In what is more than the usual differences regarding political ideologies between two candidates with fundamentally different personalities, the United States presidential election is essentially the culmination of a war of White and mixed-race cultures, influential French philosopher and author Éric Zemmour said in a political talk show on French news channel CNews.

“Beyond the ideological battles and the different personalities of [Joe] Biden and [Donald] Trump … there is a cultural war in the United States that has been going on all this year, with Black Lives Matter and the feminist movement,” Zemmour said. “I think there is a true cultural war between the traditional America — the White America — and the multicultural America.”

He added that the real background of the current debate is demographic.

“When speaking of violence and the clash of Trump and Biden, there is evidently a demographic play in the background,” Zemmour said. “It is about the life or death of the White America against the mixed-race, multicultural America, which wants to impose its new rules, hand-in-hand with a new alliance of all the movements such as the feminists and so on.”

A video of the interview with Zemmour has been deleted from Youtube, but a link to the video, which is published on the CNews website, is available here and here. Geo-restrictions may apply to those who live outside France. 

Data shows that demographic trends have certainly influenced the politics of the United States, with minorities such as Hispanics, Blacks, and Asians supporting the Democratic Party over the Republican Party in large numbers. The Black vote, for instance, amounted to 91 percent for Hilary Clinton in 2016, according to Pew Research. Publications such as the Los Angles Times have documented the phenomena, such as with its article ‘California’s changing demographics will further doom Republicans‘, which was produced in 2019. 

Whites are increasingly making up a smaller share of the overall US population and the voting electorate. Data shows that the White share of the population dropped to 60.1 percent in 2019 while the White share of the population in 1960 was 88.6 percent, according to US census data. Mass migration following the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1964 coupled with declining White birthrates has produced a situation where Whites may become a minority in the near future unless immigration restrictions are introduced.The Brookings Institution indicates in report published this year that the drop in the share of the White population is declining even faster than expected

The Federation for Fair American Immigration Reform analyzed Biden’s immigration plan and found that it would allow a “staggering 52 million new immigrants to eventually settle in the United States

Zemmour, who is Jewish, has discussed the issue of changing demographics in the past. He said on CNews last month that “immigration changes the makeup of a people. It is a crime against the European peoples, it will end in bloodshed.”

Zemmour is the author of “The French Suicide” and is known for his strong opposition against continued immigration to France. In a previous interview, he compared immigration in his country to a “demographic tsunami” and said he believes current immigration and integration policies have failed. He worked for the French channel RTL from 2010 to 2019.

rmx.news/article/article/us-election-a-war-between-white-and-mixed-race-cultures-french-author-zemmour-says

In a knife attack in a park in Berlin-Mitte on Saturday night, a 13-year-old was killed and a 22-year-old was seriously injured. The ethnicity of the attacker was not initially revealed, but witnesses described him as being bald “with a full beard”

The attack occurred around 10:40 pm between James-Simon-Park and Monbijoupark, the police said on Sunday. The attacker was a Turk.

The two victims were part of a group of seven people that consisted of children and young people, except for the 22-year-old. The group got into an argument with a man “about 45 years old”. There was a scuffle in which the Turk pulled a knife and wounded the 13-year-old and the 22-year-old.

Despite attempts at resuscitation, the 13-year-old died on site. His 22-year-old companion was seriously injured and is currently being treated in hospital.

Unknown witnesses followed the suspect in the direction of the Hackescher Markt S-Bahn station, and also took photos. A 41-year-old man of Turkish nationality was arrested by the murder squad. The suspect is currently being questioned by the police. So far there is no information on the cause of the dispute, and “no evidence of a possible racist motive” police said in their statement.

freewestmedia.com/2020/11/04/knife-attack-in-berlin-13-year-old-killed-and-22-year-old-seriously-wounded/

A major scandal has erupted in Austria after information came to light that the 20-year-old terrorist Kujtim Fejzulai, who shot dead four people and wounded 22 others in Vienna on Monday night, was released from prison in early December because he joined a deradicalization program and fooled officials. Fejzulai convinced them that he had given up his radical views after he was convicted of wanting to travel to Syria with other radicals to fight for the Islamic State.

So far, it had been reported that the radical, sentenced to 22 months in April, was released due to his young age. He was already detained in April 2019, according to Novinky.cz.

However, the Minister of the Interior Karl Nehammer clarified this information.

“He was released prematurely because he joined a deradicalization program. He should have been prepared to integrate better into society. But he managed to fool the judicial panel of his deradicalization and thus achieved early release.”

The program did not change the views of the attacker, who was born near Vienna in Mödling and had, in addition to Austria, also North Macedonian citizenship. Hours before the attack, he sent two of his accomplices videos from the attack on the editorial board of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, where two terrorists killed 12 people in 2015, mostly journalists and cartoonists.

