There are currently 124 Islamists at large in Germany who, according to the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), are considered to be at “high risk”. This is shown by the Federal Government’s answer to a parliamentary question of the Green Party in the German Parliament, which is published in the newspaper “Welt”.
According to the answer, the high-risk Islamists are divided into 97 so-called ” dangerous persons” and 27 extremists designated as relevant persons. The police always believe that dangerous persons are capable of committing politically motivated crimes of considerable dimensions, including attacks.Persons who take a leading role within the extremist/terrorist sphere or act as supporters are considered relevant persons. In addition, 151 persons are listed for whom there is a “moderate risk”. The basis for the classification is the instrument “Radar iTE”, which the authorities have developed in recent years to better classify Islamists.
According to the Federal Government, it has knowledge of a total of 240 dangerous persons who are not in custody and have been recorded by the authorities nationwide. 135 of these persons have German nationality, a third of them also having the nationality of another state.
Among the 240 dangerous persons there are also 41 Syrians, 17 Russians, seven Iraqis, seven Turks and persons from almost 20 other countries. The nationality of seven of the companions is officially considered “unresolved” – three others are stateless.Some Islamists have been hindered from leaving Germany in recent years. The background to this is that authorities can prohibit departure if there are concrete indications of planned support for a terrorist group abroad.
“According to the Federal Government’s knowledge, 24 persons who are dangerous and 13 relevant persons are currently subject to valid bans on leaving the country”, the Federal Government’s reply states. Especially Islamists who wanted to leave the country for a “so-called jihad area” were considered to have an “increased potential for danger”.
In its reply, the Federal Government also states that it has no knowledge of how many of the dangerous persons or relevant persons have a licence to carry weapons. This is the responsibility of the state authorities.After the deadly knife attack in Dresden in October, the debate about the possibilities of monitoring dangerous Islamists had gained momentum.The suspected perpetrator is Syrian and was released from prison as a classified dangerous person only five days before the attack. Although the authorities wanted to keep an eye on him, he was initially able to commit the crime undetected. Horst Seehofer ( Christian Social Union), Minister of the Interior, announced that he would again check whether deportations to Syria might be possible after all.
Recently the clashes of criminal Arab clans in Berlin escalated. Now a wave of violence seems to be about to break out in Essen (North Rhine-Westphalia).
The newspaper “Der Westen” reports disturbing pictures. Two men of Lebanese origin are said to have been attacked by around 30 Syrians. However, the police, who arrived shortly afterwards, did not find any of them. A short time later – as can be seen on a video – numerous men march across Essen and are searching for the attackers. They can also be heard insulting Syrians in Arabic.This is nothing new for the police. North Rhine-Westphalia has had a problem with criminal Turkish-Arab clans for years. Investigators assume that a total of 111 criminal clans are active in the federal state. The major cities in the Ruhr area are particularly affected, with Essen showing an increase in suspects and crimes. It is said that 3,779 suspects belonging to the clans alone are responsible for 6,104 criminal offences. It now appears that the police have been anticipating possible escalations in the clan milieu for some time.On the one hand, this is about allocation battles and the occupation of new territories, as the Head Criminal Investigation Director Thomas Jungbluth explains:”There are fights in the social milieu, where we assume that these are the first steps towards allocation battles. He also gives examples of this: “One must not forget that the clans are not friendly with each other. … Another example from another city: Here the police very successfully arrested a part of a clan that was dealing in narcotics. Another clan noticed: ‘They are gone, we can take over here’. The clan tried to take over the business.”However, conflicts based on the ethnic background should not be neglected either. After all, many clan members have a migrant background – many have Turkish (15 percent) or Lebanese (31 percent) citizenship, 36 percent have German citizenship and five percent are stateless. This is how economist and Islamic scholar Ahmad A. Omeirate (36) from Berlin explains the situation for ” Der Westen”: “There is a historical antipathy between certain Syrian and Lebanese groups, which has existed in Lebanon since the civil war in 1975” and also warns against further escalation.Just recently, the rivalry between Chechens and the Remmo clan in Berlin revealed just how strong the clans have become in Germany. Within only 24 hours, there were three attacks. The Berlin police already feared a full-scale clan war on the streets of the German capital. However, both sides finally agreed on an internal peace talk to settle their conflicts for the time being. The police and the constitutional state can only remain passive onlookers…
A rally scheduled for today, Friday, in Hamburg, to which Islamists are also mobilising, has provoked harsh criticism. The Hamburg Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the AfD party called for a ban. “A well-fortified state must not allow radical Islamists to demonstrate unhindered on Hamburg’s streets for the abolition of freedom of the press and freedom of opinion after the cruel terrorist attacks in Paris, Nice and Vienna,” said Christoph de Vries, CDU Member of Parliament, on Thursday.
