Author Archives: medforth
Boris Could OVERRIDE EU Deal
Contact and distance violations that no one in Germany cares about: 500 praying Muslims in Düren mosque despite Corona
While the German chancellor had the cheek to indirectly blame the Germans for the Corona state of emergency last night on public broadcaster ARD (by emphasising that they themselves had the power to reduce the number of infections by following the rules), one community in particular is persistently not complying with the measures: Muslim parallel societies, whose growth since 2015 has been almost one of Merkel’s greatest intentions as now the lockdown barracking of her own population.Most ethnic Germans have been slavishly following the rules for months. They dutifully denounce each other, snap at each other in everyday life if their masks are not in place or if they don’t keep their distance, report suspicious gatherings of vehicles in front of houses and wear their masks all by themselves in the middle of nowhere. So one wonders where the many ignoramuses and rule-breakers are who are supposedly to blame for the fact that the “incidence figures” are not falling.After, what a miracle, practically all the much-maligned “wedding celebrations” of the last few months turned out to be celebrated by the Turkish, Kurdish or Arab milieu, just like the “gatherings of extended families” or the legendary clan funerals, the super-spreaders’ events have recently become more frequent.For example, as has only now become known, on January the 8th, an incredible 500 people prayed in a mosque in Düren, North Rhine-Westphalia – together and in a very confined space, partly disregarding distance rules. A gathering of this size is currently prohibited. According to the internet portal “t-online”, the organiser only “possibly” has to expect consequences; presumably the administration does not want to expose itself to accusations of Islamophobia.If it happened in the case of a German football club, the scandal would already be outrageous. It took almost a month for the incident to become known at all – while the national outrage over a handful of Thuringian carnival jesters who had organised a private parade was huge.By the way, the event in the Fatih Mosque in Düren was only busted because “residents” – and thus again members of the part of the population that Merkel blames for the crisis of control – had “informed” the public order office. The maximum number of people allowed into the mosque – which, by the way, is indirectly controlled by the Turkish state through the Diyanet cultural association – was 150 at a time. But instead of taking tough police measures, the city of Düren “started talks with the person in charge of the mosque”. There, the authorities were promised that from now on “the rules would be respected. Well done!
Fear of rape and attacks – German police want refugees to stay away from carnival events
The behaviour of immigrants in Germany has been a problem not only since the gang rapes committed by mostly Muslim refugees on New Year’s Eve in Cologne.
The Express newspaper reports:
The police in North Rhine-Westphalia have advised refugee facilities in the Cologne administrative district against organising trips to carnival events for their occupants.
As reported by the newspaper “Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger”, the State Office for Central Police Services (LZPD) in Duisburg considers such actions “rather critical” according to an email sent to the district governments, because this would “force the massive appearance of refugees and asylum seekers at carnival events”.
In view of the current security situation in Germany, this “unfortunately leads to undesirable interactions” with the population, according to the letter, which the newspaper has in its possession and which is also said to have been sent to state facilities for refugees.
In addition, the LZPD recommends that the facilities inform their occupants of increased police checks at carnival events and advises those concerned, among other things, to “let the checks pass without criticism” and not to carry large bags or backpacks.
Berlin Imam demands: Women must stay locked in their homes
During a Friday sermon at the Al-Nur Mosque in Berlin, Sheikh Abdel Moez Al-Eila, who calls himself a “local imam”, stated that women should remain locked in their homes.
In the course of the same sermon, Al-Eila also said that a woman cannot refuse to have sexual relations with her husband.
Below are some excerpts:
“Most marital problems hinge on this: “When I married her, she was beautiful and thin. She always said nice things. Now she is full of fat and bones and has a gloomy face. When I look at her, she reminds me – Allah have mercy on me – of Satan! Some men say, “My wife doesn’t have the beauty of the women I see on TV.” Women on television wriggle like snakes.
[…]
On TV you can see a woman performing naked – her breast, her neck, her arms and even her thighs. She is naked. She squirms and uses vulgar language. A man immediately thinks: That’s my kind of woman! God forbid! But what do you want from this woman? Do you like the way she moves?! What do you like about her? You can go and look for such a woman. There are many stories about them.
[…]
Furthermore, a woman must not refuse to have sex with her husband. She must not make excuses or use pretexts. Prophet Muhammad said that if a man calls his wife to bed and she refuses … “Come here! I want you!” But she refuses and falls asleep … The angels will curse her until she wakes up. If a woman goes to sleep outside her husband’s bed, the angels will curse her until she wakes up.
A wife is not allowed to say “no” under any pretext. Even if a woman has her menstrual period, there is nothing to stop her husband from using her body for pleasure as long as he avoids her vagina… She puts a thong over her vagina and he can go and enjoy her body.
