19-year-old Jana D. was found stabbed to death in her car in Lüneburg four days ago. ” Police already have a suspect” (quote from the newspaper “Hannoversche Allgemeine Zeitung”).

For days, media like the “HAZ”, the “Lüneburger Landeszeitung” (“LZ”), the “Hamburger Abendblatt” and also the “NDR” have hardly published any details about the perpetrator. Although police and media seem to know that the knifeman is a rejected asylum seeker. Scandalous: The mayor of Lüneburg plays down the cruel crime.

The newspaper “LZ” reported that the alleged murder weapon had been found near the crime scene and that an “acquaintance” of Jana D. was considered a suspect. Other media reported that the murderer was the victim’s “friend”.

The “LZ” reported that the father of the 19-year-old discovered the body of his own daughter early in the morning, around 3 am. In a car park in the Lüneburg district of Schützenplatz – in a car used by the daughter. According to the police, the victim had “several injuries” which presumably led to her death.The father was searching for his daughter, previously he had waited for her in vain at home. According to media reports, the victim was working in a restaurant in Lüneburg offering out-of-home sales the evening before the crime.

On January the 20th, the tabloid “Bild-Zeitung” did not give any more details about the knifeman either. It only said: “The public prosecutor’s office did not want to give further information about the (professional) background of the accused for reasons of personal protection.”

On 21 January, “Bild” published during the day – as the only medium – more details about the perpetrator. The daily newspaper reported that as late as last month Jana D. and her later murderer by the name of “Fares A.” had celebrated Christmas together. “Bild” even presented a – pixelated – photo of the unequal couple kissing.

It was also informed that the perpetrator, who apparently lives with his parents, was an asylum seeker whose application for asylum had been rejected long before the crime and who should have been deported long ago.

The knifeman – like millions of other “immigrants” whose asylum applications have been officially rejected – was simply “tolerated” here. Certainly with all the usual social benefits available all the time. This common mistake by the responsible authorities has now cost this young woman her life.

In later versions of the “Bild” report, however, all references to the “refugee” status of the knifeman have been deleted.

Obviously, the editor in charge has been asked not to publish the report any more. If at all possible, no unpleasant facts about Angela Merkel’s “refugee” policy should be made public. The “Bild” newspaper, too, is obviously supposed to surrender to mendacious political correctness (PC).The mayor of Lüneburg, Ulrich Mädge ( Social Democratic Party), reacted disgracefully to the horrific crime. According to the newspaper Heilbronner Zeitung, he played down the knife murder using words that must seem like blatant mockery to the parents of the murdered: “We all know that where people live together, the worst things can always happen, even in the neighbourhood – but the knowledge is one thing. When it actually happens, you can hardly believe it.”

If the victim had been a “Muslim woman” and the murderer a “German of origin”, all newspapers throughout Germany would certainly have published all available social data on the victim and the killer.

But if it was a violent criminal “refugee”, suddenly there is a complete silence from the newspapers when it comes to informing the population at least approximately about the background of the respective crime.

This kind of comprehensive, manipulative reporting takes place in this country every day, even though there should be “freedom of the press” in Germany.

http://www.pi-news.net/2021/01/lueneburg-19-jaehrige-jana-d-bestialisch-von-fluechtling-ermordet/

Donald Trump’s Twitter (88 million followers), Facebook (35 million) and Instagram accounts were shut down for “incitement”. Snapchat, TikTok, Twitch, Microsoft, Youtube and Reddit have done the same. It is the first time that a head of state has seen his freedom of expression suppressed in this way.Trump has gone, Islamists stay on to use these social networks to preach their Jihad.

French essayist and analyst Alexandre del Valle points out in Valeurs Actuelles’ weekly that social media, so quick with Trump, turn a blind eye on Islamic regimes. Like the accounts of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (17.3 million on Twitter, 10 million on Facebook), “who insulted Emmanuel Macron, who threatened EU countries (Austria, France, Greece, Cyprus), who denies the Armenian genocide, who massacred the Kurds in Syria, who tried to seize water and gas from Greece and Northern Cyprus, who supported the jihadists of Syria and Libya and who sent them to massacre Armenians in Karabakh…. He has never been suspended from social networks”.

