Boris Orders Government To DUMP China’s Huawei
1
Harry and Meghan feeling a little concerned about drones in L.A.
By Monica Showalter
As if Los Angeles didn’t have bigger problems, Harry and Meghan, are leaking through friends to the press about their displeasure with all those surveillance drones.
According to the Daily Beast:
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are concerned for their family’s safety following multiple incidents at their Hollywood Hills home, where drones have flown as low as 20 feet above their property to snatch photographs of the couple and their young son, Archie.
A source has exclusively told The Daily Beast that the couple has been coping with “unimaginable” levels of press intrusion at their temporary new home, which is reportedly owned by their friend Tyler Perry. It is not known whether the couple is paying rent for the property or not.
The Beast reports that they, or someone in their household or vicinity, has called the cops five times about it.
As if moving to Los Angeles from the depths of the Canadian woods, and setting up house in some celebrity’s 24,500 square foot mansion near Beverly Hills, all for “a quieter life,” as they said, might just bring such a scenario.
It’s all so very … Karen. And pretty ridiculous.
In reality, they’ve got bigger problems.
Leftists thugs are now openly targeting the celebrity areas of Los Angeles – Brentwood, Hollywood Hills, Bel Air, Beverly Hills. They’re looking at getting paid a visit by the rioters who’ve got looting the rich on their minds — and the looters have already gotten away with it for several nights running. Twitter is loaded with tweets like these:
Which ought to concern them, a lot more than the papparazzi drones they’re complaining about.
Being wokesters, we don’t hear any condemnation of the destruction of the metropolis from the likes of this pair,at all, any more than we do from the other Hollywood celebs, including the lost souls who are loudly declaring their plans to pay the bail of “protestors,” meaning, thugs caught looting, given that those are the only ones getting arrested. Does Chrissie Teigen feel secure in her digs in those parts? Does Ariana Grande? How about all the other celebrity leftists loudly speaking out in favor of the rioters?
That it’s no protection against the plans of the thugs says a lot about the celebrities’ naivete. That these are the very celebs who virtue-signal their fealty to the looters, who have been wreaking mayhem on poor shopkeepers already weakened by the coronavirus, is a story in itself. Despite celebrity statements of support, looters and rioters are targeting them anyway, it’s no protection. It almost looks like a grotesque celebrity bid to appease crocodiles in the hopes they’ll be eaten last.
Meghan’s a pinhead and undoubtedly knows nothing about history, but Harry of all people, Prince Harry, might just know a whiff of what could come down the pike as mobs circle their part of town looking for booty and cops stay on the sidelines.
Back in 1789. the mobs had a good time marching on Versailles, invading the grounds, demanding audiences for their political grievances, getting a little, getting mad, and after getting away with this first raid, eventually went on to pick off a few royals and march around with their heads on pikes.
Here’s a Lumen Learning course refresher:
On the morning of October 5, 1789, women in the marketplaces of Paris were near rioting over the high price and scarcity of bread. Their demonstrations quickly became intertwined with the activities of revolutionaries seeking liberal political reforms and a constitutional monarchy for France.
At the end of the Ancien Régime, the fear of famine became an ever-present dread for the lower strata of the Third Estate. Rampant rumors of a conspiracy theory held that foods, especially grain, were purposely withheld from the poor for the benefit of the privileged (the Pacte de Famine). Stories of a plot to destroy wheat crops in order to starve the population provoked the so-called Great Fear in the summer of 1789.
Despite its post-revolutionary mythology, the march was not a spontaneous event. Speakers at the Palais-Royal mentioned it regularly and the idea of a march on Versailles had been widespread. The final trigger came from a royal banquet held on October 1 at which the officers at Versailles welcomed the officers of new troops, a customary practice when a unit changed its garrison. The royal family briefly attended the affair. The lavish banquet was reported in newspapers as nothing short of a gluttonous orgy. Worst of all, the papers dwelt scornfully on the reputed desecration of the tricolor cockade; drunken officers were said to have stamped upon this symbol of the nation and professed their allegiance solely to the white cockade of the House of Bourbon. This embellished tale of the royal banquet became the source of intense public outrage.