According to the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, the Al-Azhari Institute in Hamburg is also organizing the demonstration. The official purpose of the association behind the institute is to promote education and training in Islamic theology. “According to the knowledge of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, however, Islamist teaching content is actually being taught which is in clear contradiction to the canon of values of the Basic Law”. There is also talk of a basic Islamist orientation.
The motto of the demonstration is: “Against disrespect to our Prophet Muhammad”. According to information from the CDU, the appeal to demonstrate is also explicitly directed against the French satirical magazine “Charlie Hebdo”, which the Office for the Protection of the Constitution did not confirm, however. In early 2015, the magazine had been the target of a terrorist attack in which eleven people were killed. A trial against alleged accomplices is currently underway in Paris.
Already on November 8th, the Al-Azahri Institute had called for a demonstration with about 270 participants under the motto “We are against discrimination and for respect of our Prophet”. On the sidelines of the demonstration an unknown person was attacked, possibly by participants of the final rally.
“Freedom of opinion and assembly are a high good, but we must not allow them to be abused by Islamists and enemies of our constitution for their own purposes,” said Dennis Gladiator, spokesman for domestic policy of the CDU’s Citizens’ Faction.
A spokesman for the Interior Ministry said that all legal possibilities had been examined. “If there was a possibility, we would have banned the gathering.” However, the gathering was protected by the freedom of assembly according to the Basic Law.The Council of Islamic Communities in Hamburg (Shura) distanced itself from the demonstration. A spokesman stated that the Council of Islamic Communities was not inviting to the rally. The private person who organised the demonstration was not known to us, said board member Mehdi Aroui. He stressed: “We condemn all violence. He said that the Shura stood up for the absolutely precious good of freedom of expression.Aroui further stated that the Mohammed cartoons published by “Charlie Hebdo” hurt the religious feelings of Muslims and were a form of bullying. During a minute’s silence at Hamburg schools for Samuel Paty, a French teacher murdered in mid-October, some Muslim children had felt uncomfortable. They felt that they were considered “jointly liable”. The Shura wants to discuss the subject with Islamic teachers in an online event at the end of November.
A female translator who worked for months in German refugee centres revealed to the media that what she witnessed among Muslim “refugees” was “pure hatred of Christians” and that they see their mission in the Islamisation of Europe.
This statement is interesting because we generally only know about the “refugees” what they want us to know, but not how they really think.The Arab translator has worked in a number of asylum centres across the country and discovered that Muslim migrants feel “pure hatred” towards non-Muslims and women and that they plan to have more children, using European welfare systems with the aim of “destroying Christians”.
The translator explained that such hostility was even felt in kindergartens where Muslim children refuse to play with non-Muslim children.
The 39-year-old woman worked in several refugee centres all over Germany and also reports similar experiences made by her translator colleagues.
In a statement published on the Catholic website Kath.net, she explained that Islamic refugees “only show their true face” when they can talk to each other in their own language.
“They want Germany to be Islamised. They despise this country and our values,” she said.
She herself arrived in 1991 as a – genuine – refugee from Ethiopia and volunteered to work in asylum centres in order to “give something in return”. There she finally became aware of what was happening in reality.
A quote she often heard from Muslim women: “We will multiply our numbers. We must have more children than Christians, because only then can we destroy them here”.