Take former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir bin Mohamad, who has 4 million followers on Facebook and 1.3 million on Twitter. On October 29, on Twitter, after the beheading of Samuel Paty, Mahathir wrote that “Muslims have the right to kill millions of French” … The tweet has been removed, the account is still there.

Like that of the Chechen dictator Ramzan Kadyrov (400,000 on Facebook) or Ayatollah Khamenei, who on Twitter called for the elimination of Israel.

Among the 200 accounts in the world with the largest number of followers are those of many Salafist preachers or from the Muslim Brotherhood:

-Mohamed al-Arifi (21.4 million followers on Twitter; 25 million on Facebook, first Saudi account, first religious account in the world and 86th in the world) which justifies the right to beat one’s wife;

-Ayid al-Qarni (19 million Twitter followers) who fights Western values;

-Ahmad Al Shugairi (18 million), who advocates hatred for “unbelievers”;

-Salman al-Ouda (14.2 million), up to the most famous of the Muslim Brotherhood preachers, Youssef Al Qardaoui (642,362 on Facebook), never banned from social media while calling for killing of apostates, Jews, adulterers and who has justified suicide attacks …

-Or Hani Ramadan, brother of Tariq, still on Twitter but who supports the stoning and was expelled from France.

-Or like Tareq al-Suwaidan, a preacher banished from Belgium, the United States and Italy for his ideas, who continues to chirp to his 10 million followers.

Call it digital multiculturalism. With your laws we will conquer you and with our laws we will dominate you. …

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/295472

The notorious Gang of Guardians of Public Morals of devoutly Muslim Chechens is not likely to shy away from brutal extortion for protection money. For example, a father of two in Vienna was threatened to have his sons beheaded – police protection for the family and the handcuffing of four young suspects were the result!

The Caucasus gang – among them mostly recognised or tolerated war refugees – had already made the headlines several times in the federal capital and Linz. Compatriots’ wives always had to wear headscarves. And if they appeared too “western” or if their values did not correspond (photos in swimwear or meetings with non-Chechen men were sufficient), the victims, but also their families, were severely threatened and persecuted.

The guardians of public morals kept “files” on hundreds of women in secret chat logs. Beatings were also recorded on mobile phones. Finally, last summer, the investigators caught more than ten suspects.

Now, blackmail has apparently been added to the list of crimes including arms dealing, deprivation of liberty, grievous bodily harm, car theft and burglary. Four young Chechens aged 21 to 25, who are apparently part of the large group, are said to have put a father in Vienna in mortal fear via WhatsApp.

They knew where to find him, where he was employed, where his family lived and where his two children went to school. If he did not pay 5,000 euros, they would “take the head off your sons”, according to the grim message in poor German.

The blackmailers were also cheeky enough to pretend to be protectors (“solve the problem”) and demand money again. While the threatened family was under police protection, the gang was arrested by the police.

https://www.krone.at/2325595?fbclid=IwAR1pVpy_Wex18F9CGNBA-Z8WwCI_twOi0P-hc_JyNERIiT_iEHPhlTv7LDo

Mette Frederiksen, Prime Minister of Denmark and Leader of the Social Democrats wants to stop asylum requests in her country, which has already dropped to more than ten times fewer than in 2015.

On Friday the Danish leader said no future asylum applications lodged in Denmark was her declared ambition, maintaining the course of a very restrictive reception policy at a time when the country has received the lowest number of applications since 1998, according to Swiss daily La Tribune de Genève.

The small Nordic country of 5,8 million inhabitants has been discouraging migrants from coming for a while now. “We have to make sure that few people come to our country, otherwise our social cohesion cannot prevail,” explained Frederiksen.

‘We cannot promise zero asylum seekers, but we can explain our vision well,” Frederiksen said during a question-and-answer session in parliament.

In 2020, some 1 547 migrants applied for asylum in Denmark, the lowest figure since 1998, which is mainly explained by the health crisis linked to the pandemic of the new Coronavirus.

This is more than ten times less than in 2015, in the heart of the migrant crisis, where some 21 300 people applied – almost eight times less than in neighboring Sweden.

