The Hunter Biden laptop at the center of the political scandal had a sticker on it with the name of the Beau Biden Foundation. The sticker has been widely reported, but not its full name.

The full name of the foundation named after Joe Biden’s son and Hunter Biden’s brother is the Beau Biden Foundation for the Protection of Children. It’s both tragic and disgusting then that Rudy Giuliani has alleged that the laptop contained material involving underage girls.

It’s unclear if the Hunter Biden laptop actually belonged to the Beau Biden Foundation, but the The Mac Shop, at the center of the story, is in Wilmington, as is the Beau Biden Foundation. It’s a short drive down the 202 from the physical address of the foundation at the University of Delaware Law School to the Trolley Square address of the shop where the laptop ended up.

Earlier this year, the Beau Biden Foundation was one of the beneficiaries of grants from the Delaware COVID-19 Strategic Response Fund. The Biden foundation had received a $22,000 grant to provide “virtual training” to protect children from abuse. That is the sort of thing that the foundation, co-chaired by Hunter Biden and other Biden family members, does.

The Beau Biden Foundation for the Protection of Children claims that its mission is protecting children from child abuse, especially over the internet. It runs workshops, distributes ebooks, and offers training sessions to prevent children from being groomed by abusers online.

It’s deeply troubling then that Hunter Biden had apparently been accused of doing just that.

In one of the messages allegedly exchanged between Joe Biden and his son, the Democrat presidential candidate asks his son, “This is [redacted 14-year-old girl] right.”

“She told my therapist that I was sexually inappropriate with [redacted girl] when she says that I facetime naked with her and the reason I can’t have her out to see me is because I’ll walk around naked smoking crack talking [redacted] girls on face time,” Hunter replied.

Meanwhile the Beau Biden Foundation was offering lessons on how to spot online predators.

Some have speculated that this refers to Hallie Biden’s daughter. Hallie Biden, a fellow co-chair of the foundation, was also Beau’s widow and had been in a relationship with Hunter. If so this would have been a devastating indictment of the foundation’s leadership which was charging $3,000 for lessons on preventing online child abuse while its board members were involved in it.

“As adults, we have a legal and moral obligation to stand up and speak out for children who are being abused.These children cannot speak for themselves,” Beau Biden once allegedly said.

The quote decorates much of the Beau Biden Foundation’s material.

Perhaps Beau would have wanted someone to speak out if his daughter were endangered.

If Hunter Biden was privately being accused of creating “a very unsafe environment for the kids” and of exposing himself to an underage girl, this should have been made public to warn others, instead of concealing the information for years until the laptop with its Beau Biden Foundation sticker, featuring an angel’s wing (t-shirts with the logo are available for $20 bucks), went public.

The Beau Biden Foundation offers “youth-serving organizations” a $3,000 “Shield of Protection” program which claims to train staff how to be “Stewards of Children®”, stop grooming, as well as “Recognizing and Reporting Child Abuse.” The latter, a $500 workshop, deals with, among other things, mandatory reporting statutes. Were the allegations against Beau ever reported?

If the allegations are true, then the Beau Biden Foundation leaders needed that training.

It might have been a better investment of their time than the foundation’s annual Child Protection Classic golf game at the Wilmington Country Club for only $650 per golfer.

Playing golf doesn’t stop child abuse. Reporting child abusers and locking them up does.

A scandal affecting the Beau Biden Foundation doesn’t just stop there.

Beyond the various Biden family members, the foundation’s board also included Tony Allen, the president of Delaware State University, a former Biden speechwriter and special assistant, as well as a member of Biden’s Transition Team.

Also on the board is former FBI director Louis Freeh who had also been recruited by Hunter Biden to work on the case of a Romanian businessman convicted of fraud, while Joe Biden was pressuring the Romanian government to fight “corruption”. Biden’s former staffer had been appointed as ambassador and Beau had cut the ribbon for the new embassy.

Joshua Alcorn, the Chief Operating Officer at the Beau Biden Foundation, had been a senior adviser for Draft Biden, and had worked on Biden’s previous presidential campaign.

The Beau Biden Foundation, like everything involving the Biden family, is a snapshot of Bidenworld: the political and personal associations mixing together in inseparable ways.

And that may have made the alleged misconduct by Beau Biden impossible to police.

