After Governor Newsom’s French Laundry party helped kickstart a recall against him, you would think that other Democrats would learn. These past few weeks have outed much of California’s lockdown elite. Past incidents exposed the hypocrisy of Governor Whitmer in Michigan, Governor Murphy in New Jersey and, of course, Governor Cuomo in New York.
The governor of Rhode Island is facing backlash this week after she was photographed at a wine and paint night just days after she had discouraged inessential activities to curb the spread of the coronavirus.
The picture, taken by Erica Oliveras last Friday, shows Democratic Gov. Gina Raimondo sitting at table in Barnaby’s Public House in Providence without a mask, WLNE reported.
Come on, Wine and Paint is very essential when you’re a hard-working, but hypocritical, despot.
“It’s week two of our pause. I know it’s been hard, but I want to thank every Rhode Islander who’s following our guidance. Please, stay home except for essential activities & wear a mask anytime you’re with people you don’t live with. Together, we can turn our case numbers around,” Raimondo had tweeted.
Together. I don’t think she knows what that word means. Nor do any of the other Democrat apparatchiks who keep deploying it.
Writing on social media, Rhode Island’s first female governor thanked people for their well-wishes after concerns she had caught Covid-19.
She said: ‘Thank you to everyone who has reached out and offered well-wishes. I tested negative again today.
‘I am fortunate to be feeling great and will continue working from home during my self-quarantine.’
The governor faced backlash after drinking inside a Providence bar without wearing a face mask the day before.
But remember, you can’t gather together with family members for Christmas or Chanukah.
When the third week of the “pause” lifts on Dec. 21, Raimondo said, it will do so only partially. Specifically:
◘Social gatherings involving people from different households will remain prohibited.
◘Houses of worship will remain limited to 25% capacity or a maximum of 125 people.
◘Bar areas will remain closed.
Unless they’re really essential forms of wine and paint.
Ministre macédonien de la Santé a fait semblant de vacciner sa nièce avec #MMR#vaccine mais a été forcé de reconnaître que le coup était faux quand on s'est rendu compte que le bébé sur la photo était clairement trop jeune et que l'aiguille avait toujours son capuchon de sécurité https://t.co/XN88kXDh3W
Every one of us who voted for Trump believes that the only reason Biden appeared to walk away with more votes was because of massive election fraud. On Tuesday, during her morning show, Maria Bartiromo dropped what must be, in this crazy year, the mother of all bombshells. According to Bartiromo, an intel source told her that Trump won the election. It’s now up to the Supreme Court, said the source, to stop the clock from running so that the proper election result can be implemented, returning Trump to the White House.
Americans are used to losing elections. In a two-party system, after all, one side always loses. Traditionally, the losing party licks its wounds and works to do better next time.
That changed in 2016 when Democrats refused to accept that Trump had won the election. Without any vote fraud or manipulation, they ginned up a Russia collusion hoax that was long on paranoia and short on facts that showed how Russia got Americans to vote for Trump. The whole thing fell apart with the Mueller Report’s reluctant admission that there was no collusion.
In 2020, things are different: There are dozens of proofs that Democrats gamed the election.
Some of what they did was just dirty politics. For example, they used the Wuhan Flu to destroy Trump’s crown jewel: The American economy. That wasn’t fraud; it was just evil because it meant destroying the livelihoods, savings, hopes, and dreams of millions of Americans.
Democrats also relentlessly castigated Trump as a singularly evil man, right up there with Hitler. Credulous people believed this.
Democrats also accelerated their years’ long efforts to destroy election integrity. In the past, they jettisoned voter ID, implemented motor-voter registration, resisted cleaning old voter rolls, made it easier for illegal aliens to vote, and authorized ballot harvesting.
The Wu Flu allowed them to go to town with universal absentee ballots, mail-in voting, and the abolition of ballot deadlines. Indeed, some states got so excited, they forgot to have the legislature sign off on these changes, making invalid all votes that came in via these illegitimate means.
And don’t let anyone fob you off by claiming that it’s not fair to Biden voters suddenly to invalidate their votes just because their Democrat (or Georgia RINO) governments cheated. How about the counter-argument, which is that it’s not fair to Trump voters to invalidate their votes because the Biden voters’ supported cheating politicians?
Big tech and the media helped. Big tech flooded Democrat zones with money and systematically silenced conservatives, right up to Donald Trump himself. Most nefariously, tech and the media blacked out all news about Hunter Biden’s and Joe Biden’s corrupt entanglement with China.
There was also old-fashioned cheating: Phony ballots, dead voters, endlessly re-counted ballots, and voting machines that were intentionally set to alter votes. Multiple analyses revealed that, even if one accepted that the majority of the mail-in ballots counted after the physical polls closed were for Biden, those ballots still were insufficient to elect him. Bizarre spikes, fake shutdowns of counting, and mathematically impossible increases in vote counts all pointed to Venezuelan voting machines doing for Trump what they’d done for Chavez and Madura.
Evidence other than the polls also predicted with virtually 100% certainty that Trump would win. Trump massively increased his support with minorities, while Biden lost black support in the Rust Belt, Trump won the all-important cookie votes, Trump had extraordinarily long coattails while Biden had none, and Trump’s voter enthusiasm was through the roof.
Another giveaway was that Democrats only pretended to campaign. Biden hid in the basement and wouldn’t talk to the media – and Kamala hid too. They knew the fix was in, so why bother? Fox News gave the game away when it insisted that Arizona was a Biden state long before there was sufficient data to make that call.
