In Neuburg on the river Danube in Bavaria, three Nigerian asylum seekers were sentenced today to two years’ suspended sentences for arson and physical injury resulting from negligence – despite their previous convictions. The judge is convinced that the three men set a fire in their accommodation in Feilenmoos last August. According to the regional newspaper Donaukurier, the fire caused property damage of approximately 20,000 euros. Four people were injured.The female judge considered a confession of the three accused from Africa as mitigating. In her opinion, it is a first step towards reform. In addition, the judge said that the remand in custody had left a lasting impression on the three men, who have already been convicted of theft, attempted fraud and assault – but only to fines.According to the defense attorney, the motive for the act was that one of the arsonists wanted to ” send a signal” against the transfer to the asylum center.

Not all perpetrators who set fire to asylum shelters can expect such lenient sentences, as the three Nigerians living in Bavaria did. For example, in 2017, in the trial of the arson attack on a refugee shelter in Nauen, Brandenburg, NPD local politician Maik Schneider was sentenced to eight years in prison, an accomplice to seven years. In the appeal proceedings, the main perpetrator received seven years and nine months in prison. It is interesting that in many reports about this crime there is not a word about possible injured persons.You have to search thoroughly to find information about it: Schneider set fire to a sports hall in Nauen, Brandenburg, where refugees were to be accommodated – so there were none at the time of the arson. Quite different from the three Africans in Bavaria – where the accommodation was occupied and four people were injured.

In the case of the arson attack in Nauen, presiding judge Theodor Horstkötter established “xenophobic and right-wing extremist motives” in the first trial and said: “A shelter for refugees should offer protection for people who have fled from war and terror – they wanted the opposite”, Horstkötter stated. The judgement was guided by the idea of general prevention. In various other cases, xenophobic perpetrators were also sentenced to long prison terms for arson in asylum accommodations.Such harshness may well be appropriate to discourage imitators. But the question arises as to why this general prevention seems to play a much smaller role when inmates deliberately set fire to hostels that are already occupied in order to send a signal, and then a larger one when xenophobes set fire to an empty gymnasium where refugees are later to be housed. Both acts are shocking to condemn the motives in both cases in the strongest terms. Although the Penal Code was amended in 2015 in such a way that “racist, xenophobic or other inhuman” motives or goals of the perpetrator are “particularly” to be taken into account when sentencing.Here the question arises why extremism of any kind, whether right-wing, left-wing or religious, is not mentioned? Is the new regulation an ideologization of the penal code? Isn’t every setting fire to an inhabited accommodation a contempt for human beings? And don’t other factors also play a role according to the law – such as the degree of “breach of duty”? Is a suspended sentence for serious arson with injured persons really still deterrent enough for offenders with a criminal record? To sum up, it remains to be said: It is strange that the sentences are not only different, but almost diametrically opposed. And provides arguments to those who talk about a two-tier justice system in Germany.

https://www.reitschuster.de/post/brandstiftungen-in-asylheimen-zweierlei-ma%C3%9F-vor-gericht?fbclid=IwAR2jdy2fbqq7j3PrVTEI0s8mLPH5cetitMlHVuNglFNvP0C6ZEwgC3EgEjs

The news programme Tagesschau of the German public television takes on Islamic thinking.
It is created the impression that the Haghia Sophia would come AGAIN ( =BACK!) to Islam. Consequently, the name of the church is not mentioned.
The method is not new. Tagesschau also agrees with the “Palestinians” who want “their” land BACK.

An increasingly popular idea is that whenever races clash, only minorities can be victims. The notion is hardly limited to the recent riots in America. Elements of such thinking often appear in other contexts.

British women, for instance, including rape victims who drew attention to “Asian” (Pakistani and South Asian) sex grooming gangs, are also being attacked by the “woke” establishment.

