Vienna jihadist targeted youth group

According to the latest news from the investigation into the November 2 terrorist attack in Vienna, Kujtim Fejzulai, the ISIS jihadist who had carried out the attack, intended (but failed) to cause carnage during the prayer service of a youth group in a Catholic church.

Austrian daily Kronen Zeitung reported that the background of the attack targeting local churches is disconcerting: The ISIS-killer wanted to cause a bloodbath during an evening prayer of the Catholic Youth group in the Ruprecht Church in Vienna. The Islamist failed to enter through the closed door, however, due to a timer lock.

Interior Minister Karl Nehammer (ÖVP) has strengthened security measures in local churches for Advent and the Christmas season. The reason for his concern — which has been met with silence from the prosecutor’s office — is shocking. According to Krone’s investigation, specifically 17 children of the Catholic Youth Group, had escaped a certain death at the hands of the jihadist.

While the children were holding a non-public prayer hour in the Ruprecht Church in the heart of Vienna, the ISIS killer wanted to break in with an assault rifle and pistols. However, he failed to do so due to a time-locked mechanism at the entrance of the building. Seconds later, the attacker was “taken out” with one shot by WEGA agents in front of the oldest church in the city. The “Investigative Group 2 November” interviewed the shocked women and children.

Meanwhile, it has been announced that the interim report of the Austrian Commission on possible negligence in the ranks of anti-terror forces will be made public before Christmas. Talks with representatives from several government departments have already been agreed upon for the coming week.

The spokesman of the Vienna Archdiocese, Michael Prüller, on Friday afternoon described the dire situation on the evening of the terror attack. The 17 youths escaped the attacker by turning off the lights when the first shots were fired.

“You reacted with presence of mind and hid,” Prüller said. The youths stayed hidden in the darkness until 2:30 am on Tuesday. Then the police gave the all-clear so that the 17 girls and boys could go home.

The day after the attack, Nehammer pinpointed the failures of the judiciary, headed by Minister Alma Zadić (The Greens), because the attacker had been released prematurely from prison. He warned that communication between the judicial authorities and Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and Combating Terrorism (BVT) and the State Office for the Protection of the Constitution and Combating Terrorism (LVT) should be improved. Despite her error, Justice Minister Alma Zadić defended the early release of the jihadist from prison.

A spokeswoman for the Slovak police told the news channel TA3 that suspicious people, including the perpetrator, had tried to buy ammunition in Slovakia in the summer of 2020. This information was immediately passed on to the Austrian BVT, but they never acted on this information.

During the week after the attack, media reports also revealed that in the months after the jihadist’s release from prison in December 2019, the perpetrator had contact with jihadists from Germany who were known to the police and who had stayed with him during a visit to Vienna. It is not known why he was not observed and why the Krems prison court, which could have revoked his conditional release, did nothing. A research network of Süddeutscher Zeitung, WDR, NDR and a Viennese weekly newspaper questioned the Interior Ministry on these explosive findings.

The German extremism researcher Peter Neumann pointed out that three other jihadists who have just been released from prison have now become terrorists, along with Kujtim F. Hundreds of Islamists were still in prisons in France, Germany, Austria, and in other EU countries, but hardly any state has yet prepared for their early release.

The terrorist attack in Vienna saw four people killed and 23 others injured, some seriously. Initially, the police had assumed that there were several perpetrators.

freewestmedia.com/2020/11/30/vienna-jihadist-targeted-youth-group/

Berlin: man stabbed because of the Cross – perpetrators probably Afghans

An original translation by Hellequin GB with much thanks

From this German language article:

Typically Berlin:

After almost 11 weeks, the police published two phantom images for the search.

The two wanted, attacked a man who was wearing a chain with a cross.

The attack happened on September 11, 2017 near the Neukölln S-Bahn and U-Bahn station.

Neukölln, especially the north, is considered a Muslim zone, where many obviously still do not speak the German language, even after many years, more headscarves than in Izmir, plus this provocative macho culture on the streets and in public transport, which signals,

“We own here everything ”,“ what are you looking at me for”.
An adventure trip for anyone that shows up with Christian symbols.

On September 11, the 23-year-old was approached by the two men at around 10 p.m. near the Neukölln S and U-Bahn station.
They noticed a cross hanging on a long chain around his neck.
After they asked him why he became a Christian, one of the attackers tore the young man’s chain off the neck and threw it on the ground.

