The Imam started the Friday prayer in the Hagia Sophia with a sword on which the conquest surah is engraved.
In our civilization no one is happy about “prey”. At least it is bad manners.
Because such a prey is regularly not earned/acquired by legal means, but the result of a criminal act, in case of doubt also by the use of violence. 1453. 1914-1923. 1955. 1974. 2020.
An “administrative court” decision should not hide this fact, above all when you have those, which express precisely their ” delight “, more precisely their sense of triumph, hate, superiority and pride,
to classify them.

Interview of the magazine TICHYS EINBLICK with the lawyer Ralf Höcker:

Question: More and more communities in Germany are allowing the call of the muezzin. In Herford, for example, a 37-year-old responds by making counter-noise with a pot and spoon. What are the chances of defending oneself in court against the call to prayer?

Ralf Höcker: The call to prayer has a direct impact on several basic rights. It is therefore in need of justification. And I have my doubts that such a justification can succeed especially in residential areas.

Q: Which basic rights do you mean exactly?

R.H.: Article 4 of the Basic Law protects not only the religious freedom of Muslims but also the negative religious freedom of non-Muslims. In principle, no one must tolerate being compulsorily harassed with religious statements against his or her will. In any case, the fundamental right under Article 2 of the Basic Law to free development of the personality and, of course, regulations under the law on immission control are also affected. It is clear that these rights are affected if one is forced to listen to the muezzin call in his home. Whether they are also infringed, is once again another question. But I believe that there are very good reasons for this.

Q: Islamic communities argue: the church bells also ring for everyone – even for non-Christians.

R.H.: There is a judgement of the Federal Administrative Court in 1983 on the ringing of bells, i.e. from a time when nobody here thought of a call of a muezzin. The court ruled that such a centuries-old ecclesiastical expression of life is acceptable even in a secularized society if it remains within the bounds of the conventional in terms of time, duration and intensity level. This is still valid today. The ears of average Central Europeans have become accustomed to the sound of church bells over centuries. They do not find it inharmonious and disturbing. Many people feel differently when they hear the muezzin’s call. Secondly, the fact that a church bell is one of the res sacrae speaks against the equal treatment of the muezzin call and church ringing.They are therefore holy objects that directly serve ritual acts and therefore enjoy particularly high protection. In legal literature it is rightly pointed out that the sound system of a mosque, on the other hand, is a mere technical device without any special legal status. Moreover, bells, unlike the muezzin, only make sounds that do not contain any direct message. In the call to prayer: ‘There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is his prophet’, on the other hand, an assertion is made which can be offensive to a Christian or other religious adherents.Christians will be bothered by the fact that the Trinity of God is denied here, and an atheist can say all the more: I do not want to be bothered five times a day with public claims about the existence of an invisible fantasy being. Moreover, many Muslims also see the muezzin’s call as a dominant gesture that expresses a claim to power. One really cannot assume that this is the case with church bells.

Q: What could someone who does not want to be exposed to it do about it?

R.H.: Every resident could resist and appeal to the administrative court. Then it depends on whether the religious freedom of the respective Muslim religious community or the rights of the residents are given preference.

Q: Assuming you would represent the case: how would you argue?

R.H.: In the event of a conflict of fundamental rights, the principle of exception applies. This means: if an interest protected by fundamental rights can be enforced by a more lenient measure that affects other fundamental rights as little or not at all as possible, then this option must be chosen. And this measure has been in existence for some years now with the so-called muezzin app. With this the congregation reaches precisely only those with its call to prayer for whom it is intended, without the others having to listen to it.In the Immission Control Act, the state of the art plays a decisive role. Technical innovations must be used if they help to avoid conflicts of fundamental rights. In the past there was no possibility of a more moderate solution – one could hardly point the loudspeaker only at Muslims in the vicinity. Thanks to the app, it is now finally possible to address only those who are meant and who actually want to hear the call.

Q: What prospect do you see for such a lawsuit?

R.H.: I think that the lawsuit has a good chance of success if the plaintiff presents the argument of the muezzin app, which, as far as can be seen, has never been presented in court before.