Earlier this month in the UK, Sarah Champion, a Labor politician and MP for Rotherham (the epicenter of sex grooming), was accused of “fanning the flames of racial hatred” and “acting like a neo-fascist murderer.” Her crime? She had dared to assert that “Britain has a problem with British Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls.”

The same elements accusing Champion of being a “murderer” also characterizedthe UK’s anti-extremism program, Prevent, as being “built upon a foundation of Islamophobia and racism.”

A few weeks earlier, an article titled, “I was raped by Rotherham grooming gang—now I still face racist abuse online,” appeared. In it, a British woman (alias, “Ella”) revealed that her Muslim rapists called her “a white whore, a white b***h,” during the more than 100 times she was raped in her youth by the Pakistani grooming gang.

“We need to understand racially and religiously aggravated crime if we are going to prevent it and protect people from it and if we are going to prosecute correctly for it,” Champion said in a recent interview.

“Prevention, protection and prosecution—all of them are being hindered because we are neglecting to properly address the religious and racist aspects of grooming gang crimes…. It’s telling them that it’s OK to hate white people.”

Ella’s attempts to highlight the “religious and racist aspects” of her and many other girls’ similar abuse led only to “a lot of abuse from far-left extremists, and radical feminist academics,” she said. Such groups “go online and they try to resist anyone they consider to be a Nazi, racist, fascist or white supremacist”.

“They don’t care about anti-white racism, because they appear to believe that it doesn’t exist. They have tried to floor me and criticise me continually and this has been going on for a couple of months. They tried to shut me down, shut me up … I’ve never experienced such hate online in my life. They accuse me of ‘advocating for white paedophiles’ and being a ‘sinister demonic entity.'”

Placing the blame — or at least responsibility — on the victim is not limited to the UK. According to an August 9, 2019 report, “in the Swedish city of Uppsala … four women were raped in as many days.” Although police failed to issue descriptions of the rapists — usually a sure sign of their origins — they did issue warnings for women to “think how they behave,” to “think ahead,” and not “go out alone.”

Advice against alcohol, drugs, and reckless behavior would be more compelling if it were not made under duress.

After mobs of Muslim migrants sexually assaulted as many as a thousand womenon New Year’s Eve 2016 in Cologne, Germany, the city’s mayor, Henriette Reker, called on women to “be better prepared, especially with the Cologne carnival coming up. For this, we will publish online guidelines that these young women can read through to prepare themselves.”

In Austria, after a 20-year-old woman waiting at a bus stop in Vienna was attacked, beaten and robbed by four Muslim men — including one who “started [by] putting his hands through my hair and made it clear that in his cultural background there were hardly any blonde women” — police responded by telling the victim to dye her hair.

“At first I was scared, but now I’m more angry than anything. After the attack they told me that women shouldn’t be alone on the streets after 8pm. And they also gave me other advice, telling me I should dye my hair dark and also not dress in such a provocative way. Indirectly that means I was partly to blame for what happened to me. That is a massive insult.”

In Norway, Unni Wikan, a female professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo, insists that “Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes,” because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. So much for the feminist claim that women are free to dress as seductively as they want — and woe to the man who misinterprets this, unless he is from a racial or religious minority group.

Professor Wikan’s conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West need to adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: “Norwegian women must realize that we live in a Multicultural society and adapt themselves to it.”

Even when it comes to rape, then, if the victim is white and the rapist is not, she is no victim at all; worse, she is a “racist” and “hater” who, if anything, apparently deserves what she got and more. “Blame the victim” is back with a vengeance and gaining ground throughout the West.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16179/rape-victims-racism

Neger (in English language Nigger) is a district of the German city of Olpe.

Neger is divided into the villages Unterneger, Mittelneger und Oberneger (Lower, Middle and Upper Nigger. photos below). BLM activists are already there and have left their mark on the town sign.But I am not sure if the friendly black man on the photo knows what the word ” Abfallentsorgungszentrum” on the town sign means.It means: waste disposal facility !