In 2017, then at the head of the Social Democrats, she presented a plan to send “non-Western” migrants back to African camps, to holding facilities for migrants.

In September, Copenhagen appointed a migration ambassador to speed up the creation of one or more migrant camps outside the European Union as part of the new European asylum system, which it has been advocating.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/01/24/danish-pm-expresses-wish-to-stop-all-asylum-requests/

The silence of German Foreign Minister Haiko Maas showed in the joint press conference with his Turkish counterpart when the latter made new provocative statements against Greece shows that Turkey seems to be attempting to coddle up to Berlin.

Berlin’s stance on a number of issues concerning Greek-Turkish raises questions.

An article by the Süddeutsche Zeitung that occasionally echoes Berlin’s positions is critical of the extension of Greek territorial waters in the Ionian Sea to 12 nautical miles.

Among other things, the article said that the move violates previous agreements and that it could “further anger Turkey.”

This fact, in combination with the silence of the German Foreign Minister in front of his Turkish counterpart Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu, raises the question of whether Germany disputes Greek sovereign rights.

The Greek Foreign Minister, responding – through his representative – to a question by Sputnik Hellas on the issue, stated that Germany has not expressed reservations regarding the expansion of territorial waters in the Ionian Sea.

“In any case, the inalienable sovereign right of our country on the basis of international law remains. Germany has done the same with its own waters, so it would be particularly impressive if it expressed any reaction or dissatisfaction,” said the represenative.

Why did Maas not react to Çavuşoğlu’s statements

For his part, the Turkish Foreign Minister made “incendiary” statements against Greece, to which Maas did not react, although he was on the same panel with him:

“Unfortunately, Greece continues its provocations, takes steps that violate the demilitarization regime of the islands, constantly conducts military exercises, NAVTEX announces without doing anything there,”  Çavuşoğlu said.

“We also saw the statements of the Archbishop. We know the purpose of these moves,” he continued.

“They want to provoke Turkey, to take similar steps, and they will say to Europe, ‘Look, Turkey is continuing its negative steps,’ and they will ask for sanctions,” Çavuşoğlu added.

One of the reasons for Maas’ inaction is that his country is practically afraid of Turkey, said Costas Yfantis, a professor of International Relations at Panteion University.

“Germany still keeps a low profile in Greek-Turkish issues, and especially towards Turkey. This is on the one hand, because the Germans do not know how to react to Turkey and are afraid of their reactions,” the professor explained.

“On the other hand, Germany wants to maintain a channel of communication with the Turks because of their developed economic relations,” Yfantis added.

It is noted that Turkey and Germany have strong economic ties, while about 4 million Turks now live in the European country. Some of them are descendants of the first Turkish immigrants of previous decades while others are German citizens.

https://greekcitytimes.com/2021/01/23/why-is-germany-folding-turkey/?fbclid=IwAR29ZE49KyANvEi5P9SbPOiNHsdSMe37f_MwWnyw7Yd3H9rMZ-VvWIe98WQ

The car park in front of the mosque starts to get crowded, little by little the mosque-goers from the city and the surrounding area arrive. Up to 200 Muslims can gather for Friday prayers in Röthenbach – it is probably the biggest event in the Nuremberg region since the beginning of the second lockdown. Week after week.The Turkish-Islamic community in Röthenbach has long been aware that the number of visitors is noticeable in times of pandemic. Recently, there have been many enquiries in the neighbourhood about how it is possible that so many people meet despite all the distance and contact rules. Mayor Klaus Hacker (Free Voters) was also questioned about this. “There are certain fears and anxieties among the population,” he says. That up to 200 people are praying together, “that’s quite a figure”.By comparison, the county council with its 70 members last decided to meet as a committee of only 14 members for a period of six weeks to avoid large crowds. At Christmas, many church services in the district were cancelled. According to the Protestant congregation, the Holy Cross Church towering over Röthenbach could “only” accommodate up to 70 worshippers in accordance with the hygiene regulations in force. Currently, however, the services are held in the parish hall, where there is much less space. The smaller mosque in Lauf currently allows 60 people in.

https://www.nordbayern.de/region/lauf/kein-corona-verstoss-bis-zu-200-muslime-in-rothenbacher-moschee-1.10770552

Countries in the EU are theoretically bound to the neutrality obligation in its use of tax revenues: The taxpayer’s money must not be used for political purposes. But just as the German government wants to spend 1 billion euros in the next four years on the so-called “fight against the right”, the EU is funding a network of “civil society” NGOs that represent clearly left-wing politics, actively combatting conservative politicians and their parties – Matteo Salvini and Viktor Orban are but two examples.

