In an interview, the pioneer of emancipation and women’s rights, Alice Schwarzer, described Islamism as a “fascist ideology”.

It preaches misogyny, Jew-hatred and the anti-democratic Sharia. The ideology demands the full covering of women which does not belong in a democracy. She calls on left-wing critics of Islamism to have more courage to allow themselves to be called “Islamophobic” by self-proclaimed anti-racists. She herself is part of the left, she says.

The interview was conducted on the occasion of the upcoming vote in Switzerland for a referendum to ban the veil at the constitutional level. It is depressing that millions of women in the so-called Islamic theocracy are forced to wear the veil, which the Koran itself does not call for.

She sees a “triumph of the Islamists” who justify the compulsory veiling by saying that a woman’s hair and body are “sin”, which would attract other men. She calls the statement of women wearing the nikab that this covering protects them from men’s eyes a “strange view of men”.

The call for veiling comes remarkably often from female converts who are married to men from the respective countries, often in polygamous marriages.The demand for veiling comes conspicuously often from female converts who are married to men from relevant countries, often in polygamous marriages.Behind this, according to Schwarzer, are husbands and associations who wish to implement Sharia law. As an example, she mentions the Franco-Algerian Rachid Nekkaz, who pays the fines in France for violations of the burqa ban.

Such incitements made a mockery of the rule of law. In Nekkaz’s case, it was clearly politically motivated; he had ambitions for the presidency in Algeria. The veiling of women was the symbol of political Islam. Schwarzer therefore asked: “Do we want this, after 200 years of enlightenment and 50 years of struggle for equality”.

In Iran, there are women who post selfies on Instagram without headscarves, which is a death-defying act of freedom – these women must be supported! Women who wear burqas or nikabs have no rights and thus confirm the Sharia, in which they are considered legally incompetent.

Regarding the left’s accusation that she is a “right-wing feminist”, Schwarzer says: it is a trick of the Islamists to infiltrate the left. They defame any criticism of political Islam, as alleged criticism of Islam, their faith. There are many professors – from the Sorbonne to the Free University of Berlin – who have become silenced under the terror of this ideology.

Schwarzer denies that the Swiss burqa ballot is targeted at Islam and thus at all Muslims. It is helpful for the majority of non-fundamentalists to protect themselves from these fanatics. The first victims of these Islamists are ordinary Muslims. Schwarzer is less critical of the headscarf. Those who want to should wear it. Burqas – no! The Corona mask already shows how harmful it is to human communication.

https://www.wochenblick.at/faschistoide-ideologie-alice-schwarzer-attackiert-politischen-islam/

On 27 January, the Council of Europe signed Resolution 2361, which states that vaccinations in EU Member States should not be mandatory. Furthermore, persons who have not been vaccinated may not be discriminated against in any way. This effectively stops the notion of “vaccine passports”.

The resolution goes so far as to order member states such as Sweden to actively inform citizens of these rights. The resolution has been ignored by mainstream politicians and the media.

Many citizens have been worried about whether the untested vaccines will be mandatory, since it has already been proposed in several countries. In Sweden, however, it has not been, because of a law which prohibits involuntary medical interventions. But despite this law, governments could exert such strong pressure on their populations, that it could become almost impossible to live without being exposed to this experimental jab.

In Denmark, a vaccine passport could soon be required to gain access to malls, sports events and other public places, public transport or travel abroad. Happily, the Council of Europe is now putting a firm stop to these plans, since involuntary medical experiments are prohibited by the Nuremberg Convention.

The Council of Europe is an intergovernmental European cooperation organization with 47 Member States, which, despite its name and the same flag, is separate from the EU. Its resolutions are not legally binding, but recommendations to Member States are almost always complied with. For example, as recently as November last year, the government proposed that Sweden’s laws be amended as a result of the Council of Europe’s convention on cybercrime.

The resolution on forced vaccination briefly describes the problems caused by the Covid-19 pandemic with the resulting unemployment, economic downturn and poverty. It also points out that there is a certain distrust among the European population regarding a forced vaccination programme. The resolution contains various recommendations for how to achieve a large vaccine intake, but also something unexpected – namely clear provisions for it.

Point 7.3 of the resolution obliges all Member States to ensure that citizens are informed that Covid vaccinations are NOT (the only word written in capital letters throughout the resolution) mandatory and that no one is politically, socially or otherwise pressured to be vaccinated.

Secondly – at least as important – Member States must ensure that no one is discriminated against for not being vaccinated because of possible health risks or because the person simply does not want to be vaccinated.