Due to caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad, the French history teacher Samuel Paty was murderedrecently, after showing the pictures to the students while teaching about freedom of speech. Another Islamic terrorist attack was committed in Nice.

The Islamic State has called on jihadists to “shed the blood of the Crusaders” in retaliation for allegedly insulting the Prophet Muhammad. The weekly Charlie Hebdo decided to imprint the cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad again on the occasion of the start of the trial with people who took part in the attack on its editorial office in 2015.

Police, who managed to kill the attacker nine minutes after receiving information about the shooting in the center of Vienna, searched his apartment. They also secured the computer, and according to the Bild, they are examining his now-closed Instagram account, which belonged to him. There were supposed to be about 20 photos of him showing his weapons. He allegedly took an oath of allegiance to the leader of the Islamic State, Abu Ibrahim Quraysh. The Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attack.

Fourteen people were detained in Austria in connection with the attack. Two other people were detained by special Swiss forces in Winterthur in cooperation with the Austrian authorities. According to the Swiss Minister of Justice, they both met with the attacker. However, she did not say more due to the ongoing investigation.

rmx.news/article/article/vienna-terrorist-was-released-early-from-prison-after-he-fooled-austrian-officials-by-joining-deradicalization-program

Last Friday, 60 young Muslim men marched in front of the French Embassy at the Brandenburg Gate. They all wore the same black jumper with the inscription “Muslim”.

They were protesting against the French government. Their pose reminded of the IS terrorists in Syria and Iraq. On Facebook, they complained that the Prophet was insulted. They would “not keep silent” about these “attacks”.

That was a provocation. The young men simply turned the tables. While Europe is still horrified by the murder of the teacher Samuel Paty in Paris and the triple murder of the Christians in the church of Notre Dame in Nice, they justify the slaughter and complain about the alleged “Islamophobic policy”.

Radical Muslims have never before appeared in Berlin with such uninhibited behaviour. At the same time, others gathered at Hermannplatz square and shouted “Allahu Akbar”, the slogan of the holy warriors.The spectacle was frightening both here and there and makes us aware that it is not just France that is threatened. “Germany and Western Europe are still in the focus of radical Islamists,” says Federal Public Prosecutor General Peter Frank in an interview with the newspaper Welt am Sonntag. “I warn against believing that Islamist terrorism is on the retreat”.In Germany, 620 men with an Islamic background are registered as dangerous, men who are suspected to be capable of an attack at any time. About 60 of them live in Berlin. In Brandenburg, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution warns against radical Muslim Chechens who come from Russia as asylum seekers. They are considered particularly prone to violence. The murderer of the teacher Paty was a Chechen refugee.How do we respond to the threat? Last Monday at 11.15 a.m., the German ministers of culture ordered a minute’s silence for Samuel Paty. The State Parents’ Committee agrees: “We do not want to accept that teachers come to school with fear of violence. This minute of silence is important, but it is not enough.

After the triple murder in Nice, the question of protection for churches also arises. The murderer, a Tunisian migrant, deliberately wanted to kill Christians. Must Christians now be guarded in their church like Jews in the synagogue? Everything suggests that this is the case.

There was already a bad omen in Berlin: On August 30, a priest was knocked down during mass in St. Joseph’s Church in Müllerstraße. The assailant shouted “Whore Maria”; according to the police he was of “south-eastern European” appearance. The victim’s brother demanded a protection concept for churches. This does not exist.In Berlin the danger is not taken seriously enough. Dangerous people are only incompletely monitored and not deported, hate preachers are not noticed. Politicians here refuse to declare war on Islamism, as is now happening in France.

bz-berlin.de/berlin/kolumne/was-bedeutet-dieser-islamisten-aufmarsch-am-brandenburger-tor

France is once again under terrorist attacks – this time, two in two weeks. In the first, on October 16, Samuele Paty, a middle-school teacher, was beheaded for discussing freedom of speech and showing his students a picture of Mohammad. “To Macron, the leader of the infidels. I executed one of your dogs of hell who dared to humiliate Mohammed”, said Paty’s murderer, Abdullah Anzorov, apparently a Chechen jihadist. This week, three people were murdered inside the Cathdral of Nice by a man shouting “Allahu Akbar!” [“Allah is the Greatest!]. Of of the victims, a woman, was “virtually beheaded”.

“It is time for France to free itself from the laws of peace in order to permanently destroy Islamo-fascism in our territory,” said Christian Estrosi, the mayor of Nice.

Two days earlier, a note from the French Interior Ministry had announced that, after the beheading of Samuel Paty, the risk of terrorist attacks against churches was “very high”.

“It is freedom of religion and conscience that is under attack”, said French Prime Minister Jean Castex.