“In view of the current economic plight of many citizens in Germany and the EU, every taxpayer must be appalled that the EU is spending all our money on so-called ‘civil society’ NGOs that promote illegal migration and ‘no borders’ and undermine conservative EU governments want,” said the rapporteur for the budget of the Commission for the year 2019 Joachim Kuhs from the Identity and Democracy Group in the European Parliament. “This is infidelity and must be stopped immediately.”

The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), the pioneer of these “civil society” NGOs in Europe, received €29 930 from the EU in 2019 for a project on “European sovereignty”. ECFR is one of the most important lobbyists in Brussels and has a great influence on EU politics. So the EU pays ECFR to lobby the EU.

At the same time, however, the EU intervenes in the “sovereignty” of member states such as Hungary and Poland through NGOs such as the ECFR. In order to create transparency about the influence of foreign NGOs in Hungary, the Hungarian parliament passed a law based on the Israeli model in 2017, according to which NGOs have to disclose their funding. This transparency law was found to be “discriminatory” in 2020 by the European Court of Justice . The Hungarian government wants however to continue to insist on transparency in the financing of NGOs.

The command center of the left-wing human rights organizations in Hungary is the “Hungarian Civil Liberties Union” (HCLU), which in 2019 received €17 847 from the EU for “voter motivation campaigns” according to the EU financial transparency portal. The HCLU received $50 000 from the Open Society Foundation in 2018 and $365 500 in 2016.

The HCLU, along with other NGOs, belongs to the “Civil Liberties Union for Europe” (LibertiesEU) based in Berlin, which was funded by the Open Society in 2017 to the tune of $2 550 000. According to the Jerusalem Post on March 15, 2018, the head of LibertiesEU Balázs Dénes boasted:

“We are very strong. This week I am meeting with a think tank, a lobby group that has influence on the German government and the German Foreign Ministry, and I bring them copies of the law (the NGO Transparency Act) that have been translated from Hungarian and will explain to them what they can do against it.”

The members of LibertiesEU also enjoyed generous funding from the EU in 2019: the Civil Rights Defenders (Sweden) received €81 363, Center for Peace Studies (Croatia) €267 392, Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (Finland) €38 118, Nederlands Juristen Comite voor de Mensenrechte €96 617, Irish Council for Civil Liberties €56 928, Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights(Poland) €38 118, Estonian Human Rights Center €129 691, Lithuanian Center for Human Rights €157 493, and the Mirovni Institute Slovenia €281 797.

From Italy, the NGOs Associazione Antigone received €172 832 and Coalizione Italiana per le Liberta e Diritii e Civili  (CILD) €88 379. The Italian Coalition for Freedom and Human Rights CILD, founded in 2014, is a large network of NGOs that campaign for illegal immigration and complain against the Italian government when it tries to protect its borders.

These include the Lawfare NGOs Associazione per gli Studi Giuridici sull’Immigrazione (ASGI) and A Buon Diritto, which, among other things, took legal action before the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) tried to deprive Italy of the right to reject illegal immigrants at the border. Since then, border protection has been referred to in the mainstream press in Europe as “illegal pushbacks”, even though the protection of external borders is part and prerequisite of the Schengen Agreement.

The European Center for Law & Justice (ECLJ) documented in February 2020 that 22 of the 100 judges at the ECHR were former employees of Open SocietyNGOs. The CILD network also includes the left-wing community network Associazione Ricreativa e Culturale Italiana (ARCI), which is  currently trying to bring the former Italian interior minister Matteo Salvini to trial for alleged “deprivation of liberty”. ARCI and its sub-organizations received €967 298 from the EU in 2019.

The Italian NGO network, which is suing Italy and Salvini for wanting to impose their “No Borders” policy, is also funded by the Open Society: ASGI received in 2018  according to their website  $385 715, CILD received $2 016 575 000 and ARCI received large amounts from 2016 to 2018 from Open Society.