Update:

On the French Police Instructors Official Facebook Page the names of the attackers have been released: Mohamed C., Mohammed A., Moussa B. and Sélim Z. 

By Jeffrey Folks

John Milton understood evil.  Some say he understood it so well that he made Satan, not Man, the most interesting character in Paradise Lost(1667).  Regardless, what he recorded in that epic of Man’s fall from Grace is one of the central and enduring myths of mankind.  It is also a good explanation for what’s going on in Seattle, Minneapolis, New York, and a dozen other cities hit by radical protests.

Milton tells of Satan’s rebellion against God and his defeat and banishment to Hell.  After his defeat by a band of angels loyal to God, Satan travels from Hell to Earth in order to corrupt Adam and Eve.  He tempts Eve into partaking of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge.  Adam and Eve are then expelled from paradise into a world of suffering and pain.

The crucial point about Satan has to do with his motivation.  Why should one of God’s most capable and valued followers wish to rebel in the first place?  The answer is that Satan is swollen with pride and incapable of submitting to authority of any kind.  He views the universe in the way today’s anarchists do.  They see themselves as godlike creatures who should not have to submit to authority.  While today’s radicals claim to be struggling for racial justice or equality, they are really interested in something very different: the illusion of total free will and limitless power.  That was Satan’s motive as well, and Milton understood the danger it posed.

It is impossible to know just what goes on in the mind of a young protester while he is looting, setting fires, and engaging in other violent crimes.  But it is possible to know what he is attacking.  He is after those who are affluent, those who believe in goodness and decency, and those who support law and order.  One of the primary objects of attack is the police.  So far in 2020, over 30 police officershave been murdered by gunfire or other means.  Far more have been seriously assaulted, many of them by Antifa or other protesters.

Based on calls to defund the police in many cities, our police officers have become a special focus of attack.  Obviously, there have been cases of excessive force, but those rare events cannot explain the animosity of the young toward the police.  Most adults realize that the police are all that stand between themselves and criminal violence, and most of us deeply respect the men and women who protect us.  But there are thousands of protesters who truly despise those same police officers.

To a person attacking others, looting, and burning, the police are all that stand in his way.  They are the equivalent of God’s army of faithful angels preventing Satan’s takeover of Heaven.  They are also, in some cases, the only persons who have ever set limits on their behavior.  No wonder the protesters are enraged and seek revenge.  Those who throw bricks and bottles, or who gather around to beat a fallen officer in the street, are expressing their wrath because, for once in their lives, someone has told them “no.”  The police may be the only real authority they have known, and they are filled with rage.    

In the absence of the police backed up by strong city and state government — not the kind that exists in our liberal states — radical protests would literally burn down our country.  Decent Americans would cower in their homes, defending themselves as best as they could and waiting on help that never comes.  The weak — the elderly, the disabled — would become the particular targets of roaming gangs of thugs.  More and more “autonomous zones” would spring up, each ruled by a murderous warlord heading a small legion of heavily armed predators.

That was Satan’s vision of what the world should look like.  When he was stopped, he corrupted Adam and Eve and led them to violate God’s trust.  After their expulsion from the Garden of Eden, Adam was condemned to labor for a living and Eve to suffer the pain of childbirth.  Worse yet, their innocence was lost.  Afterward, they lived with suspicion and doubt and with the knowledge of their own corruption.

America, I believe, was once close to the Garden of Eden.  There were justice and opportunity for all, or nearly all, and the basis of that happy condition was a shared moral code.  Looting, vandalizing, murder, and rape were uncommon.  Even when adjusted for a higher population, the number of violentcrimes soared during the 1960s and 1970s and has remained high to this day.  There were 9,110 murders in the U.S. in 1960, rising to 16,000 in 1970; 23,040 in 1980; and 23,440 in 1990.  By 2010, that number had declined, but it began rising again in 2015.    

