To restore the sovereignty stolen from the French people, it’s imperative that the power of judicial institutions is removed so that referendums on critical issues like immigration can be held, Éric Zemmour, a prominent French intellectual recently argued.

During comments made on the CNews program Face à Face, Zemmour — the author of The French Suicide — made the case that the only way to stop terror attacks from increasing is to transfer the immense power held by unaccountable judges to the French citizenry, so that they themselves can decide on key policy issues like immigration, Valeurs Actuelles reported.

Zemmour, a political commentator who garners some of the highest ratings on French television news programs, lambasted the French state for allowing foreigners from alien cultures to wage war against the country’s native population.

The French polemicist then proposed two ways that French people could regain their sovereignty.

“First, we must bring down the power of the judges. It is they, the judges, who’ve kidnapped the sovereignty of the people with all the supreme courts that we have: the Constitutional Council, the Council of State, the Court of Cassation, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Court of Justice of the European Communities. These are the people who decide on French policy in the place of the French government, and in place of the people,” Zemmour argued.

“Secondly, the only way to restore the sovereignty of the people is by way of the referendum, in particular on immigration. There are drastic measures that need to be taken that judges will never allow us to take. It is only the people who can be summoned to say whether they are for or against [immigration].”

When asked by the reporter about the representation of famed French leader General Charles de Gaulle in the present day, Zemmour argued that President Emmanuel Macron’s policies were diametrically opposed to Gaullism.

To return to “Gaullian policy today”, it’s of paramount importance that the independence of the French nation, the sovereignty of its people, and the authority of the state be restored entirely. Zemmour then slammed Macron’s devotion to multiallelism and globalism.

With polls in France showing citizens are overwhelmingly opposed to more immigration, Zemmour isn’t the only high profile figure in the country to express deep concern over the clear links between mass immigration and terrorism.

On Friday, former French President Nicolas Sarkozy addressed the topic as well during an interview with BFMTV, arguing that the state should “place the right to security over the duty of generosity”.

“I believe that we must thoroughly renovate our immigration law to adapt to the new context,” he said.

“It would be wise to think about a short moratorium, to use this time to consult with all the political forces, because it is a subject that concerns everyone, and to send the message to the French that we understand their concern.”

France, which has the largest population of Muslim migrants in Europe, has experienced rapid demographic change over the last decades that could result in the ethnic French becoming a minority in 40 years. Currently, approximately 400,000 migrants arrive in the country each year. 

Zemmour has increasingly served as a voice channeling unease from the French over mass migration, prompting concern from the French over his growing popularity. For example, his appearance on CNews drew a record of 600,000 viewers on Oct. 5, up from the 80,000 viewers the show was receiving a year before. 

rmx.news/article/article/zemmour-france-needs-nationwide-referendum-on-immigration-and-to-take-back-power-from-unaccountable-judges

By Andrea Widburg

Dominion software’s reputation for reliability may have taken another hit with the claim that Eric Coomer, a vice president and dominion, and the person in charge of the software’s security, is an Antifa supporter and Trump hater. This information is disturbing when added to the way in which the software churned out impossible pro-Biden results in the wee hours of November 4 in Democrat-run states following a Trump wave.

Wikipedia has deleted most of Dominion’s history. I visited the page a few days ago and read about its origins in Venezuela. If you go to the Wikipedia page today, that history is gone and, in its place are accusations against QAnon. At the “view history” page, you can see dozens of recent changes since the election. The primary editor – Molly White – is a recent college grad and bisexual leftist.

These changes, along with endless “fact checks” from leftist media outlets keep burying ever more deeply the history behind Dominion. However, that history is worth dredging up because it goes a long way to explaining where we are now.

As a predicate, remember that the system is so vulnerable to hacking that, in January 2020, Texas’s Secretary of State refused to certify it:

The examiner reports identified multiple hardware and software issues that preclude the Office of the Texas Secretary of State from determining that the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system satisfies each of the voting-system requirements set forth in the Texas Election Code. Specifically, the examiner reports raise concerns about whether the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system is suitable for its intended purpose; operates efficiently and accurately; and is safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation. Therefore, the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system and corresponding hardware devices do not meet the standards for certification prescribed by Section 122.001 of the Texas Election Code.

Texas is right to be suspicious. In testimony before the Democrat-run House this past January, Dominion was one of the three voting system companies (the other two were ES&S and Hart InterCivic) that “acknowledged they relied on Chinese-made gear”:

Dominion Voting Systems CEO John Poulos and Hart InterCivic President Julie Mathis said their companies use Chinese-made LCD screen components, chip capacitors and resistors, arguing that in some cases there’s no option for manufacturing those parts in the United States.