Beau was the “good son”. The elder son who was being groomed to carry on the Biden political clan’s fortunes. At the Democratic National Convention, after Obama had picked his father as his second, it was Beau who introduced him. A year earlier, Beau had become Delaware’s Attorney General, and held the position for 8 years.

Delaware’s legal community is littered with his associates.

When Giuliani turned over the laptop to Delaware authorities, the office of Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings quickly announced that it was passing it on to the FBI.

Jennings had worked under Beau Biden and is campaigning for Joe Biden, had posted, “I’ve known Joe, Jill, and the Biden family for most of my life.”

Patricia Lewis, the Executive Director of the Beau Biden Foundation, had been a Deputy Attorney General until she retired the same year that Beau Biden did.

Delaware is a small state and its political class is a good deal smaller. How much did the board members of the Beau Biden Foundation know about what the laptop might contain? Were any of them aware that even while the foundation was soliciting and obtaining coronavirus grant funds to protect children from online abuse, its co-chair may have been accused of abuse?

Like so many questions about the Bidens, they will neither be asked nor answered.

Meanwhile, even while a laptop from its co-chair containing alleged photos of underage girls with its sticker on it was submitted to the authorities, the Beau Biden Foundation goes on promising to protect children. But who’s going to protect the children from the Bidens?

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/10/hunter-biden-chaired-foundation-stop-child-abuse-daniel-greenfield/

This is why we have the Electoral College. And it’s why Democrats are obsessed with destroying it.

Democrat victories mean that New York City and California, or rather their wealthy elites, get to run the country. That’s why they’re literally buying the election for Joe Biden.

Take it from that notorious right-wing disinformation site… the New York Times.

Mr. Biden’s entire financial edge can be accounted for through just four states: California, New York, Massachusetts and Washington.

And within those and other blue states, Mr. Biden’s hauls are particularly concentrated in big cities and suburbs. One Upper West Side ZIP code — 10024 — accounted for more than $8 million for Mr. Biden, and New York City in total delivered $85.6 million for him — more than he raised in every state other than California.

The question is whether a small group of financial elites with their power bases in a few key states should be running the country and buying elections.

That’s one of the questions that 2020 will answer.

In ZIP codes with a median household income of at least $100,000, Mr. Biden smashed Mr. Trump in fund-raising, $486 million to only $167 million — accounting for almost his entire financial edge. In the rest of the country, the two were knotted closely together.

The Democrats pretend they’re class warriors. But they’re right. It’s just not the class they’re claiming to be.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2020/10/california-and-new-york-city-are-trying-buy-daniel-greenfield/

He’s recently forgotten what office he’s running for, but on Sunday former Vice President Joe Biden got confused again by forgetting who his opponent is.

“…What kind of country we’re gonna be,” asked Biden. “Four more years of George uh… George uh… he uh — we’re gonna find ourselves in a position where if Trump gets elected we’re going to be, we’re going to be in a different world.”

Presumably, Biden was confusing President Trump with President George W. Bush, who left office 12 years ago.

Joe Biden’s wife Jill can be seen mouthing something quietly under her breath, most likely saying Trump’s name.

President Trump mocked Biden’s mixup Monday morning. “Joe Biden called me George yesterday. Couldn’t remember my name. Got some help from the anchor to get him through the interview. The Fake News Cartel is working overtime to cover it up!” he tweeted.

Joe Biden’s campaign called a lid on in-person events Sunday morning.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2020/10/26/watch-confused-joe-biden-calls-trump-george-twice-n1088128

It suddenly became really noisy last Sunday afternoon on Lübbener Square in Neunkirchen. A group of about 25 people were shouting their protest against the current policy of French President Macron ( Defending the Mohammed cartoons). The police, who, according to their own statement, were taken by surprise by the action and were alerted at 4.21 pm, reported that the group included “people with a foreign background, including Syrians”. The group included men, women and children. The protest lasted about 20 minutes and was peaceful, the police said on request. Further actions were expected in the coming days, the group announced. In talks with the protesters, the police called for closer cooperation in the run-up to the protest.

saarbruecker-zeitung.de/saarland/neunkirchen/neunkirchen/protest-gegen-macron-in-neunkirchen_aid-54235191

If I had a nickel for every time I’ve heard a leftist pundit or Democrat shill say Hunter Biden’s laptop is “disinformation” or “not verified,” I’d be a millionaire. The reality that the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice, and the Director of National Intelligence all say there is absolutely no evidence Russia is involved in the Hunter Biden laptop scandal seems to be of no effect on these accessories after the fact to what appears to be the greatest criminal corruption scandal in the history of the United States.

