Authorities Say Kazakh Man Who Attacked German Jewish Worshiper in Front of Synagogue is “Crazy”

In 2016, I wrote an article titled, All Muslim Terrorists are Crazy chronicling some of the list of violent attacks around the world whose perpetrators were dismissed as crazy.

A Muslim terrorist stabbed four people at a train station near Munich while screaming, “Allahu Akbar”. In between proclaiming the glory of Allah, he also shouted that his victims were all “unbelievers”. A woman heard him say, “Infidel, you must die”. The German authorities came to the inescapable conclusion that the attack had nothing to do with Islam. Instead, the Muslim terrorist had been “mentally ill” and was probably not even fit to stand trial. 

And then, more recently there was the horrifying case of the brutal murder of Sarah Halimi, an elderly nursery school director, whose killer got off because he smoked pot.

The 66-year-old director of an Orthodox Jewish nursery was woken from her sleep when she was violently beaten by her twenty something Muslim neighbor who then dragged her to the window.

Yonathan Halimi, Sarah Lucy’s son, describes the killer’s family as being known for its anti-Semitism. “One day, one of the killer’s sisters pushed my sister down the stairs, and the next time she called her a dirty Jew,” he described. Sarah’s brother said that the killer called Sarah and her daughter, “dirty Jews”.

Many neighbours, woken by the old woman’s screams or the assaulter’s religious chanting, called the police.

Some gave details about the exact location of the assault, the attacker’s identity, the fact he vilified his victim as a Jewish person and as “a Satan” while hitting her, or even — as far as the Muslim neighbours were concerned — the Koranic portions he chanted.

Yet the police still failed to storm Sarah Halimi’s apartment and rescue her. Eventually, Kobili Traore is claimed to have shouted that the woman was “mad and about to commit suicide”, and threw her out of the window.

He had time enough to climb back to Diara Traore’s apartment where he finally was arrested. His hands were covered in blood. There was blood everywhere in his victim’s apartment.

The police were on the scene before the murder and did nothing.

French prosecutors however claimed that antisemitism caused by pot meant the killer got off.

A French prosecutor has dropped charges against the killer of Jewish kindergarten teacher Sarah Halimi after experts ruled he had suffered a massive psychotic episode by smoking cannabis.

In an appeals court hearing on Wednesday Traoré admitted killing Ms Halimi, saying he was not aware of his actions on the night of the murder and did not recognise when he broke in.

“I felt persecuted. When I saw the Torah and a chandelier in her home I felt oppressed. I saw her face transforming,” he said.

Oddly enough, mental illness caused by drug use as a defense is a fairly common one for Islamic terrorists in Europe.

Now this latest story, back in Germany, follows the same familiar pattern.

The trial of a man accused of the attempted murder of a Jewish student began on Friday in Hamburg, where the local Jewish community is unnerved that the crime is not being prosecuted as an antisemitic act.

Grigoriy K., a 29-year-old German citizen born in Kazakhstan, left the 26-year-old student with serious injuries after beating him over the head with a short, collapsible shovel.

The incident took place October 4 in the vicinity of the Orthodox Hohe Weide synagogue in Hamburg. The student was making his way there on foot and was wearing a kippa at the time of the assault.

The attacker travelled to the synagogue by taxi, wore German military camouflage, carried a pocket knife as well as the shovel, had a piece of paper with a swastika drawn on it in his pocket, and attacked someone who was identifiably Jewish.

No antisemitism to see here. And no prosecution either. The assailant, like every Muslim attacker who targeted Jews, is just a trite unwell in the head.

A Kazakhstan man who assaulted a Jewish man wearing a kippah in front a synagogue in Hamburg will not go to prison because he has psychiatric issues, a German judge ruled.

Dozens of members of the Jewish community protested the ruling in front of the Hamburg prosecutor’s office earlier this week.

Grigory K. may be tried for attempted murder, with hate as an aggravated element. Owing to the court’s impression, however, that his psychiatric condition at the time of the assault makes him not responsible for his actions, he will not be sent to jail but treated at a psychiatric facility regardless of the outcome of any judicial proceeding.

This was inevitable since prosecutors insisted that he wasn’t antisemitic and was crazy. Pay no attention to the swastika. 

Nevertheless, the public prosecutor’s office is convinced that Grigoriy K. was not legally responsible at the time. An expert attested that the alleged perpetrator had acute paranoid schizophrenia, accompanied by delusional fears of persecution that triggered the offense. The expert saw “no evidence” that “the accused pursued religious, ideological, right-wing extremist or antisemitic goals of his own free will”.

None at all. 