There was a time when the police were respected for their role in maintaining law and order, and they could operate with a light touch because of the cooperation they received from the public.  Traffic stops did not often turn into shootouts, and arrests did not often involve suspects struggling with and fleeing officers.  Nor did the public accuse officers, or anyone else who stood in the way of criminality, of racism.  That tactic itself is another arrow in Satan’s quiver.

At the heart of Satan’s rebellion as depicted in Paradise Lost is the sin of pride.  Satan rebels against God’s authority because his sense of self-importance will not allow him to bow to any authority outside himself.  Milton understood that pride, in this negative sense, creates an endless cycle of resentment and hostility.  For those who truly believe they possess unlimited free will, there is no end to their rebellion. It may begin with George Floyd, but it soon leads to smashing windows, looting, and burning.  It may begin with the statue of Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederacy, but it quickly takes aim at George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and even Abraham Lincoln.

At the heart of today’s protests is a refusal to accept authority.  It may feel godlike to swarm through the streets, smashing, burning, and assaulting the police, but that sort of criminality can only lead to worse things.  When Satan was defeated in his rebellion against God, he was condemned to spend the rest of his days in Hell.  He spent eternity as a bitter outcast, seeking revenge and plotting against God.

That gives us some idea of what’s in store for the radicals protesting in the streets today.  While many will be saved, others will spend decades joining whatever protests arise, acting out their hatred of authority.  Their story is not so different from that of Satan in Paradise Lost.  Milton understood what happens when an individual is eaten up by pride and when he rejects every form of authority, even that of those who wish only to protect him.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/07/how_antifa_and_black_lives_matter_compare_with_satan.html

An employee of Germany’s Federal Press Office was found to have worked for an Egyptian secret service for years, according to a report presented on Thursday by Interior Minister Horst Seehofer.

“We are not commenting on ongoing investigations or on personnel matters,” said Steffen Seibert, Chancellor Angela Merkel’s spokesman and the head of the Federal Press Office.

The man is said to have been working for the visitor service of the press office as a mid-level employee, according to the German daily Bild. This means he would have completed an exam and at least two years of vocational training to obtain the job.

According to the report, German police carried out “executive measures” against the man in December 2019. The premises of the visitor service were searched as part of the investigation, Bild reported.

The Federal Public Prosecutor confirmed that the man was charged for suspicion of espionage and that the investigation is still ongoing.

“There are indications that Egyptian services are trying to recruit Egyptians living in Germany for intelligence purposes through their visits to Egyptian diplomatic missions in Germany and their trips to Egypt,” the report said.

The German government believes that Egyptian secret services seek to gather information about Egyptians living in Germany who may be members of the Muslim Brotherhood, but also members of the Coptic Christian community.

.msn.com/en-za/news/other/merkel-s-press-office-suspected-of-spying-for-egypt/ar-BB16yqoY

It happened in broad daylight, in the middle of “colourful”, cosmopolitan, multi-cultural Cologne. Cologne’s assistant mayor Elfi Scho-Antwerpes (67) was confronted with the harsh reality of a society that lacks universally accepted values. The well-known politician from Cologne quickly called… the police.

The well-known Social Democratic Party of Germany representative, who was also a member of the Bundestag for a time, had been walking through the cathedral city. Fortunately for her, the forces of law and order were not far away – one scream was enough to alert them.

But what happens to ordinary women who do not travel with a large entourage in the city? All they can do is call 110 and hope that help will arrive in time.

One New Year’s Eve in 2015, help from the police did not arrive in time for thousands of women who were being sexually assaulted by migrants. Two-thirds of the identified 153 suspects in Cologne of various sexual crimes were originally from Morocco or Algeria, 44 percent were asylum seekers, another 12 percent were illegally in Germany, 3 percent were underaged migrants.

This is possibly why the politician did not venture out alone without a security detail on Friday evening when the assault took place at Mauritiuswall, on the corner of Schaafenstraße.