Q: In this case a court would have to make a clear difference between the ringing of church bells and the muezzin call, and give it a higher rank. Courts do not like to make such a distinction because it would probably be considered discriminatory.

R.H.: Unequal treatment is only discriminatory and unconstitutional if there is no justification for it. But there is for the reasons I have just mentioned.

tichyseinblick.de/daili-es-sentials/ich-rate-gegen-den-muezzinruf-zu-klagen/

The proceedings about the gang rape of an 18-year-old girl have come to an end. Several defendants have been sentenced to prison for the rape. The main defendant is sentenced to five years and six months in prison. Some of them have been released. The reaction of the defendants – on video.Five defendants were given a prison sentence and two were sentenced to juvenile delinquency for repeatedly raping the young woman in October 2018. Other young men involved have been convicted of failing to offer aid, including Kosay A., who can be seen in the video above. The 18-year-old, who was a joint plaintiff in the trial, still has post-traumatic stress disorder and sleep problems, the judge said on Thursday.”The consequences of the crime are severe,” said the presiding judge of the Freiburg Regional Court, Stefan Bürgelin, at the sentencing on Thursday. The young woman was not able to take part in a second questioning in the trial, which has lasted over 43 trial days since June 2019. According to a medical certificate, she is still suffering from the crime, which had caused outrage far beyond Freiburg. To this day, she has been struggling with post-traumatic stress disorder and sleeping problems.The trial of the defendants, mostly refugees from Syria and Iraq, lasted more than a year. They were between 18 and 30 years old at the time of the crime. The court heard numerous witnesses and experts and tried to determine the exact complicity of the defendants. Bürgelin described the course of events on the night of the crime with numerous rapes in a bush in detail once again.The 18-year-old girl had been taking ecstasy, alcohol and caffeine and was therefore not able to make and speak out an opposing opinion. She had lost all sense of time and no longer had the feeling of being in her own body. Bürgelin rejected the defendants’ statements that the sexual intercourse had been consensual, as a purely self-serving assertion. “In such a case, this is a standard statement that is not witty,” he said.Bürgelin accused the main defendant: “You set the ball rolling and took advantage of it.” He had lured her outside under the pretext of showing her his tattoos. After the first rape, the man had deliberately led the woman to the other perpetrators. “Therefore you deserve the highest punishment.”

rtl.de/cms/nach-gruppenvergewaltigung-in-freiburg-so-feiert-ein-taeter-das-urteil-4583231.html?fbclid=IwAR21wAIXOC8QervVG1_brYTjZYQ-NqfPDzEkx_EIVE3QfMX6nREgJQCwUHQ

On July 20, Swedish TV4 interviewed criminologist Tage Alalehto, who in the segment says that one explanation for the increased number of stabbings in the country could be “ethnic, xenophobic moods”. But that was not really what he had said on camera.

When conservative weekly Nya Tider approached Alhalehto, however, he said that he also said that it was immigrant gang criminals, ethnic non-Swedes who are clearly over-represented in the increasing knife violence data, something that TV4 chose to edit out of their report.

“They [TV4] have cut and pasted and taken things out of context and put it together into something that fits a pre-established context and agenda,” he explained.

TV4’s newsroom has conducted a survey which showed that the number of people seeking care due to knife injuries has increased dramatically on year-by-year basis. The information is based on figures from the National Board of Health and Welfare’s patient register.

Knife violence in Sweden has increased for the seventh year in a row. In 2012, 624 people were injured in knife-related violence, in 2019 that number was 923. The number of victims injured in knife attacks is seven times higher than those injured in shootings.

Tage Alalehto is a criminologist at Umeå University. In a feature on TV4 on July 20, he appeared to be saying that a partial explanation could be “ethnic and xenophobic moods”. Anyone watching the feature is thus led to believe that the criminologist thinks that it was racism against immigrants that has been behind the violence.

However, that is not the case. When Nya Tider spoke to Tage Alalehto to find out what he really meant by “xenophobic moods”, it turns out that TV4 cut out the most important segment of what he had said.

“I said during the interview that the increasing knife violence is very much about gang crime and drug trafficking. When it comes to what I said about xenophobic sentiments on ethnic grounds, I mean that it is primarily gang criminals, ethnic non-Swedes who commit these crimes.”