(The attacker’s name has been listed as Grigory, but Kazakhstan is three-quarters Muslim. About a quarter of the population originates from former Russian military colonists, so it’s not impossible that the perpetrator is of Russian non-Muslim origin, and Germany does have a sizable Russian non-Jewish population (not counting Russian Germans who are their own category), but statistically it’s likely that he is Muslim. And Muslims in the former territories controlled by the Soviet Union could secularize and take Russian names. The pattern fits previously Islamic attacks on European Jews. But this is unconfirmed.) 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2021/02/authorities-say-kazakh-man-who-attacked-german-daniel-greenfield/

A German mother complains: My neighbour Mohammed raped me and is still at large

Katrin Schneider hardly ever leaves her home. For months she has been suffering from a nightmare from which there seems to be no awakening. After a rape, she encounters her tormentor almost every day because he lives in the house across the street. The perpetrator has already been convicted, but is pulling out all the stops to stay out of prison.”He deliberately gets out of the car when I pass by, still makes me feel like I deserve what he did to me and my family, and there’s no sign of remorse at all,” Schneider says in the interview with station RTL. On a Saturday in September 2019, her life changes abruptly. She is on her way home after a company party at a care facility. Her work colleague Mohammed B. accompanies her. Schneider seems safer walking with someone. But the man from whom she hopes for protection suddenly falls upon her. He rapes her behind a supermarket. Out of fear of him, she does not cry out for help, she says.Katrin Schneider calls the police. Her neighbour is arrested in his flat the same night. More than a year after the crime, the Bonn Regional Court sentences him in October 2020 to three years and ten months in prison for particularly serious rape. But Mohammed B. is still at large today – his defence lawyer has lodged an appeal. It is to be examined whether the trial was formally in order. This should hardly change the verdict, but the appeal could make it take more than a year before it becomes final.For Kathrin Schneider, this is an unbearable situation. “Everything collapses for you and I have to watch him go on with his life,” she says. Moreover, her children attend the same kindergarten group as the perpetrator’s children.When asked why Mohammed B. does not move away, his lawyer answers: “The accused has made sustained efforts to move away from there, both on his own initiative and with the help of social organisations. However, this has had no success at all.” B. has lost his job because of the sentence and it is difficult to find another job. In response to an enquiry from RTL, the municipality of Hennef stated that it had found the man a suitable flat, but that he had not accepted it. He is not legally obliged to do so. A move is also out of the question for Katrin Schneider and her family. They live in their own house and do not want to be driven away by the terrible experience.

https://www.rtl.de/cms/frau-aus-hennef-klagt-an-mein-nachbar-hat-mich-vergewaltigt-und-ist-immer-noch-frei-4708004.html

The Dutch broadcast on Trappes which caused a commotion in France

At first sight, it seems difficult to imagine: the broadcast of a Dutch news program had indirectly caused the enormous commotion in France, forced the Minister of Education and the Minister of the Interior to respond and ultimately also reached President Macron.

The Trappes affair involving French teacher Didier Lemaire, has occupied nearly all TV channels and the written press for days now, and sparked heated debates leaving the French public with even more questions.

Since philosophy teacher Didier Lemaire from the town of Trappes (near Paris) told his story to the weekly Le Point on February 5, he has appeared on every conceivable TV and radio program and has given numerous interviews to newspapers and magazines. He is being threatened by Muslim residents of Trappes and is now protected by the police. This is due to his outspoken stances against the Salafists who he believes are taking over power in Trappes. He said he feared for his safety and eventually decided not to return to the school.

Trappes is indeed known and infamous as a Salafist stronghold from which more than sixty young people left for Syria and Iraq as jihadists.

But doubts were soon expressed in the mainstream French press: was Didier Lemaire too energetic with his media appearances and did he not exaggerate the threat? This philosophy teacher from the Plaine-de-Neauphle high school in Trappes, has consistently denounced the rise of Islamic fundamentalism. The answer from the teacher: he did not receive those threats himself. They had been received by a journalist working for Dutch television, from the Nieuwsuurprogram.

Dekkers decided to inform the French police of the threats against her. The threats were received five days after January 22, in the wake of a report from Saskia Dekkers about Trappes, in which the teacher was interviewed. According to the French journalists who contacted her, Dekkers considered it her duty to inform the French police about the threatening atmosphere surrounding Didier Lemaire. But because she refused to disclose her sources, French Education Minister Blanquer said he could do little. On January 26, the police thus started an investigation and Minister Darmanin of the interior offered teacher Lemaire police protection.

