Why did German security authorities conceal further attacks by the Viennese jihadist Qaeser A.?

“Just yesterday, two other suspected terrorists with whom this Iraqi had formed a joint terrorist group were arrested in Prague, in the Czech Republic,” said Interior Minister Herbert Kickl on Thursday in a speech to the Austrian Parliament on the arrest of the Viennese IS sympathizer and assassin Qaeser A..So far German security authorities and the mass media have only reported about the attack on the intercity express line near Allersberg in Bavaria and a bit, but very quietly, about the failed attack at Karlshorst station in Berlin. But today the newspaper Kronen-Zeitung informs us that the suspected IS-terrorist is said to have already committed four attacks on the railway. In addition, the Islamist is said to have already planned his escape to Mecca.Usually a train driver will report steel cables he discovers on the railway tracks. If ominous “disruptions” of this kind occur, the board of Deutsche Bahn will certainly have been informed long ago. It is well known that Ronald Pofalla is a member of this board. A man who may even have saved the mobile phone number of Federal Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel in his mobile phone. Certainly, the federal government, at least the responsible head of department, may have been informed.Politicians must clarify immediately why all security authorities did not inform the population about the attacks. If the other failed or successful attacks are not recognized as such by the police or intelligence services, one wonders whether competent persons in these authorities bear responsibility.Or was the population even deliberately lulled into deceptive security by concealing further attacks?Those responsible at the police, the Federal Criminal Police Office or the Office for the Protection of the Constitution and the Federal Intelligence Service (which is known to be responsible for terrorists outside Germany) were either incompetent or may have lied to the population by suppressing findings known to the security authorities.The German Parliament (Bundestag) must clarify whether Federal Transport Minister Scheuer and Federal Interior Minister Horst Seehofer had knowledge. The state parliaments can no longer avoid investigating whether the state ministers responsible for transport and the interior or even the minister presidents of individual states who were affected by attacks on railway facilities were informed at an early stage.If the politicians had no knowledge, however, the question arises as to whether they are still entitled to hold this office. Either way, the political analysis of terrorist acts must have consequences for the German Railways.It would also be the duty of the public service broadcasters to ask these questions.But the state broadcasters ARD and ZDF have so far only reported on the Iraqi attacks in Allersberg and Karlshorst.In view of the high broadcasting fees, viewers can expect from the investigative journalists of ARD and ZDF that they will report broadly and comprehensively on the other two of a total of four known attack targets tonight at prime time.Perhaps one will also learn why not a single state broadcaster journalist was aware of the further attacks that the alleged terrorist Qaeser A. has now confessed to.



https://philosophia-perennis.com/2019/03/29/warum-verschwiegen-deutsche-sicherheitsbehoerden-weitere-anschlaege-des-wiener-dschihadisten-qaeser-a/

Leave a comment