The European ruling class is salivating over the prospects of a Harris/ Biden presidency. The bureaucrats who run the European Union and the globalists behind them are cocksure that with Donald Trump gone, things will return to the comfortable pre-Trump days. Daddy Yankee will again uncomplainingly throw a protective blanket of security over Europe and in his benevolence turn a blind eye to the unfair trade arrangements that benefit Europe so.
There are two problems with this view. First, it’s far from certain that Joe Biden will be sworn in as president in January. As more and more evidence mounts of Democrat election fraud and vote stealing, that prospect dims. The mere possibility that Donald Trump will continue on as president is not even considered in Europe. The ‘ever-so-smart’ European elite believe all they’ve been told by their fellow American globalists and from their consumption of the New York Times, Washington Post and CNN. Accordingly, they are clueless.
Secondly, even should Biden become president, he will not be able to restore to good old days that Europe longs for… and needs. Take the matter of defense. As president, Trump made it acceptable not just to issue objections to Europe about its freeloading but to actually start doing something about it, something none of his predecessors had the moxie to do. Adding fuel to American anger toward Europe has been the EU’s propensity to anoint itself as the moral leader of the West and try to shape U.S. foreign policy from that vantage point. The unstated but clear European message to America was ‘you do the work, and we’ll sit back and tell you what to do and how to do it.’
Trump gave voice to what the average American long thought about Europe. That genie is not going back into the bottle. Plus, irrespective of Biden’s personal feelings towards Europe, geopolitical reality will demand a de-emphasis to both European needs and Middle Eastern engagements. This is because a true pivot towards Asia is needed to counter the rise of communist China. At least Emmanuel Macron of France realizes all this, which is why he is persistent in trying to gain support an all-European army. So far, his calls are falling on deaf ears.
As it is with defense, so it is with trade. The current trade arrangements are heavily tilted in Europe’s favor. This is a remnant of the Cold War. Trump or no Trump, these trade understandings and treaties are not sustainable in this day and age. The best Europe can expect from a Harris/Biden administration is that its trade deals with the U.S. will be rectified at a slower pace than Trump would do. That’s another thing that will surprise the European elite.
One seemingly bright spot from Europe’s perspective should Biden get into the White House is that the Democrats will do considerable damage to the U.S. economy with tax increases, Green environmental nonsense, and likely more lockdowns. This would bring America closer to Europe’s sclerotic state. But before Europe celebrates, it should realize that a weakened America would be even less willing than it is now to finance Europe’s defense and to tolerate unfair trade deals.
No matter how things turn out stateside, Europe is in a fix. America will not — cannot — be Europe’s savior. The Cold War days are over. Europe’s fundamental problems are of its own making. Until the people of Europe, particularly Western Europe, can loosen the death grip the leftist elite and bureaucrats have on their countries, the continent will continue to languish.
Here is a short observation by Hellequin, the translator of the following clip:
This is how must have felt when peoples Home were raided during the Nazi Era. I really did not expect to live in a time I only heard of from Family, School-teachers, Books and old Hollywood Movies. I stand chastised……
And about this clip:
Dr. Andreas Noack is one of the most famous and popular experts when it comes to nutrition, nutrients and health.
Chairman of the US Federal Election Commission Trey Trainor recently turned heads when he declared the 2020 presidential election illegitimate due to widespread voter fraud, which he says continues to take place in states that are still counting ballots.
Trainor, during an appearance on Newsmax TV’s National Report on Friday, said that precincts which refused access to Republican observers to oversee the ballot counting process could be charged with voter fraud.
“I do believe that there is voter fraud taking place in these place,” Trainor said. “Otherwise they would allow the observers to go in.”
Although Republican operatives like Cory Lewandowski and members of the Trump’s legal team were granted a court order which allows observers from the Trump campaign to watch the ballot counting process in Pennsylvania from six feet away, the FEC chief said that observers “have not been allowed into the polling locations in any meaningful way.”
On the afternoon of Nov. 5, Trump campaign adviser Corey Lewandowski and former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi told members of the press that the city of Philadelphia was in defiance of the court order, and that observers were being shut out of the voting precincts.