Then he hit the victim in the face several times with his fist.
The second man held him while the other attacker cut his upper body with a knife.
The men then fled, leaving the 23-year-old injured.

This is how the suspects are described:

The first suspect (photo left), presumably an Afghan, is between 27 and 30 years old, around 177 cm tall, has dark hair and a full beard.

The second perpetrator (photo on the right) is also between 27 and 30 years old, about 173 cm tall and has a beard. He’s probably Afghan too.

The police can receive information on the following telephone number 4664-953315, or on this telephone number 4664-950130 or any other police station. […] Source: bz-berlin.de/24.11.2017

https://vladtepesblog.com/2020/11/29/berlin-man-stabbed-because-of-the-cross-perpetrators-probably-afghans/

Turkish-born Kadir H., alleged victim of police brutality, attacks police officers once again in Hamburg, Germany

He is 15 years old, has the massive body the size of a twenty-year-old – and he is quite obviously simply unteachable.

Junior boxer Kadir H. has once again attacked police officers. And he is defeated again: In the end he found himself at the police station and his mother had to pick him up. Now – once again – he is under investigation for resisting the police officers.

Kadir H. is not unknown to the police, he likes to make a fuss about being a victim of alleged police violence. This was last time in August, when it took eight policemen to bring him down. H. had previously pushed police officers who wanted to establish his identity.

The new case: On Thursday evening at 6.40 pm, officers were called by local residents to a brawl among eight youths onthe street Neuer Steinweg. One of them was Kadir H..This was confirmed by the police at the request of the tabloid BILD.

Because the mood was aggressive, eleven police cars finally arrived. The most aggressive: 15-year-old H. He tried to escape, tried to push the officers aside, attacked them.

They had to use pepper spray, brought Kadir H. to the ground, tied him up. Two officers were slightly injured. Then they went to the police station at Steindamm.

H. is known to the police. He has been convicted of intentional bodily harm, among other things he kicked a teacher in the abdomen. Further accusations are coercion and insult.

Apart from so-called “educational measures” there have been no punishments so far. Will it be different this time?

When Kadir’s mother left the police station with her son, she is said to have blamed the police for his misbehaviour again.

m.bild.de/regional/hamburg/hamburg-aktuell/11-streifenwagen-im-einsatz-polizei-opfer-geht-auf-polizisten-los-74178276,view=amp.bildMobile.html

Germany: Afghan stamps mother of five to death

He kicked her so brutally that the woman died of her head injuries!During an argument, a 38-year-old man is said to have kicked his wife in the face, so that she died a short time later of a craniocerebral trauma.The 38-year-old man has been on trial in Oldenburg since Friday for the killing of his wife. The charge is manslaughter.

The Afghan is accused of having kicked the 33-year-old violently in the face while arguing in July. The woman died a few days later in hospital.
The couple from Afghanistan, who have five children, lived separated. On the evening of the crime, an argument in the woman’s flat had escalated. The children were also present in the flat. They were taken into care by the Youth Welfare Office.
The Oldenburg Regional Court has scheduled several trial days until January for the trial.

bild.de/regional/bremen/bremen-aktuell/prozessauftakt-mann-soll-mutter-seiner-fuenf-kinder-getoetet-haben-74167140.bild.html?wtmc=fb.shr&fbclid=IwAR1GiK7RBdQmV79xu0PUKgL2u50jkBIIwhnipO5i-1pNNHJy-riqWybeLQ8

“Death to Christians” threats frighten residents of a tenement building in Vienna days after the deadly Islamist terrorist attack

A few days ago, tenants of a Viennese apartment building in the district of Leopoldstadt noticed threats in their stairwell. They are calling for murder (“Death to Christians”) containing spelling mistakes and glorifying the terrorist attack on the Schwedenplatz square. It is written: “The house will soon belong to us and then the whole world”. The indigestible sentence is also reminiscent of Nazi diction. Supplemented with: “Allah” may the 20-year-old assassin, who murdered four people on November the 2nd, be “merciful”. Concerned neighbours thereupon alerted the Vienna police and filed a complaint. So far it is still unclear who is responsible for the disturbing graffiti. The LVT ( State Office for the Protection of the Constitution and Counter-Terrorism) has already started investigations in this regard.