The latter is particularly interesting given the current propaganda of vaccination passports by the system media and several European governments, which they claim is necessary. The Swedish government announced on February 4 that it has decided to introduce a digital vaccine certificate that will be ready by the summer. But what is it then to be used for, if it becomes illegal to discriminate against someone who does not have it?

When the Swedish government summarized the most important things from the Council of Europe’s winter session on its website on 29 January, this was not mentioned – by far the most important in the entire resolution – in a single word. It is not difficult to understand why, given the unprecedented propaganda for mass vaccinations from the Swedish government and not least the system media, which is inflated to levels not previously seen even during wartime.

In Germany, Bavaria’s Prime Minister Söder (CSU) is similarly pushing for compulsory vaccinations for certain professional groups, for example in nursing. And he has even called on the German Ethics Council to help him in this effort. There have in fact been rumours that Söder has been receiving kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies.

According to the Nuremberg Convention, experimental vaccines can be seen as an experiment on the population. In the case of ModeRNA’s and Pfizer’s mRNA jabs, they have never been previously tested.

The Convention consists of ten points and the first stipulates: The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely necessary. But the question remains: Is it really voluntary if you are not allowed to work, send the children to school, travel or even visit the mall if you do not submit to the experimental vaccines?

The fifth point states: No experiment should be performed where there is reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur. Countless health and control authorities in several countries stated how they expected this to happen on a fairly large scale. Deaths serious vaccine injuries have already been listed as a result of the vaccinations, including at the US Public Health Agency CDC.

Readers should download the information on their smartphone to have on hand whenever it becomes necessary to remind government officials of the Council of Europe’s guidelines.

https://freewestmedia.com/2021/02/09/council-of-europe-no-compulsory-vaccinations-and-no-discrimination-against-the-unvaccinated/

The government of Prime Minister Boris Johnson wants to grant a “general pardon” to all migrants in the United Kingdom who will apply for coronavirus vaccination, the Daily Mail reported. With this step, the country wants to achieve collective immunity and loosen strict anti-epidemic measures as soon as possible. It is estimated that currently about 1.3 million people could live in the country illegally.

“Everyone has to get the vaccine, it’s for the safety of others,” the government said. The cabinet claims that illegal migrants will not overtake anyone on the vaccination waiting list, nor will the program be used to give other rights to illegal immigrants.

The government emphasized that the Home Office will not take any action against anyone who registers with a practitioner for the coronavirus vaccine even if they are staying illegally in the UK.

“Coronavirus vaccines will be offered to anyone living in the UK, regardless of immigration status,” a government spokesman said on Sunday. “Persons registered with a general practitioner are contacted, and we work closely with partners and external organizations to contact those who have no registration with a general practitioner. We have to make sure that they are offered a vaccine,” the government stated.

The government won’t check if migrants are in the country legally

The UK cabinet claims that if illegal migrants apply for vaccination, there will be no consequences for them. This guarantee will apply to all categories of illegal migrants whether they entered the country in trucks, on ships across the English Channel, on short-stay visas and stayed past their expiration, or those whose long-term residence permit had expired.

No one who applies for vaccination will have their immigration status checked. The same goes for those who have been infected or need a COVID-19 test.

This will mean that the identity of illegal migrants will not be passed on to the police or immigration officials who are responsible for deporting them. Depending on age and health risks, migrants will have to wait for their spot in the vaccination plan.

“In times of emergency, we see common sense behind this decision. As many people as possible must be vaccinated, however, it is unfortunate that governments have so far been reluctant to come up with thorough research into how many people are in this country with illegal status,” said Alp Mehmet of Migration Watch UK, which is campaigning for tighter border controls.

A study by the Pew Research Center found that in 2017 there were as many as 1.2 million “illegal migrants” in the UK.

Last year, a study by Oxford University concluded that there could be between 120,000 and 1.3 million illegal migrants in the country.

https://rmx.news/article/article/uk-illegal-migrants-will-also-receive-covid-19-vaccine

Many watched Tom Brady lead the Tampa Bay Buccaneers Super Bowl victory over the Kansas City Chiefs. The game marked the franchise’s second Super Bowl victory and Tom Brady’s seventh. Brady’s epic accomplishment has earned him the title of the greatest quarterback of all time, but many on Twitter appeared to have been triggered by Brady’s victory.Brady is no stranger to criticism, of course. Last week, Nancy Armour attacked him in USA Today for not only being white, but for his apparent support for Donald Trump. Now, Twitter users are calling his victory over Patrick Mahomes “racist” … because it happened during Black History Month.