Pennsylvania’s Democratic Governor Tom Wolf claimed that the Trump campaign’s attempts to observe the vote counting process as “planned attacks on the election” and urged the state to “reject efforts to intimidate election workers and prevent voters from being counted.”
During the interview, the Election Commission chief noted that while observers were eventually allowed inside the precinct locations to watch, they were never allowed to come close to the six feet required by the court order.
Trainor went on to say that when precincts are denying access to Republican observers who by law are required to have access, it’s quite obvious that something illegitimate and possibly even illegal is taking place.
“Our whole political system is based upon transparency to avoid the appearance of corruption,” he said, pointing out that Pennsylvania and other states such as Georgia are not conducting counting in a transparent manner.
The FEC chairman reiterated that state law requires observers to be allowed inside of the voting precincts, six feet away from where the votes are being counted. If that law is being broken, he added, then the election is “illegitimate”.
Trainor, who said that many of the lawsuits filed by Trump campaign are “very valid allegations”, predicted that some would eventually end up in the Supreme Court.
On Tuesday, Fox Business host Lou Dobbs, while discussing the Trump campaign’s legal challenges in key swing states with former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, now a member of Trump’s legal team, interrupted the conversation to say that a “highly reliable source” says that FBI is currently investigating the 2020 election results.
Chairman of the US Federal Election Commission Trey Trainor recently turned heads when he declared the 2020 presidential election illegitimate due to widespread voter fraud, which he says continues to take place in states that are still counting ballots.
Trainor, during an appearance on Newsmax TV’s National Report on Friday, said that precincts which refused access to Republican observers to oversee the ballot counting process could be charged with voter fraud.
“I do believe that there is voter fraud taking place in these place,” Trainor said. “Otherwise they would allow the observers to go in.”
Although Republican operatives like Cory Lewandowski and members of the Trump’s legal team were granted a court order which allows observers from the Trump campaign to watch the ballot counting process in Pennsylvania from six feet away, the FEC chief said that observers “have not been allowed into the polling locations in any meaningful way.”
On the afternoon of Nov. 5, Trump campaign adviser Corey Lewandowski and former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi told members of the press that the city of Philadelphia was in defiance of the court order, and that observers were being shut out of the voting precincts.
Pennsylvania’s Democratic Governor Tom Wolf claimed that the Trump campaign’s attempts to observe the vote counting process as “planned attacks on the election” and urged the state to “reject efforts to intimidate election workers and prevent voters from being counted.”
During the interview, the Election Commission chief noted that while observers were eventually allowed inside the precinct locations to watch, they were never allowed to come close to the six feet required by the court order.
Trainor went on to say that when precincts are denying access to Republican observers who by law are required to have access, it’s quite obvious that something illegitimate and possibly even illegal is taking place.
“Our whole political system is based upon transparency to avoid the appearance of corruption,” he said, pointing out that Pennsylvania and other states such as Georgia are not conducting counting in a transparent manner.
The FEC chairman reiterated that state law requires observers to be allowed inside of the voting precincts, six feet away from where the votes are being counted. If that law is being broken, he added, then the election is “illegitimate”.
Trainor, who said that many of the lawsuits filed by Trump campaign are “very valid allegations”, predicted that some would eventually end up in the Supreme Court.
On Tuesday, Fox Business host Lou Dobbs, while discussing the Trump campaign’s legal challenges in key swing states with former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, now a member of Trump’s legal team, interrupted the conversation to say that a “highly reliable source” says that FBI is currently investigating the 2020 election results.https://www.youtube.com/embed/n_p1sonhp-k
Over the weekend, Sidney Powell said during an interview that President Trump’s legal team has collected an overwhelming amount of evidence which proves “massive election fraud” caused by software made by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, Remix News reported.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states. President Trump won by not just hundreds of thousands of votes, but by millions of votes that were shifted by this software that was designed expressly for that purpose,” Powell told Maria Bartiroma, the host of Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures.
Powell has called for CIA Director Gina Haspel to be fired for willfully ignoring warnings about the Dominion voter software.
Allah's Willing Executioners 