He said the broadcasters cut and pasted and quoted his remarks “out of context and put it together into something that fits a pre-established context and agenda”.

Alalehto explained that ethnic Swedes were often the victims of criminal immigrants gangsters, including knife attacks. According to Alalehto, it may be about individual Swedes who try to invade the so-called territory of drug gangs, but it can also be about innocent people who are simply exposed to robberies where a knife is used as a weapon.

These situations take on an ethnic dimension because the gangsters usually want to “humiliate the victims in different ways and they [Swedes] are called ‘fucking slaves’ and so on”. So it is clearly not ethnic Swedes who are out on the town and walking around with a knife to stab immigrants because of some kind of xenophobic mood.

According to the criminologist, immigrants also bring their past conflicts and wars to Sweden. Tage Alalehto said that TV4 obviously had an agenda when they made the news item about increasing knife violence. Other major media outlets are also avoiding the truth, he added.

“I do not just want to point out TV4 for wanting narrow explanatory models or for ducking the truths that some journalists may find opinion-wise uncomfortable. SVT and several of the major media do the same.”

He agreed that TV4 and other mainstream media outlets often deal with issues on a subjective, ideological basis. “It is clear that it is so, and even among us criminologists there is a blissful mixture of subjective perceptions.”

freewestmedia.com/2020/07/24/swedish-broadcaster-tv4-edits-interview-to-hide-immigrant-knife-violence/

By Deborah Franklin

The issue of how some of the most privileged people in the world treat children is getting more traction. After the arrests of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, millions of ordinary people are critically examining the actions of Hollywood celebrities, titans of business, powerful politicians, media corporations, and other elite groups. Scenarios that previously seemed unthinkable are becoming more thinkable by the day.

Chrissy Teigen is a popular model and actress who’s married to singer John Legend. She enjoys a lucrative career appearing in commercials and TV shows and hawking a product line at Target. She’s also a prolific writer of tweets that feature her disturbing fantasies about children. Here are some Chrissy tweets:

“I just saw a baby that looked like a porn star. Like a trashy do-anything porn star. Is this wrong to think?” and “seeing little girls do splits half naked is just…. I want to put myself in jail. #toddlersandtiaras”

Recently, alert readers unearthed thousands of Teigen’s child-centered tweets and started swarming Twitter with questions. Some of those questions probed into whether Teigen ever had a relationship with the deceased child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Teigen responded by blocking one million people, deleting 60,000 tweets, and claiming she was the victim of heartless internet trolls. Conveniently for her, the media sided with Teigen. This article in USA Today, for instance, painted a sympathetic portrait of Teigen as an innocent woman under vicious attack, while scrupulously avoiding quoting any of Teigen’s actual tweets.

Who could have imagined this bizarre photo of accused child trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell and disgraced Oscar winner Kevin Spacey relaxing on the thrones of Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip? Yet, here it is. The Queen’s son, Prince Andrew, was a friend of Epstein for decades, and is currently wanted for questioning by U.S. prosecutors. His relationship with Epstein was well-known in royal circles but tolerated until Epstein’s arrest made it too uncomfortable.

In fact, Jeffrey Epstein remained a highly sought-after companion among the elite, even after his release from jail on sex offender charges. A dinner at his New York mansion was attended by such media luminaries as Katie Couric, Chelsea Handler, and George Stephanopolous, whose wife just publicly urged parents towatch porn with their children.

And it wasn’t just media stars who loved Epstein. Bill Gates, who has endowed the world’s largest charitable organization, visited Epstein many times and maintained close ties through his staff. Harvard University gave Epstein his own office, phone line, and unlimited access, after he donated $9 million for scientific research. And Harvard faculty visited Epstein in his various homes and in jail and flew on his private planes.

As the magnitude of the Epstein-Maxwell saga reaches the public, it’s becoming harder for elites to haughtily wave away attention to their behavior. In previous times, the story about Wayfair that raced across social media last week might never even have surfaced. But in today’s environment, this odd development inspired countless TikTok videos, outraged tweets and media denials.