In 2019, at least €25 243 412 went to NGOs that were directly linked to the Open Society Foundation. These so-called “human rights groups” finance projects to “mobilize voters” against unwelcome conservative governments, against “propaganda and hate speech in the Balkans” or for “no borders” lawfare and the rights of illegal migrants.

“I am not aware of the EU financing conservative or pro-Israel human rights groups, for example against anti-fascist terror and violence against conservative politicians and parties, against state censorship on the Internet and the suppression of alternative media, for politically persecuted critics of Islam, for border protection and against illegal migration, or against Islamization and Islamist violence against women, gays, Christians and Jews,” said Joachim Kuhs. “The EU has to behave politically neutral, and not to abuse the tax millions of the citizens for left-wing NGOs.”

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/01/23/the-eu-provides-funding-to-undermine-political-foes/

“Unlike you, Colonel, and so many others, Mila will never submit”, wrote the French teenager’s father to her school’s principal in a letter published by Le Point. On January 18, 2020 Mila O., then 16 years old, made insulting comments about Islam during her Instagram livestream.

“During her livestream, a Muslim boy asked her out in the comments, but she turned him down because she is gay. He responded by accusing her of racism and calling her a ‘dirty lesbian’. In an angry follow-up video, streamed immediately after she was insulted, Mila responded by saying that she ‘hates religion'”.

Mila continued: “The Koran is a religion of hatred; there is only hatred in it… Islam is sh*t…” Since then, she has received approximately 50,000 messages and letters that contain threats to rape her, slit her throat, torture and behead her. She has had to keep moving from one school to another.

Once again, Mila has found herself without a high school. On a social network, she accidentally gave the name of her new military school. Its management promptly excluded her for being a potential threat to the students’ security. “Devastated by so much cowardice”, Mila’s father wrote. “Even the army cannot protect her and allow her to continue her education, what can we do, us, her parents? This observation is for us a horror film”.

Even the French army cannot protect her? “She is 17 years old and now lives like the staff of Charlie Hebdo, in a bunker; it is unbearable!” Mila’s lawyer, Richard Malka, said.

A few days later, “Caroline L.”, a professor at the Faculty of Law of Aix-Marseille University, received countless death threats, accusing her of being “Islamophobic”. The Aix-en-Provence prosecutor opened an investigation for “public insults for belonging to religion”. Her “crime”? The professor had explained to her students there:

“There is no freedom of conscience in Islam. If you were born to a Muslim father, you are a Muslim for life. A kind of sexually transmitted religion. One of the biggest problems we have with Islam, and unfortunately it is not the only one, is that Islam does not recognize freedom of conscience. It is absolutely terrifying”.

The Pierre Joël Bonté High School in Riom (Puy-de-Dôme) was closed on January 11 due to “insults and death threats” targeting teachers. “We have decided to close the school following insults and death threats to protect students and staff”, a spokesperson of the school explained. A few hours later, a teacher in Toulouse, Fatiha Boudjahlat, asked for police protection after receiving significant threats.

In 2015, Islamic State announced that French schools must be attacked and invited its followers to “kill the teachers“. According to Gilles Kepel, an expert on Islamism, “The school, for the supporters of political Islam, has become a citadel to tear down.”

An article in L’Express tragically points out that schools are the object of violent campaigns by Islamists throughout the world. In 2014, a military school in Peshawar, Pakistan was targeted by a deadly Islamist attack that claimed the lives of 132 students. The Pakistani Taliban movement, between 2009 and 2012, attacked 900 schools according to a report by the NGO International Crisis Group. Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Malala Yousafzai, known for her fight for girls’ education, was shot in the head by the Taliban in Swat. Boko Haram, responsible for numerous attacks in Nigeria, claimed it had kidnapped 276 high school girls in Chibok. In an attack by Islamists affiliated with al-Qaeda on Kenya’s Garissa University, 142 students were killed. In Burkina Faso, more than 2,000 schools have closed their doors.

