing in December before the Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee, witnesses and experts presented striking evidence of electoral fraud in the state. A team of data experts even hacked into the Dominion voting machines in the ongoing Senate elections in real time. These voting machines should not have been connected to the Internet, but clearly were.

Data expert David Cross also demonstrated the statistical impossibility of the large number of Biden votes. The mainstream media simply ignored the Senate hearing.

Election observers Susan Knox and Sally Grubbs documented how bundles of ballot papers were secretly shredded from unsealed trash cans at the Atlanta polling center on the day the alleged recount which had taken place without an observer. When Knox and Grubbs called the police, they were informed that the police had received orders from the city council not to respond to allegations of election fraud.

But in the runoff election in Georgia, according to reports from NBC and CBS, the two Democratic candidates for the Senate, Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff, prevailed against their Republican opponents.

Townhall reported that Big Tech companies were taking down videos or “encouragement” of the events at the Capitol that “violates our policies”. A video of President Trump addressing a peaceful rally earlier in the day was thus deleted from Facebook and Instagram. Facebook claimed they prohibited incitement or calls for violence, but there were no such calls.

Youtube admitted that they removed content because Trump alleged fraud in the election and they disagreed. Twitter also removed the speech by Trump.

While Twitter blocked Trump’s user account for twelve hours, Facebooktemporarily excluded Trump and put him in a 24-hour ban. Both companies justified their actions with violations of their guidelines.

The Senate dismissed the appeal of Republican Senator Josh Hawley, who had protested against the results of the Pennsylvania presidential election. Some 92 Senators voted against Hawley’s motion, with only seven in favor. This means that the attempt by the Republicans to contest Trump’s defeat has failed.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/01/07/leftist-mayor-calls-national-guard-to-washington-unarmed-protester-shot-dead/

Clearer video of the shooting death of Roberta Paulsen see here:https://vladtepesblog.com/2021/01/06/protestors-let-in-to-the-capitol-january-6-dc-post-4/

If you are displeased with the weather these days, you can justifiably rail against “Ahmet”, named after Ahmet Özgül.Ahmet Özgül is the namesake of the low-pressure area which is currently afflicting Central Europe. Behind the campaign is not a xenophobic meteorologist, but the do-gooder association “New German Media Makers”.They bought the name for the current weather, as the magazine “Der Spiegel” happily reports.Yes, truly, everything is monetised these days, including the naming of high and low pressure areas. This is done for a good cause, of course, because “every sponsorship makes an important contribution to the maintenance of the complete climate observation, as well as the student weather observation at the Institute for Meteorology at the Free University of Berlin”.What if in spring the high-pressure area Donald (Trump) displaces the wintry weather and then in summer Marine (Le Pen) lets the sun shine on us? After all, Europe and the world are diverse and colourful.

pi-news.net/2021/01/tief-ahmet-bringt-schneematsch-und-dauerregen/

German Chancellor Angela Merkel had been singled out for serious criticism for the slow pace of vaccination in Germany and within other European Union member states. In the past few days, it had transpired that in the summer of 2020 she had personally intervened against the pre-ordering of a large batch of vaccines for Germany in favor of a common European approach that, in view of the protracted economic slump, had cost billions of euros and had resulted in significant delays in the purchase of vaccines needed for the population.

In the summer of 2020, there was an initiative from the health ministers of Germany, France, Italy and the Netherlands to pre-order a large quantity of vaccines from Pfizer-BioNtech that were developed in Germany and were scheduled to be manufactured in Belgium. According to documents published by the Bild newspaper, Merkel, at the start of Germany’s EU presidency, had personally intervened to block the initiative in order to show her solidarity and not to erode the authority of European institutions in tackling the coronavirus crisis. This had forced the four health ministers to backtrack on their plans and to write an apologetic letter to the Commission saying, “We believe that it is of utmost importance to have a common joint and single approach towards the various pharmaceutical companies… So we deem it very useful if the Commission takes the lead in this process.”

The four ministers have reserved 400 million vaccines from Astra-Zeneca, but after handing over the negotiations to the Commission, the process had become so protracted that it gave an opportunity for the United Kingdom and United States to secure large doses for their own citizens.

Criticism of the Commission’s failure had come from all directions, even Ursula von der Leyen’s predecessor Jean-Claude Juncker had expressed his dismay, saying that the EU had reacted very “weakly”. Yet, he also blamed the debacle on the fact that EU member states still retain their powers in the area of healthcare, which is not an unexpected remark from the former Commission president, who is regarded as a vocal advocate of a federal Europe. Others have called for Merkel’s resignation, remarkingthat “once again, the chancellor reveals herself as one overwhelmed at the crucial moment”.

The entire episode is a major embarrassment for those calling for stronger European integration and for handing over national competences to Brussels. Some nation-states, such as Israel, the US or the UK, all led by leaders often ridiculed for their nation-first attitudes, have proved to be more effective and faster in reacting to the crisis, with their vaccination programs far outpacing that of the EU’s. Only 2 million Germans, out of a population of 84 million, are expected to be vaccinated by the end of January, which is exponentially less than the proportion in some independent countries outside of the EU.

In order to inflate the number of those who have participated in the inoculation, German health minister Jens Spahn has reportedly proposed to increase the time between the two portions that are necessary for the medication to take effect, potentially endangering the effectiveness of the vaccination. He was also confident enough to shrug off any criticism, claiming in a television interview that “things are going exactly as it was planned”.

The authority of Merkel’s protégé, Ursula von Der Leyen, who is ultimately responsible for the decisions and success of the Commission, has also been tarnished by the delays. Von der Leyen, who, as the former German defense minister, is credited with the near destruction of the Bundeswehr by many, has proved to be indecisive in handling the unprecedented health crisis. Her Commissioner for Health and Food Safety Stella Kyriakides had only succeeded in pre-ordering 300 million doses from Biontech and Pfizer, as the EU had already exhausted its €2.7 billion budget set aside for the handling of the coronavirus crisis. Thus, the funds remaining for this essential medication have proven to be woefully insufficient.

The lack of funds for saving lives of European citizens comes at a time when Angela Merkel had announced the sum of €1 billion for what the German government calls a “fight against right-wing radicalism” that would effectively mean a transfer of large amounts of taxpayer money to NGOs or political research organizations aligned with the progressive liberal outlook of her government. Furthermore, to silence any possible criticism of her failure to tackle the vaccine crisis, her allies have labeled all attempts to deal with the issue outside the remit of the Brussels bureaucracy as a “vaccination nationalism”.

This is in line with the attitude of the Merkel government since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, when critics were branded as “right-wing” and public debates has effectively been muffled by the German media closing ranks behind the Merkel government. At the first signs of the epidemic in China, the disease was dismissed as harmless and government officials claimed to be well-prepared for its arrival. They blamed the “right” for causing alarm among the population.

However, as far as German election results are concerned, this strategy had worked for years in distracting from the Merkel government’s failures.

https://rmx.news/article/article/fingers-point-at-angela-merkel-over-european-vaccination-failure