In a dispatch dated October 25, in L’Express, Interior Minister Gérard Darmanin talked about the latest threats aimed at France. Al Qaeda, it appears, had asked its followers to attack “the churches and symbols of Christianity.”

“Islamism is a monstrous fanaticism that must be fought vigorously”, wrote Cardinal Robert Sarah. “It will not stop its war. Unfortunately, we Africans know this too well. Barbarians are always the enemies of peace. The West, today France, must understand this.”

Even before these events, in 2016, in Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, Normandy, two Islamic State terrorists had slaughtered the elderly priest Jacques Hamel during mass. The shock was immense. Then more terrorists unsuccessfully struck Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris with a car filled with dynamite. Another terrorist murdered three visitors to a Strasbourg Christmas market, and a terrorist plan against the churches of Villejuif, in the Val-de-Marne, was thwarted by the police.

After this week’s attack in Nice, terror attacks were also registered in Avignon and in Lyon. The Jihadist threat weighing on France has become endogenous. The country is now also facing a commercial and legal Jihad.

After the Muhammad cartoons in Denmark in 2005, an Islamic boycott of Danish goods in 2006 led to a 15.5% drop in exports, according to Danish government statistics. Exports to Saudi Arabia dropped by 40% and those to Iran by 47%. The “International of Islamism”, as French weekly Le Point calls it, wants to oblige France to pay the same price after the killing of Professor Paty and Macron’s campaign to stem “Islamist separatism.”

“How can secession be avoided?” former French President François Hollande also asked .

-The former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad asserted that “Muslims have the right to kill millions of French people”.

-The High Islamic Council of Algeria has been speaking of a “virulent campaign” against Islam in France;

-Morocco has condemned the “insulting” cartoons and Al Azhar’s Muslim Council of Elders has announced a lawsuit against the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, 12 of whose editors were slaughtered in a jihadi attack in 2015.

-Pakistan has been claiming that Macron “encourages Islamophobia”. Iran has summoned the French ambassador, and

-Teheran’s newspapers has depicted Macron as “the devil of Paris”.

-In Bangladesh, the streets have been filled with protestors against Macron, “worshiper of Satan”. Qatar,

-Kuwait and other Arab countries have eliminated French goods from supermarkets.

-Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan set in motion a campaign to boycott goods to punish the French economy.

This is the first time in the history of the two countries that France’s representative in Ankara has been recalled to Paris. “By his refusal to unambiguously condemn the terrorist attack in Conflans, by his insults against France, President Erdogan is today the champion of the most radical Islamism,” former French PM Manuel Valls wrote.

“Between the beheading of Samuel Paty and the extermination of the last Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh, it is the same common thread: the Islamist reconquest in the face of a civilization that resists, with Erdogan as the leader of this reconquest,” the journalist wrote Valérie Toranian.

In the Caucasus, Erdogan has been attacking Christian Armenians in the name of Jihad and pan-Turkism. “The Armenians today face not only a war of aggression, but an attempt at elimination,” stated an appeal by French intellectuals and scholars. In Europe, Erdogan has claimed to be the head of Muslim believers against “Islamophobia”, a strategy of curtailing freedom of speech called “a little fatwa”.

A great friend of Erdogan, Turkey’s Deputy Minister of Culture Serdar Çam, insulted Charlie Hebdo as “bastards” and “s.o.b’s”.

Is this the same Turkey the European Union courts? In Erdogan’s Turkey, prominent journalists were sentenced to years behind bars for illustrating their newspaper with a cartoon of Mohammed published by Charlie Hebdo. Erdogan also purged Turkish schools. This Islamist offensive aims to destroy freedom of expression and thought within their respective countries and to shut the mouths of Europeans.

Erdogan counts on Europe’s “moral disarmament”. The idea is simple, writes Algerian novelist Kamel Daoud, “Erdogan as an universal imam, Macron as an enemy of Islam”. Victimization is their strategy. A group of 100 French mosques, before the beheading of Samuel Paty, denounced the “discrimination of Muslims”.

The weekly Le Point notes that the same countries that control most of its mosques are boycotting France today. The Ditib association, subordinate to the Turkish Ministry of Religious Affairs, manages 250 mosques in the Hexagon, Saudi Arabia has built the Great Mosque of Lyon, Morocco that of Evry, Algeria manages the Great Mosque of Paris and so on.

The Grand Mosque of Pantin, on the outskirts of Paris, has just been closed by the French judiciary for having spread the fatwa that led to the beheading of Professor Paty. And the French Interior Minister, Gérald Darmanin, is planning to close many Islamic associations. These Islamist regimes know that, after Paty, they had to divert attention from themselves by attacking France.