(Incidentally, in a January interview about that same congressional testimony, Eddie Perez, of the OSET Intitution, said that the voting systems (including Dominion) are systemic security problems. Last week, though, he told AP, “he was not aware of any systemic issue related to problems with Dominion software that would affect the tabulation of results.”  Hmmm.)

Dominion also has ties to the Clinton Foundation through its DELIAN project, and to Nancy Pelosi, whose aide is Dominion’s D.C. lobbyist. Dominion has also been tied to numerous cases of election fraud.

During a recent appearance on Lou Dobbs Tonight, super lawyer Sidney Powell, one of the smartest people in America, had a great deal to say about Dominion’s origins and reliability. Pay special attention to the video Dobbs plays before introducing Powell, because that will be your introduction to Dominion Vice President Eric Coomer:

In the same hearing, Sharon Meroni stated that, when Coomer was asked who could make these changes to the software, Coomer allegedly replied that “vendors, election officials, and others who need to be granted access,” could do so. Coomer, who was present when she repeated his words, did not object.

There’s also an allegation that Coomer, a UC Berkeley grad, is more than just the Veep of a company that has an easily hackable software system and strong Democrat ties. Joe Oltman, a tech company CEO, contends that he located Eric Coomer’s Facebook account before the latter shut it down, and that it was a far left feast:

According to Oltmann, Coomer’s now-deleted Facebook posts include his sharing songs tilted “Dead Cops,” “Dead Prez,” and “ACAB.” One post of particular interest is a long “statement” from Antifa he shared in June in response to President Trump declaring Antifa a terrorist organization.

Twitter suspended Oltman’s account, so there’s no way to view his tweets in their original form. Either he was committing slander, which is possible, or Twitter is doing its level best to clean up Coomer’s allegedly compromised history, which is equally possible. You can see the alleged posts here, but please keep in mind that there is, as yet, no proof that they came from the Eric Coomer who works at Dominion.

Oltman has also gone on the record saying that, at an Antifa meeting he infiltrated, “Eric from Dominion,” allegedly said “Don’t worry about the election. Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that.” This person may not be Eric Coomer, but Oltman seems to be pretty sure that it is the same “Eric.”

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/the_dominion_software_story_keeps_getting_worse.html

The Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (Bamf) employs a suspected Islamist. In a response of the Federal Ministry of the Interior to an enquiry of the Left parliamentary group it says: “In the phenomenon area of Islamism and Islamist terrorism the Federal Government is aware of a serious case of suspicion. However, as the case is probably not yet closed, no further information was given.

The government’s reply, which is available to the German Press Agency, also does not contain any specific details on possible attempts by foreign intelligence services to hire agents in Bamf as translators in order to gather information on exile oppositionists. The Ministry of the Interior merely stated that all employees of the agency would be subject to security checks.

https://www.rtl.de/cms/mutmasslicher-islamist-beim-fluechtlingsamt-enttarnt-4650453.html

The accusation caused a sensation. Right-wing extremists allegedly attacked and seriously injured a 19-year-old Iranian in Bielefeld. The alleged victim told the police that the perpetrators had carved a swastika into his skin and inflicted further injuries. Now the case takes a surprising turn: The Iranian man invented the robbery.Nevertheless, the left-wing extremists went ahead with their announced demonstration this Saturday.

According to the police, the Iranian living in Bielefeld admitted on Friday evening that the injuries – including a cut in the form of a swastika on his skin – were self-inflicted.

Late on Friday evening, the 19-year-old, accompanied by his family and an acquaintance, appeared at the North Police Station and wanted to make a statement, police spokeswoman Sonja Rehmert reported. In an interrogation, the Bielefeld police officer admitted that the right-wing extremist attack had not taken place and that he had injured himself with a knife in the area of Niemöllershof/Wiener Street in the south of Bielefeld. A passer-by then found him injured there and called the emergency services.

According to the police, the young man wanted to attract attention by making the facts public. Criminal proceedings were initiated against the 19-year-old for feigning a crime.

According to the police, the Iranian is said to have reported a similar crime as early as January. This, too, was apparently made up. “The investigations at that time had not led to the clarification and identification of suspects”, said the police spokeswoman.

The young man had made the fictitious right-wing extremist assault public in social media, claiming to have been coerced by the police immediately after the crime. According to this, police officers were quick to recognise the truth and told the alleged victim that he had inflicted the injuries on himself.