Scho-Antwerpes has become a victim herself of the policy of open borders of her party – joining the plight of many women in Germany. But she nevertheless expressed surprise at the assault.

Scho-Antwerpes had attended the Christoper Street Day parade for the LGBT community. This day was originally created to fight for the rights of homosexuals, but ironically this same group has been totally silent when it comes to the rights of women.

Moreover, she was being groped by migrants, young men who were not interested in practicing social distancing nor in wearing masks.

“When I pointed this out, one of them came at me with a crazy look in his eyes. Our nose tips touched and suddenly he touched my breast. It was incomprehensible,” she said.

Even though at first she called the perpetrators “young men”, she did not reserve this polite description for the man who had grabbed her breast. According to Scho-Antwerpes, he was a gender-specific “immigrant” – a man.

“I then called in policemen nearby for help. The perpetrator could be identified immediately. […] It was a man around 30, apparently with an immigrant background. The man didn’t even apologize,” she complained.

It is quite rare for a leftist politician to point out that a suspect is from an immigrant background. Until recently, they were called members of the “party scene”. But being a victim herself, Scho-Antwerpes, did not hesitate to describe the suspect quite clearly.

Cologne mayor Henriette Reker in a press conference had previously categorically stated that there were no indications of “refugees” being among the perpetrators of the sexual assaults and that presumptions of that sort were “completely intolerable” and she judged it “completely improper (…) to link a group that appeared to come from North Africa with the refugees” who had arrived in record numbers in Germany in the year 2015.

German political scientist Klaus Schroeder in an interview on 6 January 2016 confirmed that mainstream German newspapers and public broadcasters also refused to name the perpetrators who had sexually assaulted thousands of women in Cologne and other cities, to avoid driving the public “into the hands of extreme right”.

The police meanwhile confirmed to German tabloid Bild that sexual harassment charges had been brought against a man (34) who had groped the assistant mayor. The Kölnische Rundschau had first reported on the incident.

Unlike the victims of 2015 who were discouraged from speaking out, Scho-Antwerpes said she wanted to speak “openly” about the attack. “I will go public to encourage women to defend themselves in situations like this and not fear the consequences.”

Unsurprisingly, the incident deeply marked Scho-Antwerpes: “Experiencing something like this is a drastic experience, simply ugly. I am deeply hurt. You don’t count on such a disrespectful attack.”

freewestmedia.com/2020/07/10/migrant-sexually-assaults-a-leftist-political-icon-in-cologne/

Data in a German city shows that when violence is used against the police, the suspects are foreigners in 40 percent of the cases.

More than 40 percent of all suspects in attacks on police officers in Hamburg last year were foreigners. The regional chairman of the AfD in the hanseatic city revealed that 497 of the 1 217 men and women were not German citizens in such incidents. Notably, the proportion of foreigners in the city-state was 16,5 percent in 2019.

According to a response from local government, suspects came from Turkey (35), Afghanistan (31), Romania (21) and Syria (20). Almost 50 of them were asylum seekers, a further 28 were entitled to protection or asylum or were quota refugees and 29 were tolerated in Germany.

Compared to 2018, the number of suspects rose by eight percent. Persons with an immigration background and a German passport were not recorded separately, suggesting that the percentage may even be higher.

“The numbers show an increasing willingness to use violence and disrespect towards our police officers. This frightening development is promoted by a contempt for police that seems to be becoming more and more socially acceptable in some parts of society and political parties,” warned the chairman of the AfD parliamentary group Dirk Nockemann. Police officers should be better protected, he said.

“Anyone who treats our police violently and without respect is trampling on the values ​​of our society,” emphasized Nockemann, a jurist who is also the political spokesman for his parliamentary group. In addition, he called for legally convicted foreigners to be deported.

freewestmedia.com/2020/07/10/foreigners-over-represented-in-attacks-on-police-in-german-city/