In the Netherlands this huge upheaval has remained completely unreported. And when the public radio station FranceInfo asked Nieuwsuur for information about the threats, the French received a laconic answer: “In our report we dealt with our subject to inform the Dutch TV viewer about a current event in a European country. We have nothing to add to this.”

Dutch media broadcast the documentary on Trappes as an update of a first film shot in 2017 on Islamism in the city, directed by journalist Saskia Dekkers and in which Didier Lemaire already appeared. In this second report, which combines images from the previous documentary and reactions to the French bill on integration, Saskia Dekkers again questioned Didier Lemaire, but also Ali Rabeh, mayor of Trappes, and even Naila Gautier, a Muslim member of a local association, allegedly fighting against radicalization.

Gautier however contacted the Dutch journalist on several occasions, deploring an “unbalanced report” on Trappes, in particular because of the comments made by Didier Lemaire. Worried for the safety of the philosophy teacher, Dekkers decided to notify the police. Dutch media even took the decision to suspend the publication of the documentary. It was then that the police protection of Didier Lemaire was extended and that the media surge began. On January 26, behind the scenes, the judicial police of Versailles opened an investigation. Naila Gautier was summoned by the police, questioned and later released.

Yannick Jadot, figurehead of Europe Ecology – The Greens, and who hopes to be a candidate for the French presidency, meanwhile defended the radical mayor of Trappes who had stormed into a school to distribute religious pamphlets, Ali Rabeh.

Didier Lemaire gave an interview to Le Figaro, on Friday February 19, in which he reiterated his remarks: “For my safety, for the well-being of my students and the safety of my colleagues, it is reasonable that I do not continue to teach. […] But we must admit that the Islamists won a battle at Trappes. It will take time to push them back,” he lamented.

“We are no longer in France. We are no longer in a Republic. Neither freedom of conscience, of the use of one’s body, nor equality are guaranteed.” Lemaire gave an example: “A North African woman sits at a men’s coffee table, and she has to endure comments made to her. Then in the street, men spit on her, insult her, or threaten her with rape.”

The teacher added that “certain media constantly relativize the seriousness of attacks on the principles of freedom and equality”. He therefore estimated: “By participating in denial, [the media] end up giving these kind of malicious individuals [Islamists editor’s note] credit.” It is clear to this teacher that France is “at war” and is “facing an enemy which is not an army”.

What is becoming increasingly evident in France is the violent atmosphere and the far-reaching Islamization with which many neighbourhoods or zones such as Trappes are confronted.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/02/21/the-dutch-broadcast-on-trappes-which-caused-a-commotion-in-france/

Germany: Syrian refugee slaughters two patients in psychiatric hospital

The mainstream media consistently report in a concealed manner on the brutal double murder committed by a 21-year-old guest of Merkel in Lüneburg in the early hours of the morning on ( halal) Friday: At the psychiatric clinic “Am Wienebütteler Weg”, first a 54-year-old patient was massacred by another “patient” at around 2:10 am.

According to initial police findings, the young man killed the 54-year-old by ” violent impact on the neck”, usually an investigator’s euphemism for the slaughter of a victim. The perpetrator injured another 56-year-old fellow patient in his ward so severely that he later died in hospital. A 61-year-old female nurse was seriously injured by the ” refugee”. The perpetrator also threw objects at the emergency services and injured another 42-year-old female nurse and a police officer.Several police officers were deployed to subdue and restrain the perpetrator.The officers had to use pepper spray against the guest of the ruling parties and as well of the German taxpayer.According to the hospital, the escalation of violence occurred “out of the blue” at around 2:10 a.m. in a ward of the adult psychiatric hospital. Senior public prosecutor Jan Christoph Hillmer: “The 56-year-old died due to blunt force to the head, the 54-year-old due to force to the neck.” Senior prosecutor Hillmer sums up, “He has not admitted to the charge of the crime.” According to the public prosecutor’s office, however, the Syrian had already been charged with assault and threatening behaviour. According to the public prosecutor’s office, it is “completely unclear” why the refugee suddenly killed two people on a Friday.The 21-year-old Syrian lived in a small town in the district of Lüneburg at public expense until the crime. He had only been admitted to the psychiatric ward on Thursday. There were no indications of danger to others or to a self-endangerment. Spokesperson Angela Wilhelm: “The patient had come voluntarily for inpatient treatment. At night, there was an escalation of violence without any foreshadowing.”