This was subsequently confirmed by a medical examiner who examined the Iranian. In the opinion of the expert, the wounds do not match the statements made by the man from Bielefeld.Immediately after the publication of the 19-year-old’s fake news, the left-wingers have sided with the alleged victim of right-wing extremist violence and made accusations against the police without waiting for further investigation results on the truth.After it became known this Saturday that the Iranian had invented the attack, the organisers of the demonstration were initially at a loss. In the end, the decision was made to meet at the main railway station after all, but to abandon the planned move through the city centre.Some 200 people came to the station on Saturday afternoon to demonstrate against racism. In chants they shouted “there is no right for Nazi propaganda” and “shoulder to shoulder against fascism”.

https://www.westfalen-blatt.de/OWL/Bielefeld/Bielefeld/4313159-19-Jaehriger-erfindet-rechtsextremen-Angriff-in-Bielefeld-linke-Szene-demonstriert-trotzdem-Iraner-hat-sich-Hakenkreuz-selbst-in-die-Haut-geritzt

There was a time when the British were known for their stoicism, their ability to battle through hardship, no matter the odds. The so called ‘blitz spirit’ of eighty years ago, that saw the nation ‘pull together and carry on’, regardless of the Nazi bombardment of our cities, characterised a generation that had suffered two world wars yet could not be bowed.

During the Covid pandemic, however, this ‘blitz spirit’ has been noticeably absent. There has been certainly very little in the way of a nation pulling together; in its place, there has been just a lot of bickering, mud-slinging and name calling-among politicians, activists, and the increasingly fragmented populace.

Predictably, Covid-19 was quickly turned into a divisive political issue by many in the oppositional media. The assertion now — that anyone against face coverings, vaccines, or testing is assumed to be on the extreme right, while those obeying the safety rules, are on the left — is as simplistic as it is loopy. One might have imagined that a deadly pandemic would act as a great uniter, finally bringing an end to the squabbling that has characterised UK (and US) politics for the last few years. Instead, we have been baked in identity politicking, making an already turbulent time more turbulent than ever.

Some malcontents have taken their vitriol to new levels of malice, publicly hoping, for instance, that British Prime Minister Boris Johnson would not recover from the coronavirus. No pulling together there. No blitz spirit. No compassion. Just bitterness, feuding and ever-deepening separation.

The fertile, if airy, ‘soil’ of cyberspace has become the perfect breeding ground for radicals of every stripe to spread their doctrines of division amongst the young, politically ripe millennials during lockdown. Pitching everyone against everyone — left against right, young against old, black against white, women against men, trans (seemingly) against everyone — appears to be the aim. All of that successfully seems to be driving a wedge of seething resentment between communities.

It has become an almost daily occurrence to find news stories of parents being ‘called out’ by their newly politicised children for expressing on social media ‘wrong’, ‘unwoke’ views, or of people being fired for something they may or may not have said years ago. Anyone who openly dares to emphasise the ‘Great’ in ‘Great Britain’ is simply asking to be labelled a ‘racist’. For those naïve enough to believe in basic biology — that the anatomy of women and men are different – the gulag awaits you. If you dare to utter the unthinkable, that ‘all lives matter’, prepare to leave town.

Many agitators — unconcerned by either civility or tolerance — continue perpetuating the notion, developed by precocious two-year-olds, that if you shout for long enough, your wishes might be served up. This sense of entitlement has come to characterise a group whose younger demographic seem to have no comprehension of the horrors of a war — or indeed, of many authentic hardships — in their own relatively comfortable lives. This lack of respect for, or understanding of, history, along with an apparent need to invent, import, or re-animate grievances from the past, then lead them to advocate inflicting what they decide is the appropriate revenge for a grievance on people who have had no part in causing it. Tolerance is to be expected only from others. For many ‘progressives’, there is no such thing as a two-way street. Agitators now seem to put their energy and focus into prioritising pet causes to which they feel everyone else ought to acquiesce. These might include men who have changed gender competing in female sports; defunding the police so that the most disadvantaged communities will be even further unable to protect themselves; expanding censorship in academia and Big Tech, or paying billions in taxpayer funds to other countries for promises to stop using fossil fuels at some far-off date and with no means of enforcement. Oh, and by the way, there is no debating anything. Just do what you are told.

While the Remainer-disruptors dragged out their opposition to Brexit as long as they could, seeing off two different prime ministers in the process, they may have relished their power. It was only after the Tories’ landslide victory in December 2019, that they finally let go of their dream of overturning Brexit – but not before having branded all those in favour of leaving the EU as bigoted xenophobes.

That slur is a particular slap in the face to the people of this patient nation. For decades, they have done their best to move in step with the creeping, ‘progressive’ times in which we live. The acceptance of a variety of often controversial societal changes, such as the ever encroaching desires of various sexual lobbies, ushered in under the banner of ‘human rights’, seems lost on the liberals, so intent are they on pushing their identity politics agenda. If this is how appreciation is shown for the British public’s quiet, respectful acceptance of often controversial, ‘tipping point’ changes within society, then no wonder much of the public may have decided that they have had enough of this new orthodoxy.