In France, a low-intensity war is bubbling, aimed at radicalizing education. While many Muslims might not support such a transformation, the current effort seems to have begun in 1989, during the bicentenary of the French Revolution and the French publication of Salman Rushdie’s fictional novel, The Satanic Verses. A college in Creil refused admission to three students wearing the Islamic veil. French authorities tried by dialogue and appeasement to calm the situation. In an appeal, however, published by Le Nouvel Observateur and signed by authors Alain Finkielkraut and Elisabeth Badinter, several intellectuals denounced the “Munich of the republican school”.

The Islamization of French education is now proceeding at a rapid pace. In 1989, the cry was, “Teachers, let us not capitulate!”. Since then, some French teachers who have refused to capitulate have paid with their lives.

In October 2020, a French history teacher, Samuel Paty, was beheaded by a Chechen terrorist for having carried out his work: educating his students to respect the founding values ​​of Western societies and the words mounted over the doors of their school (Liberté, égalité, fraternité), for discussing freedom of speech and showing them Charlie Hebdo‘s cartoons of Mohammed.

“Living together is a fable,” Alain Finkielkraut wrote after Paty’s beheading; “the lost territories of the Republic are the territories conquered by hatred of France. Eyes have opened, the evidence can no longer be hidden”.

French Minister of Education Jean Michel Blanquer revealed that after the beheading of Paty, 800 Islamist “incidents” had taken place in French schools.

Another teacher was physically threatened at the Battières School in Lyon, where Samuel Paty had started his career. This teacher of history and geography had given a lesson on freedom of expression, in accordance with the school curricula, to a fifth-grade class. He stated, among other things, that Emmanuel Macron was not “Islamophobic”. The father of a student came to see the teacher, challenging him verbally in front of witnesses. “He was vocal and very intrusive about what he said was and was not allowed to say in his classes”, a witness said. Shocked, the teacher was put on sick leave and asked to change schools.

At a high school in Caluire-et-Cuire, near Lyon, a student threatened a teacher to “cut off his head”. In Gisors, a girl distributed a photo of Paty’s beheading to her companions. In Albertville, Savoy, the police had to summon four ten-year-old children and their parents because in the classroom they said “that teacher deserved to die”. In Grenoble, an extremist Muslim was arrested for threatening to behead a teacher of history and geography named Laurent who appears on a reality TV show. “I will behead you” he said . Laurent was evidently preparing a video tribute to Paty. At the Pierre Mendès France School in Saumur, a student told his teacher, “My father will behead you”.

It has become impossible even to make a precise list of these incidents. They occur every day in France.

A new survey reveals the level of self-censorship among French teachers. To avoid possible incidents, one out of every two teachers is admitting to self-censoring in class. By means of fear, terror and intimidation, Islamism is reaping what it has sown.

How We Let Islamism Enter the School is the title of Jean-Pierre Obin’s new bookabout the rise of Islamism in French schools. Obin, a former inspector-general of national education, in 2004 coordinated a report on manifestations of religious affiliation at schools. It was not the first report from a French education insider. Bernard Ravet was, for 15 years, the principal of three of the most problematic schools in Marseille. In his book, College Principal or Imam of the Republic?, Ravet wrote:

“For more than ten years, fanaticism has been knocking on the door of dozens of establishments…. It has sought to encroach on the physical territory of the Republic, centimeter by centimeter, by imposing its signs and standards”,

French philosopher Robert Redeker wrote in 2006:

“Islam tries to impose its rules on Europe, opening swimming pools at certain times exclusively for women, a ban on caricaturing this religion, the demand for special dietary treatment of Muslim children, the fight for the wearing the veil at school, the accusation of Islamophobia against free spirits.”

His column in Le Figaro was titled, “Faced with Islamist intimidation, what should the free world do?” A few days later, Redeker began receiving death threats. “I can’t work and I am obliged to hide”, Redeker said. “So in some way, Islamists have succeeded in punishing me on the territory of the republic as if I were guilty of a crime of opinion”.

We should have paid more attention to that first case. It was the first in a long series of attacks on French teachers and schools. Fourteen years later, Samuel Paty has paid with his life, a university professor just received security protection and another had to leave his school after threats. If extremists have managed to intimidate France’s schools and universities, why should they not be able to subdue all of society?

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16972/france-schools-religion