Additionally, the fact that a Navy Officer veteran has not only verified many of the emails, but also said Joe Biden was personally involved in many of the transactions seems to cut no ice with the lame-stream media.

But the real key to understanding how Joe Biden is likely guilty of federal criminal bribery is carefully parsing Biden’s Oct. 22, 2020 debate statement that “I have not taken a penny from any foreign source ever in my life.” This statement is vital because while Joe Biden said that personally, he hasn’t taken “a penny from any foreign source,” if his son Hunter has taken “a penny” from foreign sources and Joe Biden knew about it, it is just as much of a crime as if Joe Biden had taken the “penny” personally.

Hunter Biden receiving money from companies and governments that specifically benefitted from Joe Biden’s official decisions as Vice President explicitly invokes the Federal criminal bribery law, specifically 18 USC Sec. 201.

Under 18 USC Sec. 201, “Bribery of public officials and witnesses,” the mere fact that Joe Biden knew that Hunter Biden, with no experience in these areas, was receiving huge sums of money from companies and entities regarding which Joe Biden was making favorable decisions would, at a minimum, be a predicate for a full scale criminal investigation, if not a likely federal bribery crime in, and of, itself.

Firstly, 18 USC Sec. 201, states in pertinent part:

“(b)Whoever—

(1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises anypublic official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—

(A) to influence any official act; or

(B) to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

(C) to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person;

(2)being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:

(A) being influenced in the performance of any official act;

(B) being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

(C) being induced to do or omit to do any act in violation of the official duty of such official or person;”

Section “1” covers the “briber” crime and section “2” covers the “brib-ee” or elected “public official’s” crime. The key to understanding how Hunter Biden’s receiving bribes for Vice President Joe Biden’s official actions is a crime is focusing on the language at the tail of sub paragraphs “(1)” and “(2).” The key language in sub-paragraph 1 says it’s a crime if the briber gives or offers to “give anything of value to any other person or entity,” It is irrelevant for this federal criminal bribery statute whetherJoe Biden personally didn’t receive a penny.”

The question is “Did Hunter Biden receive millions for Joe Biden’s favorable official decisions.”

Similarly, sub-paragraph 2, or the “brib-ee” “public official” part explicitly states that being a “public official” or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:” The key phrase: “to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity,.” Again, Hunter Biden is “any other person or entity.” And, Hunter’s receiving bribe money is every bit as much of a crime as if Joe Biden received the money personally.

Hence, Biden’s debate-night carefully parsed statement that “I have not taken a penny from any foreign source ever in my life.” looks suspect when viewed through the lens of 18 USC Sec 201 where it is every bit as much of a direct crime if Hunter took foreign source or any source money in return for a favorable official act by Vice President Joe Biden.

It is beyond any doubt that Hunter Biden received huge sums of money from the Ukrainian Burisma and others solely because Hunter was the Vice President’s son.

It is also clear that Joe Biden knew the only reason these companies, (specifically Burisma when Joe was Vice President) were giving Joe Biden huge sums of money was because Hunter was Joe’s Biden’s son.

Did Joe Biden expect these companies to give his son millions of dollars with nothing for Joe Biden to do in return? Of, course not.

Joe Biden’s actions with respect to directly protecting Burisma by demanding the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor who was criminally investigating Burisma is, at a minimum, a red flag predicate act to start a major criminal investigation of Joe Biden, if not prima facie explicit evidence of gross bribery.

But tragically, the failure of the relevant US government agencies to properly investigate Joe Biden’s suspicious acts, and either clear him or indict him, has allowed a possibly suspect person to be a candidate for the office of the next president of the United States.

The American government agencies’ failure to properly investigate Joe Biden is, perhaps, an even greater crime than the one Joe Biden may have committed. Joe Biden may be personally corrupt, but the American government investigative agencies’ failure to even investigate Biden’s Burisma actions proves conclusively that these branches of the American government itself are hopelessly corrupt.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/289878