Despite this evidence, the courts have been craven. While leftists crow that Trump and his allies keep losing in court, Trump supporters have noticed that the courts have consistently refused to look at the evidence. So far, the Supreme Court has been just as bad.
And that gets us to Maria Bartiromo’s Tuesday morning bombshell. According to Bartiromo, an intel source reports that the Supreme Court is the only thing that can stop the fraud:
Maria Bartiromo: “An intel source told me President Trump did, in fact, win the election. He says that it is up to the Supreme Court to hear suits from other cases across the country to stop the clock. This follows the high court’s refusal to hear the lawsuit from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.”
Trump’s been remarkably quiet. Maybe this is what he’s been waiting for.
Let me summarise: Asylum seeker steals expensive designer jeans. He even wears one of the stolen jeans quite brazenly when he comes into the shop again. The shop owner runs after him and confronts him. Mohammed A. (24) is on the verge of tears. He allegedly had been drugged. He said he couldn’t breathe. (Does this sentence sound familiar to anyone?!). In his defence, he says he didn’t have had the money for the expensive jeans. (I don’t have money for expensive designer jeans either). Conclusion: The shop owner has to pay him 2,000 euros for pain and suffering.
Banana Republic of Germany
By the way, anyone who suffers damage at the hands of an asylum seeker in Germany has to pay the damages. It doesn’t matter whether it’s vandalism to cars, as often happens, or stolen trousers (if damaged). Since those men are usually without financial means, the damage is not compensated.
Because he pushed his pregnant wife into the track bed in Pirna and kidnapped her children in order to force the wife to have an abortion, Wais S. (25) is sentenced to prison. The Pirna District Court sentenced the Syrian to 14 months in prison.
As reported, in August Wais had an argument at Pirna suburban train station with Iman A. (28), to whom he was married according to Islamic law.
He wanted her to abort their baby. Because she refused, Wais pushed Iman into the track bed, grabbed the children and disappeared with them.
“I was not to see them again until I had an abortion,” said the child’s mother in court, who separated from Wais.
After many phone calls to his family, Wais did bring the children back hours later, but threatened Iman with a knife and even threatened to kill them all the next day.
The accused remained silent about all the accusations.
A serious fire would have broken out, several flats in a 19-apartment building in Wiesloch would have burned down, and their residents would have been in danger from toxic fumes. What the perpetrator did not know, however, when he attempted arson was that diesel fuel, which he had used, is not flammable at room temperature, unlike normal petrol – and so worse could be prevented. Due to his paranoid schizophrenia, the Heidelberg Regional Court declared the 37-year-old accused to be incapable of contracting guilt; he was suffering from a highly acute psychosis.Yesterday, Wednesday, the presiding judge Markus Krumme passed the sentence: In his current condition, the accused was “a considerable danger to the general public”. Therefore, the criminal division followed the prosecution’s demand and ordered the accused to be placed in a psychiatric hospital.In January of this year the schizophrenia started again according to the judgment by the court.This had also been proven by changes in his behaviour, as several neighbours of the 37-year-old had reported. For example, the accused lived out the Islam to which he had converted years before, “without caring about third parties”. He listened to loud music in the evenings and at night, harassed a female tenant so massively that she was forced to move out, lost his job and then appeared on the premises of the North Baden Psychiatric Centre wearing a mask and carrying a stick. “This suggests the existence of a highly active psychosis,” the judge said. In addition, the 37-year-old is said to have reduced contact with his parents during the same period, to have met friends with offensive hostility and to have undertaken a haphazard journey eastwards, finally ending up in London.The psychosis finally culminated in two incidents: In mid-May, the accused observed a woman discussing with a man in Wiesloch. Because he recognised the woman as a former neighbour, the 37-year-old also took part in the discussion – without knowing what it was about. “He got into such a rage that he hit the man in the face with his fist,” Judge Krumme stated. The man defended himself with pepper spray, but that did not stop the accused: according to the judge, he kicked the man, who was lying on the ground in the meantime, several times. “This is not a normal psychological reaction,” said the judge.”But even after this incident, things continued, the accused was now mainly busying himself with arson,” Krumme reported: After the 37-year-old had burnt several books on his balcony in mid-June, causing a shooting flame, he bought a five-litre canister a few days later. He filled it with diesel, poured out the fuel in the cellar and tried to start a fire with a lit piece of paper, the judge added. “The motive remains unclear, the accused did not want to comment on it.” According to Krumme, however, the court is certain: “Without the pathological psychosis, these deeds would not have occurred. The prerequisite for psychiatric placement is undoubtedly present.”
The authorities of the Federal Republic of Germany are able to provide information on the extent of real estate owned by the right-wing extremist scene as well as by the left-wing extremist scene. However, when it comes to properties owned and/or used by Islamists, the Federal Government seems to find the investigation too time-consuming. After all, it certainly won’t be because the question was asked by the AfD parliamentary group in the Bundestag, will it? Bundestag.de reports:
“A small question of the AfD parliamentary group (19/25058) deals with real estate of the Islamist community. Among other things, it asks how the Federal Government justifies the fact that ‘it is not possible to identify the properties used by Islamists in Germany, because this would involve an unreasonable or disproportionate amount of work of approximately 2,300 hours due to the Islamist potential of 28,020 persons’. However, at the same time, it was possible to determine the properties used by left-wing and right-wing extremists, although in 2019 the potential number of left-wing extremists was 33,500 and the potential number of right-wing extremists was 32,080, thus exceeding the potential number of Islamists.