Although the coronavirus outbreak, with its restrictions of movement, briefly muted woke activism for a short time, it was not long before the extreme, activist milieu became restless. Until the death of George Floyd, a black American seemingly killed by a white policeman, these individuals had been busy berating figures on the right for not taking Covid-19 seriously enough. Suddenly, none of that mattered anymore. A frenzy of orchestrated Black Lives Matter protests erupted across Britain, despite the incident bearing absolutely no similarity to anything happening on Britain’s streets, and despite the relative anonymity of the BLM movement in Britain until that point.

Many in the media, nevertheless, made sure that the message was loud and clear: protesting against perceived racism — even if on another continent — was more important than any pandemic.

Thus, after months of being told we would be prosecuted for breaching the Covid rules, we then had to observe on television thousands of protestors, not just flouting the safety rules, but tearing down historical monuments — all off the back of a grievance that felt largely imported.

Even as the protests turned violent, no one was arrested. Up until this point, the government had made clear that any breach of lockdown rules would be met by the full force of the law — no caveats, no exceptions. Probably no one was happy about it, but still we complied — for the greater good.

Then, all of a sudden, chaos was erupting in towns and cities across the UK. There on the news, amidst the violence of civil unrest, not only were the lockdown rules being flouted, but, under the banner of Black Lives Matter, a raft of widespread anti-social behaviour was being tolerated. When the statue of Winston Churchill in Trafalgar Square was vandalised, the police, evidently held hostage to political correctness, stood by and watched as their role was publicly undermined by open disregard for the law.

The protestors’ dismissal of British heritage, a bid to ‘cancel’ history, appears a threat to the nation. We supposedly have nothing to be proud of. Our achievements have presumably been little more than the spoils of an evil, bigoted patriarchal system. These malcontents, by pledging allegiance to the Marxist architects of that narrative, not only insult the memory of those who have fought and died for the freedoms we now take for granted; they are also two-stepping towards totalitarianism.

While the rights of sexual and ethnic minorities appear to be immovably written in stone, the freedom to visit our families, the pub, or the library can be withdrawn by the state at a moment’s notice. Thousands of protestors marching through cities on the same day: no problem. Crowds flocking to the seaside on a summer day: the risk of arrest. One man’s freedom, it seems, has become another man’s cause for resentment.

So what will we be left with, as we try to reclaim our post-Covid lives in a not yet post-woke world? An increasing atmosphere of distrust and walking on eggshells. People are increasingly afraid to speak their minds. Even law enforcement is in a state of politically correct paralysis (here, here, here and here) .

While the UK was busy promoting multiculturalism and demoting choices such as Christianity, the nuclear family and a cultural heritage caringly assembled by people frequently written off as white and dead, we seem have failed to notice the societal divisions it has caused. According to reports, for example, about 19,000 of our children have been groomed and gang raped. The coronavirus pandemic, rather than bringing us together, has served to highlight divisions that are transforming the United Kingdom into something regressive, unevolved, and unrecognisable. Sadly, the United Kingdom is anything but united at this time.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16762/britain-totalitarianism

This crime shocked the Hanseatic City of Hamburg in spring! At the beginning of May, Kalender E. (50 years old) wanted to savagely kill his ex-wife and children. For his trial he now appeared huddled in a wheelchair.

The horrible father is accused of four attempted murders. On May 1st, he is said to have stabbed his ex-wife (41 years old) in the neck with a razor and then, as well as their son (12 years old at the time), doused them with petrol and set them on fire. Their daughter (then 10 years old) managed to escape from the fire to the balcony. Since Friday morning ( November 13th ) Kalender E. has had to answer to the district court of Hamburg.

On the first day of the trial, the course of events on May 1st was recounted. A police officer on duty testified and the emergency calls that were made to the police and fire brigade were played back.

Particularly frightening: After setting fire to his ex-wife and son, the horrible father Kalender E. shouted in front of the flat: “You shall burn!His ex-wife and son, who was twelve years old at the time of the crime, survived the brutal attack with life-threatening injuries. The woman was in mortal danger for several days after her skin had been burnt to 35 percent. The then ten-year-old daughter was able to flee to the balcony of the apartment building in the Hamburg district of Lurup, escaping serious injuries.

Following the attack, the stateless, Turkish-born man is also said to have set fire to the flat on the street Luruper Hauptstraße. It burned down completely. Kalender E. himself lay in a coma after the fire attack.

The 50-year-old man is charged with four counts of attempted murder because the attacks on his ex-wife are considered two different crimes.

Apparently the mechanical engineer and his ex-wife were arguing about visiting rights for the children. After the divorce about eight years ago, Kalender E. lived in seclusion in a panel building in Eidelstedt. He had no previous convictions.

Neighbours of the man reported that he controlled his ex even after the separation, wanted his son with him. According to the tabloid BILD information his ex-wife wanted to withdraw his visiting rights.

m.bild.de/regional/hamburg/hamburg-aktuell/horror-vater-in-hamburg-vor-gericht-ihr-sollt-verbrennen-73921478,view=amp.bildMobile.html