Ankara fears that the French bill against separatism, announced by Macron, will weaken its influence within the Turkish community in France. A few days before Paty’s beheading, the weekly Marianne revealed the Turkish project in Strasbourg: schools, mosques, consulates, Islamic campuses. The “largest mosque in Europe” will be Erdogan’s new Turkish mosque in Strasbourg.

He is planning also to open Turkish schools in France. That is why speaking with Turks in Germany, Erdogan urged them not to assimilate and called the assimilation of migrants in Europe “a crime against humanity”. Separatism is exactly their goal. Islamists want Europe’s Muslims to remain part of the Ummah, the global Islamic community.

The goal of this Islamist offensive is also to insinuate doubt in French public opinion. Professor Paty is barely buried, do we really have to persist with these caricatures and freeedom of expression that only caused trouble? Who triggered the boycott of French products, the cartoons or Erdogan? But we must not forget that the Turkish President has shut the mouth of German comedians with the threat of legal action.

“The duty of fraternity requires everyone to renounce certain rights”, said Mohammed Moussaoui, head of the French Council of the Muslim Cult, who went on the offensive after Paty’s case and the commercial boycott. Translated: give up freedom of expression and we will give you “peace”. The response to this request for submission came in the Journal du Dimanche with an appeal from 49 intellectuals:

“The permanent questioning of freedom of expression and the repeated attacks on public schools are evident symptoms of the ultimate will of our enemies: to undermine the democratic foundations of the French Republic”. Marcel Gauchet (philosopher), Jean Glavany (former minister), Catherine Kintzler (philosopher), Richard Malka (lawyer), Henri Peña-Ruiz (philosopher) and many others signed the appeal. “We must change the laws, organize an ideological but also a legislative war against the Islamists”, philosopher Elisabeth Badinter told L’Express. “And that wouldn’t have happened without terrible aftershocks from the opposing camp. New attacks, more numerous, more bloody. All this can no longer be solved with pacifism, because it has gone too far. It’s a war, but I’m not sure if the French are ready”.

If the French are not ready, nobody will be in Europe. Not a single political head of state in Europe still dares to face this Islamist penetration and separatism. Denmark surrended in the battle over freedom of expression (the Jyllands Posten newspaper has embraced programmatic self-censorship on Islam). After Samuel Paty’s beheading, will Macron’s France offer its head to the Islamist guillotine?

France is at an existential crossroads. Islamist beheadings are now taking place in its streets and churches. Stopping radical Islam or facing a “civil war”, as the former Chief of Staff of the French army Pierre de Villiers declared. They cannot run away and hide.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/290517 / Author: Giulio Meotti

Clearly, the Vienna jihadist could count on an extensive network to support him. Two of his accomplices were arrested in Switzerland.

A special unit of the Swiss police arrested two 18- and 24-year-old Swiss people in Winterthur on Tuesday afternoon. The two are said to have had close contact with the 20-year-old jihadist from Vienna. The arrest was made in coordination with the Austrian authorities.

The two suspects were arrested by a special police unit. As Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter said at a panel discussion of the St. Galler Tagblatts that the arrested were “colleagues” of the assassin. “The three men also met physically,” she was quoted in the online edition of the paper.

In the evening, the Federal Office of Police announced on Twitter that the two arrested persons were known to the authorities from terrorism proceedings of the Federal Prosecutor’s Office. The exchange of information with the Austrian authorities and all national partners was in full swing.

In the course of several raids, 14 people around the 20-year-old were arrested in Austria on Tuesday. These people are currently being interrogated.

freewestmedia.com/2020/11/04/swiss-colleagues-of-the-vienna-jihadist-arrested/

The plan for a TV coup continues.

Here’s the New York Times…

In the United States — which, unlike many other countries, does not have a national electoral commission — the role of calling the winners of presidential elections falls to the news media. Here’s how it will work:

No. 

The United States has an Electoral College, a House of Representatives, and a Senate.

At no point in time did the United States Constitution designate the “news media” to call the winners of presidential elections. Unlike some European countries, there’s no law preventing the New York Times, me, or the crazy homeless guy who throws peaches at passing trucks from doing so. Both Hubert and the New York Times have equal legal standing for their calls.

The media putting forward a claim of who won the election is no different than it putting forward a claim as to whether the runner was safe or not. It’s not a role. It’s audience opinion.

Except for the part where Big Tech has decided to treat the media’s calls as authoritative and ban anyone else from contracting it, giving the media the same status on elections as WHO has on the pandemic.

Seriously, do we need to pass a law now to stop the media from calling elections, because this is a coup. 

And Biden’s people are telling the media that they’re going to rely on the media’s calls for the Democrat candidate to declare victory and begin announcing appointments, as if the Electoral College and the voters had been replaced by CNN and the New York Times.

This is not how America is run. It’s not how it’s going to be run.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2020/11/new-york-times-role-declaring-winner-presidential-daniel-greenfield/