And this, in 1792, after a mob ripped apart then-Queen Marie-Antoinette’s chief lady in waiting, the Princess de Lamballe, who was married to France’s richest man:
After her death, her corpse was reportedly undressed, eviscerated and decapitated, with its head placed upon a pike.[2] It is confirmed by several witnesses that her head was paraded through the streets on a pike and her body dragged after by a crowd of people shrieking ‘La Lamballe! La Lamballe!’.[2] This procession was witnessed by a M. de Lamotte, who purchased a strand of her hair which he later gave to her father-in-law, as well as by the brother of Laure Junot.[2]
Some reports say that the head was brought to a nearby café where it was laid in front of the customers, who were asked to drink in celebration of her death.[13] Some reports state that the head was taken to a barber in order to dress the hair to make it instantly recognizable,[14] though this has been contested.[12] Following this, the head was put on the pike again and paraded beneath Marie Antoinette’s window at the Temple.[16]
Sound a little familiar? Not a word about this threat from them, which looks a little too real right now. They’re just concerned about the drones.
Germans now show their Stasi stripes by demanding Youtube remove 3 videos that contradict the man-mad Global Warming narrative
Naoimi’s Youtube channel is here.
Here are a couple of them:
(If Naomi goes to court it will not be she that is on trial. It will be the Rule of Law in Germany.)
US: BLM member forces woman to get on her knees and apologize for her ‘white privilege”
Disturbing video footage has emerged out of the United States which shows a Black Lives Matter (BLM) activist aggressively running up to a white woman, commanding her to get on her knees, and forcing her to apologize for her “white privilege”.
More About Socialism Than About George Floyd
These aren’t “protests.” They are an organized insurrection. Evidence keeps pouring in:
Germany: Rejected asylum seeker Abdallah D. raped schoolgirl
In the summer of 2019, the rape of a 16-year-old schoolgirl upset the Czech population. The suspected perpetrator: a rejected asylum seeker who had just been released from prison in Dresden. Now he is on trial.
Abdallah D. (30 years old) came to Dresden with the waves of refugees in 2015. He claimed to come from Mali, but is probably Libyan. In 2017 he rioted in the Dresden social welfare office, demanded a passport and a flight to the USA.
He threatened an employee: “I’ll wait for you after work. I’ll kill you.”
For this threat and fare dodging, he spent 46 days in jail in Dresden. He could not be deported because he had no passport.
On the day of his release he took the train to the Czech Republic and raped a 16-year-old schoolgirl. He was arrested, the police secured his sperm and saliva on the victim.
The trial was postponed for a long time, as Abdallah D. had been psychiatrically examined, according to the Czech media. The suspicion: he might suffer from schizophrenia (mental illness). In custody and in court he behaved conspicuously, gestured, could not sit still.
In a preliminary psychiatric report, however, it was also stated that it could not be ruled out that D. was only simulating. The trial will continue on June 4.
bild.de/regional/dresden/dresden-aktuell/dresden-abgelehnter-asylbewerber-30-vergewaltigt-maedchen-16-71001450.bild.html?fbclid=IwAR0U5CVi4uyzuGdrag6rMEls7_R7BX3Zpja1NWUHptn6lSObVHmu51HxaYE
America’s fire was set by the idea that the world has to end in the dustbin
by Giulio Meotti
Frightening images from the US on fire after George Floyd’s death: attempted lynching of whites, banks and shops looted across the country, curfews, churches and statues burning, elderly ladies beaten up for defending their shops.But the tragic death of Floyd by a police officer is not the real reason that led to such a crisis. The policeman will serve many years in prison and the US president has condemned what happened. What else could one expect to happen in a democratic country in response to this terrible event?
And despite what the media tell you, America is less, not more racist. There have been two terms of the first black president, there are preferential lanes for minorities in universities and at work, even old classic novels like “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” are panned for the smell of racism and the use of offensive terms in public against minorities is synonymous with social death.
Instead, we are witnessing the violent disappearance of the old America, the land of thrift, temperance, civilization, and moderation.
The left has renounced real liberalism, dialogue and civilized dissent to move to a ruthless politics based on racial and sexual identity that has overwhelmed everything. The US cultural consensus today – at least that of the left’s adherents – is as if it has moved from the old and blessed responsibility of the individual to the idea that society is responsible for all ills.
For years the media and universities have said that black people were oppressed and that their ideological hate is legitimate. Now America gathers in the streets what was sown during years of cultivated rancor.
The late US historian Gertrude Himmelfarb said: “It is evident that we are suffering from a grievous moral disorder”.
We witness the cultural destruction of a society, individualism has deprived society of the old relationships that once made sense to collective identity, the points of reference (church, community, schools which teach values …) are in crisis and what remains is the war of all against all as in a video game.