These are also intended to clarify whether the slogans originate from IS sympathizers or whether Muslims are being deliberately denigrated in the building in Leopoldstadt. “The attack of November the 2nd was a dramatic act of terrorism in Austria and never before seen in its dimension”, said Interior Minister Karl Nehammer at a press conference on Thursday. On that occasion he also shared the latest findings on the terror investigations: It could not be excluded that the perpetrator deliberately wanted to search for victims in churches in order to execute them. Therefore, he said, there would immediately be increased protection for churches.

“We are in a delicate phase”, said the Minister of the Interior and warned of possible copycat offenders, which is why there will be an increased presence of security forces at churches and other places of religious worship from now on, announced the Director General for Public Security, Franz Ruf. In addition, it would be ensured that the facilities would be guarded in a plain and uniformed, visible and concealed manner. In addition, there are new Cobra rapid reaction forces, which ” will locate possible perpetrators within the shortest possible time, lock them up and finally end the situation of amok or terror”, Brigadier Hannes Gulnbrein continued.

https://www.heute.at/s/tod-den-christen-drohungen-erschuettern-gemeindebau-100114896?fbclid=IwAR3LQJCB9ZOS0p97mgtKMtweBMY4vYG5ai5hLRNEoax5VUcAhopJM-Toxxc

Did President Trump Spring a Trap on Treasonous Democrats on Election Night?

By Paul Dowling

“I, DONALD J. TRUMP . . ., find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections . . . constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. … I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.”

President Trump, in his executive order of September 12, 2018, giving the pretext for the blocking of property and money transfers, without prior notification, belonging to persons who have dealt in foreign interference during the 2020 presidential election

Trump Knew All Along the Democrats Would Cheat

When President Trump became president in 2017, he knew that the Democrats were hell-bent on removing him from office.  The Democrats tried endlessly to find skeletons in Trump’s closet, as part of a Soviet-style harassment campaign, wherein a person, rather than a crime, is investigated.  Stalinist Lavrenty Beriawould have been proud; it was Beria who said, “Show me the man, and I’ll find you the crime.”  The fact that Trump has survived so much character assassination and political scrutiny only goes to show how scrupulously honest Trump has been in his business and other dealings throughout his life.

Trump has known for a long while that, to finish his part in restoring America’s free republic, he would have to deal with tremendous election fraud in his bid for re-election.  In 2016, Trump enjoyed the element of surprise in that his overwhelming popularity was great enough to overcome the systemic fraud set in place to rig the election for Hillary Clinton.  So certain were the complicit media of a win for Clinton that they predicted a 95% probability of her winning.  But the same blunder — born of Democrat arrogance and overconfidence from years of triumphant cheating — would not occur a second time in 2020.  The media would, during Trump’s first term as president, embark on creating the illusion that the most popular president since Ronald Reagan was actually reviled.  ThisBig Lie would be endlessly repeated, in hopes of making enough people believe a loss to Biden was in the cards for Trump.

Learning How the Sausage Is Made

In 2018, there was serious election fraud in Florida and in Arizona.  Trump’s team observed the cheating and learned from it in preparation for the 2020 presidential election cycle.  Prior to the 2018 election, on September 12, Trump issued an “Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.”  The importance of this Executive Order largely escaped notice during the 2018 election cycle, but it would loom ever larger as the 2020 election approached.

The fact that no major arrests seem to have been made, concerning the election fraud of 2018, indicates that many of the fraudsters may have received plea bargains in exchange for making the next round of electoral crimes so highly visible that the irregularities could not be missed.  If arrests had been made back in 2018, the Democrats would simply have brought in new operatives to do their criminal bidding in 2020, which, in the long run, would not have helped President Trump.  While this line of reasoning is speculative, to be sure, the actual election fraud perpetrated in 2020 against the president is unmistakable.

Does Trump Possess Proof of Widespread Cheating in the 2020 Election?

After the November 3 presidential election of 2020, a news story broke reporting the seizure of important computer servers in Frankfurt, Germany.  Though the event is disputed, what occurred, according to the Gateway Pundit, was this: “[a] unit under the command of USEUCOM (i.e., United States European Command) did in fact conduct an operation to take control of computer servers.  But these servers belong to the CIA. … Such an operation would have been carried out with US law enforcement present to take custody of the evidence.”  The presence of federal agents of the court would guarantee a chain of legal custody for the servers that would render their data admissible before a judge.