This is the second case of a large-scale police operation at the psychiatric hospital in Lüneburg that has become public knowledge within four months. In mid-November, the police arrested two perpetrators who had escaped from the psychiatric hospital’s forensic psychiatric unit. The two men, aged 29 and 36, had threatened a staff member in the kitchen with a knife in November and “fled”. Initial search measures were unsuccessful, so that targeted search measures were initiated. The ” fugitive” men, who had been in the Lüneburg prison for a number of robbery offences, were later brought back to the more or less open prison.

The weekly magazine Der Spiegel reports on the double murder under the heading “Panorama”, but conceals any details from its few remaining readers – also a case for the loony bin!

http://www.pi-news.net/2021/02/lueneburg-syrer-toetet-zwei-patienten-in-psychiatrischem-krankenhaus/

Austria: Afghan goes berserk outside office, threatens staff and passers-by with death

A 24-year-old man went berserk in front of an office building in Vienna’s Leopoldstadt district on Friday morning, threatening to kill several people.

In front of an office building in the Lassallestraße area in the second district, an argument apparently broke out between a currently unknown elderly person and a 24-year-old Afghan man at around 9.15 am on Friday. The 24-year-old allegedly threatened to kill the man.

A 39-year-old witness called the police and took a photo of the suspect. When the 24-year-old became aware of the 39-year-old, he allegedly threatened to kill the man as well. The 39-year-old went back into the office building and locked the door.

The 24-year-old then allegedly hit the door several times and threatened to kill a 48-year-old woman who was also present in the office.

The Vienna police were then called in and arrested the suspect after he briefly tried to escape. The man was taken to a prison.

https://www.heute.at/s/mann-rastet-vor-buero-aus-bedroht-personal-mit-dem-tod-100128941

Medical treatment for chronic patient refused for political reasons

Andrea Zürcher was refused medical treatment because she is an AfD member. Photo: Instagram

A political quarrel should end because the means to solve it is provided by law. Health has nothing to do with it – at least one should hope so. But the case of an AfD candidate in the Bundestag in Baden-Württemberg has raised serious doubt.

Andrea Zürcher was nominated two weeks ago by AfD members from the districts of Waldshut and Breisgau-Hochschwarzwald as constituency candidate for the federal election. The 37-year-old has been with the AfD, deputy chairwoman of the Konstanz district association since 2016 and works for the AfD parliamentary group leader Alice Weidel, among others.

The trained business woman suffers from a chronic illness and therefore has to see a doctor on a regular basis. This week, she said in an interview with Berlin weekly Junge Freiheit, she had a scheduled medical visit with a family doctor in Stühlingen, where she has been a patient for two years. The doctor suddenly terminated her appointment for her visit. The reason: her political opinion.

It seems that when a relatively new political force threatens to take away votes from the established parties during election campaigns, even the ordinary becomes fraught with danger.

Zürcher explained that he learned from the newspaper that his patient was running for the AfD. “He said that the relationship of trust was destroyed and that he could no longer give 100 percent to my treatment.” He would only intervene in medical emergencies, otherwise she should look for another family doctor.

“I’ve never been so shocked in my life. I was in tears,” says Zürcher. Up to now no one would ever have never imagined that there would be anything like this happening in Germany. “It is equally shocking and sobering to see the openness with which the supposedly tolerant – speaking of itself as the middle class – society unabashedly and in front of an audience makes medical care dependent on its own political and ideological ideal,” complained the AfD politician.

Does a doctor actually terminate an appointment with a patient who is regularly present because she is running for what he sees as the wrong party? A request from the JF to the doctor in question yielded nothing. The call ended after a few seconds with the words: “No comment.” Even further inquiries did not change anything.

Meanwhile, the AfD candidate reported the doctor to the police on Friday for discrimination and a host of other crimes. According to the Basic Law, nobody in Germany may be discriminated against because of their political views.

It is unusual for a doctor to terminate a contract with a patient since family doctors and health insurance companies benefit from such agreements. The former receive premiums from the health insurers if they can retain patients for a longer period of time. And the latter save because the patients do not do “doctor hopping”, ie go from one specialist to the next, but first to their family doctor, who then specifically forwards them to a colleague. An answer to a request from JF to the relevant health insurance company from Andrea Zürcher is still pending.

The fact that the AfD is directly and indirectly disadvantaged is nothing new. Especially since it has been represented in the Bundestag and in all 16 state parliaments, cases have repeatedly come to light in which previous political practices are thrown overboard if the AfD could benefit from them. The currently largest opposition party in the Bundestag has also been hardest hit by attacks on people, real estate or election posters for years.

But the fact that even doctors now refuse treatment because a patient is a candidate for the AfD, is a new frontier.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/02/20/medical-treatment-for-chronic-patient-refused-for-political-reasons/