Today, for an American boy, and even more in the black community, it is easier to have a TV at home than a father.
Destroy the father figure, dissolve the family, deconstruct the school, play around with gender and race war, deprive the human being of the religious dimension and throw him into a condition of pure consumerism without the bonds that make us less vulnerable to violence, foment a vulgar and exhibitionist culture based on some sort of collective guilt – and you will have flames.
We have cultivated the desire to transgress, to destroy, to wipe out “the system”. The whole world has to end sooner or later in the dustbin, becoming “trash”.
And this unprecedented violence is grafted into a social fabric heavily devastated by 100,000 deaths from the pandemic and the prospect of an unprecedented economic crisis.
We are losing the old America. We will all regret it.
Who’s paying for the bricks to be conveniently dropped off in protest areas?
Robert Alan ‘Bob’ Pritzker (June 30, 1926 – October 27, 2011) was an American businessman and member of the wealthy Pritzker family.
Pritzker’s nephew and namesake,[20]J.B., became Governor of Illinois in 2019.
AfD: Germany, EU Should Follow Trump Lead on Banning Antifa
A spokesman for the populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) has called on the European Union and Germany to ban the far-left extremist group Antifa after U.S. President Donald Trump declared it would be designated a terrorist group.
AfD Spokesman on the Foreign Policy Committee of the German Bundestag Petr Bystron commended President Trump’s announcement made over the weekend in response to the ongoing riots raging across the United States.
“Donald Trump is doing the right thing in designating these violent extremist groups as terrorists. Antifa is an anti-democratic hate group whose radical left-wing ideology rejects the free market and freedom of speech,” Bystron said in a press release seen by Breitbart London.
“American Antifa is modelled on German Antifa and finds its supporters in the German mainstream media and politics. German Antifa stages regular violent attacks on AfD members like Frank Magnitz, hunted U.S. journalists like Tim Pool on the street in Hamburg at the G20 summit, and just two weeks ago put a union activist a coma in Stuttgart,” he added.
Bystron also noted that there had been alleged cases of meetings between the German branch of Antifa and members of American Antifa groups in Hamburg with members of the Islamic State terror group.
“The AfD, the largest opposition party in the German Bundestag, has been attacked and terrorised by Antifa for years, to the applause and encouragement of left-wing media and politicians,” Bystron said.
The AfD has recorded hundreds of violent incidents directed at members and supporters in recent years, from assaults to property damage and arson attacks.
Last year, Antifa extremists went as far as posting an “assassination guide” on the popular far-left platform Indymedia, directing others to kill AfD politicians.
“We urge the U.S. government to examine the international Antifa terror network all the way up to the highest levels in press and government, and issue travel bans and international arrest warrants where necessary and appropriate,” Bystron said.
While Bystron and the AfD expressed support for the designation of Antifa as terrorists, the German Social Democrats, one half of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s grand coalition government, disagreed, stating on Twitter that the party itself was Antifa.
“157 and Antifa. Obviously,” the party’s official account wrote, referencing its 157-year age in response to co-leader Saskia Esken who wrote: “58 and Antifa. Obviously.”
The global threat of far-left extremism across Europe and North America has dramatically risen in recent months, from suspected large-scale sabotage of infrastructure and the discovery of a bomb-making headquarters in France to a recent attempt by far-left extremists to bomb the home of a Greek conservative former government minister.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/06/02/afd-germany-eu-should-follow-trump-lead-banning-antifa/
Prominent Mongolian politician arrested ahead of election
Since the fall of communism in 1989 Mongolia has grown into a developed democracy, but alarming signs are beginning to appear. The prominent politician Nomtoibayar Nyamtaishir was arrested, despite the fact that according to Mongolian law he has immunity until the election on June 24.
Nomtoibayar Nyamtaishir had fought corruption within the ruling Mongolian People’s Party, but was then expelled from this party and deprived of his parliamentary immunity. He then launched a campaign as an independent candidate, where he very quickly reached the number of required signatures. He needed 801 signatures, but in five days he managed to get support from almost a third of the 97 000 voters in his constituency in Ulan Bator. His opponents were, however, successful in sabotaging his campaign.
The young politician was accused of abuse of power during this time as Minister three years earlier, an accusation he claims is fabricated. He was arrested and indicted. The proceedings are scheduled to be held on June 26, two days after the election, which obviously makes any campaigning impossible.