Wayfair is a popular online purveyor of household goods, which attracted interest when some internet sleuths noticed strangely labeled items. Some ordinary looking cabinets, pillows, and baby goods were selling for absurdly inflated prices. Even more remarkably, each item had an unusual name which matched the name of a recently missing kid. For instance, the Duplessis Zodiac pillow, which was priced at $9,999.99, matched the name of 13-year-old Samara Duplessis, who had just gone missing in Southfield, Michigan. The Samiyah storage cabinet, retailing for $12,899.99, matched the name of 17-year-old Samiyah Mumin, recently missing from Columbus, Ohio.

Wayfair denied it.  But internet investigators speculated that Wayfair was fronting for human trafficking operators and continued to probe its personnel and history. But instantly, as soon as the story broke, the media jumped in, proclaiming it a “false conspiracy” which was “baseless,” “unfounded,” and “debunked.” On what basis was the Wayfair story debunked?

The media remains remarkably uncurious about NXIVM, the sordid sex cult whose founder, Keith Rainiere, faces life in prison for sex trafficking. This grotesque saga has everything you could want for tabloid excitement: underage sex slaves, Hollywood stars, one of the richest families in the world, connections to powerful politicians and the Dalai Lama. Yet the public remains largely unaware of NXIVM. Has any journalist asked Senator Kristin Gillibrand what her father was doing as an NXIVM member and its highly paid lawyer? Has anyone asked Hillary Clinton why sex cult members were illegally raising money for her campaign? Has anyone asked the Dalai Lama why he took a $1 million fee to endorse a sex cult that branded women like cattle?  Have any mainstream journalists investigated what was being done to children at NXIVM’s international day care centers?

Unfortunately, the elites’ unsettling relationship to crimes against children is too extensive to catalogue here. Oprah promoted Brazilian “holy man” John of God, now a convicted rapist who impregnated underage sex slaves to sell their babieson the black market. Meryl Streep led a standing ovation at the Oscars for Roman Polanski, who drugged and raped a 12-year-old girl. BBC boss Mark Thompsonhelped to cover up violent assaults by TV host Jimmy Savile, who attacked more than 500 children.  Thompson is now CEO of the New York Times.

In this unprecedented time when authorities are asking us to trust them as they strip away our freedom, an honest appraisal of their trustworthiness is long overdue. The American people deserve to know what some of the privileged elites are doing to our children.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/07/do_global_elites_commit_crimes_against_children.html

Last Wednesday, a 36-year-old man repeatedly insulted, threatened and spat at an employee of a fast-food restaurant in the Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe train station.

What had happened?

Around 11 am the man entered the branch and demanded free food and drink. Since the employee did not comply with this demand, he was repeatedly insulted and threatened by the 36-year-old from Egypt. The homeless man was in a wheelchair and remained obtrusive. The whole culminated in an attempt to spit on the employee. Fortunately, this could be prevented by an installed protective screen.The 36-year-old was only calmed down when a patrol of the Kassel Federal Police arrived. The identity check showed that the man suffers from several contagious diseases. The homeless man is now facing criminal proceedings for insulting, threatening and attempted dangerous bodily harm. After the police measures, the man was released.

presseportal.de/blaulicht/pm/63990/4660261

by Giulio Meotti

The Netherlands paid the salary of two terrorists implicated in the assassination of 17-year-old Israeli Rina Shnerb, killed a year ago (her brother Dvir was seriously injured) by a bomb while visiting the “Danny Spring”.Dutch Foreign Minister Stef Blok and Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation Sigrid Kaag admitted it in the Hague. It is the first time that a European government has admitted that its funds, supposedly destined for charitable causes, have ended up fueling terrorism against Israel.

Samer Arbid, who was responsible for the attack on the Shnerb family, was an accountant at the Union of Agricultural Work Committees (UAWC). Last October, he was indicted on 21 counts as a commander of the PFLP terrorist cell which detonated the bomb that killed young and vivacious Rina Shnerb.

Abdul Razeq Farraj was the director of finance and administration of the UAWC and was charged for the aid he gave for perpetrating the attack. The two were not only members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a group called “terrorist” by the European Union and also featured on the payroll of the UAVC, to which the Netherlands has donated 20 million dollars in a period of seven years.