I’d really like to believe these people are just joking, but there are too many tweets for that to be true.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/02/08/tom-brady-called-racist-on-social-media-for-winning-super-bowl-during-black-history-month-n1423916

Scandal with Islamist background at the Social Democratic Party (SPD) in Olpe concerning Nezahat Baradari, a member of the German Bundestag of Turkish origin, widens. Member of parliament incites against her opponent within the party.

Her counter-candidate, Sercan Celik is a Yazidi.

Ms Baradari was confronted with these screenshots by me over 48 hours ago and was given the chance to comment. Ms Baradari did not respond to the press request.

This is the German translation of a certified translator:

C:
What is this? 😤

[Image/link with Karl Lauterbach.]

Baradari:
Hello Mr C. Don’t ask me that. He is also using a forbidden picture.

Karl Lauterbach told him to remove the picture there, but he doesn’t.

Greetings and my respects.

C:
Really very sad. It’s unbelievable that Lauterbach lets him get away with so much. One has to point this out to the journalist. It is a violation of the right to vote. If you don’t do it, no one else will call the newspaper’s attention to it. If my German language had been sufficient, I would have called the newspaper and held them accountable. If we Turks had done something like this, everyone would stand up against us. But unfortunately, people only look for failures from us. It is not because we are good or bad. There is a general hostility towards Turks in Germany.

Baradari:

It’s not that simple, Mr C..

C:
What do you mean? Didn’t understand?

Baradari:

This is politics. My counterpart is insolent. If I mess with this little person, throw mud on him, then I will end up suffering a loss. “Every sheep must be hanged by its own leg” (Note: Turkish. Proverb.
I will not lose my correct attitude. Others must make the complaint, not me. That is what I meant. Perhaps I have been able to express it better now. Respectful greetings.

C:
You say a little person. Yes, it is true. But you can’t give scope to such small people. You know how much these Yazidis are against Atatürk. You are right, of course, they must not be smeared with mud, but these infidels must not be casual about them. Unfortunately, the Germans love such people. They have never understood the great Turkish nation and never will. Unfortunately, there is a hidden hostility towards Turks in this country. Everyone pretends to like the Turks, but unfortunately the truth is different. If only we could help you…

Baradari:
Thank you for your interest. Have a nice evening and stay healthy.

C:
You’re welcome. Wish you a blessed evening too.

NRWSPD SPD-Fraktion im Bundestag #Baradari

by Giulio Meotti 

Donald McNeil is a famous American reporter for the New York Times, where he has worked for45 years and had just been nominated for the Pulitzer Prize for his articles on the pandemic.

Two years ago, McNeil led a group of high school students on a Times-affiliated trip to Peru. Subsequently, a handful of students and some parents complained that McNeil, who is white, had used the word “nigger” to repeat a story and that he had rejected the idea that there is a “white privilege”.

What is the real story? McNeil was asked at dinner by a student if he thought a classmate of his should be suspended for a video made when she was twelve in which she used a racial slur. To understand what was in the video, McNeil used the insult himself .Therefore, the journalist did not want to use the word to offend, but to understand in what context the word had been used. That’s enough to be destroyed.

“It is now the official policy of the New York Times that for some words intent does not matter, it only takes one strike to sink a 47-year career,” wrote Reason’s Matt Welch.

Two years ago the Times investigated the complaints, scolded McNeil and closed the case. End of story? No, because days ago The Daily Beast website learned of the complaints and wrote about the case.

150 Times reporters said they were “offended” by the comments reported by their colleague McNeil and complained that they had not been consulted at the time. Times editor Dan Baquet reneged on the 2019 decision, denounced “racism and discrimination of all kinds” and pushed McNeil out.

And it is certainly not the first case. “By now Twitter is running the newspaper”. It is with these words a year ago another journalist, Bari Weiss, resigned from the Times.

Not only that, but to try to calm the situation, the reporter had written a pathetic letter of apology, which Andrew Sullivan compared to the “confessions” that the Khmer Rouge extorted from prisoners. “This sounds like a Bolshevik at his trial of him farce that he admits he betrayed the revolution even though he never wanted to betray the revolution because he loves the revolution,” comments Vanity Fair‘s Peter Savodnik.

It is the story of Arthur Koestler’s “Darkness at Noon”, the Rubascëv case, the tale of a former Soviet commissioner who himself ends up in the dock and who will “confess” to crimes he was not guilty of just as the people he had accused did.

The liberal press is daily less and less liberal.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/296484