Aisha said that Prophet Muhammad would put a thong over her vagina and then use the rest of her body for pleasure. How does a man get pleasure from his menstruating wife? Well, he has the whole body except the vagina and the anus. That is permissible (halal).”
https://unser-mitteleuropa.com/berliner-imam-frauen-duerfen-das-haus-nicht-verlassen/
Why Donald Trump Should Get on Gab
President Trump has been awfully quiet since he was banned from Twitter and Facebook and it’s unsettling to more than just me. Everyone misses his mean tweets…even media types who claim they don’t. Their boredom is palpable. Jim Acosta is tweeting about other people talking about Trump.
We all know that the political world will only be exciting again when Trump is unmuzzled. So why is he waiting? I’ve been experimenting with alternative platforms since the great purge began, where thousands of pro-Trump accounts were banned around the same time as the president’s. Parler was okay until it got purged as well. But the established survivor that is still operating with no issues is Gab.
In the past two weeks, I’ve had more activity on Gab than I get on Twitter. Twitter is notorious for “shadow-banning” conservative accounts, so even if you have thousands of followers, the only way they will see your tweets is if they go to your page. They won’t see them in a news feed because of algorithms that filter out unwanted content according to Twitter’s opinions of what is good and what isn’t. Gab, on the other hand, does not filter content and I have more activity there with only a few hundred followers than I do on Twitter with thousands.
There’s no doubt that Gab is growing and growing fast. PJM reached out to Gab owner Andrew Torba to ask him about the site’s explosion.
In the past 30 days alone Gab’s services have been used by 33 million people resulting in 260m+ page views which is more than many of the top legacy media companies. Tens of millions of people are fleeing from Silicon Valley mind prisons and moving to Gab and other alt-tech services. Gab is still online today because we survived years of deplatforming from dozens of service providers by building our own infrastructure that we can’t be banned from.
Torba thinks the president should get on Gab too, and he’s even archived his entire Twitter feed under a verified @realDonaldTrump account on Gab that is just waiting for the president to log on.
It’s important that The People see President Trump fight back against this Silicon Valley censorship and the entrenched bureaucrats in Washington who would love to see him de-platformed and silenced forever. The best way to do that is not by calling for the government to do something, it’s by leveraging the free market and using services like Gab.
President Trump has given We The People a voice again and Gab is here to make sure that he has his. If he is willing to join the platform, hundreds of millions of people will follow and Big Tech’s grip on the free flow of information will be crushed.
The only obstacle at the moment is the lack of an app. The app stores have banned Gab on both Apple and Google for the usual reasons and excuses about “hate speech,” which educated Americans don’t believe exists. Hate speech is just protected speech someone doesn’t like. If it is offensive to you, the proper action is to block it from your feed, or use your First Amendment rights to argue against it, not destroy a platform with censorship. Even without the app, Gab is usable. I find that I enjoy using it when I’m logged onto my computer for the workday. The lack of an app for mobile just allows me more time to not be focused on social media when I’m away from my computer, which is a nice break.
If you haven’t tried Gab yet, I recommend it. You can find me @MeganFox. And hopefully, soon we can all find President Trump there too. If Trump joins the Gab community it could destroy Twitter because all of the people on the left who love to disparage him will have to join Gab just to see what he is saying. Twitter will become a much-deserved wasteland. Come on, President Trump! What are you waiting for?
https://pjmedia.com/columns/megan-fox/2021/02/03/why-donald-trump-should-get-on-gab-n1422843
Communist Sarkar Insults Captain Sir Tom Moore’s Tribute
This is outrageous…
Macron submits bill against radical Islam
French President Emmanuel Macron submitted to parliament the long-awaited bill meant to combat radical Islam; it has already divided both the country and Muslim leaders there, daily Magyar Hírlap writes.
The debate on the bill against radical Islam began in the French National Assembly on Monday. In his opening speech, Minister of the Interior Gérald Darmanin, who presented the draft, put it this way: France is suffering from separatism, primarily Islamist separatism, which attacks national unity. He added that the disease should be called by its name and medicine should be found for it.
The government’s draft seeks to achieve an overarching neutrality of the state and public life primarily through technical measures. The law would provide an opportunity to punish those who upload someone’s personal information to the internet in a way that puts them at risk, as was the case with beheaded school teacher Samuel Paty.
Among the planned measures is that all associations receiving state support must commit themselves “to the principles and values of the Republic.” In addition, foreign donations in excess of €10,000 must be reported to the tax office, a move aimed at tighter control of foreign-run mosques.
A separate objective would be to eliminate illegal association schools and tighten oversight of religious foundation schools, which should follow a compulsory education program. The law would penalize doctors who issue a virginity certificate before marriage as well and also strengthen measures against polygamy and forced marriage.
The text does not include the term “Islamist separatism” — used by Macron when he introduced the proposal on October 2 — nor “secularization,” which means the separation of state and church. The law states that its purpose is to strengthen the principles of the Republic in order to prevent groups from being segregated within society based on their religious or ethnic affiliation.
Darmanin said the bill is not intended to punish religion but to fight against the rise of Islam. In his speech, Justice Minister Éric Dupond-Moretti said the law provides appropriate, prompt and systematic responses so that they can punish those who are preparing to break the order and unity of the Republic.