So the salaries of the two terrorists were covered by Dutch funds.

According to NGO Monitor, Italy and Spain are among the countries that donate funds to the UAWC. To remedy the scandal, the Hague has suspended donations to the UAWC. It wasn’t just about payments. In 2017, both the terrorists received a one-year pass from the Dutch representation in Ramallah with which they could identify themselves as employees of a partner organization of the Dutch representation. It is not the first similar case.

In 2018 it emerged that the Ma’an Center, which received Dutch grants, had hired a terrorist, Ahmad Abdallah Aladini, an employee who died in Gaza shortly thereafter.

It was what Eitan, Rina Schnerb’s father said when he appealed to the European Union to stop funding terrorists:

“How can it be that people who glorify death are active in human rights groups? How can it be that for years they have received millions of euros in aid from European nations? I have no doubt that European countries do not advocate terrorism or the murder of innocent people. But they certainly understand that the links between Palestinian civilian groups and terrorist organizations is a reality that must be condemned. I urge you not to close your eyes. Don’t be fooled. Don’t lend a hand, a grandstand or finance to these organizations”.

A year ago, an 80-page report by the Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs, titled “Terrorists in Suits”, denounced the links between terrorist organizations such as Hamas and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and NGOs promoting the campaign for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel, which is simply well-mannered terrorism.

And it also showed that some of these NGOs receive funding from European states. The report gave names and faces of thirty members of Hamas and PFLP who hold high-level positions in NGOs, often after serving prison terms for terrorist-related crimes, including assassination, and who maintain active links with terrorist groups.

At the time, the report was dismissed by some as an Israeli spin. With Holland’s admission of guilt, it cannot be ignored anymore. Now Europe must disclose how much of its money went to the killers of innocent Israeli girls such as Rina.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/284091

Even the worst moonbattery quickly gets worse still. The Black Lives Matter goon kneeling on the neck of a white 2-year-old for a photo op was appalling enough. Then we read this:

Brian Papin, a Special Education teacher at Cedar Grove High School in Atlanta, Georgia encouraged the Black Lives Matter supporter kneeling on a white baby’s neck in a viral photo to “lean into it until death.”

To quote this woke Teacher of Color,

“Again! Your doing it wrong! One knee on center of the back one on the neck and lean into it until death! You saw the video! Get it right or stop f***ing around!”

See a screenshot of his Facebook comment here.

Papin may be a product of his environment. Cedar Grove High School encourages athletes to show contempt for America and obeisance to Black Lives Matter by kneeling during the national anthem.

moonbattery.com/special-ed-teacher-encourages-blm-thug-to-kill-white-baby/

A bevy of politicians of Turkish origin in Germany have invariably openly appeared as propagandists for Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his party the AKP. Are their careers supported by Ankara?

German newspaper Der Westen is currently reporting on the case of Eyüp Odabasi, a long-time local Green politician of the city of Bünde in North Rhine-Westphalia, who is no longer allowed to stand for the election because of his overt and obvious pro-Erdogan propaganda. The Greens had protested strongly against Odabasi’s Turkish nationalist statements.

Can Odabasi now start a second political career in Turkey as an AKP politician? Similar cases have already confirmed such a presumption.

In this context, Der Westen lists a number of Turkish politicians, mostly SPD and Green Party members, who, after their political career in Germany, were able to start a second political career in Turkey as loyal Erdogan supporters: Ozan Ceyhun, a long-time member of the European Parliament (1998-2004) for the Greens and then for the SPD, worked as an advisor to the Turkish government in Ankara. He also ran for a seat in the Turkish parliament – as a candidate of the Erdogan party, the AKP. Today he is Turkish ambassador in Vienna.

Similarly, Mustafa Erkan, former SPD member in the Lower Saxony parliament, also ran unsuccessfully for the AKP in Turkish parliamentary elections and is now an advisor to the Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Cavusoglu.

What is particularly striking here, is that all the aforementioned Turkish politicians from the left-wing liberal parties SPD and the Greens, which call themselves “progressive”, easily switch to Erdogan’s ultra-conservative Islamic AKP.

freewestmedia.com/2020/07/23/germany-turkish-politicians-as-erdogans-agents-of-influence/