Candidates have been arrested on two occasions before, only to be released shortly after the elections. One was the former Prime Minister Mendsaikhany Enkhsaikhan, the other the former President Nambaryn Enkhbayar. Both were accused of corruption, but never charged.
The international lawyer Dr. Arildiipurev Tsevelragchaa points out that the arrest of Mr. Nyamtaishir is in itself a crime against the constitution, since all candidates enjoy immunity precisely in order to prevent the legal system from being used as a tool against political opponents:
“By arresting Nomtoibayar Nyamtaishir before the election campaign begins, the judge himself violated the Constitution of Mongolia (Article 16.9) by ignoring his basic human right to be elected, dishonored his candidate’s immunity protected by the Law on Parliamentary Elections of Mongolia (Article 35.2; Article 35.2.1) and violated due process described in the Criminal Procedure Code (Article 35.2.1) which is the essence of the country’s rule of law,” she said.
The story goes back to November 2018, when a number of investigative reporters revealed the Prime Minister, several of his ministers and a number of Members of Parliament had embezzled 1,3 million dollars, funds intended to support small businesses. Nomtoibayar Nyamtaishir demanded that the guilty be held accountable.
In December 2019 the parliament introduced a law that prevents officials who have been found guilty of abuse of power from running again. Just a few days later the new law was used against Nomtoibayar Nyamtaishir. He was charged with suspected abuse of power during his tenure as Minister of Labour and Social Protection in 2017. Dr. Tsevelragchaa points out that the current minister has not been accused of anything, in spite of having made the same kind of decisions as Nyamtaishir a year later. When police investigated the accusations against Nyamtaishir they were unable to find any proof of the accusations and the issue was shelved. As soon as Nyamtaishir announced that he would run as an independent candidate in this year’s election, however, it was decided to look into the case again. He was interrogated on 28 May and charged the same day. He is now locked up, unable to do any campaigning. An interesting aspect is that he intends to run against the Minister of Justice, Tsendiin Nyamdorj.
The story had further implications for the Mongolian rule of law. The Parliament decided in March 2019, in an emergency session without hearings or public consultations, to introduce amendments to laws concerning the judicial system and corruption. These changes would mean that the National Security Council can suggest removals of judges and other key officials who work against corruption. The controversial law has attracted international criticism.
“This fundamental change in the legal framework would seriously undermine the balance of power, erode checks and balances and limit the possibility for the judiciary to fight corruption,” says Dr. Tsevalragchaa.
In May 2019 the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Michel Forst, visited Mongolia. In his report he concludes that the new law sends a clear sign intended to intimidate people who demand justice and wish to speak out against corruption. He also asserts that the law violates the UN conventions on political rights.
Yet another questionable law, from a democratic standpoint, was introduced in 2017. Then ”slander” was made an offence that could be punished be either prison for three to six months, or a fine which amounts to between 50 and 150 times the average monthly salary. Since officials often report journalists for slander, this law could lead to journalists censoring themselves.
Dr Tsevelragchaa emphasizes that an independent legal system is necessary to have checks and balances and to prevent the executive power from arbitrarily abusing its position. When a government can fill a legal system with its own appointees, dismiss judges and use the legal system as a weapon to punish political opponents, democracy will suffer. She continued: “Eliminating the judiciary’s independence is not the first sign of democratic erosion.”
Just a month before election day, Mongolia’s two major parties — the MPP and the DP — changed the country’s election rules from a mixed system that uses proportional and majoritarian voting to a “winner takes all” system that made it more difficult for independent and third-party candidates to win seats.
Dr Tsevalragchaa’s says it is essential for Mongolia to have international monitoring regarding MP Momtoiyar Nyamtaishir’s case to protect and promote the fulfilment of human rights and to monitor the conditions as to implementing international human rights conventions and obligations in the country.
Her closing words are: “Many observers have considered Mongolia an unlikely ‘oasis of democracy’ since 1990. Now it’s the latest nascent democracy to begin sliding toward authoritarian rule. Mongolian laws cannot insulate judges from political pressure. The judicial power may turn into a monster that serves government to hunt down leaders who demand justice. Taking aim at the strongest leaders creates fear and turns them into vulnerable subordinates. In a country without an independent judicial system, democracy cannot survive.”
freewestmedia.com/2020/06/01/prominent-mongolian-politician-arrested-ahead-of-election/