The French Left protested against the draft law, with far-left leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon saying the bill “stigmatizes Muslims.” Meanwhile, Damien Abad, leader of the center-right Republican parliamentary group, said the bill ignores the problem of radicalization in prisons and among immigrants. Marine Le Pen, president of the right-wing National Rally, presented an alternative bill to parliament on Friday that would ban Islamist ideologies and the wearing of Muslim headscarves in public.
French Muslim leaders commented that the bill is necessary to regulate those who organize against French values but warned that the law in its current form would also provide an opportunity to harass law-abiding associations. The head of the French Islamic Foundation said “the law is unfair but necessary.”
https://rmx.news/article/article/macron-submits-bill-against-radical-islam
He joined the jihad – now the Swiss Confederation is revoking his Swiss citizenship
Alperen A. grew up in Arbon on Lake Constance, in a family of Turkish origin. At the age of 4, he is naturalised by the Thurgau parliament – together with his parents. That was on May 27, 1998, at a time when Islamism was hardly an issue in Switzerland.
Today Alperen is 27 years old – and he is to lose his Swiss citizenship because the federal authorities consider him a danger to Switzerland. On Tuesday, the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) announced in the Federal Gazette that it was initiating the procedure to revoke his citizenship.
First naturalisation and two decades later denaturalisation: something like this almost never happens in Switzerland.
At that time, in the distant year of 1998, the members of the A. family seemed to be perfectly integrated in Thurgau. His father is a machine fitter, his mother a medical assistant, and Alperen is also following the path that young people take in Switzerland: He completes an apprenticeship as a logistics specialist, goes to parties and referees for FC Steinach. But at some point Alperen discovers radical Islam.Alperen grows a beard, becomes a Muslim missionary in southern Germany and Switzerland, distributing Korans in eastern Swiss towns as part of the controversial mission campaign “Read! The True Religion”. In 2013, when he is 20 years old, he marries a German woman who converted to Islam shortly before at a “Read!” stand in Stuttgart.Although his young wife was pregnant, Alperen left Arbon in 2014 – he was now 21 years old – to join the jihad in Syria. In Whatsapp messages he announces that he wants to “cut off the heads of infidels”. And he threatens that at some point he and his comrades-in-arms will also “conquer” Switzerland and Germany, as the public broadcaster SRF’s “Rundschau” programme reported in a report in 2015.In Syria, Alperen joined the Nusra Front, the regional Al-Qaeda offshoot. What exactly he had been doing there is still unclear. According to an article in the newspaper NZZ, he even considered a martyrdom as a suicide bomber. In autumn 2014, his heavily pregnant wife follows him to Syria. Apparently she wants to bring her husband back, but instead she is forced to stay in Syria herself: Her own husband is detaining her against her will. In March 2015, she gives birth in the middle of the war zone; only later does her husband allow her to leave for Turkey.Alperen’s activities in Syria also called the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland into action: in 2014, it opened criminal proceedings and has since been looking for him on the basis of an international arrest warrant. The suspicions range from belonging to an Islamist terrorist organisation to hostage-taking.
Alperen himself was arrested in Turkey in 2016 – and is still in a Turkish prison, according to the latest information available. By withdrawing his citizenship, the federal government now wants to ensure that he will never be able to return to Switzerland later on.
Because his current whereabouts are officially unknown, the SEM had to publish the decision in the Federal Gazette. Alperen A. now has one month to comment. If he learns of the threatened revocation of his citizenship at all, he can appeal it to the Federal Administrative Court.It is extremely rare for the Swiss Confederation to take away a Swiss citizen’s right to citizenship. During and after the Second World War, Switzerland denaturalised around eighty Nazis. From 1947 to 2019, there was not a single denaturalisation. But then, under the aegis of Federal Councillor Karin Keller-Sutter, the Justice Department rediscovered an old legal paragraph and began to apply it systematically to jihad travellers.
However, a prerequisite for denaturalisation is that the person concerned still holds another citizenship. If they only have one citizenship, this may not be withdrawn – this is a principle of international law.Alperen A. also has Turkish citizenship.
Alperen is the fifth jihadist against whom the Swiss Confederation has initiated such proceedings, but only one has been successfully completed:
- In 2020, Sahila F. was legally expatriated – the first Swiss woman to be expatriated since 1947. The 31-year-old woman from Vaud abducted her own daughters to Syria and still lives in a camp there.
- In 2019, the SEM also wanted to revoke the passport of Ümit Y. from Lugano after he was convicted by the Federal Criminal Court for belonging to IS. But the Turkish-Swiss dual citizen has challenged the decision to revoke his passport at the Federal Administrative Court. His case is pending there.
- The SEM also initiated revocation proceedings against the Spanish-Swiss jihadist Daniel D., but had to discontinue them in June 2020. The reason: Spain had beaten Switzerland to the punch and expatriated D. more quickly.
- The SEM also suspended the expatriation of the Italian-Swiss Christian I. from Winterthur, who died in Syria.
According to its own information, the State Secretariat for Migration is currently examining the withdrawal of citizenship in about a dozen other cases.