Gina Haspel and Christopher Wray were supposedly not informed of the raid in advance, leaving the CIA and FBI heads necessarily blind to this action and, therefore, unable to interfere.  This means that the CIA was certainly the target and that a law enforcement agency unrelated to the FBI, such as the U.S. Marshalls or the Secret Service, was likely used to take control of the evidence.  The timely firing of Mark Esper prior to the raid would mean that theoppositional defense secretary was cut off from foreknowledge of the raid and, therefore, would have been unable to disrupt what was going to transpire.

Biden’s Voter Fraud Was Predictable

As Bill and Ted may have characterized Biden’s unrealistic vote totals on election night, “strange things are afoot at the Circle K.”  But these are strange thingsBiden himself brought up while speaking to former Obama staffers on Pod Save America on October 24, 2020, saying, “[W]e’re in a situation where we have put together — and you guys did it for our…president Obama’s…administration, before this — we have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”  Perhaps it would have been wise for the former vice president to have remained mum and in his basement that day, especially in light of his follow-up comment, while speakingto Michigan voters on November 1, 2020: “I don’t need you to get me elected; I need you once I’m elected.”  Taken together, Biden’s comments paint the picture of a candidate with no need of voters to get elected, instead relying on election fraud to win — the same plan, it would seem, that worked for Barack Obama.

Did Trump Set a Trap for Election Thieves?

The Millennium Report of November 6, 2020, opens, “Just as the Democrats had 4 years to come up with a plan to steal POTUS 2020, so did Team Trump to foil that convoluted scheme. … Where to set the biggest traps was as easy as pie — Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia.”  This idea that Trump set up the Democrats with his executive order and sprang a trap on them on Election Night is definitely within the realm of possibility, given what is known about thiscreative president.

It is likely that Trump has known about Dominion Voting Systems for some time but has chosen not to interfere with enemies who were in the process of setting themselves up for their own destruction.  Little did the Democrats suspect that their villainous strength — the ability to win elections by cheating — was about to become an eminently indictable weakness.  Psalms 141:10 reads, “Let the wicked fall into their own nets, while I pass by in safety.”  It would appear likely that this is precisely what President Trump’s motto has been during the presidential election of 2020.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/11/did_president_trump_spring_a_trap_on_treasonous_democrats_on_election_night.html

CLAIM: Dominion Exec Bragged That He Made Sure ‘Trump Is Not Gonna Win’ on Conference Call

Joe Oltmann, the founder of FEC (Faith Education Commerce) United, spoke to OAN about how he participated in a September 27 conference with members of antifa, and allegedly made a bombshell discovery about a key member of the leadership of Dominion Voting Systems.

Oltmann said he learned that “Eric from Dominion,” whom he later identified as Dominion employee Eric Coomer, would be on the call.

According to Oltmanna, someone on the call asked, “What are we gonna do if f***ing Trump wins?”

Oltmann paraphrased Coomer’s alleged response:  “Don’t worry about the election, Trump’s not gonna win. I made f***ing sure of that!”

Snopes currently rates these allegations as “unproven,” explaining that they “don’t know whether Oltmann’s allegations against Coomer are accurate or not.” Evidence presented by Oltmann so far, such as social media posts allegedly belonging to Coomer, do not prove or disprove the key allegation made by Oltmann—that Coomer bragged about rigging the election. Snopes concedes that despite this, it  “doesn’t necessarily mean Oltmann’s claim is false, it just means it is so far not supported by any publicly available evidence beyond his verbal account.” However, Snopes does add yet another caveat: “It’s also not clear whether Coomer’s alleged remarks if they did take place, were made in earnest, and therefore whether they should be interpreted as proof of election meddling … even if Coomer made the comment in earnest, he might have been lying, either to impress others on the call, to exaggerate his power and influence, or for some other reason.”

As of right now, there is no proof that the person on the call was Eric Coomer of Dominion, or that he made the statement. Conference calls involving a large number of participants may have recordings, but so far, no recording has surfaced, and Oltmann’s claims are, at this point, hearsay, especially without other witnesses who participated on the call verifying the statements.

Oltmann was apparently banned from Twitter soon after he first went public with his allegations. But without a recording of the conference call verifying that the comments were even said, and verifying who said them, there isn’t much to go on here. If Oltmann recorded the call, he needs to release the audio. Without audio to prove the foundation of his claim, these allegations will go nowhere.

https://pjmedia.com/election/matt-margolis/2020/11/28/claim-dominion-exec-bragged-that-he-made-sure-trump-is-not-gonna-win-on-conference-call-n1179285